Re: aufs5 GIT release (v6.0-rc1)

2023-08-23 Thread Tomas M
thers. While I know you strive not to let people down, I also recognize that pleasing everyone is an unattainable goal, so attempting to do so would be futile. Thank you for taking the time to consider my viewpoint. Sincerely, Tomas M slax.org On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 4:44 PM J. R. Okajima

Re: Patching kernel with aufs

2022-02-13 Thread Tomas M
It seems it worked just fine. Thank you! Tomas M On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 3:20 PM J. R. Okajima wrote: > > Hi Tomas, > > > Finally I am trying to apply aufs5-base.patch and I get error. > > It looks like while patching fs/inode.c, the function is no longer > > call

Patching kernel with aufs

2022-02-13 Thread Tomas M
ut it is inode_update_time() and it is already declared as non-static Maybe the file aufs5-base.patch needs updating? Or maybe I should checkout different branch? Thank you Tomas M

Re: man command fails with aufs

2019-10-28 Thread Tomas M
profile configuration for aufs, which will allow aufs to access all files, and this configuration could be either part of aufs sources or could be noted in documentation. Unfortunately I do not know how to configure apparmor so disabling it entirely is easier for me now. Tomas M > There

Re: man command fails with aufs

2019-10-26 Thread Tomas M
o You can add boot parameters in the syslinux boot menu. Tomas M Tomas M On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 4:59 AM J. R. Okajima <[2]hooanon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ben Hutchings: > > I think I noticed this a while ago, but since Debian doesn't run on >

Re: aufs4 GIT release (linux-v4.15-rc3)

2017-12-28 Thread Tomas M
purposes. By the way, I am very happy that Debian has aufs patches in their stock kernel, so adding AUFS to debian is a matter of single command (apt install aufs-dkms) without the need to recompile kernel. This makes life so easier :) Happy 2018! :-) Tomas M On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 5:49 PM

Re: aufs4 GIT release (linux-v4.15-rc3)

2017-12-28 Thread Tomas M
. Thank you Tomas M slax.org On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:45 AM, sfjro--- via Aufs-users wrote: > o minor > - remove a harmless warning about the internal file-close, reported by > Ralf Jung. > > > J. R. Okajima > > > - a

Re: test

2016-05-23 Thread Tomas M
It looks like first message bounces and others work fine ... maybe TM On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Tomas M wrote: >> My emails to aufs-users mailing list are bouncing back. >> This is test if it works now. Please igno

Module-only AUFS without kernel patches

2016-05-22 Thread Tomas M
you Tomas M -- Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control

test

2016-05-22 Thread Tomas M
My emails to aufs-users mailing list are bouncing back. This is test if it works now. Please ignore. Tomas M -- Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to

Module-only aufs

2016-05-21 Thread Tomas M
load the aufs module. But instead, I would like to compile only aufs module, and use distribution's kernel as is without patching. Is this entirely impossible? Is there any chance to achieve this? Maybe even in a way which would be "wrong", but working? Thank you T

Re: aufs-utils

2013-10-03 Thread Tomas M
Thank you. Maybe I am doing something wrong, but 'make headers_install' only installs /usr/include/linux/aufs_type.h which doesn't contain any text like EAU* I'm compiling for kernel 3.10.14 Tomas M On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 2:36 AM, wrote: > > Hi Tomas, > >

aufs-utils

2013-10-02 Thread Tomas M
I have some strange errors while compiling aufs utils. perror.c complains that EAU_Last is undeclared, as well as the other constants starting with EAU I've git-checked aufs utils as origin/aufs3.9 Where are those supposed to be defined? Thank you To

Re: aufs utils ver test

2013-08-23 Thread Tomas M
> How about this message? > Wrong version! > aufs3.x, but aufs is aufs3.y. > See README in detail and try git branch -a. That would be excellent :) Thank you Tomas M -- Introducing

