> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 13:05:43 -0400
> From: Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Blackbox web site]
>
> "Mr. Brigham Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Originally I understood the use of "Un*x" was to protect against
> > lawsuits from
> Subject: Re: "Emulating" a right-click on the root window
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 10:55:59 -0400
> From: Roy Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "blackbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >Is there anyway to send an event/atom/whatever to the
> >root window to say "hey buddy, someone right-clicked
> >on yo
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:44:31 +0200
> From: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: blackbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [bbkeys] X error: BadWindow
>
> blackbox-0.65.0beta2
> bbkeys-HEAD
I forgot to mention the ./configure lines:
blackbox: ./c
blackbox-0.65.0beta2
bbkeys-HEAD
:r .xinitrc
cd
xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc &
/home/roman/blackbox-0.65.0beta2/bin/bbkeys -i -c ~/.blackbox/bbkeys &
exec /home/roman/blackbox-0.65.0beta2/bin/blackbox -rc ~/.blackbox/blackboxrc
:r blackbox.log
XFree86 Version 4.2.0 / X Window System
(protocol Versi
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 01:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: grouping windows
> My stance may cost this project a few users. But then again, leaving
> out pixmap support for the widgets loses us users too. Every choice
>
> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 02:14:20 +0200
> From: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: blackbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: new NETWM key grabber
>
> > Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:49:44 -0400
> > From: Scott Furt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &g
> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:49:44 -0400
> From: Scott Furt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: blackbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: new NETWM key grabber
>
> Es Bee Ex wrote:
> >It would be less painful if, instead of having to switch between modes
> >like vi, you could use a single key combo to ent
Sorry if this is a complete nonsense, but is it possible now / after
some coding to have blackbox treat several windows as one?
It would've saved me a few seconds (and writing this email :) right now
if I could somehow move several windows across the screen at once.
--
FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE
12:40P
> From: Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 08:45:01 +0100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: new NETWM key grabber
>
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 10:16:18PM -0500, Ben Jansens wrote:
> >> Do you use the window list cycling curren
Hi there,
sorry if I'm going to ask questions already answered on the list (or
elsewhere), I wasn't subscribed for ~.5y, and searching the ML archive
didn't turn up anything relevant.
I was running 0.62.1pre0 for quite some time. I've switched to
0.65.0beta1 yesterday.
What bothers me is that t
> From: Kevin Geiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:01:59 -0700
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: slit functionality...
>
> check out xtoolwait!
where can we get it?
--
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
10:50AM up 11 days, 17:35, 31 users, load averages: 0.12, 0.06, 0.02
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 04:03:02 -0800
> From: David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: blackbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: goofy blackbox/bbkeys interaction
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:30:26AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 26 Fe
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:19:45 -0800
> From: David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: blackbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: goofy blackbox/bbkeys interaction
>
> I have focusNewWindows set to true and focusLastWindow set to False.
> (I don't know if these settings are germane to my problem...
> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:35:27 +0100
> From: Mads Martin J?rgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: David Terrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: cvs on sf.net
>
> * Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Feb 07. 2002 20:24]:
> >
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:05:22 -0500
> From: Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: E-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bb and transient windows
>
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Personally, I would rather people use the tarballs I release.
> > Frankly the need to do
> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:46:41 -0500
> From: Jan Schaumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "BlackBox (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: bb and transient windows
>
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Um. I don't see why you would discourage help so quickly. At very
> Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 13:15:15 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Asviyan, Anatoly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: bb and transient windows
> Cc: "BlackBox (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 05-Feb-2002 Asviyan, Anatoly wrote:
> >> From: Sean 'Shaleh' Pe
> Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 16:11:04 -0500
> From: Kyle Donaldson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: program launching method mismatch in blackbox and bbkeys
>
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > blackbox spawns programs (from the
blackbox spawns programs (from the root menu) via execl(), while bbkeys
uses execve() (or vice versa, don't remember). this leads to, on both of
my machines at least, terminals with different characteristics (see
below). could you guys agree on a program launching method that will
allow the termin
looks like there's a typo in src/main.cc: bitwise OR instead of logical
one.
--
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
11:35AM up 15 days, 17:58, 9 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.04, 0.04
Index: src/main.cc
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/bbkeys/bbkeys/src/mai
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 08:28:09 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: website, let's get the decision made
>
> 1) http://www.planetquake.com/lvl/blackbox
> 2) http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox
> 3) http://www.threadbox.net/blackbox/ligh
> Subject: OT: Quirky problems on a laptop
> From: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 16 Jan 2002 12:26:18 -0600
>
> My wife has a laptop that does some very strange things. From time to
> time, certain programs will refuse to start. However, in many cases a
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:03:04 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: nl_NL@euro can't find catalog.
