On 23/04/14 19:56, Christopher Gregory wrote:
Hello,
After just on two weeks and many rebuilds later I can say that we ARE
able to install gnome on top of a base linux from scratch SYSTEMD build.
The one thing that remains broken is GDM (gnome display manager). It
will not start
On 24/04/14 00:32, Christopher Gregory wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 21:59 +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 23/04/14 19:56, Christopher Gregory wrote:
Hello,
After just on two weeks and many rebuilds later I can say that we ARE
able to install gnome on top of a base linux from scratch SYSTEMD
make check fails (no target).
Should be make test.
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 02/12/14 15:53, Armin K. wrote:
On 12.2.2014 5:37, Petr Ovtchenkov wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:27:50 +0100
Armin K. kre...@email.com wrote:
On 10.2.2014 13:04, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I thought it would be worth sharing what I have just read. Perhaps not
everybody knows about
Hi,
Any reason why the documentation tarball was not updated to the latest
version? There is a 2.5.2 version available.
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi All,
I've been having an issue downloading this package.
http://pkg-isocodes.alioth.debian.org/downloads/iso-codes-3.48.tar.xz
I get an URL Not Found error. I've been trying for several days now with
no success.
Has this link worked for anyone else recently?
Thanks,
Wayne.
--
On 11/26/13 02:35, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Wayne,
I am worried that other xorg packages will have to be fixed for Python3,
not only xcb-proto and libxcb.
What do you think? Igor?
I've rebuilt all of xorg, and xcb-proto was the only modification I had
to do to complete the build.
On 11/26/13 06:10, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 25-11-2013 14:30, Igor Živković escreveu:
On 11/25/2013 05:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Wayne,
...
OK.
I ran
bzgrep -ri python *.bz2
in xc (xorg source directory), after moving out xcb-proto and libxcb.
Any reason why the development version of seahorse was put in the book?
The latest stable version of seahorse is 3.8.2.
Version 3.10 should be released in the next few days.
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
On 09/20/13 20:26, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Any reason why the development version of seahorse was put in the book?
The latest stable version of seahorse is 3.8.2.
Version 3.10 should be released in the next few days.
Regards,
Wayne.
gcr is another where 3.9.91 is from the development
On 18/08/13 00:20, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 17/08/13 12:57, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 16-08-2013 20:44, Wayne Blaszczyk escreveu:
On 17/08/13 04:51, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 16-08-2013 15:32, BLFS Trac escreveu:
#3973: LibreOffice-4.1.0: troubles with dictionaries, help
On 17/08/13 04:51, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 16-08-2013 15:32, BLFS Trac escreveu:
#3973: LibreOffice-4.1.0: troubles with dictionaries, help and languages
support
+--
Reporter: fo | Owner: fo
Type: defect | Status:
On 04/08/13 13:15, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/08/13 09:07, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
We have reached a milestone. The SVN versions of both LFS and BLFS are
now up to date. There are no major outstanding issues that need to be
fixed.
There are a couple of minor changes that I
On 04/08/13 13:46, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/08/13 13:15, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/08/13 09:07, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
We have reached a milestone. The SVN versions of both LFS and BLFS are
now up to date. There are no major outstanding issues
Hi,
I've found a couple of issues with the latest build instructions.
The tar command has the wrong file name.
The second sed command has a backslash missing.
The config command fails with the following:
which: no libpng-config in
(/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin)
On 29/06/13 10:11, Armin K. wrote:
On 06/29/2013 01:52 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Hi,
I've found a couple of issues with the latest build instructions.
The tar command has the wrong file name.
The second sed command has a backslash missing.
The config command fails with the following
On 31/03/13 18:46, Armin K. wrote:
On 03/30/2013 11:06 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Hi,
I had an issue building MythTV on LFS 7.3.
Turns out to be the following bug(s) with alsa-lib:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109298
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885306
The following
Hi,
I had an issue building MythTV on LFS 7.3.
Turns out to be the following bug(s) with alsa-lib:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109298
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885306
The following patch has been applied upstream:
On 28/03/13 03:21, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 06:52:34PM +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone successfully built WebKitGTK on LFS 7.3?