Re: aufs utils ver test

2013-08-22 Thread Tomas M
ot know what is that command. Something like: git "show me all checkpoints which I can checkout to" - that will make it easy for the user to see which nearest version of aufs tools is available for his aufs version. Thank you for consideration Tomas M On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at

aufs utils ver test

2013-08-22 Thread Tomas M
Hello, while compiling aufs utils for Linux 3.10.9, I get error that aufs is for 3.0 and later, but aufs is 3.10-... Attached patch fixes that. Thanks for consideration Tomas M a.diff Description: Binary data

Re: git checkout aufs3.10

2013-07-06 Thread Tomas M
Thank you very much Tomas M On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 1:37 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > Tomas M: >> can't git checkout aufs3.10. Would you please make it available? > > I made aufs3.10 in my local repository on this Tuesday. > It will be released

git checkout aufs3.10

2013-07-06 Thread Tomas M
Hello, can't git checkout aufs3.10. Would you please make it available? Thank you very much Tomas M -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev

Re: [RFC] move-down

2013-07-01 Thread Tomas M
hecks by default, and allow user to specify a parameter to skip the checks, if he knows what is he doing :) That way you give the power and the responsibility to users hands. Tomas M On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 1:31 PM, wrote: > > Tomas, > Thank you for the comment. > > Tomas M

Re: [RFC] move-down

2013-07-01 Thread Tomas M
ted that the file as seen through /union/file.txt may be different after move-down since the unmodified version will show up from the readonly branch I think I will not personally use the move-down function, this is just my feedback as I understand it. Thank you Tomas M On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 8

Re: aufs3.0 .. aufs3.5 will end

2013-04-06 Thread Tomas M
Ben could probably confirm or clarify that. Tomas M On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:02 AM, wrote: > > Ben Hutchings: >> The base kernel is the 3.2.y stable/longterm branch which I'm >> maintaining at kernel.org. It was updated from 3.2.39 to 3.2.41 today. > > Hmm, so th

Re: aufs3.0 .. aufs3.5 will end

2013-03-28 Thread Tomas M
for recent kernels, and you will optionally get paid for the hard work in supporting any of the old kernels for business clients. Does anybody have any objections here? :) Tomas M On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:53 PM, wrote: > > Tomas M: >> I prefer if you drop support for all ol

Re: aufs3.0 .. aufs3.5 will end

2013-03-28 Thread Tomas M
I prefer if you drop support for all old kernels at all and maintain only AUFS for latest stable kernel. Just my personal preference :) Tomas M On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Oliver Welter wrote: > Hi, > > as 3.4 is the latest longterm kernel, I would be happy if you can provide a

Re: Error while compiling aufs utils

2013-03-10 Thread Tomas M
Thank you for confirming the issue. I fixed it locally. I just wanted to assure that what I did is the correct way. Tomas M On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, wrote: > > Tomas M: >> The problem is that 'make headers_install' does not install aufs_type.h >>

Re: Error while compiling aufs utils

2013-03-09 Thread Tomas M
The problem is that 'make headers_install' does not install aufs_type.h anywhere, as far as I know. Probablytheaufs3-kbuild.patch should add one line to $LinuxSrc/include/uapi/linux/Kbuild as follows? header-y += aufs_type.h Thank you Tomas M

Error while compiling aufs utils

2013-03-08 Thread Tomas M
I doing anything wrong? Thank you very much Tomas M -- Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the endp

Re: AUFS for kernel 3.8 ?

2013-03-02 Thread Tomas M
Thank you very much Tomas M On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:27 PM, wrote: > > Hi Tomas, > > Tomas M: >> is AUFS available for 3.8 kernel? >> I tried git checkout origin/aufs3.8 >> but get an error "pathspec ... didn't match any files" > > I wi

AUFS for kernel 3.8 ?

