Re: [blfs-dev] NSS

--- Em qui, 4/4/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] NSS > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quinta-feira, 4 de Abril de 2013, 11:43 > > > > --- Em qui, 4/4/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreve

Re: [blfs-dev] NSS

--- Em qui, 4/4/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] NSS > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quinta-feira, 4 de Abril de 2013, 11:38 > Forgot it and gorgot to look for it there. :-< Sorry, s/gorgot/gorgot/

Re: [blfs-dev] NSS

--- Em qui, 4/4/13, Randy McMurchy escreveu: > De: Randy McMurchy > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] NSS > Para: "BLFS Development" > Data: Quinta-feira, 4 de Abril de 2013, 11:33 > On 4/4/2013 9:29 AM, Fernando de > Oliveira wrote: > > I never noticed it, before. In

[blfs-dev] NSS

I never noticed it, before. In make, there seems to be switches for system zlib to be used and linked. Is zlib a "Required Dependency"? []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above informati

Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] [BLFS Trac] #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2

--- Em dom, 10/3/13, Ken Moffat escreveu: > De: Ken Moffat > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] [BLFS Trac] #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2 > Para: blfs-dev > Data: Domingo, 10 de Março de 2013, 16:12 > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:57:45PM > -, BLFS Trac wrote: > > #3826: libreoffice-4.0.1.2 > > >

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions

--- Em ter, 22/1/13, Armin K. escreveu: > De: Armin K. > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 22 de Janeiro de 2013, 13:31 > On 01/22/2013 04:27 PM, Fernando de > Oliveira wrote: > >

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions

--- Em ter, 22/1/13, Matt Burgess escreveu: > De: Matt Burgess > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 22 de Janeiro de 2013, 12:49 > On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 07:27 -0800, > Fernando de

[blfs-dev] Xulrunner-18.0.1: libxpcom.so permissions

Hi, Armin, I reinstalled Xulrunner/Firefox to comply with the new page you modified (only difference, I did not install system libevent), and again, it is even smaller (disk space) than my previous install script/mozconfig, thank you for the good work! As written in

Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed

--- Em qui, 17/1/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quinta-feira, 17 de Janeiro de 2013, 14:22 > --- Em qui, 17/1/13, Ar

Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed

Have to stop now. Later or tomorrow will go back to this again. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] firefox fails with cairo w/o patch

--- Em qui, 17/1/13, Tobias Gasser escreveu: > De: Tobias Gasser > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] firefox fails with cairo w/o patch > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quinta-feira, 17 de Janeiro de 2013, 14:15 > Am 17.01.2013 13:28, schrieb Armin > K.: >> I'm pretty sure that I removed --enable-s

Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed

[]s, Fernando --- Em qui, 17/1/13, Armin K. escreveu: > De: Armin K. > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quinta-feira, 17 de Janeiro de 2013, 12:17 > On 01/17/2013 03:36 PM, Fernando d

[blfs-dev] Cups security issue - /etc/cups/cups-files.conf needed

Re: Message in Debian (reproduced below). See also: where there is this: "Name CVE-2012-5519 Description CUPS 1.4.4, when running in certain Linux distributions such as Debian GNU/Linux, stores the web interface administrator ke

[blfs-dev] Update: icedtea-2.3.4, but openjdk-1.7.0.9?

Hi, The updated source: There are security fixes: I have found that Red Hat, Debian, Ubuntu and Arch Linux have updated it. However,

Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea-web on seamonkey problem

--- Em sáb, 12/1/13, DJ Lucas escreveu: > De: DJ Lucas > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea-web on seamonkey problem > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Sábado, 12 de Janeiro de 2013, 3:30 > On 01/11/2013 11:39 PM, JZB2 wrote: > > On Friday, January 11, 2013 04:

Re: [blfs-dev] icedtea-web on seamonkey problem

--- Em sex, 11/1/13, JZB2 escreveu: > De: JZB2 > Assunto: [blfs-dev] icedtea-web on seamonkey problem > Para: blfs-dev > Data: Sexta-feira, 11 de Janeiro de 2013, 19:25 ... > icedtea-2.3.3 (openjdk-1.7.0_09, built from source, after binary, per BLFS) > seamonkey-2.13.2 > icedtea-web-1.3 I my ca

