On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:34:19 +0200 Robert Widhopf-Fenk wrote:
Robert On Monday, April 12, 2004 at 10:58:02, Jochen Küpper wrote:
I do not want entries from mailer-daemons in my bbdb, so I configure
bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all, but it doesn't work.
Robert You want one of the bbdb-ignore*-hook
-notes-ignore-all, but it doesn't work.
,[ C-h v bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all RET ]
| bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all's value is
| ((From . MAILER-DAEMON.*)
| (From . Mailer-Daemon.*)
| (From . mailer-daemon.*))
`
Any ideas on what I might be doing wrong? Where shall I look for
issues
,
| GNU Emacs 21.2.1 (i686-pc-cygwin, X toolkit) of 2003-01-23 on DRACO
| No Gnus v0.2
| BBDB version 2.35 ($Date: 2004/03/22 15:23:33 $)
`
I do not want entries from mailer-daemons in my bbdb, so I configure
bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all, but it doesn't work.
,[ C-h v bbdb-auto-notes
On July 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I hear because it says so in the source and info files and the docstring
for bbdb-notice-hook, but I've not tested it personally for some
years. :)
Sorry, my bad. You are correct, of course.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very
On July 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Keeping the default behavior is usually the best thing we
can do and with Waiders and Gods help we did it more than
once, but not if it:
More like Waider's interference and Robert's patience with same :)
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very
On Sunday, July 27, 2003 at 11:47:26, Mats Lidell wrote:
Robert wrote:
Robert Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
Robert break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
Robert record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
Isn't is possible to keep the
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Ronan Waide moaned:
On July 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yes, but that collides with caching sometimes (I hear; I use Gnus
so don't `benefit' from the caching).
Not to be picky about it, but I'd prefer it does or it doesn't
rather than I hear. There's enough trickiness
On July 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
1) The point is: IF THERE IS ALREADY AN RECORD FOR THIS PERSON!
Ah, good point.
2) The change of bbdb-always-add-addresses's semantic allows
NOT-SO-LISP-EXPERIENCED users to utilize the same hooks as
for ignore-(some|all)-messages, i.e. all they need is
Robert wrote:
Robert Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
Robert break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
Robert record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
Isn't is possible to keep the default behavior when the address isn't
ignored?
Yours
--
%%
as records
in my BBDB. Therefore I wrote the following:
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore
'(
(From . [EMAIL PROTECTED])))
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all
'(
(From . [EMAIL PROTECTED])))
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to work because BBDB asks me if I
want to add these addresses
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Ronan Waide moaned:
One other thing that occurred to me that operates in this space is
bbdb-notice-hook.
Yes, but that collides with caching sometimes (I hear; I use Gnus
so don't `benefit' from the caching).
--
`We cannot get a new line down the pipe due to a blockage
On July 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Yes, but that collides with caching sometimes (I hear; I use Gnus
so don't `benefit' from the caching).
Not to be picky about it, but I'd prefer it does or it doesn't
rather than I hear. There's enough trickiness in BBDB as it stands
without adding rumours to
On Thursday, July 24, 2003 at 16:25:44, Ronan Waide wrote:
On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
So have a look at this
wrote the following:
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore
'(
(From . [EMAIL PROTECTED])))
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all
'(
(From . [EMAIL PROTECTED])))
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to work because BBDB asks me if I
want to add these addresses to my friends who already
want to have these addresses as
records in my BBDB. Therefore I wrote the following:
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore
'(
(From . [EMAIL PROTECTED])))
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all
'(
(From . [EMAIL PROTECTED])))
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to work
On July 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Thus I propose the following change ... however this will
break default behavior, i.e. being asked to create a new
record for people which are already in the BBDB ...
So have a look at this an vote for it or against ...
What does your patch do that, say,
'(
(From . [EMAIL PROTECTED])))
(setq bbdb-auto-notes-ignore-all
'(
(From . [EMAIL PROTECTED])))
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to work because BBDB asks me if I want
to add these addresses to my friends who already got an entry in my
database. Any ideas?
I use BBDB 2.35 (2003/04/09
17 matches
Mail list logo
