I need an SB2 to fit the enlosure I'm using for a DIY project. eBay has
been letting me down. Does anyone want to upgrade their SB2 for a new
white SB3?
-US owners only
-Wireless version preferred
-Functioning perfectly
-Display should still be good and bright
-Case condition not so important
Ho
jaysung;236423 Wrote:
> My hearing maxis out at 15khz and I am 24 years old. Imagine being 50 or
> 70... I sell my hifi stuff at some point in the future ;).
Careful there, jaysung, some of us 'oldies' might take offense at that
:-)
But seriously, although the high frequency response of my ear
I'd like flac as well, but it's easy to convert between any lossless
format and flac, so I suppose it doesn't really matter. Unfortunately,
it's probably smartest for them to bet on lossless WMA and have folks
who want FLAC convert it since most people who know enough to choose
FLAC probably are
I would suggest waiting until you had enough cash to make a big impact
with speakers and amplification. I don't know your speakers, but the
rest of it looks good.
--
riffer
riffer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/
>I reckon this quote is probably taken out of context.<
Not sure how much of the hi-fi+ material I can quote but here goes
"I had to ask him what use I might have for such a component, and
Patrick explained that the SB+ provided the interface between a
wireless linked computer and a hi-fi
Flac or Wav, Flac or Wav (stadium erupts with wild applause) "Flac or
Wav"...
--
Phil Leigh
You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...
...SB3+TACT+Altmann+MF DACXV3/Linn tri-amped Aktiv 5.1 system and some
very expensive cables ;o)
---
harmonic;234601 Wrote:
>
> But since it sounds like you have found a speaker you like i would
> considder the sb3+ mod or buy a transporter.
>
>
WHAT! Has the sun set in the east and I havew not been watching? Or
have I by some hifi accident altered quantum phase and am finding
myself in a par
Mark Lanctot;236413 Wrote:
> I'm willing to accept that he's a great guy then, and if he is reading
> this I apologize.
>
> I'm willing to accept the "I don't do computers" statement was taken
> out of context, but taken on its own I still find it extremely
> ignorant. Computers are involved in
Hi,
exciting idea. How will you cope with copyright protection? wma with
drm? Then I wouldn't be interested. BTW.: All the fuzz about 24bits and
96khz is to be considered with caution. There is a quite lengthy thread
here and it basically states that it is hard to hear the differences.
Sure a puls
Patrick Dixon;236206 Wrote:
> I'm pretty sure Paul Messenger knows his audience, and that many of them
> are just like him, and not very au fait with networks and the like (they
> probably all use Apples too), so I'm sure the piece is written to appeal
> to, and to entertain them (I haven't seen
SatoriGFX;236243 Wrote:
> ...
> As to using computers. It IS time consuming to rip all of your cd's
> (and doing it well means learning how to set up EAC and Accuraterip
> properly and so on) and it requires a computer in the same room or
> buying a wireless router (not everyone has one). And e
opaqueice;236345 Wrote:
> None of the results in that paper are even close to significant, as far
> as I can see from a glance at it.
My initial impression upon reading that sentence was that you did not
consider the tests as having showed anything. I am sure that is not
what you intended people
cliveb;236353 Wrote:
> My initial impression upon reading that sentence was that you did not
> consider the tests as having showed anything. I am sure that is not
> what you intended people to think. I would go so far as to say that the
> results are *very* significant, in that they demonstrate
cliveb;236353 Wrote:
> My initial impression upon reading that sentence was that you did not
> consider the tests as having showed anything. I am sure that is not
> what you intended people to think. I would go so far as to say that the
> results are *very* significant, in that they demonstrate
cliveb;236299 Wrote:
> The most famous study of this was by Julian Dunn & Ian Dennis (Prism)
> and Doug Carson (DCA). They investigated apparent audible differences
> in numerically identical CDs. Their paper was called "The
> Numerically-Identical CD Mystery: A Study in Perception versus
> Measu
cliveb;236295 Wrote:
> This comment may lead some to believe that Jive could be out in November
> (or shortly thereafter). I'm one of the Jive beta testers, and as far as
> I can recall didn't sign any gagging agreements, so
And thats why i said that SC7 does not rely on any Jive hardware bei
On the subject of HiFi Critic I had a long chat with Paul Messenger
recently at a hi-fi show. He's a real gentleman. (Paul - if you're
reading this - as agreed I'm identifying myself as "the guy with the
Pink Floyd t-shirt"!)
HiFi Critic is a new magazine, and goodness knows we need a breath of
f
amey01;236265 Wrote:
> My Squeezebox is one of my favourite products I own, so I've thought
> long and hard about this and have to disagree.
>
> I hate to think whether I'd have the time for this if I wasn't in the
> IT industry and know this sort of stuff inside out.
>
> I'm thinking of my s
Phil Leigh;236123 Wrote:
> It was something like this:
>
> If the servos have to work harder to track the laser and get the
> (correct)bits off, they might induce electrical noise into the audio or
> digital (SPDIF) circuits. This might even lead to Jitter!
The most famous study of this was
funkstar;236219 Wrote:
> There is no public timescale to the development process. The Jive
> hardware relies on SqueezeCenter 7.0 (re-named from SlimServer) which
> is slated for November ...
This comment may lead some to believe that Jive could be out in
November (or shortly thereafter). I'm one
20 matches
Mail list logo