Re: [blfs-dev] razorqt-0.5.1

--- Em qui, 15/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: [blfs-dev] razorqt-0.5.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quinta-feira, 15 de Novembro de 2012, 20:27 > Worked out of the box. > > Has panel, widgets, apparently al

Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved

--- Em sex, 16/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Sexta-feira, 16 de Novembro de 2012, 19:14 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > --- Em seg,

Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved

Where I wrote 500MB, please, read as 500GB. []s, Fernando --- Em sex, 16/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Sexta-feira, 16 d

Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved

--- Em seg, 29/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Segunda-feira, 29 de Outubro de 2012, 13:08 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Yesterday, one 500

[blfs-dev] razorqt-0.5.1

Worked out of the box. Has panel, widgets, apparently all I need. For transparency (pseudo), I had installed already feh. Very good, if no problems appears, it will be kept as default. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/b

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

I intended to send the messages for this thread to the support list, only now noticed that I sent to dev. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

I am more satisfied now. Downloaded and installed faenza-icon-theme_1.3.zip, and the stausbar icons are much better now, yet small. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information pa

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

Not important, but I hate inaccuracies. Time in the filename attached in previous mail is not accurate, screen capture was saved by clicking over the wrong and adding "good". Correct name is something like MidoriCaptura-de-tela-de-2012-11-14-22.25.00-NovoGamerLFS71-good.png to which I have rena

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

--- Em qua, 14/11/12, Ken Moffat escreveu: > De: Ken Moffat > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quarta-feira, 14 de Novembro de 2012, 15:11 > Sorry, all I can say is "here be dragons". Some > months ago, when > Andy

Re: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

--- Em qua, 14/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: [blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quarta-feira, 14 de Novembro de 2012, 13:37 > I needed to upgrade mido

[blfs-dev] midori-0.4.7 status bar functionalities no icons

I needed to upgrade midori, it was showing some instability. So I did upgrade the system to the following: ruby-1.9.3-p286 glib-2.34.1 libsoup-2.40.1 webkitgtk-1.10.1 midori-0.4.7 Unfortunately, no icons are displayed in the status bar, as previous 0.4.6 correctly did. Have changed themes, icon

[blfs-dev] Two cents on Sawfish x Openbox

Just installed sawfish-1.9.1. Not very nice, getting a black screen without anything on it. On the contrary, openbox comes, at least, with a menu. Including a line with "xterm &" in .xinitrc, one can at least run sawfish-config, links graphical (links -g) or other software. A panel will add much

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 19:27 > > Guys, please trim your responses. Ok. (I did trim the latest, at least.) > I'd like to add that we shoul

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: > De: Armin K. > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 19:20 > Dana 13.11.2012 22:26, Fernando de > Oliveira je napisao: ... > We tend to u

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:26 > --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. > escreveu: > > > De

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: > De: Armin K. > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 18:01 > Dana 13.11.2012 21:43, Fernando de > Oliveira je napisao: > > --- E

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: > De: Armin K. > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 16:33 > On 11/13/2012 06:01 PM, Fernando de > Oliveira wrote: > > > > Armin, I h

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 14:05 > --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Fernando de > Oliveira escreveu: >

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 14:01 > --- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. > escreveu: > > > De

Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

--- Em ter, 13/11/12, Armin K. escreveu: > De: Armin K. > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 13 de Novembro de 2012, 13:51 > On 11/13/2012 05:49 PM, Fernando de > Oliveira wrote: > > checking for GLIB - ver

[blfs-dev] libsoup-2.40.1

checking for GLIB - version >= 2.33.1... no *** Could not run GLIB test program, checking why... *** The test program failed to compile or link. See the file config.log for the *** exact error that occured. This usually means GLIB is incorrectly installed. configure: error: GLIB 2.33.1 or later is

Re: [blfs-dev] cups-filters-1.0.24

--- Em sex, 9/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] cups-filters-1.0.24 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Sexta-feira, 9 de Novembro de 2012, 12:31 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > Every reinstall fails, then I h

[blfs-dev] Questions on contributions (RE: seamonkey-2.13.2)

Bruce, Thank you for the comments in the ticket. One thing I do not understand. > * general.ent needs a date change at the top Also, I did not want to use svn to send, as once you told me, because being the first attempt, I was expecting (many) corrections. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfro

