[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread P Floding
jhm731;173186 Wrote: I believe you've found a cheap piece of crap that won't sound any better than the stock SMPS wall wart. I can't believe you wimps are so afraid of soldering the right size plug onto a simple two wire connection. LOL!!! Speak for someone else, young lad! We did have

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Suggestion: New mid-market player

2007-01-23 Thread JJZolx
Without trying to design the next generation SB4 (which I'd expect would be similar or lower in price compared to the SB3) and without actually _adding_ to the features (which is the wrong direction if you wish to lower the Transporter cost) my suggestion would be: - Transporter quality

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread opaqueice
jhm731;173186 Wrote: I believe you've found a cheap piece of crap that won't sound any better than the stock SMPS wall wart. You're right, actually - my $20 isn't likely to buy anything that sounds any different than the wallwart... just like your $750! -- opaqueice

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;173260 Wrote: You're right, actually - my $20 isn't likely to buy anything that sounds any different than the wallwart... just like your $750! I believe that is what's called a preconception. Doing a A/B (blind or not) with preconceptions would invalidate the test. And, as we all

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;173261 Wrote: It's a linear - these were available a while back, and someone opened one up. It was actually rather decently put together from the photos. ok! I'd recommend snipping off the plug and soldering on a new one, rather than using an adaptor. Fewer contacts are always

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread egd
opaqueice;173040 Wrote: I believe I've found the fabled plug-and-play linear power supply for the SB. Thx, just ordered two. -- egd Linux and loving IT! egd's Profile:

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which DAC chip is used by the Lavry DA10?

2007-01-23 Thread jan van mourik
Yeah, when I was browsing there I saw quite a few posts of him. Good thing! If I'm going the dac route, the Lavry is definitely high on the list. One thing about the Benchmark I like though, is the volume knob. That would make it very easy to hook it up straight to a power amp. Other competitors

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread opaqueice
P Floding;173262 Wrote: I believe that is what's called a preconception. Doing a A/B (blind or not) with preconceptions would invalidate the test. And, as we all know by now, a negative A/B proves nothing. It's incorrect to think you can ever go into such a test without preconceptions -

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which DAC chip is used by the Lavry DA10?

2007-01-23 Thread mlsstl
The Lavry DA-10 also has volume control. It has an up/down toggle switch that controls the volume over (I believe) a 60 dB range. The volume is displayed on an LED at the right of the unit. I leave mine set in the low 40's and then control the volume from there with the SB3 remote. That leaves me

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;173291 Wrote: It's incorrect to think you can ever go into such a test without preconceptions - that's impossible. Even if you had no idea what you were listening to, you'd expect there was a difference - why else would someone go to the trouble of doing the test in the first

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread opaqueice
P Floding;173295 Wrote: You are right about preconceptions. But, although I phrased it poorly, I really meant that a negative result from an A/B with someone who doesn't expect to find anything is pretty much useless. If, instead, you do indeed find a difference (don't forget to REMOVE the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread P Floding
opaqueice;173301 Wrote: Tails you win, heads I lose, apparently. I really don't think a little knowledge of physics and audio is going to deafen me. Why? This is a DC power supply - the only thing an extra connecter can do is put a tiny bit of extra resistance in series with the

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread tomjtx
Opaqueice, Rational arguments just don't seem to work with some people :-) I applaud your patience. -- tomjtx tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449 View this thread:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread bludragon
Adding resistance (or impedance) between the psu and the load (ie squeezebox) is bad because it means the the voltage seen by the load will vary with the current it draws creating voltage noise. (As the current draw changes, so will the voltage drop across any impedance between psu and load) If

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread Skunk
jhm731;173186 Wrote: I believe you've found a cheap piece of crap that won't sound any better than the stock SMPS wall wart. I can't believe you wimps are so afraid of soldering the right size plug onto a simple two wire connection. LOL!!! Soldering the right size plug on a wire is

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Suggestion: New mid-market player

2007-01-23 Thread USAudio
JJZolx;173203 Wrote: Without trying to design the next generation SB4 (which I'd expect would be similar or lower in price compared to the SB3) and without actually _adding_ to the features (which is the wrong direction if you wish to lower the Transporter cost) my suggestion would be... I