> Cc: bb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 15-Jan-2002 Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Sean 'Shaleh' Per
> Subject: Re: Blackbox Web Design
> From: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 08 Jan 2002 15:09:08 -0600
>
> On Tue, 2002-01-08 at 08:39, xOr wrote:
> > Well, my vote still holds with http://speed.seas.upenn.edu/~rarya/bb2/
>
> It's got, and had my vote from t
> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 23:31:50 -0500
> From: Thread <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Blackbox Web Design
>
> Man, some browsers just suck. The design rendered beautifully in the
> brosers I developed it with, but ie, and apparently others, choked on it
> as some folks
> Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 11:11:52 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Code Commenting
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 06-Jan-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > How do you folks feel about someone commenting the BB
> From: scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: website - _basic_ design available
> Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:43:10 -0500
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thursday 03 January 2002 07:56, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > I'm no HTML guru, but is there
> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:02:10 -0500
> From: Scott Moynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: blackbox mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: New epistrophy pre-release
>
> A new version of epistrophy has been uploaded to
> http://nexus.carleton.ca/~smoynes/epistrophy.tar.gz
>
> Notable changes in
> Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 04:06:18 +0100
> From: "joh.n-do" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: blackbox pre9
>
> I want to install blackbox 0.80 pre9
> wher is possible to download it?
http://www.sf.net/projects/blackboxwm
--
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
5:06AM up 4 days, 1:36, 5
> Subject: Re: pre7 uploaded
> From: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 22 Dec 2001 21:31:57 -0600
>
> On Sat, 2001-12-22 at 18:11, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > pre7 is up. Been stable here for a few days. Any issues, please let
> > me know.
>
> Would it b
> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 16:11:57 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: pre7 uploaded
>
> pre7 is up. Been stable here for a few days. Any issues, please let
> me know.
Hi Sean,
thanks for your work, but I have a plea: could y
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2001 00:08:40 +
> From: David Thor Bragason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: try it, love it, live it, pound it, tell us what breaks
>
> Cheers to that!
Definitely. BTW, has sf.net stopped counting downloads? The page
still shows 0 even
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:46:50 -0800
> From: Eric Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Blackbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: E-mail clients
>
> I've been using mutt and IMAP for well over a year now with
> *no* problems. Note that you have to use
> Subject: Re: E-mail clients
> From: "Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Blackbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 11 Dec 2001 12:12:50 -0600
>
> On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 11:43, Jim Knoble wrote:
> > You must mean 'telnet'. The user interface isn't spectacular, but it's
> > great for command-l
Hi there,
I think this will be a bit long-winded, so accept my apologies...
I'm using blackbox-0.61.1 with bbpager-0.3.0. bbpager is started from my
.xinitrc. yesterday I looked at the option of having it swallowed by the
slit. this turned out to be problematic, as blackbox seems to keep
reconfi
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:46:20 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bbconf & freebsd
>
> On 11/19/2001 at 01:16 PM, Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >has
> anyone built bbconf on freebsd? I'm no expert on the
Hi there,
has anyone built bbconf on freebsd? I'm no expert on the GNU build tools,
but it looks to me like the bbconf_LDADD lines in
bbconf-1.2/bbconf/(Makefile.am|Makefile.in) are hosed: hardcoding those
libs in beats the purpose of configure. FreeBSD has dlopen() in libc, and
qt-2.3.1 installe
> From: Jason vanRijn Kasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bbkeys configuration [was: Re: iconized bbkeys]
> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 16:20:27 -0500
>
> On Thursday 15 November 2001 14:36, Scott Moynes wrote:
> > * Roman Neuha
> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:29:13 +0100
> From: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: iconized bbkeys
>
> Hi there,
>
> bbkeys-0.3.6 started from .xinitrc with "bbkeys -i &" doesn't capture the
> keypresses. I
Hi there,
bbkeys-0.3.6 started from .xinitrc with "bbkeys -i &" doesn't capture the
keypresses. Is there a way to make it work without cluttering the desktop?
Or rather, since I just realized that the current version is 0.8.3, is this
fixed in the newer versions?
TIA
--
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE
4:1
40 matches
Mail list logo
