Hello,
I installed bacula 13.0.2 on my Ubunut 20.04.5 System.
Now I want to know If it is possible to install bextract also.
When I want to use it the console says I have to install bacula-sd.
I have installed Bacula-sd over Bacula 13 repo
(bacula-mysql_13.0.2-1~focal_amd64.deb )
and cant ins
Please translate "dislink" to "dislike"
On 02/26/2016 03:52 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> This is not a bextract error per-se, rather when Bacula is reading the
> volume, the checksum it found in a block is not the same as the checksum
> it computed with the data that was read. Normally this means th
This is not a bextract error per-se, rather when Bacula is reading the
volume, the checksum it found in a block is not the same as the checksum
it computed with the data that was read. Normally this means that your
disk drive is going bad. In your case, you aare using a mounted volume,
and in
> In case it happens again I'll try and restart a single process at a time
and see if I can pinpoint the root cause better.
I build and repair computers for a living, and it's very common for hard
drives to begin to fail slowly, rather than die all at once.
The only way to know whats happening i
On 02/24/16 11:09, Wanderlei Huttel wrote:
> Have you tried to restore another job to check if occurs the same?
No.
However, after power cycling the NAS everything seems to work correctly
once again.
Sorry for the noise.
In case it happens again I'll try and restart a single process at a time
Have you tried to restore another job to check if occurs the same?
Atenciosamente
Wanderlei Hüttel
Enviado de Motorola Moto X2
Em 24 de fev de 2016 6:47 AM, "Andrea Venturoli" escreveu:
> On 02/24/16 10:13, Wanderlei Huttel wrote:
>
>> Hello Andrea
>>
>
> Hello.
>
>
>
> I guess the error is cle
On 02/24/16 10:13, Wanderlei Huttel wrote:
> Hello Andrea
Hello.
> I guess the error is clear, volume error!
Yes, it's clear; what isn't clear is the cause/reason.
> The job terminates fine?
Yes:
> Non-fatal FD errors:0
> SD Errors: 0
> FD termination status: OK
>
Hello Andrea
I guess the error is clear, volume error!
The job terminates fine?
Can you restore this job in bconsole?
Best Regards
Wanderlei Hüttel
Enviado de Motorola Moto X2
Em 24 de fev de 2016 5:44 AM, "Andrea Venturoli" escreveu:
> Hello.
>
> I'm getting an error and having an hard time
Hello.
I'm getting an error and having an hard time figuring the reason, so I'm
looking for some insight.
I have a job that backups a Windows client. It
_ dumps some databases in "Client Run Before Job";
_ backs the dump files normally to a NAS which is running bacula-sd;
_ runs a "Run After Job
On 02/07/15 02:49 PM, Bill Arlofski wrote:
> On 07/02/2015 02:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
>> I'm finishing up rebuilding a server and just need to get a few files
>> back from a backup. I've got bacula going to the point that I can test
>> the configuration files and not see any errors. However I haven
On 07/02/2015 02:17 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> I'm finishing up rebuilding a server and just need to get a few files
> back from a backup. I've got bacula going to the point that I can test
> the configuration files and not see any errors. However I haven't
> created any new pools yet. I want to mak
I'm finishing up rebuilding a server and just need to get a few files
back from a backup. I've got bacula going to the point that I can test
the configuration files and not see any errors. However I haven't
created any new pools yet. I want to make sure I don't touch the current
backup volumes
Hi experts.
I got an backup server that runs bacula director and storage, also the
server is a client too. The server periodically exports the backups to an
external device via bextract, with the folowing syntax:
# bextract -b /path/to/bsr/file/xxx.bsr /path/to/volumes/ /destiny/ >
/dev/null
The
Are wildcards in the -e file for exclude files handled? It would seem
that the answer is no. The man page is less than explicit in how this
file should be laid out. Any suggestions here?
The backstory is that I'm having to restore to bare metal, and I don't
know which volume has the configuration
> On Fri, 25 May 2012 17:17:05 -0300, Luis H Forchesatto said:
>
> It's possible to restore a backup that is stored in a remote server using
> bextract?
>
> I use bextract -b /var/lib/bacula/intranet.bsr /storage/backup/
> $MOUNT_POINT/smbserver where /storage/backup/ is in the local server,
Hi
It's possible to restore a backup that is stored in a remote server using
bextract?
