On Thursday 05 July 2001 08:58, Curtis Poe wrote:
> --- Greg Jetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well you found one here , I've worked with it since the first version ,
> > in fact I work with it daily , it's how I earn my daily bread. You can
> > not separate it's shortcommings from the que
AIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Jul 05 09:57:09 PDT 2001
Subject: Re: Configuring cgi scripts on Windows2000
>On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Greg Jetter wrote:
>
>> My stance on O/S's is use which ever one does the job your trying to
>> accomplish. Same with Scripti
--- Greg Jetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well you found one here , I've worked with it since the first version , in
> fact I work with it daily , it's how I earn my daily bread. You can not
> separate it's shortcommings from the question posed about UID . I see you
> offered no advice
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Greg Jetter wrote:
> My stance on O/S's is use which ever one does the job your trying to
> accomplish. Same with Scripting langauages or hardware. Just what is your
> problem bud ? Instead of attacking me why don't you sugest how this problem
> might be resolved ? do you
thing other than how to start a
flame war ?
Greg
20 year computer programer
Perl novice and advancing .
>
> -Original Message-
> From: RL Autry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 8:36 PM
> To: Greg Jetter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: C
This is just an FYI on uid:
uid is the User ID number. It comes from the /etc/passwd file on unix
systems. Each person who has a login has a UID and a GUI (group ID #)
in the passwd file.
HTH
#
#We have a problem with many of our cgi requiring a "uid"
#which in this case doesn't exist because
At 11:36 PM 7/4/2001, Steve Howard wrote:
>However, a discussion of OS's would be about like a political discussion,
>and I think is certainly out of place here. I'd much rather stay to the
>programming issues.
Well taken and we will take it off list.
Sorry about that.
Thanks,
RL
ing issues.
Steve H.
-Original Message-
From: RL Autry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 8:36 PM
To: Greg Jetter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Configuring cgi scripts on Windows2000
At 08:26 PM 7/4/2001, Greg Jetter wrote:
>Your best bet is to stay with a Unix based provid
At 08:26 PM 7/4/2001, Greg Jetter wrote:
>Your best bet is to stay with a Unix based provider. There is a
>reason why developers choose to develope on Linux/Unix and not Windows crap
>. This is one of them..
>
>
>Greg
Will do on the copyright suggestion.
I wanted to make them all availabl
On Wednesday 04 July 2001 13:42, RL Autry wrote:
> We have a problem with many of our cgi requiring a "uid"
> which in this case doesn't exist because (we are told)
> it is not used on our present OS (Windows2000).
>
> 1) Is there a hack to require the equivalent of a "uid"?
> (so the scripts can
10 matches
Mail list logo