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-23 Thread USAudio
Magazines also have to sell copies/subscriptions so they have a large reader pool that is attractive to advertisers. They do that by putting popular and/or desirable products on the cover, whether the manufacturer buys ad space or not. -- USAudio SB3 - PS Audio Trio C-100 - Revel Concerta

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread P Floding
tomjtx;173312 Wrote: Opaqueice, Rational arguments just don't seem to work with some people :-) I applaud your patience. Only, I didn't see any rational arguments. The power supply MAINTAINS a DC level. That dosesn't mean the interface (power connector) won't see high frequency

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread jhm731
I'm using a $30. linear, which I've upgraded with some parts(including the plug)left over from other projects. opaqueice;173260 Wrote: You're right, actually - my $20 isn't likely to buy anything that sounds any different than the wallwart... just like your $750! -- jhm731

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread Skunk
P Floding;173381 Wrote: P.S: If anyone has the schematics for the SB's internal power supplies, I'd be very interested. All of them? The relevant ones are posted on the forums but you'll have to be a good searcher ;-) -- Skunk

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-23 Thread Limping_Pylon
I think I just read the answer to my question. Hi Fi Choice, a UK publication, responded to a reader's question by telling him that they are looking into doing a review of the TP provided they feel that it lives up to it's audiophile claims. -- Limping_Pylon

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: plug-and-play linear PS (part one)

2007-01-23 Thread tyler_durden
Deaf Cat;173425 Wrote: Has anyone ever sound tested an expensive linear supply against a cheaper one, (when pluged in to a SB) ? You can't get any agreement about whether a linear or switcher makes any difference. Why would you think you could get it when comparing two linear supplies? TD

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-23 Thread Mark Lanctot
Limping_Pylon;173500 Wrote: I think I just read the answer to my question. Hi Fi Choice, a UK publication, responded to a reader's question by telling him that they are looking into doing a review of the TP provided they feel that it lives up to it's audiophile claims. Hmm? They'll do a

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which DAC chip is used by the Lavry DA10?

2007-01-23 Thread jmourik
Oh, thanks for that info, mlsstl! I didn't quite get how that volume adjustment was working! Good to know! One more question, what kind of interconnects do you use? For now, I'll have to go to RCA. Are these readily available? jan -- jmourik

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-23 Thread RalphO
I picked up a copy of Stereophile today and this was my first opportunity to read the review. I picked up on one view of the reviewer that said something along tyhe lines of: The transporter costs $1,999 and is produced by a company from the world of computers. If it had been introduced by a

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which DAC chip is used by the Lavry DA10?

2007-01-23 Thread mlsstl
The Lavry DA-10 has XLR outputs but adapter cables to covert XLR to RCA are available. If you are handy with a soldering iron the DA-10 manual includes instructions on wiring the XLR--RCA cables yourself. As I type this, I am listening to a bit of Mozart (the Adiagio from Piano Concerto No, 23

Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which DAC chip is used by the Lavry DA10?

2007-01-23 Thread Pat Farrell
mlsstl wrote: The Lavry DA-10 has XLR outputs but adapter cables to covert XLR to RCA are available. If you are handy with a soldering iron the DA-10 manual includes instructions on wiring the XLR--RCA cables yourself. But that destroys the balanced cabling. There is a reason that all

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which DAC chip is used by the Lavry DA10?

2007-01-23 Thread jmourik
Pat Farrell;173555 Wrote: mlsstl wrote:[color=blue] Real amps accept balanced input. I'll be feeding the DA10 output into my (unreal) Denon receiver, and it only accepts rca. So I'll need to convert... At some point I'll probably try running directly to the power amp (Rotel) which does accept

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Which DAC chip is used by the Lavry DA10?

2007-01-23 Thread Skunk
jmourik;173556 Wrote: I'll be feeding the DA10 output into my (unreal) Denon receiver I want some of whatever was in that source first kool aid! -- Skunk Skunk's Profile:

[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Re: Transporter on the cover of Stereophile, Feb 2007 issue

2007-01-23 Thread Konig
u guys live in the states right? just buy 1 and return it if u dont like it. The canadian tax agency wont refund me my tax so its no go for me =( -- Konig Konig's Profile: