.
>
> It worked fine until Xulrunner-1.9.2.16 with Firefox-3.6.16 and
> Icecat-3.6.16, but when trying to do with Xulrunner 2.0 with Firefox 4.0,
> Firefox will not run, so, I did not bother build Icecat-4.0 with Xulrunner,
> thus included it with a "probably" in the subjec
,
but when trying to do with Xulrunner 2.0 with Firefox 4.0, Firefox will not
run, so, I did not bother build Icecat-4.0 with Xulrunner, thus included it
with a "probably" in the subject.
At the moment, I have Firefox 4.0 and Icecat-4.0 built without system Xulrunner.
I closely followed in
I launched Bug 647910
"Firefox-4.0 compile fails on using "--enable-javaxpcom"
For reference, see Andrew Benton's thread
"Firefox-4.0 and GCC-4.6"
-- Alex
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.h
Alex said:
The Firefox-3.6.13 mozconfig example,
# If you enable javaxpcom, you must have a java compiler installed.
ac_add_options --disable-javaxpcom
I'm not sure I have a java compiler on this machine
(I do have jdk-precompiled-1.6.0_12 installed, though)
--
Apr 4, 2011 01:32:29 AM, DJ Lu
On 04/03/2011 09:49 PM, al...@verizon.net wrote:
>
> BTW, I'm not sure I have a java compiler on this machine
> (I do have jdk-precompiled-1.6.0_12 installed, though)
>
Yes, you do, however, you really should update it with either IcedTea6
(preferred), or Oracle JDK-1.6.0_24. The version you
Apr 1, 2011 07:40:59 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Firefox-4.0 in its raw state won't compile with gcc-4.6.0.
> The build grinds to a halt like so:
c++ -o nsEnumeratorUtils.o -c -I../../dist/stl_wrappers
...
/home/andy/firefox-4.0/xpcom/glue/nsEnumeratorUtils.cpp
/home/andy/firefox-4.0
Andrew Benton wrote:
> Hello World!
>
> Firefox-4.0 in its raw state won't compile with gcc-4.6.0. The build
> grinds to a halt like so:
> c++ -o nsEnumeratorUtils.o -c -I../../dist/stl_wrappers
-I../../dist/system_wrappers -include
/home/andy/firefox-4.0/config/gcc_hidden.h
Hello World!
Firefox-4.0 in its raw state won't compile with gcc-4.6.0. The build
grinds to a halt like so:
c++ -o nsEnumeratorUtils.o -c -I../../dist/stl_wrappers
-I../../dist/system_wrappers -include
/home/andy/firefox-4.0/config/gcc_hidden.h -DOSTYPE=\"Linux2.6\"
To All 'libpng' Aficionados (Bug 645519):
The way I diagonally read it, a quick fix might interfere with Bug 624133
(see "history", the 2011-03-31 14:03:47 PDT line).
Tread carefully.
-- Alex
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/
To anybody who feels sad and blue
(and would like to reinforce the feeling):
It might help to take a (quick) look at
Bug 646150
-- Alex
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 12:23:25AM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> add --with-system-libvpx (it still tests for yasm, I'd added that
> before I realised I could tell it to use my own copy, but I suspect
> it will still fail to configure if yasm is not present - must be an
> old verion of libvpx that
Mar 27, 2011 07:03:50 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> You should make your fix into a patch and submit it to LFS patches.
If and When
1. Approved by all those guys (Mats, Glenn, ?, etc.)
2. Firefox-4.0 comes down the pipe in BLFS
3. I get around to it.
Anyway, All's Well That Ends Well.
Mar 27, 2011 05:08:49 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> It [gtk+-2.22.1-old_icons-1.patch] applies with offsets to 2.24.x
I installed GTK+-2.24.3 (i.e., patch AOK)
(I had also installed GLib-2.28.4 for good measure.)
I rebuilt Firefox-3.6.16
I got my dear and sweet arrows back
Thanks a lot,
-- Alex
-
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:27:04 -0500 (CDT)
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> Mar 27, 2011 01:32:12 PM, alupu wrote:
>
> Andy:
> >> Can we see the actual error message (and some lines of context before
> >> the crash happens). Maybe we can find a fix for you?
>
> > Thank you very much.
> > Please bear wit
On 03/27/2011 03:40 PM, al...@verizon.net wrote:
>
> My question:
> Is your patch good for any>= 2.22.1 ?
>
It applies with offsets to 2.24.x IIRC. I don't think I had to rediff,
but it should be simple to do so.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: h
Mar 27, 2011 02:47:36 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
Andy:
>> You can fix the back and forward arrows by setting a gtk theme
DJ Lucas:
> You shouldn't have to. ...
> Patch [2.22.1] attached.
Hi DJ,
Thank you very much.
I know that the buttons are still missing as of the latest release, 3.6.16.
Be that as
, etc.
To Whom It May Concern:
On a dare, I decided to install the freshly released Firefox 4.0.
It was also on a "squeeze" - the 3.6.14 and 3.6.15 failed me miserably:
I had lost my beloved back and forward arrows of the navigation buttons
(see Bug 640850). I was also beyond a GTK+-2/3
Mar 27, 2011 01:32:12 PM, alupu wrote:
Andy:
>> Can we see the actual error message (and some lines of context before
>> the crash happens). Maybe we can find a fix for you?
> Thank you very much.
> Please bear with me about (hopefully) an hour or so after this post.
> I'm submitting a Bug report
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:48:34 -0500 (CDT)
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> I tried my damnedest; each time I use "--with-system-png"
> the compile fails about 1/3 of the way with some crazy
> problem with
> ranlib libimglib2_s.a
> in sub-directory `/usr/src/firefox-build/modules/libpr0n/src'.
>
C
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 09:45:22 -0500 (CDT)
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> Mar 26, 2011 04:20:04 AM, Andrew Breton wrote:
>
>
> > ldd '/usr/lib/firefox/firefox-bin'
> > ...
> > libpng14.so.14 => /usr/lib/libpng14.so.14 (0xb706)
> > ...
>
> > As you can see, firefox.bin is linked to libpng14.so.14
.
2.1. NO mention of _png_ in configure at all, which _tends_
to confirm that the use of "with-system-png" is NOT recognized
(and thus wrong - as I've been saying and experiencing all along)
3. FWIW, _my_
ldd /usr/lib/firefox-4.0/firefox-bin | grep libpng15.so.15
libpng
On 3/26/2011 3:19 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> As you can see, firefox.bin is linked to libpng14.so.14 so
> --enable-system-png obviously works fine...
Actually, the output of ldd is quite meaningless for determining
if Firefox is using it directly. For example, if you compile GTK+
wit libpng, the o
> Andy:
> There is definitely an --enable-system-png line
>
> Alex (comments as of this writing):
> I said
> there's no "--with-system-png" line
> I don't remember mentioning "-- enable" :)
>
> Apparently, "with" <> "enab
't remember mentioning "-- enable" :)
Apparently, "with" <> "enable", not only in E-mailing but
in the real life of compiling:
1.1. "--enable-system-png" doesn't exist in
'configure --help' (for Firefox-4.0)
1.2. Like I said,
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:30:29 -0500 (CDT)
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> Alex (comments as of this writing):
> 1.1. To make a LONG story short, I haven't been able to
> "recover" my arrows so far.
>
Have you tried using something like lxappearance to set a gtk theme?
http://wiki.lxde.org/en/LXAppeara
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:39:53PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 07:53:20AM +0100, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> > On Tuesday 22 March 2011 02:59:09 Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks for this, I was planning to move to 3.6.15 when I've
> > > finished migrating my data to my n
ot;upgrade") in a package breaks
the whole mozillah.
Item No 3. -
Alex (comments as of this writing):
My Firefox 4.0 (once built and installed OK :) crashes
with "segmentation fault" on certain sites.
As Mozilla people like to say:
<
irefox and its supporting packages (like gtk).
All of a sudden, a change ("upgrade") in a package breaks
the whole mozillah.
Item No 3. -
Alex (comments as of this writing):
My Firefox 4.0 (once built and installed OK :) crashes
wi
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:18:33 -0500 (CDT)
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> The only note,
> 'libpng' with or without "apng" is an exercise in futility:
> One MUST comment out,
> # ac_add_options --with-system-png
>
No, it builds fine --with-system-png here.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/l
Mar 23, 2011 06:40:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Can't even build it!
> The md5sum
> 3468a2c463b4fc2788ba621e4b511c30 firefox-4.0.source.tar.bz2
> Can anyone confirm that md5 ...?
Yep.
That's the one that worked for me (in OP).