I get the following error:
make[1]: Entering directory `/sources/webkitgtk-1.10.2'
/bin/mkdir -p ./.deps/DerivedSources
CXXLD
On 20/02/13 23:51, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote these words on 02/20/13 06:10 CST:
If I do a svn update, it says its at revision 10963.
Is this correct?
Sorry for my other posts as I am being stupid this morning. Please disregard.
You indeed updated the repo on the old
Hi,
It has been a while since I done an update to the book.
I think I just did a commit to the book in relation to JSON-C, but
something does not look right. It seems that the local version I have
has missing entries in the changelog for February. Apologies if I did
something wrong.
If I do a svn
Hi,
During the fcron build, 'make install' fails if systemd is installed.
The following fixes the issue:
sed -i s/files\/fcron.init.systemd/script\/fcron.init.systemd/
Makefile.in
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
On 19/01/13 21:10, Armin K. wrote:
On 01/19/2013 03:48 AM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
My apologies right here at the beginning if this subject has been discussed
and I missed the discussion. I am curious about BLFS' view on the obsolete
.
If anyone is interested in discussion, I
On 09/01/13 09:56, Tobias Gasser wrote:
Am 08.01.2013 02:42, schrieb Wayne Blaszczyk:
What happens if you try?:
--with-gtk=3.0
--with-x11
checking What rendering backend to use. configure: error: X11 SHM
backend is not compatible with GTK3
Can you post your full
On 08/01/13 06:14, Tobias Gasser wrote:
Am 07.01.2013 16:38, schrieb Tobias Gasser:
if i specify
--with-gtk=2.0
--with-x11
i now tried spice-gtk-0.14 and -0.15 with gtk 3.6.2, 3.6.3, 3.6.4. amd
even 3.4.4 but get always the same error.
What happens if you try?:
On 04/01/13 18:54, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/01/13 18:28, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/01/13 09:52, Tobias Gasser wrote:
Am 03.01.2013 23:23, schrieb Armin K.:
On 01/03/2013 11:03 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
any hint what else i can try to build 1.0.1?
thanks for any help
tobias
On 04/01/13 09:52, Tobias Gasser wrote:
Am 03.01.2013 23:23, schrieb Armin K.:
On 01/03/2013 11:03 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
any hint what else i can try to build 1.0.1?
thanks for any help
tobias
As you see, libtirpc is not yet ready to take over RPC stuff. That's why
Glibc developers
On 04/01/13 18:28, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/01/13 09:52, Tobias Gasser wrote:
Am 03.01.2013 23:23, schrieb Armin K.:
On 01/03/2013 11:03 PM, Tobias Gasser wrote:
any hint what else i can try to build 1.0.1?
thanks for any help
tobias
As you see, libtirpc is not yet ready to take
On 20/12/12 09:55, Tobias Gasser wrote:
who has and why is libvirt removed from the book?
i still try to get a vnc client. vinagre shows only part of the screen
(gtk2 and gtk3 versions - i meanwhile updated almost everything to gtk3
where possible).
vnc4 shows the whole screen but i
On 22/10/12 09:22, Armin K. wrote:
Dana 21.10.2012 22:37, Wayne Blaszczyk je napisao:
Hi All,
The following instruction creates a file called docbook-xsl-1.77.1
rather than a directory.
install -v -m644 -D README \
/usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl-1.77.1
Should
Hi All,
The following instruction creates a file called docbook-xsl-1.77.1
rather than a directory.
install -v -m644 -D README \
/usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl-1.77.1
Should in not be:
install -v -m644 -D README \
/usr/share/doc/docbook-xsl-1.77.1/README.XSL
On 22/08/12 05:47, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 08/21/12 13:09 CST:
For things in the book, the last person to look was Andy. Google
finds his comments on the gimp and poppler. Then he pointed to a
debian patch for poppler. I think we've upgraded both since then,
Hi,
There are two typos on this page.
patch -Np1 -i ../mysql-5.5.27-client_only_fix-1.patch
should be
patch -Np1 -i ../mysql-5.5.27-fix_client_only-1.patch
and
install -v -m644 /usr/share/mysql/support-files/my-medium.cnf /etc/my.cnf
should be
install -v -m644
Hi,
Having a closer look at this package. I cannot see why python would be a
required dependency. I can build and install this without python. Any
thoughts why Python would be required.
