Mitch Harding;285832 Wrote:
I just installed it, looks good. One thing -- I had previously been
running
7.0 gold, and I was a little surprised that it didn't prompt me to
update my
controller software. Does this mean there have been no updates for
the
controller between 7.0 and the
Ah, I did not realize that. Thanks for the heads up!
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:01 AM, funkstar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mitch Harding;285832 Wrote:
I just installed it, looks good. One thing -- I had previously been
running
7.0 gold, and I was a little surprised that it didn't prompt
On Apr 1, 2008, at 1:34 PM, erland wrote:
andyg;285808 Wrote:
Plugins will currently need to update their install.xml files to
change the maxVersion value to '*' instead of '7.0+'.
Is this really what we want ?
I thought the whole idea with maxVersion was to make sure to now allow
plugins
andyg;285808 Wrote:
Plugins will currently need to update their install.xml files to
change the maxVersion value to '*' instead of '7.0+'.
Is this really what we want ?
I thought the whole idea with maxVersion was to make sure to now allow
plugins to run unless they have been tested by the
andyg;286150 Wrote:
I assumed 7.0+ would include 7.0 and anything higher, but this didn't
work for 7.1. So I just went with * to get our plugins working again
quickly. It would certainly be better to fix the version parser to
work properly.
How far can I increase maxVersion
tamanaco;285685 Wrote:
No Windows 7.01 nigthly builds either yesterday or today. Am I looking
using the right URLs?
http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/nightly/SqueezeCenter_trunk_v2008-03-30/
http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/nightly/SqueezeCenter_trunk_v2008-03-31/
I have my Debian box pointing to the testing tree, but it still shows 7.0 -
17983 as the latest available. Am I doing something wrong? Why is Debian
not picking up the 7.0.1-18219 build that I see in the nightly directory?
Thanks for any help!
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Diranged
[EMAIL
Mitch It's now changed by the powers that be to 18223.
Mike.
--
mudlark
SB3CyrusDACXPreXvsNAP140+260AKEFiQ7, Avondale and Naim cable,
Kubuntu Gusty Gibbon server, linkstation for storage.
DIY SB3 3A linear power supply.
Using SqueezeCentre 7.0.1 testing
Hi Folks,
I've tried unstable again and the default desktop has returned to
normal with internet radio, music services and favourites returning.
My 7.0 pluigins alien bbc, lyrics and review don't appear in the left
page menu, they appear in the settings plugin structure. The settings
tab
On Mar 31, 2008, at 2:07 PM, mudlark wrote:
Hi Folks,
I've tried unstable again and the default desktop has returned to
normal with internet radio, music services and favourites returning.
My 7.0 pluigins alien bbc, lyrics and review don't appear in the left
page menu, they appear in the
andyg;285808 Wrote:
On Mar 31, 2008, at 2:07 PM, mudlark wrote:[color=blue]
Plugins will currently need to update their install.xml files to
change the maxVersion value to '*' instead of '7.0+'.
Thanks Andy,
I guessed as much. I will be patient and await the return of the
plugins.
Index of /downloads/nightly/latest/trunk
Icon Name Last modified Size
Description[DIR] Parent Directory
-
[ ] SqueezeCenter-7.0.1-18170.dmg30-Mar-2008 00:17 25M
Mac OS X Disk Image
[TXT]
has probably something to do with all those plugins not being specified
for 7.1 (which is okay as there is no 7.1 release at all, but could be
fixed by tweaking those install.xml files)
kind regards,
Markus
--
schiegl
schiegl;284946 Wrote:
has probably something to do with all those plugins not being specified
for 7.1 (which is okay as there is no 7.1 release at all, but could be
fixed by tweaking those install.xml files)
kind regards,
Markus
Marcus,
I have included above the fact that I am missing
Did the links to download the nightly builds changed? I tried
http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/nightly/latest/trunk/, but there
is no 7.0.1 Windows build.
I also tried http://www.slimdevices.com/downloads/nightly/latest/7.0/,
but is dated March 3rd
--
tamanaco
mudlark wrote:
Try not to be so flipping sarky...Don't treat me as if i came off the
boat yesterday.
There have been numerous announcements about the recent changes,
including the fact that trunk will go unstable.
Choosing a title like today's build a real mess to describe the status
of a
I know about the change of trunk?
Things have changed before without such obvious perturbations of the
default desktop. I was sending information, I wasn't whining. I don't
expect my problems to be sorted as the build isn't that sort of build.
I know that.
Perhaps it would be better if
mudlark wrote:
Perhaps it would be better if you don't respond to this post. I never
wanted a response in the first place...
Then perhaps it would have been better if you hadn't written it in the
first place?
Big kiss,
R.
___
beta mailing list
Robin Bowes;285033 Wrote:
mudlark wrote:
Try not to be so flipping sarky...Don't treat me as if i came off
the
boat yesterday.
There have been numerous announcements about the recent changes,
including the fact that trunk will go unstable.
There are currently _four_ trunks. The
Robin Bowes;285100 Wrote:
mudlark wrote:
Perhaps it would be better if you don't respond to this post. I
never
wanted a response in the first place...
Then perhaps it would have been better if you hadn't written it in the
first place?
Big kiss,
R.
I am not a number I am a
mudlark;285092 Wrote:
Things have changed before without such obvious
perturbations of the default desktop.
... but then again the first builds of SC7 with the new interface
weren't exactly plug'n play.
That said, the stability of unstable trunk builds can vary across
projects and
SqueezeCenter Version: 7.1 - 18153 - Debian - EN - utf8
Server IP address: 192.168.1.15
Perl Version: 5.8.8 i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi
MySQL Version: 5.0.45-Debian_1ubuntu3.3
Platform Architecture: i686-linux
Dear critics and those that aren't. I have recreated my previous
situation for your
bhaagensen;285139 Wrote:
... but then again the first builds of SC7 with the new interface
weren't exactly plug'n play.
That said, the stability of unstable trunk builds can vary across
projects and companies, and historically the unstable SC builds have
been very polished for long period
mudlark;285140 Wrote:
SqueezeCenter Version: 7.1
So kdf nailed it. You've checked out a branch that is now known to be
very unstable.
You say you know about the recent changes to branching. I'm afraid
you don't understand the implications. It's a very large departure
from past procedure.
JJZolx;285148 Wrote:
So kdf nailed it. You've checked out a branch that is now known to be
very unstable.
You say you know about the recent changes to branching. I'm afraid
you don't understand the implications. It's a very large departure
from past procedure. In the past, the 'trunk'
To install the latest stable release (SlimServer 7.0) update your
/etc/apt/sources.list to include:
deb http://debian.slimdevices.com stable main
To install the latest testing release (SqueezeCenter 7.0.1) update your
/etc/apt/sources.list to include:
deb http://debian.slimdevices.com testing
I tried today's build and the players ettings have changed.
left screen has lost plugins and squeezenetwork.
Trying to role back to stable and the right screen artworks are huge
and all is a mess.
Mike.
--
mudlark
SB3CyrusDACXPreXvsNAP140+260AKEFiQ7, Avondale and Naim cable,
Kubuntu Gusty
Sounds like you went for 7.1, which is very much NOT beta.
Not the best plan as that is currently where experimental changes are
being added. It should only be taken on by those who can diagnose
problems for themselves and take part in the fix. Posting about daily
builds being a real mess
Sorry kdf,
i have posted regularly in the past and i usually run with unstable.
Today is very different so I thought I would let you know. I am
assuming a replacement will appear soon such as tomorrow. If you would
like more details of my experience I can help. frankly I am tired and
off to
29 matches
Mail list logo
