On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Pedro Sepúlveda wrote:
I have a robotic library Storagetek L40 with twho drives Ultrium
LTO 2. In my server I have a network card scsii. I have Red Hat
Advanced Server 3.0
With this scsii I have connected the robot as the two drives in
such a way that the first drive is
On 10/4/06, Grasso Maurizio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi MAx
have you got an example of bacula-dir.conf and bacula-sd.conf for manage
the HP Ultrium?
thanks a lot
Hi,
below here are some fragments taken from my bacula-sd.conf and bacula-dir.conf,
hopefully enough to help you get the HP
Hello,
===
Bacula: 1.38.11
Os: Linux (Debian), kernel 2.6.17
Tape drive: Sony SDX-500C
Scsi card: Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI
===
I'm using Bacula for months and it worked fine until today:
05-Oct 03:00 phoenix-sd: Volume Full-Tape-0018 previously written,
moving to end of data.
05-Oct 03:01
Hi,
This happens if you interrupt a backup, so the catalog is not updated
properly.
Here's how to fix it:
http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Tips_Suggestions.html#SECTION000367000
Greetings,
Ger
Op donderdag 5 oktober 2006 09:49, schreef Julien Cigar:
Hello,
===
Bacula: 1.38.11
Hi,
On 10/4/2006 6:50 PM, Brandon King wrote:
Hello,
I have just added a second raid array to my bacula server and want to
have 2/3 of my incremental pool be on Array0 and the other 1/3 on Array1.
To set this up, I added a second Device to bacula-sd.conf (both devices
shown below):
Hi,
On 10/5/2006 8:53 AM, Michael Brennen wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Pedro Sepúlveda wrote:
I have a robotic library Storagetek L40 with twho drives Ultrium LTO
2. In my server I have a network card scsii. I have Red Hat Advanced
Server 3.0
With this scsii I have connected the robot as
Hi,
On 10/5/2006 9:49 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
Hello,
===
Bacula: 1.38.11
Os: Linux (Debian), kernel 2.6.17
Tape drive: Sony SDX-500C
Scsi card: Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI
===
I'm using Bacula for months and it worked fine until today:
05-Oct 03:00 phoenix-sd: Volume Full-Tape-0018
Thanks for reply.
I read that in the manual, but unfortunately I haven't interrupt a
backup, and Bacula didn't crashed ...
What's strange is that the backup starts at 03:00am, and the last full
backup completed sucessfully
Ger Apeldoorn wrote:
Hi,
This happens if you interrupt a backup, so
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
not the default system address.
I have just tried to do this with IPTables and source NATing but due to
a bug in the Fedora Kernel (or what
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
hello :)
On 10/5/2006 9:49 AM, Julien Cigar wrote:
Hello,
===
Bacula: 1.38.11
Os: Linux (Debian), kernel 2.6.17
Tape drive: Sony SDX-500C
Scsi card: Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI
===
I'm using Bacula for months and it worked fine until today:
05-Oct 03:00
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Julien Cigar wrote:
Thanks for reply.
I read that in the manual, but unfortunately I haven't interrupt a
backup, and Bacula didn't crashed ...
What's strange is that the backup starts at 03:00am, and the last full
backup completed sucessfully
I have been seeing this
Hello,
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
not the default system address.
I have just tried to do this with IPTables and source NATing
Jonas Björklund wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the
same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
not the default system address.
I have just tried to do this with
On 5 Oct 2006 at 12:34, James Ray wrote:
Jonas Björklund wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the
same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
not the default
On 5 Oct 2006 at 12:34, James Ray wrote:
Jonas Björklund wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the
same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
not the default
On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:02, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
not the default system address.
I have just tried to do this with IPTables and source
On 5 Oct 2006 at 14:02, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:02, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
not the default system address.
I
On Thursday 05 October 2006 14:01, Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 12:34, James Ray wrote:
Jonas Björklund wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the
same IP
address I have
On 5 Oct 2006 at 14:12, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 14:01, Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 12:34, James Ray wrote:
Jonas Björklund wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:02, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
not the default system address.
I have just tried to do this with
In response to James Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We have a concept of a system address (the machine itself) and a service
address (one for each service, say .2 == an apache service, .3 == an
bacula service, .4 == a dns service, where as .1 is a _system_ address)
all the interfaces will be on the
Hello,
I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32
binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release or
next to last release before the official 1.40 production release in the
second half of November.
There are quite a number of areas of
On Thursday 05 October 2006 15:03, James Ray wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:02, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {} resource. This is
not the
On Thu 05 Oct 2006 10:17, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I have no idea how to control which address is used for outgoing
communications other than by configuring your network gateway to go through
the preferred device, which may not do exactly what you want.
In any event, unless I am misunderstanding
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't had time to investigate whether the [FD|SD|DIR]Address sets
both the listening and the outgoing address, but a firewall audit is
on the TODO list, and when I finally get to it, I'll have to address
this for a number of
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 15:03, James Ray wrote:
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 11:02, James Ray wrote:
All,
I am wanting the communications from bacula to come out of the same IP
address I have DirAddress set as in the Director {}
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't had time to investigate whether the [FD|SD|DIR]Address sets
both the listening and the outgoing address, but a firewall audit is
on the TODO list, and when I finally get to
Greetings All,
Being a little new to Bacula, please forgive my questions if they are too
simplistic for the skill level of the mailing list as I am trying to learn
in more detail.