2013-03-02 Thread Tomas M
Hello, is AUFS available for 3.8 kernel? I tried git checkout origin/aufs3.8 but get an error "pathspec ... didn't match any files" Thank you Tomas M -- Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your

Re: Aufs deadlock on adding branche

2012-12-01 Thread Tomas M
By the way, I recompiled kernel with aufs CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG=y, I can see in /proc/config.gz that CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG=y, but mounting aufs with debug=1 doesn't make any change, it reports "debug=1 ignored" in dmesg. Is there anything I'm missing? Thanks Tomas M On Sat, De

Aufs deadlock on adding branche

2012-12-01 Thread Tomas M
nfig (deleted) (stat: Stale NFS file handle) Notice in the second line that it claims the directory 'config' is deleted, which is not true, I can 'stat' it. What more info should I provide in order fo

Re: Memory leak on tmpfs under aufs

2012-11-07 Thread Tomas M
? Is it safe to use trunc_xino? Is there a huge performance penalty? Thank you Tomas M -- LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management. Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs from one comm

Re: Memory leak on tmpfs under aufs

2012-11-07 Thread Tomas M
e. I am no expert at all, just AUFS user. Lets wait for Junjiro Okajima to explain that :) Tomas M -- LogMeIn Central: Instant, anywhere, Remote PC access and management. Stay in control, update software, and manage PCs fr

Re: Memory leak on tmpfs under aufs

2012-11-07 Thread Tomas M
le on some other filesystem. Also try to remount the aufs like $ mount -o remount /tmp/mnt and try df again. Tomas M On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > Hello, > > I found tmpfs usage grow unexpectedly on my systems until crash when it > reaches 100%. The system

Re: Unprivileged user have no access to filesystem

2012-10-15 Thread Tomas M
ering the command, ignoring the result since when I try things on liveCD I don't care much) Mystery is no longer a mystery :) Aufs works properly! :) Tomas M -- Don't let slow site performance ruin your business.

Re: Unprivileged user have no access to filesystem

2012-10-15 Thread Tomas M
not reproduce the situation again, it's gone. Now for me everything works as it should! I have no explanation for what I did differently the previous time. Tomas M On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:22 PM, wrote: > > Tomas M: >> When I create unprivileged user, he can login without

Re: Unprivileged user have no access to filesystem

2012-10-15 Thread Tomas M
ou may get Slax ISO or TAR here: http://www.tomas-m.com/blog/18813-Slax-with-kernel-3-6-2.html Tomas M slax.org On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Guan Xin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:10 PM, wrote: >> >> Guan Xin: >>> I am not sure if this maillist acc

Re: Unprivileged user have no access to filesystem

2012-10-15 Thread Tomas M
I would like to report that I've built Slax (pre-release version) with AUFS for 3.6.2 kernel and I see no problems whatsoever, aufs is used as root filesystem, and it works just fine. Thank you very much Junjiro! Tomas M slax.org On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:52 PM, wrote: > >

Re: aufs standalone module won't load ~ unknown symbols

2012-08-30 Thread Tomas M
longer needed. The answer to klaatu's question is: make sure the newly compiled (and patched) kernel is actually the one which you're booting: uname -a or cat /proc/version if you prefer Also, if you are using LILO, rerun it to make sure it picks the new kernel. Tomas M On Thu, Aug 3

Re: make headers_install

2012-08-20 Thread Tomas M
hen I copy the aufs_type.h header to appropriate location. This is sufficient for me, thank you for helping me understand how to do that. Tomas M -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the

Re: make headers_install

2012-08-20 Thread Tomas M
kernel tree) and then copy the prepared aufs_type.h manually to the system includes. Tomas M On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Tomas M wrote: >> But let me make sure again. >> Did you choose the first method or second? >> DESTDIR is for the second method only. > > A

Re: make headers_install

2012-08-19 Thread Tomas M
rdless of which method I choose, so I need make headers_install with INSTALL_HDR_PATH=/usr in both cases. Am I wrong? > I wrote "copty ./usr/include/linux/aufs_type.h to ...", which means Ah, I didn't notice the lea

Re: make headers_install

2012-08-18 Thread Tomas M
rnel tree, so it is probably wrong idea to simply copy the file manually as the documentation suggests, so this should be perhaps removed from the docs at all. Thank you Tomas M -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusi

Re: make headers_install

2012-08-18 Thread Tomas M
ll DESTDIR=/aaa' with no result, also tried 'DESTDIR=/aaa make headers_install' with no result as well. Thank you very much. Tomas M -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the w

