[boost] By the way... (index.htm on CVS)

I copied the Recent Items for 1.30.1 and 1.30.2 from the latest archive to CVS (to Dave). I corrected that URL fragment that used a backslash instead of a normal slash (to Beman). Daryle ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman

[boost] Re: Deprecation/removal of libraries

On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 4:34 PM, Beman Dawes wrote: At 01:22 AM 8/24/2003, Daryle Walker wrote: On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 10:12 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote: I'd like to deprecate or remove two libraries: - min_rand has been the only entry in our list of "Obsolete Libr

[boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 2:21 PM, Peter Dimov wrote: Daryle Walker wrote: That's an invalid argument, since the STL containers give you a default value for the allocator argument, which makes containers work out of the box, and the default is "for free." I'm a

[boost] Re: what happened to allocators in boost?

On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 2:57 PM, Peter Dimov wrote: E. Gladyshev wrote: --- Peter Dimov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In this context, an allocator parameter is only an excuse for implementors to avoid doing the necessary work to make function<> useful out of the box. "You can always use a

[boost] Re: Problem on the CVS version of the top web page

On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 4:26 PM, David Abrahams wrote: Janusz Piwowarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Sunday, August 24, 2003, 7:15:11 AM, Daryle Walker wrote: I have a "CVS Quick Reference Card" lying around, and the entries for "checkout" and "update&q

[boost] Re: Problem on the CVS version of the top web page

On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 6:49 PM, Janusz Piwowarski wrote: On Sunday, August 24, 2003, 7:15:11 AM, Daryle Walker wrote: I have a "CVS Quick Reference Card" lying around, and the entries for "checkout" and "update" have a sub-option "-j REV" that sa

[boost] Re: Deprecation/removal of libraries

On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 10:12 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote: I'd like to deprecate or remove two libraries: - min_rand has been the only entry in our list of "Obsolete Libraries" for quite some time. Random is quite mature, so let's just eliminate min_rand now. Doesn't one of the classes in

[boost] Re: Problem on the CVS version of the top web page

On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 7:52 AM, David Abrahams wrote: Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 8:14 AM, David Abrahams wrote: Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The CVS version of BOOST_ROOT/index.htm does not have Latest News

[boost] Re: lexicographic: review request?

On Saturday, August 23, 2003, at 11:21 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: Jan Langer wrote: what is needed for the lexicographic class to be included into boost? I don't know, but I think there are several ideas which haven't been addressed and that we should at least have a look at: a) Short-circuiting b)

[boost] Re: boost-install list on mailing_lists.htm

On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 11:54 AM, David Abrahams wrote: Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: David Abrahams wrote: our mailing lists page advertises boost-install as the list for installation assistance, but it really isn't for user questions at all. I plan to remove it from that pa

[boost] Re: lexicographic: review request?

On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 6:01 PM, Jan Langer wrote: what is needed for the lexicographic class to be included into boost? if it is a formal review (probably a really short one) i want to request it. maybe it can also be reviewed together with other utility components. Do you have anything

[boost] Re: boost::format on gcc2.96?

On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 8:20 AM, David Abrahams wrote: Jarl Friis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: All true. Unfortunately, 2.96 was released by RedHat with one popular version of Linux, which makes it (in many peoples' eyes) an important compiler to support anyway. I will in line with the a

[boost] Re: Problem on the CVS version of the top web page

On Friday, August 22, 2003, at 8:14 AM, David Abrahams wrote: Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: The CVS version of BOOST_ROOT/index.htm does not have Latest News entries for 1.30.1 and 1.30.2. (I guess they haven't been copied from the 1_30_x branch yet.) Feel free to ma

[boost] Re: [filesystem] operator<(path, path)?

On Thursday, August 21, 2003, at 10:12 PM, Beman Dawes wrote: At 06:38 PM 8/21/2003, David Abrahams wrote: I need to make a mapping over paths. Is there any important reason there's no operator< provided? I don't think it has been discussed. I've had the need myself, but worked around it by us

[boost] Re: augmented_crc problem with gcc 3.1 and 3.2

[This was originally posted on the Users list. I'm posting the response here to the main list because I have no idea how to fix it. This message isn't cross-posted to the Users list because I used different e-mail addresses to subscribe to each list.] On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 4:56 PM, R

[boost] Slight error on home page

This is on . Look at the second link of the first line under the 19-Aug-2003 entry of "Latest News", which corresponds to 1.30.2. Someone used a backslash [\] for a URL-part separator instead of the proper regular-slash [/]. I guess the last writer uses Windows. But, i

[boost] Re: [Boost-announce] Boost 1.30.2 is released

On Tuesday, August 19, 2003, at 11:56 AM, David Abrahams wrote: This release was managed by Dave Abrahams with the generous and dedicated help of Aleksey Gurtovoy and Misha Bergal of Meta-Communications, Inc., and of Martin Wille. We expect this to be the last release in the 1.30.x chain; see

[boost] Re: Insufficient significant digits using lexical_cast

On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 10:31 PM, Paul A. Bristow wrote: Agreed - but what do we do if NOT is_iec559? Give up? #error "Can only work with IEEE 754!" Or choose a massive amount of decimal digits? eg 40? Why not just use what we're currently doing, use numeric_limits<>::digits10 and hope

[boost] Re: Insufficient significant digits using lexical_cast

On Sunday, August 17, 2003, at 10:33 PM, Paul A. Bristow wrote: [SNIP] But you are right that it would be better to check that numeric_limits::digits exists and isn't something silly before using the formula. With all the built-in floating point types it should be fine, and for other (well) Us

[boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released

On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 10:50 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: - Original Message - From: "Fredrik Blomqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:40 PM Subject: [boost] Re: Boost 1.30.1 released Shouldn't the documentation for function and signals be

[boost] Hey, I have a replacement test file here! (was: Added newtestfile, need help testing)

ginal announcement of the new file. There are some (minor?) issues with it. If you don't know what I'm talking about, or if you want to help with the issues, I'm reprinting the original notice: On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 4:43 AM, Daryle Walker wrote: I added another test file for

[boost] Re: GUI/GDI template library

On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 2:25 PM, David B. Held wrote: "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] At 07:30 PM 8/6/2003, Joel de Guzman wrote: [...] And don't forget the Mac ;-) [...] I know that Windows and X Window are major API's that follow very different

[boost] Re: Insufficient significant digits using lexical_cast

[Paul claims that lexical_cast prints (floating-point) numbers with too few precision digits. Currently, limits::digits10 + 1 is used. Paul wants to change it to "int significant_digits10 = int(ceil(1 + limits::digits * log10Two));" where "limits" is the numeric-limits traits class and "log10

[boost] Re: Wrong version.hpp in Boost 1.30.1 download

On Monday, August 4, 2003, at 11:27 PM, David Abrahams wrote: Alisdair Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: version.hpp still claims to be version 1.30.0 Oh well. I guess there are some details missing from the release manager's responsibilities on the release procedure page. Can you (or Beman,

[boost] Re: Reversed operator helpers?

On Thursday, July 31, 2003, at 9:58 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: Daryle Walker wrote: In we have helper classes that can generate "operator OP" from "operator OP=", where "OP" can be "+", "/", ">>", etc. What about types and algorith

[boost] Reversed operator helpers?

In we have helper classes that can generate "operator OP" from "operator OP=", where "OP" can be "+", "/", ">>", etc. What about types and algorithms where the non-assignment version is easier than the assignment version? Should we have reverse helpers? //

[boost] Using the sandbox for further versions? (was: Re:[dynamic_bitset]- small fix for workaround macro)

On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 11:49 AM, Gennaro Prota wrote: Ok. In general, please refer (for now) to the sandbox version of dynamic_bitset, which is the one actively maintained (and, as you can see, it already uses BOOST_WORKAROUND, though just to define BOOST_WORKAROUND_BLA_BLA_BLA). I hope

[boost] Re: Slight revision to more-I/O

On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 8:51 AM, Paul A. Bristow wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daryle Walker Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 8:38 AM To: Boost Subject: [boost] Slight revision to more-I/O In the latest post-review version, I

[boost] Quick thought on circular_buffer

Could circular_buffer be done like std::stack and std::queue, as an adapter for a regular container class? You may have to have a custom iterator, though. Daryle ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[boost] Another mailing list (was: Re: uBlas and linear algebraquestions)

On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 8:59 PM, Kirill Lapshin wrote: David Abrahams wrote: [SNIP] Well, that's disturbing! http://tinyurl.com/hinz plainly says: Mailing lists - uBLAS has no dedicated mailing list. Feel free to use the mailing lists of Boost . What's the addres

[boost] Added auto_temp_buf to sandbox

In the Boost sandbox CVS, I added to the memory library auto_temp_buf, a variant of std::auto_ptr based on the rarely used standard temporary buffer functions. It's in the following files ROOT/boost/memory_fwd.hpp [changed] ROOT/boost/memory/auto_temp_buf.hpp ROOT/boost/

[boost] Re: Fixed-Decimal's Scale

On Saturday, July 19, 2003, at 7:59 AM, Bill Seymour wrote: I've been thinking about the related issues of whether decimal should be a template and whether the scale should be immutable. First, I'm adamant that the user should be able to write dollars = foo; without magically losing pennies

[boost] Re: Slight revision to more-I/O

On Saturday, July 19, 2003, at 3:30 AM, Gennaro Prota wrote: --- Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, I don't think the Review Manager ever gave a final answer. Well, he and everyone else can take a quick look. It seems that some people around here are jumpy for a

[boost] Slight revision to more-I/O

In the latest post-review version, I fully disabled copying for the array-based stream-buffer class. I also copied the revised version of the library to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/more_io_revised.zip so you don't need access to the Sandbox CVS to see the altered files. This is

[boost] Need to mention more Boost Internet resources

Looking at the ROOT/boost/more/mailing_lists.htm file from the latest CVS and the web site: 1. Not all the lists are given. It excludes (at least) the documentation and installation lists. (The CVS version adds the Spirit list that isn't on the web site yet.) 2. All the web sites for separat

[boost] Missing functional files in CVS?

In my copy of the main CVS, looking at ROOT/boost/libs/libraries.htm, the links to "function" and "signals", both by Doug Gregor, don't work. Hopefully this is temporary?... Daryle ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listi

[boost] Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again)

On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 9:12 PM, Joaquín M López Muñoz wrote: Well, to sum it up, these are the public names of the library: 0 multiindex_set (haven't decided on the final name, still doubting between indexed_set and indexed_table). 1 swap, equality and comparison operators 2 index_type 3 g

[boost] Thoughts on fixdec

This is on version 2.2 that is dated on 5 July 2003. I haven't read any messages since July 12th, so I haven't seen any other reviews yet. I think this library should be accepted. I have some suggestions for fixes and other changes. 1. We have two math-related namespaces already. The boost::

[boost] About member extraction

In another thread, by Joaquín M López Muñoz, there is talk of a helper class like: // template< class Class,typename Type, Type Class::*PtrToMember, typename Compare=std::less > struct less_by { less_by(const Compare& comp=Co

[boost] Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again)

On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 9:21 PM, Joaquín M López Muñoz wrote: Hi again, - Mensaje Original - De: Fernando Cacciola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fecha: Sábado, Julio 12, 2003 7:32 pm Asunto: [boost] Re: Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again) [stuff about conceptual structure of multtindex_se

[boost] Re: Interest in multiindex_set?(again)

On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 12:25 AM, Joaquín Muñoz wrote: [SNIP] A related question: Should boost::multiindex::multiindex_set be raised into Boost namespace as boost::multiindex_set (or whatever its final name)? Seems the standard practice, but I think it is safer to ask first. [TRUNCATE] If

[boost] Filtered stream-buffer, part 3

For the past few weeks, some posters were talking about streambufs that can decorate another stream buffer. I wrote up a third version at . The differences from the previous version is that is actually implements filtering for the ma

[boost] Filtered stream-buffer, part 2

For the past few weeks, some posters were talking about streambufs that can decorate another stream buffer. I wrote up a second version at . It moves the calling functions to the stream buffer class. It adds example filtering functi

[boost] Re: filtered/decorated streambufs

On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 8:34 AM, Larry Evans wrote: Paul A. Bristow wrote: [SNIP] (More sadly, I was much impeded in trying to understand much of Larry's work in progress on account of the bizarre layout - this would be an serious impediment to acceptance by Boosters - see the Boost coding

[boost] Re: tokenizer comments

On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 8:59 AM, Edward Diener wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Edward Diener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [SNIP] "The Tokenizer documentation for char_separator tokenizer function states that the default argument for the second template type is "char_traits". This is incor

[boost] Re: filtered/decorated streambufs

On Friday, June 27, 2003, at 1:27 PM, Paul A. Bristow wrote: I also have an updated ('C++ 1998 STL standardized') version of James Kanze's of filtering streambuf and filtering streams derived from his files at www.gabi-soft.fr re-built for MSVC 7.1, (Could be posted on request). and his illumi

[boost] Someone wanted filtered/decorated streambufs?

For the past few weeks, some posters were talking about streambufs that can decorate another stream buffer. I wrote up a general class at . The non-virtual filter functions act as a pass-through (i.e. no change) filter/monitor at the

Re: [boost] API Review request: XML API for C++, second round

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 8:12 PM, Stefan Seefeld wrote: [SNIP] As the wrapper objects have reference semantics, I append '_ptr' to their name to stress that fact. A practical side-effect of this is [TRUNCATE] Shouldn't the type names use a suffix of "_ref" instead? (I don't need to know th

[boost] Added new test file, need help testing

I added another test file for the I/O-state saving classes. It's in the main Boost CVS as "boost/libs/io/test/ios_state_unit_test.cpp". I have two compilers installed (GCC 3.1 and CodeWarrior 8). I wrote and tested the new file with CodeWarrior. But my GCC doesn't support the wchar_t part of

[boost] Re: BOOST_STATIC_WARNING ?

On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 12:38 AM, Gennaro Prota wrote: On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:49:42 -0400, Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 9:59 PM, David Abrahams wrote: Slightly. They are still "non-portable constructions made up by compiler ma

[boost] Re: Novell NetWare support (filesystem), patch

On Thursday, June 19, 2003, at 10:29 AM, Beman Dawes wrote: [SNIP] Because the platform is apparently so similar to POSIX and/or Windows, I'd prefer not to treat it as a distinct platform. Rather, I'd like to treat BOOST_NETWARE as a variation on BOOST_POSIX and/or > BOOST_WINDOWS. [TRUNCATE] A

[boost] Re: BOOST_STATIC_WARNING ?

On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 9:59 PM, David Abrahams wrote: Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: My point was that warnings are non-portable constructions made up by compiler makers. So are the semantics of #include. That doesn't mean we can't count on certain simi

[boost] Re: BOOST_STATIC_WARNING ?

On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 7:03 AM, David Abrahams wrote: Daryle Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Sunday, June 15, 2003, at 10:15 AM, Robert Ramey wrote: H - I never imagined that something like this would be so problematic. For now with my VC 7.0 compiler I can use the fol

[boost] Re: Exception testing for Boost.Test incomplete

On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 12:38 AM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote: "Daryle Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] While writing some other code, I checked out how some of the macros in Boost.Test are implemented. The BOOST_CHECK_THROW and BOOST_CHECK_

[boost] Re: Changed CRC

On Monday, June 16, 2003, at 9:09 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote: Daryle Walker wrote: In CVS, I added an example file to the CRC library. I changed the documentation to point to the example file. Daryle, I see this code in the example: do { ifs.read

Re: [boost] BOOST_STATIC_WARNING ?

On Sunday, June 15, 2003, at 10:15 AM, Robert Ramey wrote: H - I never imagined that something like this would be so problematic. For now with my VC 7.0 compiler I can use the following and it gives me almost exactly what I need. The warning message points exactly to the place in my code

[boost] Added auto_array to sandbox

In the Boost sandbox CVS, I started a memory library with auto_array, an array-based variant of std::auto_ptr. It's in the following files ROOT/boost/memory_fwd.hpp ROOT/boost/memory/auto_array.hpp ROOT/boost/libs/memory/doc/auto_array.html ROOT/boost/libs/memory/

[boost] Exception testing for Boost.Test incomplete

While writing some other code, I checked out how some of the macros in Boost.Test are implemented. The BOOST_CHECK_THROW and BOOST_CHECK_EXCEPTION macros flag when an intentional exception was missed and when the expected exception type was caught. But what about when an exception of the _wro

[boost] Would anyone mind an ios_state_saver addition?

I was thinking of adding I/O state-saving classes for the positioning information. This is given by "tellg" and "seekg" for input streams and "tellp" and "seekp" for output streams. Would anyone mind? Would these have to be reviewed? Daryle ___ Un

[boost] Changed CRC

In CVS, I added an example file to the CRC library. I changed the documentation to point to the example file. Daryle ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[boost] Minor transition problem in Boost.Test

While looking up something, I noticed in CVS that the libraries page refers to the top Boost.Test documentation page as "index.htm", but it the actual file was changed to "index.html", so my browser missed it until I guessed the change. Can someone fix it (in ROOT/libs/libraries.htm), if it ha

[boost] Changed base-from-member

In CVS, I changed the header to increase the maximum number of constructor arguments to 10. I changed the documentation to match. I also did minor tweaking in these and related files. Daryle ___ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/

Re: [boost] BOOST_STATIC_WARNING ?

On Saturday, June 14, 2003, at 9:45 AM, Robert Ramey wrote: I find BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(...) extremely useful. I would also find BOOST_STATIC_WARNING(...) extremely useful. I've looked in boost and now found such a thing. Am I missing something? Is there something equivalent? Can such a thing

[boost] Up-to-date std::auto_ptr?

I've occasionally read that the std::auto_ptr system was changed in an update document, due to some problems in the standard's specification. Is this true? If so, is there a place where I can read the adjusted system? (I want to finally add an array-variant to Boost, and I want to make it cl

[boost] Would anyone mind these adjustments?

Is it OK to make these adjustments to our main CVS? 1. The base-from-member template forwards constructor arguments up to 3. I want to extend it to around 10. (I saw some code that used a custom BFM class because he needed 5 forwarded arguments.) 2. From discussions in the Users mailing list,

Re: [boost] [filesystem] "." directory-placeholder added

On Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 6:27 PM, Beman Dawes wrote: At 01:31 PM 6/12/2003, Daryle Walker wrote: [SNIP] Is it possible to override this and use "." or ".." as regular object names? No. Likewise there is no escape mechanism that allows you to include "/" in

Re: [boost] [filesystem] "." directory-placeholder added

On Thursday, June 12, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Beman Dawes wrote: An updated version of Boost.Filesystem has been added to CVS. The primary change is adding "." as a directory-placeholder to the generic path grammar. This solves the problem of distinguishing between an empty path and one that acts a

[boost] Re: More refinement for future(?) more_io

On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 4:43 PM, Larry Evans wrote: Daryle Walker wrote: Since my last announcement (a couple of weeks ago) of refining the more_io files that were reviewed a few months ago, I've done another set of revisions. The altered files are in the Boost Sandbox CVS. Besid

[boost] More refinement for future(?) more_io

Since my last announcement (a couple of weeks ago) of refining the more_io files that were reviewed a few months ago, I've done another set of revisions. The altered files are in the Boost Sandbox CVS. Besides an altered "boost/io_fwd.hpp" and "libs/io/doc/index.html", we got: boost/io/array_

[boost] Clean up the Yahoo Group files area some more?