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
The
chmod -v 755 /usr/lib/libhogweed.so.2.2 /usr/lib/libnettle.so.4.2.2
command fails with a
chmod: cannot access `/usr/lib/libnettle.so.4.2.2': No such file or
directory
I presume it should be /usr/lib/libnettle.so.4.4
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
The
install -v -m644doc/*.{html,png,eps,pdf,ps} doc/cyclo/*.html \
/usr/share/doc/gnutls-3.0.21
command returns an error due there not being any *.ps files in doc/
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
On 03/07/12 09:24, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:06:53 +0100
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Or we could just remove libdv. However it is referenced in
+1 for removal. I don't install it so I'm not really familiar with it
but I have no problems playing video files,
On 04/07/12 06:51, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I ran into two problems with polkit. First, the default instructions
failed to make the man pages because I had a problem with my xml
configuration.
/usr/bin/xsltproc -nonet --stringparam man.base.url.for.relative.links
On 17/06/12 18:24, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 06:44:55 +0100
Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Hi,
Just noticed that the version of Libre Office is done in an
unconventional way. Why is the entity libreoffice-version set to 3.5.4
and then a .2 is appended
Hi,
Just noticed that the version of Libre Office is done in an
unconventional way. Why is the entity libreoffice-version set to 3.5.4
and then a .2 is appended throughout the libreoffice.xml page?
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
On 22/05/12 07:13, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm getting a failure in 'make check' in colord:
libcolord:ERROR:cd-self-test.c:971:colord_client_func: assertion failed
(error == NULL): Could not connect: No such file or directory
(g-io-error-quark, 1)
/bin/sh: line 5: 18614 Aborted
On 06/05/12 01:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Armin K. wrote:
On 05/05/2012 03:52 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 05/05/12 01:52, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
BLFS Trac wrote:
#3350: libvirt-glib does not build on LFS 7.1
--+-
Reporter
On 05/05/12 01:52, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
BLFS Trac wrote:
#3350: libvirt-glib does not build on LFS 7.1
--+-
Reporter: wblaszcz | Owner: blfs-book@…
Type: defect| Status: new
On 12/04/12 17:26, Thomas de Roo wrote:
On 04/12/12 07:50, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 12/04/12 05:47, Thomas de Roo wrote:
On 04/09/12 14:52, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
On 08-04-2012 17:31, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:07:53 +0100
DJ Lucas wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
Hello
On 12/04/12 05:47, Thomas de Roo wrote:
On 04/09/12 14:52, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
On 08-04-2012 17:31, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 21:07:53 +0100
DJ Lucas wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
Hello,
Based on the information Fernando is spoon feeding me I think I may be
close to
What is with the broken download links on the
mobile-broadband-provider-info page?
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 08/04/12 11:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 07:23:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
In mesa, I see three places that use card0. They are all of the form
fd = open(/dev/dri/card0, O_RDWR);
I see in rules.d/50-udev-default.rules an entry
SUBSYSTEM==drm,
Apologies if I missed a previous discussion, but I noticed the
x-setup.html page no longer exists (not linked).
I was specifically looking for the following instructions:
cat /etc/sysconfig/createfiles EOF
/tmp/.ICE-unix dir 1777 root root
EOF
I gather that this is still relevant since I'm
On 04/04/12 09:56, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 04/03/2012 06:36 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:07:23 +0100
Armin K.kre...@email.com wrote:
Great. And then everyone told me how /etc/gnome and prefix other than
/usr can work. Well, yes they can. But there is a lot of additional
On 09/02/12 04:23, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 02:57:41PM +0100, Denis Mugnier wrote:
Hi,
in the file avahi.xm you write :
lLe 07/02/2012 18:45, k...@linuxfromscratch.org a écrit :
+paraparameter--with-distro=none/parameter: This parameter specifies
the
+LFS
On 18/12/11 12:28, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 18/12/11 08:31, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Bruce,
pycairo-1.10.0 is actually depended on Python3 so should it not be
called py3cairo? The url is broken (should be bz2 rather than xz).
I didn't intend to update pycairo, only
On 24/12/11 11:44, Ken Moffat wrote:
For accepting /usr/libexec - I'm mostly in favour : if upstream
want to use it, that's their decision. I think it probably violates
the fhs, which will be why the book has avoided it. 'Mostly'
because there are occasional packages such as dhcp which use
On 20/12/11 11:46, Ken Moffat wrote:
I'm starting to gather my data to update the gnome2 packages that I
.
So, my own preference is for /etc/gnome, or failing that to move
the legacy packages I mentioned the other day to using /etc/gnome2
or -2 or -2.32. But what do other people,
On 21/12/11 05:36, Randy McMurchy wrote:
On 12/20/2011 11:24 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
Wayne Blaszczykwblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
My preference is option 4) /etc (Something that Fedora and Ubuntu uses,
just to name a few)
+1 for
On 21/12/11 07:22, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Only issue is the FHS says that if possible *always* keep
same-package sysconf data in a subdirectory of /etc. Such
as /etc/gnome.
I don't see Gnome as a package. GConf is a package, libgnome is a package,
Gnome is a Suite of packages.
Just my
Bruce,
pycairo-1.10.0 is actually depended on Python3 so should it not be
called py3cairo? The url is broken (should be bz2 rather than xz).
pyGobject-3.0.3 is not backward compatible with pyGobject2. I beleive a
few packages still rely on pyGobject2.
Regards,
Wayne.
--
On 18/12/11 08:31, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Bruce,
pycairo-1.10.0 is actually depended on Python3 so should it not be
called py3cairo? The url is broken (should be bz2 rather than xz).
I didn't intend to update pycairo, only py2cairo. I left it at version
1.8.8
On 09/12/11 04:08, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 08/12/11 15:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I don't have a problem with adding Gnome 3, but would like it in a
completely separate section. We would not want to mix Gnome2 and Gnome3
packages. I agree with Andy that the pages should
On 16/12/11 11:00, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:25:17 -0600
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, the construct is not explained. I think it should be removed.
I agree it should be explained, then people can make an informed
choice. I don't mind
On 15/12/11 16:28, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne,
In the D-BUS instructions, what does this mean?
useradd -c D-BUS Message Daemon User -d /dev/null \
-u 18 -g messagebus -s /bin/false messagebus || [ $? == 9 ]
Accidental update from a script?
-- Bruce
No, not accidental.
On 09/12/11 12:58, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:53:30AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
- these are in the book and used everywhere:
i.e. items 1 to 6 are used 'everywhere'
1. libxml2-2.7.8 = general
2. glib-2.30.1 = general
3. gdk-pixbuf-2.24.0 = general, also used by
On 08/12/11 15:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I don't have a problem with adding Gnome 3, but would like it in a
completely separate section. We would not want to mix Gnome2 and Gnome3
packages. I agree with Andy that the pages should be marked. It's easy
enough to define an entity in
On 07/12/11 16:59, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I'm working on pam and I'm getting undefined references to
__db_ndbm_{open,fetch,close} etc.
I can get around this with telling configure --enable-db=no. In the
configure log, I have:
checking for db_create... yes
checking db.h usability... yes
On 05/12/11 06:50, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 12/04/2011 01:15 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/12/11 15:30, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:19:52PM +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
The next release of Gnome will be next March.
If anyone is interested, here is my current build for Gnome3
On 04/12/11 04:13, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 02:20:32AM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
So what do people think, is it Ok to put pango-1.29 in the book?
gtk+-3.2 requires pango-1.29. gtk+-3.2.2 is the current stable version
of gtk+-3. It's a contradiction.
On 04/12/11 15:30, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:19:52PM +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
gnome-media is no longer part of Gnome3 (as of 3.2).
The next release of Gnome will be next March.