Re: make headers_install

2012-08-18 Thread Tomas M
why 'make headers_install' doesn't work as suggested by aufs documentation. Tomas M On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:28 PM, wrote: > > Hi Tomas, > > Tomas M: >> However later I use make headers_install, as requested in the >> documentation, and it does nothing. >&g

make headers_install

2012-08-17 Thread Tomas M
e for `relocs'. I've searched entire system for aufs_type.h but it's nowhere, so it didn't install it at all. Is this normal? Am I missing anything? Thank you Tomas M -- Live Security Virtual Conference

Re: How to unmount aufs (Ubuntu 12.04)

2012-05-17 Thread Tomas M
somewhere else. This is tricky part, I did it in Slax by switch_root. Let me know if you think this is your case so I could perhaps explain in more detail if you need. 4) do not use 2>/dev/null redirection of stderr output - rather analyze the error output of your remount commands Tomas M slax.

Re: How to unmount aufs (Ubuntu 12.04)

2012-05-17 Thread Tomas M
t put the xino file to another filesystem (eg to memory, as explained above) during you INITIALIZE your aufs root (eg at the boot time) > The /cow is definitely in use... use 'lsof' command to see what files are opened then... Tomas M slax.org

branch mod reordering

2011-08-06 Thread Tomas M
performed, which however reorders branches: mount -o remount,mod:/tmp/empty=ro /tmp/union /tmp/empty=ro /tmp/002=rw /tmp/001=ro Also attached is sample script to reproduce the problem (reproduce.sh) Am I doing anything wrong? Thank you very much Tomas M + UNION=/tmp/union + mkdir -p /tmp/empty

Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/8] overlay filesystem: request for inclusion

2011-08-06 Thread Tomas M
ibe in few sentences why AUFS is equivalent (or even better) competitor to overlayfs. If I knew how, I would submit the inclusion request myself! ;) Tomas M On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:29 PM, wrote: > > Thanks forwarding, Pete. > > Here is what I am guessing currently. > - ove

Re: RFC: Aufs distribution format

2011-08-04 Thread Tomas M
M On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:20 AM, wrote: > > Hi, > > Tomas M: >> My question: Is it possible to release aufs in a different form, which >> doesn't need the kernel to be recompiled and rebooted? >        ::: >> Is it technically possible? >> Or is

RFC: Aufs distribution format

2011-08-03 Thread Tomas M
unctions copied from the "newer" kernel version 2.6.39. I hope you understand my suggestion and question. Please forgive my ignorance if my question is totally out of order, I don't know anything about kernel in ge

Re: [RFC] aufs versions and GIT repo

2011-08-03 Thread Tomas M
it includes much more data than just the kernel sources (if I understand it right). In my opinion, average user wants to download AUFS just as a patch for his particular kernel version. That may be the reason why people prefer to use the standalone version of aufs. Tomas M On Tue, Aug 2, 2011

aufs cleanup after rmmod

2011-05-30 Thread Tomas M
think it's not needed IMHO aufs should cleanup the si_* entry in sysfs after the step 2 even if mounting fails due to xino on xfs. Thank you Tomas M -- vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security

Re: support old kernels

2010-08-23 Thread Tomas M
I personally suggest to stop supporting old kernels at all, and focus on the newest kernel only. If a person needs aufs for any older kernel, he will have to use the older version of aufs which were available for that particular old kernel. Just my suggestion :) Tomas M slax.org On

doubled donations

2010-08-10 Thread Tomas M
tions. For those folks who didn't decide to donate yet, or even for those who wish to donate again, this is your last chance to get your money doubled :) You can donate to AUFS here: http://www.slax.org/aufs.php Tomas

doubled donations

2010-08-09 Thread Tomas M
e who wish to donate again, this is your last chance to get your money doubled :) You can donate to AUFS here: http://www.slax.org/aufs.php Tomas M slax.org -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they