I use bextract -b /var/lib/bacula/intranet.bsr /storage/backup/
$MOUNT_POINT/smbserver where /storage/backup/ is in the local server, but
cat this directory be located on a remote server? E mean, restore from
v
On 07/13/2011 12:01 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:47:31 +0200, Pierre Bourgin said:
>>
>> This bug is corrected "only" in the devel branch code.
>> So I just have to wait some weeks for the 5.2 release or backport the
>> patch on the 5.0.3 code on my own, right ?
>
> Yes.
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:47:31 +0200, Pierre Bourgin said:
>
> This bug is corrected "only" in the devel branch code.
> So I just have to wait some weeks for the 5.2 release or backport the
> patch on the 5.0.3 code on my own, right ?
Yes. The patch in bug 1703 should work in 5.0.3 too, so
On 07/12/2011 06:02 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:15:59 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
>>
>> - "Martin Simmons" wrote:
>>
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:42:35 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
Hello,
I have installed bacula 5.0.3 on a CentOS
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:15:59 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
>
> - "Martin Simmons" wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:42:35 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have installed bacula 5.0.3 on a CentOS 5.4 x86_64 system (RPM
> > x86_64 rebuilt
- "Martin Simmons" wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:42:35 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have installed bacula 5.0.3 on a CentOS 5.4 x86_64 system (RPM
> x86_64 rebuilt from source) and it's working great since a year.
> >
> > After a mistake I mad, I need
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:42:35 +0200 (CEST), Pierre Bourgin said:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have installed bacula 5.0.3 on a CentOS 5.4 x86_64 system (RPM x86_64
> rebuilt from source) and it's working great since a year.
>
> After a mistake I mad, I need to restore my catalog.
> So I tried to use b
Success!!
Given the difficulties I was having with bextract, I decided to go back to
bscan an try again (3th time) to get the volume into the database and use
restore to get the files I needed. It worked!..
I think what was happening before was the nightly jobs were running and pruning
the
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:07:35 -0500, Troy Kocher said:
>
> All,
>
> I could really use some ideas..
>
> #bextract -d99 -i databaselist.rest -V DatabaseF-0027 /data/bacula /data/tmp
> bextract: stored_conf.c:698-0 Inserting director res: foobar-dir
> bextract: butil.c:282 Using devi
All,
I could really use some ideas..
#bextract -d99 -i databaselist.rest -V DatabaseF-0027 /data/bacula /data/tmp
bextract: stored_conf.c:698-0 Inserting director res: foobar-dir
bextract: butil.c:282 Using device: "/data/bacula" for reading.
bextract: acquire.c:109-0 MediaType dcr= dev=
Hi,
I have a backup, created as a VirtualFull on a LTO2 tape
(Bacula-5.0.2), and its bootstrap file. I am trying to extract some
files from this backup.
Depending on combinations of -e exclude_file and -i include_file, I
have been able to get only empty directories (no files at all), or
everythin
Hi everyone,
I found many questions related to this issue, but no satisfying answer
up to now. When I use bconsole to restore a file I get the correct file
and filesize. When I use bextract to restore the same file, I get this
error message:
bextract JobId 0: drwxrwxrwx 1 root root
Andy Howell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was testing extracting the catalog from disk volume, only to find the
> machine swapping,
> and bextract using more the 3Gb res mem, 4+Gb virtual. I had compression
> turned on in the
> catalog fileset. When I turned that off, ran BackupCatalog again to
Hello,
I was testing extracting the catalog from disk volume, only to find the
machine swapping,
and bextract using more the 3Gb res mem, 4+Gb virtual. I had compression turned
on in the
catalog fileset. When I turned that off, ran BackupCatalog again to a new disk
volume, I
was able
> On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 04:34:52 -0700 (PDT), cby said:
>
> Jesper
>
>
> Jesper Krogh wrote:
> >
> >> I fired up bextract (standard bacula restore is not appropriate in this
> >> case) which restored the first occurrence of the file as expected.
> >> However,
> >> instead of halting after r
Jesper
Jesper Krogh wrote:
>
>> I fired up bextract (standard bacula restore is not appropriate in this
>> case) which restored the first occurrence of the file as expected.
>> However,
>> instead of halting after restoring the file, bextract continued to the
>> end
>> of the tape and found a
> I fired up bextract (standard bacula restore is not appropriate in this
> case) which restored the first occurrence of the file as expected. However,
> instead of halting after restoring the file, bextract continued to the end
> of the tape and found a second occurrence with the same filename wh
Martin
Thanks for the pointer. Looks like it's the way to go.
cby
Martin Simmons wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:40:33 -0700 (PDT), cby said:
>>
>> Running bacula on Centos 5.2 I have a tape volume which has more than one
>> occurrence of the same filename as a result of appending to
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:40:33 -0700 (PDT), cby said:
>
> Running bacula on Centos 5.2 I have a tape volume which has more than one
> occurrence of the same filename as a result of appending to tape. I needed
> to restore the first file.