[blfs-dev] cups-filters-1.0.24

Every reinstall fails, then I have definitely added the line rm -v /usr/share/cups/charsets/pdf.utf-8 to the script. Error log: ... make install-data-hook make[2]: Entrando no diretório `/media/Dados1T/NovoGamer/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2012.11.09/cups-filters-1.0.24' ln -s

Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc

--- Em dom, 4/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Domingo, 4 de Novembro de 2012, 22:58 > Perhaps we should promote gtk-doc to recommended, but I can > see where > users really don't care abo

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7 MANDATORY paths

--- Em seg, 5/11/12, DJ Lucas escreveu: > De: DJ Lucas > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7 MANDATORY paths > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Segunda-feira, 5 de Novembro de 2012, 2:40 > On 11/03/2012 11:28 AM, Fernando de > Oliveira wrote: > >> I h

Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2

--- Em dom, 4/11/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Domingo, 4 de Novembro de 2012, 22:55 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > --- Em qua, 31/10/12, Bruce Du

Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc

Resending with proper line format. --- Em dom, 4/11/12, Ken Moffat escreveu: > De: Ken Moffat > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc > > Data: Domingo, 4 de Novembro de 2012, 21:10 > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:29:39PM > -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > &

Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc

--- Em dom, 4/11/12, Ken Moffat escreveu: > De: Ken Moffat > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Domingo, 4 de Novembro de 2012, 21:10 > On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 02:29:39PM > -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: &

Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2

--- Em qua, 31/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quarta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2012, 12:24 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > >

[blfs-dev] gegl-0.2.0 and (gtk-?)doc

This is in the make log: /bin/sh: line 1: 24093 Falha de segmentação [segmentation fault] GEGL_DEBUG_TIME=yes GEGL_SWAP=RAM GEGL_PATH=../../operations ../../bin/gegl clones.xml -o `echo clones.png | sed s?./??` > `echo clones.png | sed s?./?? | sed -e s/png/txt/` make[5]: ** [clones.png] Erro

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7 MANDATORY paths

It took a very long time for this message to appear in the list. This delay has been happening since some days ago. Thus, I am building Xorg without the modifications I am asking about below, still replies would be much appreciated. []s, Fernando --- Em sáb, 3/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira

[blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7 MANDATORY paths

Probably for Armin, but I am thankful to any replies. I have noticed some modifications in the "Introduction to Xorg-7.7" page, particularly: sed 's@/usr/X11R6@@g' -i /etc/man_db.conf In my host "LFS7.1", I have not done that, there is the symlink /usr/X11R6 -> /usr and just in case, I have ad

[blfs-dev] gnutls-3.0.24 md5sum

Different md5sum: 6c075012a57cb4a10285c1d7b166441b []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-dev] pcre-8.31

I got this error: mv: impossível obter estado de “/usr/lib/libpcre.so.*”: Arquivo ou diretório não encontrado translating: mv: impossible to obtain state of “/usr/lib/libpcre.so.*”: File or directory not found After removing mv -v /usr/lib/libpcre.so.* /lib && it builds. But then, I noticed

Re: [blfs-dev] sshfs-fuse-2.4 depencies

Thanks for your message, Ken. --- Em qua, 31/10/12, Ken Moffat escreveu: > De: Ken Moffat > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] sshfs-fuse-2.4 depencies > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quarta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2012, 20:26 > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:54:20PM > -0700

Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2

--- Em qua, 31/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quarta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2012, 12:24 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > >

[blfs-dev] sshfs-fuse-2.4 depencies

I do not remember getting this before "lfs7.2": configure: error: Package requirements (fuse >= 2.3 glib-2.0 gthread-2.0) were not met: No package 'glib-2.0' found No package 'gthread-2.0' found I am trying to build in chroot. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs

Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2

--- Em ter, 30/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Finishing up BLFS checks for LFS-7.2 > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2012, 17:58 > Armin K. wrote: > > On 10/30/2012 08:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> I'm in the final s

[blfs-dev] OT - Hardware Problems again, but perhaps solved

Hi, My main machine, used as host has presented some instability for some months, and I could not until recently, solve the issue. This was the main reason I progressively decreased my contribution to almost nothing. It runs normally LFS7.1, more precisely # cat /etc/release SVN-20120311 It came