Re: AUFS donations

2010-07-07 Thread Tomas M
7;d like > to choose something good for donators. The report will be the first > step. It may result in "no news", or "another better way". > If it result in "another new project instead of aufs", then I will ask > everyone how it will be. Until th

AUFS donations

2010-07-06 Thread Tomas M
Hello Junjiro, > Tomas M makes a donation as "monthly doubling". > I have tought about what I can do for users, especially for SLAX > users. Actually I have asked but there is no response. I replied to your question some time ago, I hope you got the reply. I told you that I rea

Re: thank you (Re: Your AUFS donation will be doubled by Tomas M)

2010-05-03 Thread Tomas M
> > Tomas M says this is monthly donation. > Not exactly, what I meant is the opposite - all donations are just one time payments, however everybody is welcome to donate again every month. It was a bit surprising for me how many people sent money, I didn't really expect such inte

Your AUFS donation will be doubled by Tomas M

2010-04-15 Thread Tomas M
Hello all aufs users, this is Tomas M, the author of Slax and Linux Live scripts. I am using AUFS in my open source projects and I need AUFS to be developed as long as possible. At the same time I realize that it is very hard task to keep the code up to date with recent Kernel changes. So I

Re: Will aufs2 support ramfs?

2009-03-12 Thread Tomas M
> I thought swtich_root or something do that Ah yes you are right, switch_root is the program (application) which removes all the files. Tomas M -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder

Re: Will aufs2 support ramfs?

2009-03-12 Thread Tomas M
mains as is all the time the operating system is running, unless you rm all files from it manually (or by using some program). Tomas M -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering W

Re: regression: permissions of dev nodes

2008-11-14 Thread Tomas M
So please unfreeze it if you can :) Tomas M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Kris Warkentin: >> Works perfectly. Thank you very much. > > Thank you for your test too. > Unfortunately, this patch will not be included in next Monday release > since aufs is in the weekly

Re: aufs+fuse troubles

2008-08-04 Thread Tomas M
to reread aufs man page. Because I see there is a lot of new features since the time I last checked it. Tomas M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tomas M: >> These processes are blocked: >> 1 (init) >> 2190 (posixovl) >> 3236 (udevd) >> 5291 (klogd) >> 5352 (dbu

Re: aufs+fuse troubles

2008-08-03 Thread Tomas M
, there it freezes. Does it help? I remember something regarding some change in fstatfs ... but I'm not sure if the change was in fuse or aufs. I guess I shall try to upgrade to latest FUSE version from CVS or something... maybe? Tomas M Tomas M wrote: > Good morning Junjiro. >

aufs+fuse troubles

2008-08-03 Thread Tomas M
t possible for you to find out where the problem may be, after looking at the dmesg? Thank you very much Tomas M dmesg.gz Description: application/gzip - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer&#

branch list through /sys

2008-06-26 Thread Tomas M
r'? (for example, are there any circumstances when a file br* can exist in /sys/fs/aufs/si_123456/, while it won't contain any branch path?) Thank you Tomas M - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It

Re: Mounting aufs filesystem as root filesystem

2008-05-08 Thread Tomas M
sible in /.aufs/ When you reboot, you have to 1) end all processes 2) close all files 3) switch_root back 4) umount /aufs, /ro and /rw 5) shutdown Tomas M slax.org linux-live.org - This SF.net email is sponsored by the

Re: aufs Monday release

2008-04-20 Thread Tomas M
;t let him - 'make' will silently replace it to =y automatically. The only way to disable sysfs is when you set CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y, which is IMHO very rare. I believe it is completely safe to depend on CONFIG_SYSFS. Tomas M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> o news >> - begin

Re: Problem with aufs, 2.6.24, apache and files greater than 256 bytes

2008-04-04 Thread Tomas M
Hi, Apache uses sendfile, which went through several changes in latest kernels. I believe you have to apply splice patch (see in /patches/ directory in aufs sources). But maybe I am wrong. By the way, 2.6.24.24 doesn't exist yet :) Tomas M Wolfgang Barth wrote: > Hi, >

sysfs information (was: Re: [PATCH] Update against 2.6.25-rc)