>
> I fired up bextract (standard bacula restore is n
Hi
Running bacula on Centos 5.2 I have a tape volume which has more than one
occurrence of the same filename as a result of appending to tape. I needed
to restore the first file.
I fired up bextract (standard bacula restore is not appropriate in this
case) which restored the first occurrence of
Hello,
we are planning to use data encryption in bacula.
We made some tests and everything works fine except restore of
backup with one or more volumes missing.
I would like to ask, if there is any way how to extract encrypted data
from volumes? Bacula itself won't run restore job or fail if w
I try to bextract one volume, this volume was build on windows system,
and backuped up on linux
backup01:/etc/bacula# bextract /virtual/backup1/volume-daily-0001 /tmp
bextract: butil.c:269 Using device: "/virtual/backup1" for reading.
10-lut 16:59 bextract: Ready to read from volume "volume-daily
Hello!
thanks Martin!
first I installed winbacula in a win xp computer, second I
reconfigured the server and third I extract all files using bextract.
It works and I have my files.
Marco
2007/6/22, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It is impossible using bextract on unix.
>
> The best way is
It is impossible using bextract on unix.
The best way is to use bscan to put the jobs back into the catalog and then
restore them as normal. With Bacula 2.x, you can probably do the restore on
unix to get the main data stream in the file.
You could also try the latest winbacula beta, which I thi
Do you mean that now it's too late and I can not extract useable data
from the volume?
Marco
2007/6/22, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:41:28 +0200, Marco Strullato said:
> >
> > Hi all!
> > I found an old thread about the same problem:
> >
> > http://www.mail-
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:41:28 +0200, Marco Strullato said:
>
> Hi all!
> I found an old thread about the same problem:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg10945.html
>
> between Kern Sibbald and Timo Eissler
>
> That thread finished with that sentece of Ke
Hi all!
I found an old thread about the same problem:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg10945.html
between Kern Sibbald and Timo Eissler
That thread finished with that sentece of Kern:
It looks like the BackupRead header information is not being correctly parsed.
Hi!
I add some info.
After recovery, when I open the file daemon config file with ultraedit I have:
¼ € 0 L /Õìm 8»$C
2ë /Õìm 8»$C
2 p ÿ ÿ $ ÿ
/Õìm 8»$C
2ë (c)
Hi all!
I have a big problem with bacula: a windows pc crashed and I have to
restore all data.
Because of some unluckly facts I have to restore directly from the
volume: I have a full backup of that pc. I used bextract and I get all
files but they are unreadable! I mean Every kind of files, from t
Michel Meyers wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Emery Guevremont wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
>> volume. Here's the command I ran:
>>
> [...]
>
>> I've got the pem file of the client copied on thi
Hello,
I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
volume. Here's the command I ran:
bextract -V 24 -b /var/bacula/backup-dir.restore.4.bsr -v /dev/nst0 /tmp
and here's the error message I got:
bextract: match.c:249 add_fname_to_include prefix=0 gzip=0 fname=/
bext
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:23:10 -0400, Ryan Novosielski said:
>
> Emery Guevremont wrote:
> > Michel Meyers wrote:
> > Emery Guevremont wrote:
> >
> Hello,
>
> I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
> volume. Here's the command I ran:
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emery Guevremont wrote:
> Michel Meyers wrote:
> Emery Guevremont wrote:
>
Hello,
I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
volume. Here's the command I ran:
> [...]
>
I've got the pem f
Michel Meyers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emery Guevremont wrote:
Hello,
I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
volume. Here's the command I ran:
[...]
I've got the pem file of the client copied on this machine, but I don't
kn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emery Guevremont wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
> volume. Here's the command I ran:
[...]
>
> I've got the pem file of the client copied on this machine, but I don't
> know how I'm supposed to
Hello,
I'm in the middle of trying to bextract a file that's encrypted on a
volume. Here's the command I ran:
bextract -V 24 -b /var/bacula/backup-dir.restore.4.bsr -v /dev/nst0 /tmp
and here's the error message I got:
bextract: match.c:249 add_fname_to_include prefix=0 gzip=0 fname=/
bext
re about at this time.