If anyone is interested, here is my current build for Gnome3:
http
On 28/11/11 22:36, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 18:38:24 +1100
Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
I didn't have a problem building this on a x86_64 system. You did add
the --enable-64bit parameter?
No, I didn't notice it buried down in the command explanations
GTK Engines should be an optional dependency, without it I get the
warnings about clearlooks theme missing.
The highlighting of the menu does not great without it.
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
On 29/11/11 00:58, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:55 +1100
Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
GTK Engines should be an optional dependency, without it I get the
warnings about clearlooks theme missing.
The highlighting of the menu does not great without
On 28/11/11 12:43, Andrew Benton wrote:
Hello,
When I try to install nspr-4.8.9 configure fails like so:
checking for pthread_create in -lpthreads... no
checking for pthread_create in -lpthread... no
checking for pthread_create in -lc_r... no
checking for pthread_create in -lc... no
On 26/11/11 23:51, Andrew Benton wrote:
Hello,
Is anyone working on Firefox? Would it be Ok if I updated it?
Andy
By all means, go ahead and update it.
Could I make one suggestion.
Can we have the /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins as the directory, and symlink
to this rather than the other way
On 20/11/11 04:16, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:46:20PM +1100, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Based on the current build instructions, Cups creates files under
/usr/etc and /usr/var.
Glib2 creates bash completion scripts under /usr/etc.
Not directly related to BLFS, but it also looks
The md5sum does not match.
I beleive it should be 5408d4a70ac132f7c439d7de40e83aff
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 20/11/11 12:53, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
The md5sum does not match.
I beleive it should be 5408d4a70ac132f7c439d7de40e83aff
Regards,
Wayne.
I should wait until the build finishes before posting;)
The following two commands failed for me:
cp -v docs/faq/*.html /usr/share/doc/gtk+-2.24.8/faq
cp
Bruce,
The checksum does not match the gz file. I assume you meant to include
the xz file in the url?
Regards,
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 18/11/11 22:00, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Bruce,
The checksum does not match the gz file. I assume you meant to include
the xz file in the url?
Regards,
Wayne.
Also, I could not build Guile with libunistring.
Should libunistring be a required dependancy?
Wayne.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
On 19/11/11 01:39, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 22:56:34 +1100
Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Also, I could not build Guile with libunistring.
Should libunistring be a required dependancy?
Do you mean without libunistring? Guile-2.0.3 builds fine
The Cups installation instructions failed for me if I try to do it for
the second time, around the mv command. (i.e. directory not empty error)
Can we put in some logic around this so that the instructions are
repeatable?
Maybe replace the move with a copy, then delete?
The reason why I suggest
On 19/11/11 08:40, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
The Cups installation instructions failed for me if I try to do it for
the second time, around the mv command. (i.e. directory not empty error)
Can we put in some logic around this so that the instructions are
repeatable?
Maybe
On 19/11/11 12:55, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:29:39 +1100
Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
The dependency pkg-config is linked to the Configuring pkg-config
section rather than the pkg-config page.
Thanks Wayne,
fixed. It should have been xref linkend
Bruce,
A few findings.
The parted md5sum does not match the url's file.
I presume you were meant to use the xz version rather than the gz version?
Python 2.7.2 ftp url is broken. I believe they only have the bz2 version
on that site.
Also, the url doc version should be 2.7.2 rather than 2.7 and
On 10/11/11 22:20, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Bruce,
A few findings.
The parted md5sum does not match the url's file.
I presume you were meant to use the xz version rather than the gz version?
Python 2.7.2 ftp url is broken. I believe they only have the bz2 version
on that site.
Also, the url
On 08/11/11 14:47, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne,
You added the device-mapper. I've updated it in my sandbox from the
LVM2.2.02.88 tarball. Everything works fine, but how did you get a
version of 1.02.45 from the LVM2.2.02.62.tgz tarball?
The only thing I need is the version of
On 05/11/11 10:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 03:03:42PM -0600, bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Author: bdubbs
Date: 2011-11-04 15:03:36 -0600 (Fri, 04 Nov 2011)
New Revision: 8935
Log:
Update to glib-2.31.0.
Update to pkg-config-0.26.
