Archaic schreef:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:44:58PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
lspci
cat /proc/pci
and dmesg will tell you which driver it loaded
Owk thanks, i'm trying some stuff right now...
really, THANKS :-)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 04:44:58PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> lspci
> cat /proc/pci
and dmesg will tell you which driver it loaded
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs
--
http://lin
Thomas De Reyck wrote these words on 09/01/05 16:38 CST:
> The network card works on the LFS livecd though. Is there any way to see
> what driver is being used by the livecd?
You can try these commands. Not sure if the information is available
through the livecd, but try them.
lspci
cat /proc/p
Hello fellow (B)LFS'ers,
I have a network card that is causing trouble on my LFS system: it
appears not to exist. I have already tried to compile the kernel with as
much drivers as possible, and it just won't work. This is quite odd,
since it worked with LFS 5.
The network card works on the
Hi all,
I need some advice from more experienced LFS'ers.
Right now, I build my LFS systems (all two of them) by a customized
scripted build, which makes it easy to upgrade packages whenever a new
kernel, glibc, gcc, etc. comes out.
When the build is over, it puts a S99firstboot symlink in rc3.d
THANKS!!!
But you are overestimating my skills... :)
It is particularly the "> I would grab them both." statement that drives me
crazy. I am *VERY* CVS challenged... :(
But I guess that I can figure out how to grab them out of the LFS-BLFS
documentation, I'll get them both and try to compil
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> Hello everyone:
>
> Please...
> This is my question today:
> I am trying to use my laptop with 2 monitors but I hit this bug:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1064
>
> I also know that this is my file:
> http://cvs.freedesktop.org/x
On 8/31/05, David Ciecierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, you might be right. The only problem is that I really need to get
> this PC done as soon as possible - my sister has been waiting for it for
> almost a month now :-)
This isn't really my place to say, but is you're sister going to kn
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> >Is ATK showing in /usr/lib/pkgconfig?
> >I would delve and try to isolate how configure checks for atk and then
> >check that out yourself in a root console.
>
> Yes, it does exist according to pkgconfig. And I did try to have a look
> in the conf
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> David Fix wrote these words on 08/31/05 14:12 CST:
>
> > Just kidding. :P I actually have no idea, I'm just
> > hoping to at least put a smile onto your face. I've
> > thought of doing some kind of package management myself,
> > but seeing stuff like this always makes me
Randhir Phagura wrote:
> An abstract from 'gtk-sharp configure script'is given
> below: There is one dependency shown as 'GNOME_CFLAGS
> GNOME_LIBS' (marked with * *). Then again further down
> 'ENABLE_GNOME_TRUE ENABLE_GNOME_FALSE'. What do you make
> of that?
Ok, my earlier reply was somewha
> [code]
> AC_TRY_LINK_FUNC(atk_object_get_type, : ,
> AC_MSG_ERROR([
> *** Cannot link to Accessibility Toolkit.
> Accessibility
> *** Toolkit is required to build GTK+]))
> [/code]
I hit what was probably a variant of this problem when I
upgraded ATK yesterday. For some reason,
It's old but perhaps it's still relevant?
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2001-December/msg00251.html
It... would be relevant. But I compiled packages in proper order, and
even just rebiult them in exact same one as stated on the page. Still no
success...
Best regards,
David Cieciers
Is ATK showing in /usr/lib/pkgconfig?
I would delve and try to isolate how configure checks for atk and then
check that out yourself in a root console.
Yes, it does exist according to pkgconfig. And I did try to have a look
in the config script and that's why I only quoted a small part of it
t
Hello,
I would be really glad if you could share what kind of performance
monitor you use. Sure, I know about sysstat - but what I would like such
a tool to do (primarily) is to display the stats in a nice and pleasant
way over the web. I'm basically building a small home server to be
administ
Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words
> >My advice it to just wait a few more days for GNOME-2.12 to come out.
> >Sure, it is probably very similar to what you are working with now,
> >but the GTK folks are probably working overtime to get their stuff
> >right before the release.
>
> Hmm,
16 matches
Mail list logo