> >
> > So is there any tool which will allow me restore my files without
> > permissions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> >> -Original Message-----
> >> From: Ryan Novosielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >&g
al Message-
>> From: Ryan Novosielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 5:28 PM
>> To: David Michal
>> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bextract and Win32 data stream not
>> supported on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would be really surprised if this is not in the FAQ by now, but it
gets asked regularly on this list. Searching the archives could have
yielded a faster answer.
In any case, Win32 streams are not restoreable to Linux hosts unless
they are configured
Hello,
I have one bacula archive I need to restore data from. All I want is
just extract whole content of the archive and then manually move files.
So I did: bextract -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf archive /root/restore
And I've got: bextract Error: Win32 data stream not supported on this
Cli
Hello,
I have one bacula archive I need to restore data from. All I want is
just extract whole content of the archive and then manually move files.
So I did: bextract -c /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf archive /root/restore
And I've got: bextract Error: Win32 data stream not supported on this
Cli
bextract -V Volume-0001 -p -v File /home/myuser
where "File" is a resource defined in bacula-sd.conf, u will need "-c"
option for specify configuration file. Try "man bextract" =)
2006/11/21, Jean-Michel Caricand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I want to use bextract to restore a directory. My v
Hi,
I want to use bextract to restore a directory. My volume is
named /tmp/Volume-0001 and the directoy /home/myuser.
What is the correct syntax ?
Thank.
Jean-Michel Caricand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste
sur www.laposte.net ou sur 3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34
Will bextract allow me to get the raw file out of my volume? I am really
struggling to see how it works from the docs.
--
Tom Newton
SmoothWall Limited
1 John Charles Way
Leeds
LS12 6QA
United Kingdom
www.smoothwall.net
Phone: +44-(0)870 1 999 500
DDI: +44-(0)113 38 74 166
Fax: +44-(0)870 1
cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:
[Bacula-users] bextract not extracting windows
I find the chapter on bextract in the manual is very short - I don't see
any mention on how to send data to a windows client
>You are probably not extracting it to the windows client.
>
>If you extract it to a Linux client, you'll get that error. Try sending it
to
>the FD on the Windows PC.
>
>Gre
You are probably not extracting it to the windows client.
If you extract it to a Linux client, you'll get that error. Try sending it to
the FD on the Windows PC.
Greetings,
Ger.
Op dinsdag 20 juni 2006 13:32, schreef [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to extract one file from a diskvol
Hello,
I am trying to extract one file from a diskvolume and get this error:
" bextract error: Win32 GZIP data stream not supported on this client."
Does this mean that it does not extract W-data or am I doing something
wrong?
This is version 1.38.0 - I think I remember something mentioned on t
Greetings,
System Information:
Server:Dell PowerEdge 2650
OS:CentOS 4.2 (fully updated)
SCSI Card: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic LSI8952U
Tape Unit: Exabyte Magnum 1x7 LTO-3 Tape Library w/
IBM Ultriam-TD3 drive
Bacula:1.38.5 (SQLite RPM)
rpm -qi output and tapeinfo output
Hey,
We're running Bacula 1.36.3 on Debian/Sarge (standard Debian packages)
on a standard PC (AMD Athlon XP, IDE hard discs, one HP DDS4 SCSI
streamer). We're backing up six Linux clients and one Windows client
simultaneously, meaning the data from the clients is interleaved on the
tapes.
Now I w
> On Wednesday 18 January 2006 06:34, Jo Rhett wrote:
> > Oh, no. /d is a new filesystem on the freshly built server, and
> > '/d/restores' is the directory I'm bextracting to.
> >
> > Any thoughts on this problem? Any debug I can get for you?
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:40:23AM +0100, Kern Sibb
Hello,
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 06:34, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Oh, no. /d is a new filesystem on the freshly built server, and
> '/d/restores' is the directory I'm bextracting to.
>
> Any thoughts on this problem? Any debug I can get for you?
The output you are showing is very strange. I've never
Oh, no. /d is a new filesystem on the freshly built server, and '/d/restores'
is the directory I'm bextracting to.
Any thoughts on this problem? Any debug I can get for you?
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:07:22AM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I guess I was incorrectly interpreting the /d/restores as
Nope. These are freebsd filesystems from the bacula server itself. There
are windows backups on different tapes, none on these tapes.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:51:18PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> It appears that you are dealing with a Win32 client. One important
> consideration here is that
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 05:41, Jo Rhett wrote:
> Nope. These are freebsd filesystems from the bacula server itself. There
> are windows backups on different tapes, none on these tapes.