2008-03-11 Thread Tomas M
ere and will provide the same (or even better) functionality. Just an idea :) Tomas M - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/

Re: aufs splice patch

2008-02-25 Thread Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tomas M: >> 'modprobe aufs' shows error message 'unknown symbol' and dmesg shows that it >> doesn't know symbols do_vfsub_splice_from and do_vfsub_splice_to, >> >> I am sure that I applied splice-2.6.23.patch correctly

aufs splice patch

2008-02-25 Thread Tomas M
Hello. I am trying to use newest aufs, using 2.6.24.2 and today's Monday aufs release. 'modprobe aufs' shows error message 'unknown symbol' and dmesg shows that it doesn't know symbols do_vfsub_splice_from and do_vfsub_splice_to, I am sure that I applied splice-2.6.23.patch correctly. I verifie

Re: problem: Corrupted filesystem

2008-02-20 Thread Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tomas M: >> I just received several reports (from 5 different people) that they are >> trying to build a Live CD, and their squashfs filesystems seem corrupted >> (while extracting the squashfs image using unsquashfs results in 100% >> corre

Re: problem: Corrupted filesystem

2008-02-20 Thread Tomas M
e like a problem with squashfs in-kernel driver, or something. But it works OK for me so I don't investigate the problem much. Anyway, how was the problem solved? I received only empty messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED], so I am unable to track you

Re: au_lkup_neg

2008-02-18 Thread Tomas M
. I'll ask him to provide more info. Anyway, he should never write to the rw branch directly, so he is doing something unsupported (at least from the point of view of linux-live scripts). Thank you very much for your reply. Tomas M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tomas M: >> Some

au_lkup_neg

2008-02-17 Thread Tomas M
ew it and say whether it is AUFS problem or something else. Some Slax user reported the following. Junjiro, Would you please review it briefly to make sure it's not in aufs? Thanks a lot! Tomas M here is the bug report: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey, I have an probleme with aufs, I

Re: aufs xfs devs bug

2007-12-12 Thread Tomas M
r_dir - vfsub_notify_change - aufs_setattr seems aufs is somewhere deep. If you need the precise log, I will try. But for now, I suggest to wait until xfs is fixed in kernel, do you agree? I will also try 2.6.24-rc5 with your aufs+xfs patch. Thank you Tomas M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I see X

Re: aufs xfs devs bug

2007-12-10 Thread Tomas M
As usual, I forgot to note my kernel version, I am sorry. I am using 2.6.24-rc4 kernel. Tomas Tomas M wrote: > Hello. > > I think I've found a problem in AUFS, at least in the latest CVS version. > Here is a short script to reproduce it: > > #!/bin/bash > mkdir e

aufs xfs devs bug

2007-12-10 Thread Tomas M
t works correctly, so I'm confused :) Tomas M slax.org - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source.

Re: get cvs from the past

2007-12-07 Thread Tomas M
> I usually use this simply after first co (as aufs/README says), > $ cd aufs.wcvs/aufs > (never remove CVS dirs. for Tomas only) > $ cvs update -D20061212 And thank you Junjiro :) Tomas M - SF.Net email is

Re: get cvs from the past

2007-12-07 Thread Tomas M
t does what I need (downloads a version from 13th of November 2007); Thank you flip! Tomas M slax.org - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy o

get cvs from the past

2007-12-07 Thread Tomas M
date_spec, but that doesn't work somehow, it's perhaps somehow tricky. I hope it's possible. Thank you for your help. Tomas M slax.org - SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marke

Re: aufs Monday release

2007-12-03 Thread Tomas M
Hello. May I ask you, what is the trunc_xino useful for? I didn't find anything in aufs.5 documentation, only trunc_xib and notrunc_xib, but that is perhaps something else, am I right? Thank you Tomas M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > o bugfix > - bugfix: a race in revalidati