I have just installed Bacula onto a fresh install of a Fedora 5 server
(which we will mirror to another machine for
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't had time to investigate whether the [FD|SD|DIR]Address sets
both the listening and the outgoing address, but a firewall audit is
on the TODO list, and when I
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:29, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't had time to investigate whether the [FD|SD|DIR]Address sets
both the listening and the outgoing address, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Were you sure to restart after making these changes?
James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't had time to investigate whether the
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:29, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't had time to investigate whether the [FD|SD|DIR]Address sets
both the listening and the
On 5 Oct 2006 at 11:36, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Were you sure to restart after making these changes?
bacula-fd? Yes.
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:42, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:29, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't had time to investigate whether the
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:42, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:29, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't had time to investigate whether the
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:42, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:29, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't had time to investigate whether
Greetings All,
I was just considering more options for the backup system that we would
like to get in place and it occurred to me that it would be a great thing
if I could have the bacula client machines connect to the bacula server
via OpenVPN when it was time to do the backup and then
Oops, I forgot to reply to the list...
---BeginMessage---
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
On 10/4/2006 6:50 PM, Brandon King wrote:
Hello,
I have just added a second raid array to my bacula server and want to
have 2/3 of my incremental pool be on Array0 and the other 1/3 on Array1.
To set
On 5 Oct 2006 at 17:27, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:42, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:29, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:36, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 9:11, Bill
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:48:32AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings All,
I was just considering more options for the backup system that we would
like to get in place and it occurred to me that it would be a great thing
if I could have the bacula client machines connect to the bacula
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:52:44 -0400, Dan Langille said:
Priority: normal
Content-description: Mail message body
On 5 Oct 2006 at 17:27, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:42, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:29, James Ray wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 09:45, Frank Sweetser wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:48:32AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings All,
I was just considering more options for the backup system that we would
like to get in place and it occurred to me that it would be a great thing
if
On 5 Oct 2006 at 19:10, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:52:44 -0400, Dan Langille said:
Priority: normal
Content-description: Mail message body
On 5 Oct 2006 at 17:27, James Ray wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:42, James Ray wrote:
Dan
Hello all, Two questions -:
1. Is the tape encryption all or nothing, or is it possible to pick and
choose what files/directories are or are not? If so, how?
2. If a disaster occurred and all you had was the master key (lost the
individual client .pem file), how would you go about restoring
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32
binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release or
next to last release before the official 1.40 production release in the
second half of November.
On 5 Oct 2006 at 14:34, Dan Langille wrote:
On 5 Oct 2006 at 15:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32
binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release
or
next to last release before the official 1.40
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:14:17AM -0800, Joshua J. Kugler wrote:
My first thought is Access to the company's LAN, which the laptop (or other
machine) would not have otherwise. In other words, there can't even be a
connection for backup without starting up the VPN first.
Ah, like for
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:16:14 -0400, Dan Langille said:
Priority: normal
Content-description: Mail message body
On 5 Oct 2006 at 19:10, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:52:44 -0400, Dan Langille said:
Priority: normal
Content-description: Mail message body
On 5
Im getting the following error when I try to put a
second full backup onto tape. Where do I need to start do diagnose the problem?
05-Oct 16:06 athos-sd: FullBackup.2006-10-05_14.32.09 Error:
Unable to position to end of data on device Drive-1
(/dev/rmt/1cbn): ERR=dev.c:1298 read error
On 5 Oct 2006 at 21:13, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:16:14 -0400, Dan Langille said:
Priority: normal
Content-description: Mail message body
On 5 Oct 2006 at 19:10, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:52:44 -0400, Dan Langille said:
Priority: normal
On 5 Oct 2006 at 16:27, Alan Davis wrote:
I'm getting the following error when I try to put a second full backup
onto tape. Where do I need to start do diagnose the problem?
05-Oct 16:06 athos-sd: FullBackup.2006-10-05_14.32.09 Error: Unable to
position to end of data on device Drive-1
On Thursday 05 October 2006 08:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32
binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release
or next to last release before the official 1.40 production release in the
second half of
On Thursday 05 October 2006 22:40, Michael Brennen wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 08:14, Kern Sibbald wrote:
I have just released Bacula BETA 1.39.24.20061002 source and the Win32
binaries to Source Forge. This is very likely to be the last beta release
or next to last release before
If I understand correctly, your scenario is something like (I'm making
up the IP addresses, so don't read anything into them based on what you
have sent previously):
Machine A - bacula director
Primary IP - x.x.x.10
Bacula IP - x.x.x.11
Machine B - bacula fd
Primary IP - x.x.x.20
WWW IP -
Per Kern's request I've been trying to get the regress scripts set up to find
a bug in multi-drive usage. In a 4 tape autochanger library only one tape is
being used. Up to and including the 9/9/2006 beta multiple drives were being
used for archives in different Pools That seems have been
55 matches
Mail list logo
