On February 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi!
Something is wrong with the completion routine in latest CVS. If the
Completion Buffer pops up selecting a choice causes the buffer to be
closed but no expansion on the so far typed name gets done.
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01)
On February 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
emacs or xemacs?
Silly of me to miss that, sorry. You had it in your post. Doh.
Waider. I should read more slowly.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
I really need to reinstate the witty comments, dammit.
On Friday, February 16 2001 15:11:57, Raymond Scholz wrote:
Something is wrong with the completion routine in latest CVS. If the
Completion Buffer pops up selecting a choice causes the buffer to be
closed but no expansion on the so far typed name gets done.
What do you mean by no expansion?
On Friday, February 16 2001 17:52:52, Raymond Scholz wrote:
[...]
Uhm, yes that's what I expected BBDB to do in this case. But the
reason for my crying about the completion was another.
Has it ever done this before?
Suppose you are in my BBDB and another guy called Robert, a good
friend of
Robert Fenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uhm, yes that's what I expected BBDB to do in this case. But the
reason for my crying about the completion was another.
Has it ever done this before?
Don't think so, but I'd like it :)
Give him an mail-alias (e.g. robf) or an unique AKA, since
Okay, this is officially irritating me.
1. Why is xemacs telling me that bbdb-autoloads is already loaded,
when I have nothing to load it in my .emacs?
2. Why is it a fatal error to load bbdb-autoloads twice? If this is a
"my version vs. your version issue, wouldn't it be more sensible
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
Okay, this is officially irritating me.
1. Why is xemacs telling me that bbdb-autoloads is already loaded,
when I have nothing to load it in my .emacs?
If you have the package installed, it's probably done by the packaging
system to ensure that the
On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If you have the package installed, it's probably done by the packaging
system to ensure that the autoload functions are available.
Packages are designed to be available (autoloads only) when they are
installed, IIRC.
Okay; that's not solving the
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
On February 17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
Oh dear. I've just realised what the problem is. bbdb-initialize does
(load "bbdb-autoloads"), IIRC. D'oh. I'm leaving the above text to
show you that I am an idiot who misses the obvious from time to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Grojohann) writes:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Ronan Waide wrote:
Wow. If I'd known you simply wanted it to stop noticing anything,
I'd've told you to read the manual ages ago!
I think what Harry really wants is to have two entries in his BBDB:
Harry Putnam [EMAIL
10 matches
Mail list logo
