have you tried validate() on dataroce field?
--- drescher_r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm working on a customer's request to secure a
> checkbox.
> It's in the InventTable-Form and if the user clicks
> the checkbox, a
> messagebox should appear and inform the user, that
> checking/
Hi John,
Again, I agree with you completely. But sometimes, have to do break the law
in order to keep things moving :P..
I agree from the functional perspective...And also it depends upon the client
aslo who are sometimes very sticky to their ideas and will not listen to our
suggesti
But I would like to know more about why Microsoft implemented the re-use in
SP4?
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail contains confidential and/or privileged
information and is intended to be read only by the person or authorized
representative of the organization to whom it is addressed. If you
And by giving a work around, we now have a situation where someone could
comprise the system security and print a false check and then reset the
check counter.
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail contains confidential and/or privileged
information and is intended to be read only by the person o
Hi ,
I am fully with you. Its the same as if you mistyped the date/name/amount on
a check from your cheque book (or damaged cheque ) , you need to issue another
cheque.
Morever, there is a Re Use option available. I dont know if they did any
customozation which messaed up with this f
This is a very interesting topic and I would appreciate further discussion.
Whether Re Use is available or not - The basic issue goes to sound (read:
secure) accounting practices. US checks require MICR numbers in the
following format:
There are five major fields on a MICR line :
1. Auxiliary
Hi James,
Strangely, I got this problem with Ax3 and SP2 on my local axapta PC. Did you
find any solution for this?. I tried to redo whole process again, I could not
duplicate the problem.
Did you find the solution for this? or just cancel the qty ,close the PO and
stay calm
Hello, Altamash,
Are you still having this problem?
I would recommend doing the following.
1. Compile the full application from Adminstration menu. This will do forward
compilation also. Please make sure no user is online when you do this.
2. if not also solved, please do '
Hi,
This is a clear case of lack of data integrity , check synchronize the table
and delete the incosistent data.
reagrds,
Kumar
G Radhakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it happening after compilation, synchornization and
indexing ?
--- Altamash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>From the problem I had, and it looks like something similar for you, I
am guessing that there is user information stored in Axapta that we are
unable to get access too.
Need someone from Microsft or familiar with the kernel to clarify if
this is the case.
-Original Message-
From:
Hi Akshay,
The user based licensing in Axapta is concurrent user based means no of user
loged on together.
Regards,
Kumar
Akshay Ramgopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi People,
Can anyone tell me, in case of licensing no:of users is the user access
calculated by the no: of on
Barry,
After uninstalling the Axapta client, I spun through his registry, didn't
find anything (but maybe I was looking for the wrong thing).
A new user record works fine.
Still scratching my head...
Andrew
> -Original Message-
> From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
> [mail
John,
Just to make clarification that "Re Use" is in SP4 now.
Hemant
John Remsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The "reuse" function is part of the BKD PowerPak.
John Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have to agree with the MS response.
Checks in the US have the check number impr
Had a similar problem.
Did you ensure that all registry keys were also removed?
Create a new user record for them (ie do not use the same user Id).
Let me know how it goes.
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andr
The "reuse" function is part of the BKD PowerPak.
John Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have to agree with the MS response.
Checks in the US have the check number imprinted in the MICR number at the
bottom of the check.
This is done in magnetic ink, unless you are printing the check on a la
I have to agree with the MS response.
Checks in the US have the check number imprinted in the MICR number at the
bottom of the check.
This is done in magnetic ink, unless you are printing the check on a laser
with a MICR cartridge, the check
number will not match. Furthermore, good audit practic
Thanks Subrahmanyam i will try ur solution .
Thanks to all for replying my small query.
Regards
Vivek
"Subrahmanyam, Mamidi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok. This is my final thought..
1. You can void the cheque for check number '01'
2. You can reset the check number sequence
Ok. This is my final thought..
1. You can void the cheque for check number '01'
2. You can reset the check number sequence from '0x' to '01'
3. Print your check with check number '01'
4. Reset the check number Number sequence to '0x'
please let me know if you
Just found something for your reference.Its a nice answer..
MSFT:
To be able to print a check twice would be a serious security problem - and
probably illegal in several countries around the world.
In the case with wrong paper etc., you simply have to void the check in the
payment
And one more thought is,
1. If you have a erroneous check generated while printing ( or whatsoever may
be the reason ), if you want to print the same check number, you need to void
it out right??. Once you have voided it out and then may be if you want to use
the same check number, I am no
Hi Vivek,
There should be 6 status.
1. Non
2. Sent
3.Received
4.Approved
5.Rejected
6.ReUse
please let me know the menu path you are looking at and are you using Ax3 and
Sp3?
vivek sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess there is no such reuse option . Only
I guess there is no such reuse option . Only five options are there as
mentioned in Asrar's reply .
Vivek
Nancy L Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Reuse option does allow you to reuse the check
number. I would invetigate why you do have that
option, uless the journal is posted.
--
I do not know of this being possible. The use of Security Keys also controls
table level access.
Nihar Saraiya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Group
[Not a Technical guy]
Can we add tables to the Record Level Security form?
Regards
Nihar Saraiya,
Synergy Software Systems,
Dubai.
T
The Reuse option does allow you to reuse the check
number. I would invetigate why you do have that
option, uless the journal is posted.
--- vivek sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nancy
>
> What u said is quite true and correct . But what
> will happen in case we want to use the same
Hi Krishna,
I think its not possible to use ReCordSortedList class to sort the records in
decending order.
My recomendation is that you may have to create a temporary table and do a
'Inser_recordSet' and then use select orderby or group by with option Asc or
desc...
These are
Hello friends!
This a query to discuss with you.
I need to sort a record buffer with any key field of it in descending order.
I tried using RecordSortedList but it all only sort the records in ascending
order.
Any trick pls let me advise.
Thanks in advance!
Hello Group
I have the Payment Status as 'Sent' in the Payment Journal, but not
posted.
I can see the same journal in Payment Transfer screen. However i can not
post it. The infolog states, 'No Record was Found'. I also modified the
status to Received, but still could not post it.
What am i m
Hello Group
[Not a Technical guy]
Can we add tables to the Record Level Security form?
Regards
Nihar Saraiya,
Synergy Software Systems,
Dubai.
Tel: +971 4 3374 282
Confidentiality Notice
This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not
the intended recipient please noti
28 matches
Mail list logo