BTW, I stand by (so to speak) what I said in the
vice.h
was in the distant past (before 3.6). My first thought was that I
might need xulrunner to generate it, but I'm certain several of the
logs I looked at were from recent builds not installing xulrunner.
It's definitely not in the tarball. The md5sum of what I
downloaded is:
3468a
n a dare, I decided to install the freshly released Firefox 4.0.
> It was also on a "squeeze" - the 3.6.14 and 3.6.15 failed me miserably:
> I had lost my beloved back and forward arrows of the navigation buttons
> (see Bug 640850). I was also beyond a GTK+-2/3 version where I m
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 10:37:52 -0500 (CDT)
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Thank you for the themes pointers.
>
> >> Did you use
>
> >> --with-system-nspr
> >> --with-system-nss
>
> >> like me?
>
> > No. the only thing I install which uses nspr or nss is Firefox so for
> > me it makes n
Hi Andy,
Thank you for the themes pointers.
>> Did you use
>> --with-system-nspr
>> --with-system-nss
>> like me?
> No. the only thing I install which uses nspr or nss is Firefox so for
> me it makes no sense to install them a system libraries.
I'm a little confused here.
I was talking about
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:09:31 -0500 (CDT)
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> William, Andy:
>
> CORRECTION
> The build did pick up GTK+-2, despite my best
> efforts to place a GTK pointer pointing to GTK+-3
> in /usr/lib and /usr/include.
> Apologies.
>
> Andy:
>
> > You can fix the back and forward arr
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 07:53:20AM +0100, Thomas Trepl wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 March 2011 02:59:09 Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > The apng stuff sounds as if it hasn't changed - although I admit to
> > suggesting blfs should go with apng (one of my bad suggestions!),
> > firefox has always been happy t
or me.
Did you use
>> --with-system-nspr
>> --with-system-nss
like me?
> Did you not try using google?
> .../apng/files/libpng/libpng15/
>> but nobody expects Firefox-4.0 to be for the faint of heart.
> You'll live.
The OP covered my first thoughts after a quick
Mar 22, 2011 12:37:26 AM, William Tracy wrote:
> Does Firefox build with GTk+3? I assumed it didn't.
I no longer touch GTK+2 for reasons alluded to in my previous posts.
The whole work described in my OP was done using GTK+-3.03.
-- Alex
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-supp
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:37:07 -0700
William Tracy wrote:
> Does Firefox build with GTk+3? I assumed it didn't.
>
No it doesn't, firefox uses gtk+-2.0 >= 2.10.0
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See t
y Concern:
>
> On a dare, I decided to install the freshly released Firefox 4.0.
> It was also on a "squeeze" - the 3.6.14 and 3.6.15 failed me miserably:
> I had lost my beloved back and forward arrows of the navigation buttons
> (see Bug 640850). I was also beyond a GTK+-
> glib-2.28.3, gtk+-3.0.3, sqlite-3.7.5, etc.
> >
> > To Whom It May Concern:
> >
> > On a dare, I decided to install the freshly released Firefox 4.0.
> > It was also on a "squeeze" - the 3.6.14 and 3.6.15 failed me miserably:
> > I had lost my
Does Firefox build with GTk+3? I assumed it didn't.
William Tracy
Work: wtr...@cisco.com
Play: afishion...@gmail.com
Cell phone: (805) 704-0917
Internet phone: (707) 206-6441
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:06 PM, wrote:
> Mar 21, 2011 10:01:36 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > The apng stuff sounds as if
Mar 21, 2011 10:01:36 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> The apng stuff sounds as if it hasn't changed - although I admit to
> suggesting blfs should go with apng (one of my bad suggestions!),
> firefox has always been happy to build its own patched version.
Hi Ken,
Frankly, I've always trusted _my_ stuff
y Concern:
>
> On a dare, I decided to install the freshly released Firefox 4.0.
> It was also on a "squeeze" - the 3.6.14 and 3.6.15 failed me miserably:
> I had lost my beloved back and forward arrows of the navigation buttons
> (see Bug 640850). I was also beyond a GTK+-
"ASUS P5E-VM HDMI" with Intel G35/ICH9R.
Intel Core2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz, 4GB
(B)LFS i686-pc-linux-gnu 2.6.37.3, Xorg-7.6
glib-2.28.3, gtk+-3.0.3, sqlite-3.7.5, etc.
To Whom It May Concern:
On a dare, I decided to install the freshly released Firefox 4.0.
It was also on
45 matches
Mail list logo