Re: aufs Monday release with 2.6.24-rc

2007-11-20 Thread Tomas M
Hello, tried Monday release of aufs with 2.6.24-rc3 and doesn't compile for me: sysaufs.c: error: implicit declaration of subsys_put and subsys_get (in function reg and unreg) Should I wait for 2.6.24 final? Thank you Tomas M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > o news > - introduce a new se

Re: AuFS feature request - reorder branches

2007-10-15 Thread Tomas M
opposite - reorder only writable branches (to balance free space on writable branches). So I understand it is not such simple to implement in aufs. > I will try when I have time. Give me some time. Yes of course I will wait. I don't need it so hard anyway :) It would be just nice to

Re: AuFS feature request - reorder branches

2007-10-13 Thread Tomas M
1, the result would be: /mnt/empty=rw /mnt/hda3=ro /mnt/hda1=ro /mnt/hda2=ro I am sorry for confusion. Tomas M - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems?

AuFS feature request - reorder branches

2007-10-12 Thread Tomas M
aufs. If it is very hard, then please just add it to your todo list and focus on more important things :) But if it is very easy, it may be interesting to have such a feature. Thank you for consideration Tomas M - Thi

Re: disk space usage in aufs mount

2007-09-24 Thread Tomas M
I would suggest mount -t aufs -o remount /vid/00/logs Maybe it will help. Tomas M On Mon, September 24, 2007 12:21 pm, Matt Jarvis wrote: > Hi > > > I am using aufs for a project, and have some issue with reported disk > space usage. I use aufs between a tmpfs set at 50MB,

Re: Aufs max branches

2007-09-14 Thread Tomas M
refers them every > time user does something. The essential information for inode and > dentry exist in the allocated arrays. So if I understand all of this correctly, it would only make AUFS slower in remount time (adding a branch), but it would work the same speed after then. Am I cor

Re: Aufs max branches

2007-09-14 Thread Tomas M
oesn't appear to perform worse than kmalloc'ed. But that's just one single result I found on google. What does aufs do more often? 'allocate' the memory, or 'use' the allocated memory? Tomas M --

Re: Aufs max branches

2007-09-14 Thread Tomas M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Tomas M: >> You said that it's not prefered to allocate large memory blocks which >> require several pages. Does the paragraph above say that current aufs >> does exactly that? (allocate more). Or it does only for MAX_1023? > > What I w

Re: Aufs max branches

2007-09-14 Thread Tomas M
ocks which require several pages. Does the paragraph above say that current aufs does exactly that? (allocate more). Or it does only for MAX_1023? BTW, I do not enable CONFIG_AUFS_HINOTIFY. Thank you Tomas M slax.org - T

Re: Aufs max branches

2007-09-13 Thread Tomas M
at most. Well, it still works, even with larger objects than a page :) Tomas M - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/

Aufs max branches

2007-09-13 Thread Tomas M
l, if I use only 10 branches in my aufs, it should have the same performance for all CONFIG_AUFS_BRANCH_MAX_* settings, am I correct? Thank you very much for answers. Tomas M slax.org - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Mic

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Tomas M
, then I use 'man -l ./aufs.5' and it shows the following: Set by default for a branch whose fs-type is either 'iso9660', 'udf', (and here the paragraph ends, no more text) Tomas M - This SF

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Tomas M
e automatically marked as =rr?" Because I think it should _not_ be. > UDF is writable. That is, as long as you have a writable media... > >Jan So I am not alone who thinks this :) Thank you Tomas M slax.org - T

Re: branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Tomas M
e automatically marked as =rr?" Because I think it should _not_ be. > UDF is writable. That is, as long as you have a writable media... > >Jan So I am not alone who thinks this :) Thank you Tomas M slax.org - T

branch rr - real readonly

2007-09-10 Thread Tomas M
gget to update aufs.5 man page :) Second thing, I have a question. I believe that udf filesystem is 'writable', I think it may be used on DVD-RAM media and may be modified. But maybe I'm wrong; please v

Re: Inclusion in the kernel?

2007-07-20 Thread Tomas M
FUTURE, if you decide to include it in kernel few years later :) Thank you for consideration. Tomas M - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/

  1   2   >