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

Bruce, Still about version, I believe you know, but just in case, I do some things more to check the plugin version. Since version 7u7 (maybe even before), some of the tests I used stopped working for OpenJDK and IcedTeaWeb, but still work for jre. So, something has been (intentionally?) changed b

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

--- Em sáb, 20/10/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Sábado, 20 de Outubro de 2012, 19:31 > real    231m51.964s > user    229m51.144s > sys    18m15.361s I remem

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

Forgot to add: real231m51.964s user229m51.144s sys 18m15.361s Do not remember SBU. Just to compare, last LibreOffice-3.6.2.2 build, with j4, took real68m25.200s user227m14.552s sys 12m42.693s []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ:

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

Since JDK, I was numbering using book's convention and comparing numbers with other distributions and with the convention in JDK site. So, I changed the subject for what was normal in the past. What name to be used is not important for me, but in many other sites/distributions I remember, they use

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea)

2012, 19:54 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > Previous attachment had a line out of order and with a > typo. > Thanks.  That's helpful. Right now I'm running tests, > but that takes quite a while. Later, perhaps tomorrow, I will try to run the tests. > I think we sh

Re: [blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea)

Previous attachment had a line out of order and with a typo. []s, Fernando OpenJDK-1.7.0.7-to-1.7.0.9-some-differences-2012.10.19.log Description: Binary data -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above in

[blfs-dev] OpenJDK-1.7.0.9 (was: iced tea)

Hi, Bruce, No tests run, but package installs again, just changing the instructions in the book about the packages that will be automatically download. Patches applied with some displacements. Installed also IcedTea-Web-1.3 # java -version java version "1.7.0_09-blfs" OpenJDK Runtime Environme

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

--- Em sex, 19/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Sexta-feira, 19 de Outubro de 2012, 16:03 > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > --- Em sex, 19/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > &

Re: [blfs-dev] iced tea

--- Em sex, 19/10/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > De: Bruce Dubbs > Assunto: [blfs-dev] iced tea > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Sexta-feira, 19 de Outubro de 2012, 14:37 > I've been looking at updating iced > tea. > > I'm into problems because the make files have > hard coded paths > into

Re: [blfs-dev] xfce exo and seamonkey

--- Em sex, 14/9/12, Armin K. escreveu: > De: Armin K. > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] xfce exo and seamonkey > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Sexta-feira, 14 de Setembro de 2012, 18:16 > Dana 14.9.2012 23:06, Bruce Dubbs je > napisao: > > I just ran into a minor problem. I was installing > ex

Re: [blfs-dev] Avoiding sourceforge

Em 12-09-2012 18:29, Randy McMurchy escreveu: I am glad to hearing from you again. Was worried after your last message telling about the tornado, and every day thought about enquiring if all went well. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.li

Re: [blfs-dev] FYI : my current plans

Em 11-09-2012 21:08, Ken Moffat escreveu: > I'm about to step back from editing BLFS for a while. This year, > I've spent far too much time on it, and the other things that I put > aside must now take priority. At the moment, I'm preparing one of > my irregular lists of what I've built, and in w

Re: [blfs-dev] Firefox and xulrunner

Em 29-08-2012 15:22, Armin K. escreveu: > On 08/29/2012 07:24 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >> When xulrunner first appeared, my memory tells me that it was quite >> a bit quicker to build only firefox, instead of building xulrunner >> and then linking firefox to it. Of course, the instructions were >>

Re: [blfs-dev] GNOME Update Plan and New GNOME Order.

--- Em sex, 24/8/12, Armin K. escreveu: > De: Armin K. > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] GNOME Update Plan and New GNOME Order. > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Sexta-feira, 24 de Agosto de 2012, 23:22 > On 25.8.2012 2:32, Fernando de > Oliveira wrote: > > Em 2

Re: [blfs-dev] GNOME Update Plan and New GNOME Order.

