On 2/25/2014 10:43 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> That said, I don't have strong opinions about whether it is in the book
> or not.
I would like to see it back in the book. As Bruce mentioned, Sendmail
has a background unlike most other software. The current version still
is usable and works fine. Ther
On 2/25/2014 5:26 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 25.2.2014 23:54, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> Though I strongly disagree with your decision to remove the docs,
>> the more important part of your commit is removing the work done
>> by another editor without discussion. Another editor went to the
>> trouble o
On 25.2.2014 23:54, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> Though I strongly disagree with your decision to remove the docs,
> the more important part of your commit is removing the work done
> by another editor without discussion. Another editor went to the
> trouble of adding the instructions to build and ins
On 2/25/2014 2:20 PM, Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Rev 12783 has reverted what I had done for guile. I am curious why:
>
> I had suppressed instructions for building pdf docs (using texlive!), and
> simplified instructions to build and install html and txt doc, but had not
> changed anything else (I ha
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Le 25/02/2014 21:36, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
>> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>>> Rev 12783 has reverted what I had done for guile. I am curious why:
>>>
>>> I had suppressed instructions for building pdf docs (using texlive!), and
>>> simplified instructions to build and install ht
Le 25/02/2014 21:36, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Pierre Labastie wrote:
>> Rev 12783 has reverted what I had done for guile. I am curious why:
>>
>> I had suppressed instructions for building pdf docs (using texlive!), and
>> simplified instructions to build and install html and txt doc, but had not
>>
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Rev 12783 has reverted what I had done for guile. I am curious why:
>
> I had suppressed instructions for building pdf docs (using texlive!), and
> simplified instructions to build and install html and txt doc, but had not
> changed anything else (I had tested that with a D
Rev 12783 has reverted what I had done for guile. I am curious why:
I had suppressed instructions for building pdf docs (using texlive!), and
simplified instructions to build and install html and txt doc, but had not
changed anything else (I had tested that with a DESTDIR install). It is really
cu
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723). There has not
> been a real discussion about that. The reason is that the current
> building instructions do not lead to a functional package, although
> Armin and Igor have tried to do so. Furthermore, there
On 02/25/2014 12:39 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:19 +0100
>> From: Pierre Labastie
>> To: BLFS Development List
>> Subject: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723). There has not
>> been a real discussio
Hi,
Here is what I plan to do:
networking/mailnews/re-alpine.xml:&lfs74_checked;
networking/mailnews/procmail.xml:&lfs74_checked;
networking/mailnews/fetchmail.xml:&lfs74_checked;
x/installing/x7driver-cirrus.xml: &lfs74_built; I can test it, but
it does not work well. Maybe I'll
On 25/02/2014 13:39, akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:19 +0100
>> From: Pierre Labastie
>> To: BLFS Development List
>> Subject: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723). There has not
>> been a real discussion a
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:55:52 -0300
> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] Problem
>
> Em 24-02-2014 19:36, akhiezer escreveu:
> >> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:06:57 -0300
> >> From: Fernando de Oliveira
> >> To: BLFS Development List
> >> Subject:
Em 24-02-2014 19:36, akhiezer escreveu:
>> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:06:57 -0300
>> From: Fernando de Oliveira
>> To: BLFS Development List
>> Subject: [blfs-dev] Problem
>>
>> I am feeling a little depressed, now.
>>
>> Will be unable to work for some days, perhaps weeks.
>>
>
>
> Fernando, wh
> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:26:19 +0100
> From: Pierre Labastie
> To: BLFS Development List
> Subject: [blfs-dev] discussion about sendmail
>
> Hi,
>
> Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723). There has not
> been a real discussion about that. The reason is that the current
> b
Hi,
Recently, sendmail has been archived, (see ticket #4723). There has not
been a real discussion about that. The reason is that the current
building instructions do not lead to a functional package, although
Armin and Igor have tried to do so. Furthermore, there are alternatives
(exim4 and p
16 matches
Mail list logo