Remove gcc3.
Bruce,
I've merged the latest changes into my own repository and I must say,
the python stuff was a bit confusing.
Below is the xml vs id vs html table:
xml id html
python.xml python3 python3.html
python2.xml python python2.html
Can we change the python.xml to
I don't generally use PAM, so I don't mind any changes to it. I'm
curious though. What do others get from PAM? I don't see any
advantages over plain shadow for a direct terminal or ssh login unless
you have a lot of different users trying to login and you are trying to
control that
On 31/10/11 03:49, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
wblas...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
Author: wblaszcz
Date: 2011-10-30 00:13:20 -0600 (Sun, 30 Oct 2011)
New Revision: 8925
Modified:
trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml
trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/cacerts.xml
Log:
Added wget
The Linux-PAM build fails for me, most likely due to the Bekkeley DB
upgrade to 5.2.26.
I get the following error:
.libs/pam_userdb.o: In function `user_lookup':
/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:159: undefined
reference to `__db_ndbm_open'
On 30/10/11 09:43, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
On Oct 29, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
The Linux-PAM build fails for me, most likely due to the Bekkeley DB
upgrade to 5.2.26.
I get the following error:
.libs/pam_userdb.o: In function `user_lookup':
/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules
Some observations about the latest Python build.
Besides the
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/Python-3.2.2-bdb_4.8-1.patch
missing, there is no actual instruction to apply the patch.
The ftp://mirror.ovh.net/gentoo-distfiles/distfiles/Python-3.2.2.tar.bz2
url is also broken.
If we
On 28/10/11 21:13, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Some observations about the latest Python build.
Besides the
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/Python-3.2.2-bdb_4.8-1.patch
missing, there is no actual instruction to apply the patch.
The ftp://mirror.ovh.net/gentoo-distfiles/distfiles
On 28/10/11 23:10, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:57:15 +1100
Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
On 28/10/11 21:13, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
Some observations about the latest Python build.
Besides the
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/Python-3.2.2
On 29/10/11 13:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 28/10/11 23:10, Andrew Benton wrote:
When I tried to build libxml2, it did not detect Python.
libxslt also did not detect Python.
I suspect there will be a lot of other packages that will have trouble
with Python 3.2.
As DJ
On 25/08/11 06:12, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 23:14:32 +1000
From: Wayne Blaszczyk wblas...@bigpond.net.au
Subject: Re: BLFS-6.7.x
.
.
Also, where are your current-work 6.8 patches c being merged/committed
into?
it's on my own private git repository. I've only
Whereas Wayne's reply, above, seems to cast doubt on that.
I'm only basing it on the trend of the last 2 years.
Wayne, what do you plan to do when LFS-7.0 is released in a few weeks'
time: will you stick with LFS-6.8 (as a basis for a BLFS *release*)
I'll probably merge my work into LFS-7
On 22/08/11 07:04, akhiezer wrote:
Hi,
I'm considering building a system based on BLFS-svn-20110728 and LFS-6.7 .
Are Wayne/Guy/Randy/etal interested in receiving any
patches/confirmations/feedback/c from that process, towards a release
of BLFS-6.7.x by end March 2012 at latest?
On 30/07/11 21:20, Thomas Trepl wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 02:29:55 Randy McMurchy wrote:
...
I was hoping that my response to your post would encourage additional
responses. Actually, I am surprised that it has not. All that has
happened is additional packages have been added to the
On 11/07/11 09:11, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 07/10/2011 12:23 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 10/07/11 01:16, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 07/09/2011 01:45 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/07/11 09:42, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
Taking only Gnome for an example, it's just too difficult
On 04/07/11 09:42, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
It has been some time, though I have read every message to all the lists
for the last several months. I want to keep this short, but start a
conversation that could lead us to the direction (if there is any) we need
to go.
What do we do
On 10/07/11 01:16, DJ Lucas wrote:
On 07/09/2011 01:45 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
On 04/07/11 09:42, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Hi all,
...snip...
Is it maintainable?
In theory it's maintainable, but going on current trend, it's not. At
the rate we going, a final release will never happen.
One
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