I guess I was incorrectly interpreting the /d/restores as a Win32
directory ...
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 a
On Monday 16 January 2006 08:06, Jo Rhett wrote:
> FreeBSD 6.0p2 with Bacula 1.36.3 stock compile options. It's a DDS-3 tape
> drive. The other threads talk about not being able to do a restore from
> the catalog is the same thing.
>
> Anyway, I'm pretty sure this is a bug now. Why?
It appear
FreeBSD 6.0p2 with Bacula 1.36.3 stock compile options. It's a DDS-3 tape
drive. The other threads talk about not being able to do a restore from
the catalog is the same thing.
Anyway, I'm pretty sure this is a bug now. Why? Because I get exactly one
each time it changes directory, in or out.
Too bad we still don't know anything about your "setup".
Version, Hardware, OS, ...
Moin btw. ;]
M.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 - 5:57pm, Jo Rhett wrote:
>So I'm successfully restoring from bextract, but it shows this...
>
>bextract: drwx-- 2 501 500 512 2005-10-09 20:37:09 *none*
>
So I'm successfully restoring from bextract, but it shows this...
bextract: drwx-- 2 501 500 512 2005-10-09 20:37:09 *none*
bextract: drwx-- 3 501 500 512 2005-10-05 23:31:50 *none*
bextract: drwx-- 3 501 500 512 2005-10-05 23:31:50 *none
On 10/3/2005 4:42 PM Drew Tomlinson wrote:
On 10/3/2005 12:27 PM Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
On 03.10.2005 21:00, Dean Waldow wrote:
I also have have learned I have to stop bacula (likely the bacula-sd
daemon) to use either 'mt -t /dev/st0 COMMAND' or 'btape ... ' for
testing. It appears th
On 10/3/2005 12:27 PM Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
On 03.10.2005 21:00, Dean Waldow wrote:
I also have have learned I have to stop bacula (likely the bacula-sd
daemon) to use either 'mt -t /dev/st0 COMMAND' or 'btape ... ' for
testing. It appears that bacula has the device in use because I
de
You've probably already tried this, but I have had a problem
occasionally before of getting the device busy error when trying to use
mt-st, and just stopping the bacula daemons has gotten rid of it. Worth
a shot, anyhow, if you haven't tried already. Doesn't answer the rest
of your question,
Hello,
On 03.10.2005 21:00, Dean Waldow wrote:
I also have have learned I have to stop bacula (likely the bacula-sd
daemon) to use either 'mt -t /dev/st0 COMMAND' or 'btape ... ' for
testing. It appears that bacula has the device in use because I defined
it already in the bacula-sd.conf file.
I also have have learned I have to stop bacula (likely the bacula-sd daemon) to use either 'mt -t /dev/st0 COMMAND' or 'btape ... ' for testing. It appears that bacula has the device in use because I defined it already in the bacula-sd.conf file. It is likely documented some where but I didn't see
Hello,
On 02.10.2005 17:50, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I'm still stuck on this. Any attempts to eject the tape with 'mt' or
'camcontrol' result in 'device busy' errors. Thus I assume that
bextract has a hold of the device and won't let the tape eject. Is
there some config or command line option
I'm still stuck on this. Any attempts to eject the tape with 'mt' or
'camcontrol' result in 'device busy' errors. Thus I assume that
bextract has a hold of the device and won't let the tape eject. Is
there some config or command line option that I need to add so bextract
will eject the tape
I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 and using bextract 1.36.3 to restore multiple
tape volumes to a drive I lost. It's giving me the following message:
29-Sep 10:39 bextract: End of Volume at file 16 on device /dev/nsa0,
Volume
"TAPE-0003|TAPE-0004|TAPE-0005|TAPE-0006|TAPE-0010|TAPE-0011|TAPE-0012"
29-Se
Hi ,
First let me explain what I am trying to do. I backup about 4 servers on a
daily basis with full backups once a month , differentials weekly and
incrementals daily. What I am trying to accomplish now , is using "bcopy" to
copy the daily incr volumes to an offsite disk (this is all file bas
Hi ,
Ok tried the bextract cmd again got :
bextract -V apolloprofilesfull-0001 /offsite1/apolloprofiles /tmp
bextract: butil.c:258 Using device: "/offsite1/apolloprofiles" for
reading.
01-Apr 13:14 bextract: bextract Warning: Could not unserialize Volume
label: ERR=label.c:205 Expecting Volume L
84 matches
Mail list logo