Em 24-08-2012 20:39, Armin K. escreveu: > Hi. I just took a time to make an order for GNOME packages in the book. Thanks for the large amount of good work. > I would like to remove the following packages from the book: I much like baobab. Please, keep this in the book. > baobab -- []s, Fer

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]

, 2012 at 05:48:54AM > -0700, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > > > To Ken: > > > > Sorry to come back to this again. > > > > 1. In the second _ln_, I believe the correct is the > _devel_ directory: > > > > s#ln -sv -f ../xulrunner-14.0.1/sdk/bin

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]

Bruce and Ken, please, read below. Em 22-08-2012 20:13, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> --- Em qua, 22/8/12, Ken Moffat escreveu: >> >>> De: Ken Moffat > >>> so, it bit me again. I'll have another try. >>> >>>

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]

2 at 10:28:22PM > +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:49:59AM -0700, Fernando de > Oliveira wrote: > > > > > > LOL. > > > > > > Sorry about the Portuguese. Will try to remember > > > the translations, next > > > t

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg Chapter

Em 20-08-2012 20:28, Armin K. escreveu: ... > I would also like to add here a note about LLVM dep and MesaLib itself. > > LLVM may not be heavy dep for MesaLib, but it is dependency by default > unless different instructions are used (I set it to recommended because > there were complaints). L

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice 3.6.0

First, thank you very much for the page upgrade. Looks very good. Em 13-08-2012 13:16, Ragnar Thomsen escreveu: > On Friday 10 August 2012 20:41:47 Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> The important differences with previous version 3.5.5.3 are: >> >>

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice 3.6.0

Other data that could help (sorry, also forgot yesterday). I copy the old versioned src directory to a new versioned one, start the build phase and stop after download. Then check the new files, and delete their older versions. In the present case, the new downloads other than libreoffice-core-3.6

Re: [blfs-dev] LibreOffice 3.6.0

Forgot to write poppler version: poppler-0.20.2 []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[blfs-dev] LibreOffice 3.6.0

Hi, Ragnar. Instructions are much the same as for the version in the book. I do some things differently, though. 1. I install in /opt. 2. I use symlinks in /usr/bin, instead of scripts. 3. With sed, I modify the installed .desktop files. None of these seem to be important differences, Andy's c

Re: [blfs-dev] Andy Benton

Em 31-07-2012 18:25, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > With great sadness, I have to report the passing of Andy Benton. > > I never had the opportunity to meet Andy in person, but after several > thousand posts to the lists, I think I knew him. His first post was in > March 2004. Since that time he made

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]

Em 27-07-2012 10:35, Ken Moffat escreveu:> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:22:10PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >> Umm, thanks - I don't read Portuguese and all the talk of symlinks >> led me to believe they can be added after the install. You are >> saying that you add them *before* the install ? >> >

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]

orrow. > > ĸen > But Ken, this was the reason for the first post in the thread (reproduced below). After this error is fixed, another with xpcshell will appear. *Fixes are*: ln -sv -f ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/run-mozilla.sh /usr/lib/xulrunner-14.0.1 ln -sv -f ../xulrunner-devel

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-13.0.1, 14.0.1 and Icecat-13.0.1

Em 26-07-2012 17:36, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 03:56:48PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote: >> On Thursday, July 26, 2012 08:27:53 PM Ken Moffat wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:39:31AM -0700, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>>> Em 25-07-2

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]

Em 26-07-2012 17:23, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:01:35PM +0200, Armin K. wrote: >> On 07/25/2012 07:59 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> Em 25-07-2012 14:03, Armin K. escreveu: >>>> >>>> I have just symlinked everything from /us

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-13.0.1, 14.0.1 and Icecat-13.0.1

Em 26-07-2012 16:27, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:39:31AM -0700, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 25-07-2012 21:58, Ken Moffat escreveu: >> >> [...] >> >>> Thanks for your, and Armin's comments on xulrunner - so far tonight >>

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner-13.0.1, 14.0.1 and Icecat-13.0.1

Em 25-07-2012 21:58, Ken Moffat escreveu: [...] > Thanks for your, and Armin's comments on xulrunner - so far tonight > I've only built firefox (standalone) 4 times [ first was without > system-cairo because it was on my old 7.1 install with an unpatched > cairo, second was with system nss, nspr

[blfs-dev] Xulrunner-13.0.1, 14.0.1 and Icecat-13.0.1

When installing Xulrunner-14.0.1, did not remove previous 13.0.1 version. Icecat-13.0.1 had been built against Xulrunner-13.0.1. Thought Icecat could possibly not run. Tested icecat --version, got error. Replacing /usr/bin/icecat unversioned in- and out-side with cat > /usr/bin/icecat << "EOF" #

Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]

Em 25-07-2012 14:03, Armin K. escreveu: > On 07/25/2012 06:50 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> [Sorry for the typo in the title for the previous mail] >> >> >> When trying to install Firefox-14.0.1 against Xulrunner-14.0.1, there have >> been tw

[blfs-dev] libreoffice-3.5.5.3

This is the latest stable. Did not change my script to build (obviously, with versions changed). Only one new file other than Libreoffice* was loaded: a9a1db27688bad49418667b434d29c1f-libvisio-0.0.18.tar.bz2 replacing the older 2fa6028324347860e684e75310818d43-libvisio-0.0.16.tar.bz2 Don't kn

[blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]

[Sorry for the typo in the title for the previous mail] When trying to install Firefox-14.0.1 against Xulrunner-14.0.1, there have been two small problems: Problem 1 ... adding: defaults/preferences/firefox-branding.js (deflated 56%) /bin/sh: /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/bin/run-mozilla.s

[blfs-dev] Xurunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1

When trying to install Firefox-14.0.1 against Xulrunner-14.0.1, there have been two small problems: Problem 1 ... adding: defaults/preferences/firefox-branding.js (deflated 56%) /bin/sh: /usr/lib/xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/bin/run-mozilla.sh: Arquivo ou diretório não encontrado make[1]: ** [insta

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7-1 upgrade (Was: Xorg-7.6-2 upgrade)

Em 21-07-2012 11:47, Dan Nicholson escreveu:> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Fernando de Oliveira > wrote: >> >> With much respect, IMHO, as Xorg is not anymore monolithic, i.e., is >> modular, it would be good keeping doing upgrades, for example, once a >>

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg-7.7-1 upgrade (Was: Xorg-7.6-2 upgrade)

Em 25-06-2012 15:18, Ken Moffat escreveu: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:06:38AM -0700, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: [...] >> Thank you very much for your replies, Ken. >> >> I did not reply with all care needed to some of the points (many things >> being done for

[blfs-dev] XScreenSaver-5.18

Make failed with message: sonar-icmp.c: In function ‘subnet_hosts’: sonar-icmp.c:594:55: error: ‘AF_LINK’ undeclared (first use in this function) sonar-icmp.c:594:55: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in make[1]: ** [sonar-icmp.o] Erro 1 make[1]:

[blfs-dev] LXDE [Was: lxpanel-0.5.10]

Em 07-07-2012 23:45, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > Just installed, is running ok, seems to have solved instability when > dowloads are performed with firefox. False. However, three of my six LFS machines have LXDE and lxpanel seems to be stable. Did tests, and noticed in one that when c

Re: [blfs-dev] Xorg Applications

Em 10-07-2012 14:01, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:> Armin K. wrote: >> On 07/10/2012 06:35 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Armin K. wrote: On 07/10/2012 06:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Armin K. wrote: >> Hi there. There was some talk about splitting Xorg Packages into >> seperate ones. I went wi

Re: [blfs-dev] Rebuilding an LFS System

Sorry for the long line. This one below is corrected. []s, Fernando --- Em ter, 10/7/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Rebuilding an LFS System > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Terça-feira, 10 de Julho de 2012,

Re: [blfs-dev] Rebuilding an LFS System

Em 10-07-2012 00:46, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > As I've said before, I've been working on rebuilding my system. I'm > finally somewhat current, so I thought I'd write up what I did. > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/updating-lfs.html > >-- Bruce > I've been following and always th

[blfs-dev] lxpanel-0.5.10

Just installed, is running ok, seems to have solved instability when dowloads are performed with firefox. A couple of nice plugins have been added. Problems to build. First, dependencies: wireless_tools.29 and libwnck-2.30.7 (libwnck3 not accepted). Has a switch --eneble-gtk3, but I got error, a

Re: [blfs-dev] System load applet

Em 06-07-2012 23:06, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 06-07-2012 18:45, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >>> In KDE3, I had a system applet that was a small histogram of cpu usage >>> (load), memory use, and swap use. >>> >>> Does anyone

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >