Re: record "" unhas network addresses

2002-01-13 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
Robert Fenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday, January 12, 2002 at 14:04:44, Alex Schroeder wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam C. Finnefrock) writes: > > > > > Is it a crime to have a BBDB entry without a net field? :) > > > Seriously, should I

record "" unhas network addresses

2002-01-11 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
(GNU Emacs 20.7.1, BBDB version 2.33 ($Date: 2002/01/06 22:07:20 $) ) When sending e-mail, I get the repeated warning, record "" unhas network addresses This comes from bbdb-com.el : (if (not bbdb-silent-running) (bbdb-warn "record \"\" unhas network addresses"

vcard -> bbdb

2001-02-15 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gnu.emacs.gnus as well. Just wondering, before re-inventing, if anyone had written lisp to read vcards from an (gnus) e-mail into bbdb. (Not talking about syncing to a palm, replacing bbdb, etc., just a one-way input

Re: Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-02-14 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
Jack Twilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> "Adam" == Adam C Finnefrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Adam> I only use gnus-private, so that I can have per-user sorting, > Adam> without an regexp entry for each person in BBDB. >

Re: Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-02-13 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
I only use gnus-private, so that I can have per-user sorting, without an regexp entry for each person in BBDB. gnus-public will handle mailing lists, but it's intended to override gnus-private and uses regexps. You set up rules with it instead of what you currently have in nnmail-split-fancy, bu

Re: Replacing Gnus nnmail-split-fancy badness with bbdb goodness

2001-01-27 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
Jack Twilley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've got a brutally ugly and hard-to-maintain nnmail-split-fancy > variable in my .gnus file and I vaguely remember someone having > documented some way to add something to a bbdb record, and then have > gnus magically file emails sent to that person int

Re: SyncBBDB ignores common fields

2000-11-22 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
Hi Arcady, I'm going to answer as a fellow user, not the developer or even someone really familiar with the code. > > For example, *some* phone numbers' modifiers were not imported (were > imported with an empty modifier). Fields `fax' were not imported. > Only one email out of a list usually

Re: which bbdb?

2000-11-06 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I too have tried SyncBBDB and had trouble getting the necessary perl > framework set up. I, too, had a lot of difficulty with this. The fault lies with pilotmgr, not SyncBBDB. After about three hours I got it. I can help someone else, if they have a l

Re: Postal codes

2000-07-15 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I find phone canonicalization enormously useful. > > I think we should keep all phone numbers as strings, and have a user > variable bbdb-phone-canonicalize which should be nil for "as is" or a > function which is applied to the phone and should return

Re: `bbdb-current-field' is sometimes off by one

2000-06-06 Thread Adam C. Finnefrock
Ronan Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On June 6, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > > > It seems that the line-count in `bbdb-current-field' is off by one, > > but I have not been able to debug this (yet)... So currently this is > > just a bug report. :) > > > > Alex. > > Yep, I've seen this on