Over a year ago, some of the old files in the Yahoo Groups area were moved to "2000" and "2001" subfolders to clean up the main space. Should we do that again for the 2002 files (and some forgotten 2001 files I see there)? I think an administrator has to do it, since they can move any user's

[boost] Re: Interest in library generating streambufs from objects

On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 3:23 PM, Reece Dunn wrote: [SNIP] Also, is there a way for you to bind a streambuf to a stream? I have not had any direct experience with stream buffers, so I don't know. If not, it would be a good idea to have an I/O stream that can have a custom stream buffer, that

[boost] Re: I/O library status

On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 8:26 AM, Ed Brey wrote: [SNIP] * Stream-buffer-wrapping Streams motivation: Why would someone want an internal buffer (versus independent buffers as used by standard streams)? (Example, please.) The basic stream (template) classes support attaching a stream buffer

[boost] Re: Need two new configuration macros

On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 11:46 AM, John Maddock wrote: [Daryle suggested two new configuration macros to detect if std::ios_base and std::basic_streambuf<> have been made explicitly non-copyable. DR #50 recommends this change for std::ios_base. Recent versions of GCC implement this change,

[boost] Re: Math Constants Formal Review

On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 6:45 AM, Jaap Suter wrote: Today is the start of the formal review of the Math Constants library by Paul Bristow. The review will run until Sunday June 15th. I will be serving as review manager. [SNIP] You can find the latest documentation, including a bigger FAQ

[boost] Need two new configuration macros

I see the need for two new configuration macros. The need popped up when I was trying to add a copy constructor to a stream buffer template class (for completeness) but GCC blocked it. The std::basic_streambuf<> class template and the std::ios_base class don't mention any copying semantics in

[boost] Re: Imminent Code Breakage

David Abrahams wrote: This is going to break every boost library and every user which is depending on the current CVS version of iterator_adaptors. The new adaptors are so much better designed and easier to use that making the transition should be cake, but before I do anything drastic I want to

[boost] Re: Better Intel-Win32 support

On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 3:54 PM, Beman Dawes wrote: Hum... I just had a thought. Is it possible to detect if wchar_t is a typedef at compile time? Yes, I think so. Won't boost::is_same< unsigned short, wchar_t >::value be true if wchar_t is a typedef, and false if a distinct > type? I'l

[boost] Re: I/O library status

On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 9:19 AM, Thomas Witt wrote: [SNIP] To me there are basically two reasons that make newl desirable beside the formatting issue. [SNIP] 2. IIUC the difference between a character and a manipulator is that the manipulator is not tied to the streams character type. So fo

[boost] Re: I/O library status

On Monday, June 2, 2003, at 12:21 PM, Ed Brey wrote: Daryle Walker wrote: I fixed up the I/O library I had reviewed a few months ago. It was some little things last week, but some big documentation and testing this week. It's in the sandbox if you want to try it out. Looking at to

[boost] Configuration ideas

[I wrote this half-asleep a few days ago. You could add things like signals/slots, better list management, etc. Take this suggestion as a very general guideline, not as actual code to use.] I haven't looked at the command-line/config library under review right now. I have seen recent discuss

[boost] How to add automated testing?

In a revamp of the I/O library reviewed a few months ago, I revised the structure of the test programs to match that given in the Boost.Test documentation. Is what I have alright? Someone (Beman?) mentioned the desire for Jamfiles; but I don't use Jam, so I don't know if that's needed for arr

[boost] Stream-buffers can't be copied?

I'm trying to fix up the I/O library submission I gave a few months ago, and came up with an issue with a copy constructor and GCC. I explicitly wrote a copy constructor for a new stream-buffer class template. I just added test code that used that constructor. Everything ran fine on my Metro

[boost] Re: I/O library status

I fixed up the I/O library I had reviewed a few months ago. It was some little things last week, but some big documentation and testing this week. It's in the sandbox if you want to try it out. Besides an altered "boost/io_fwd.hpp" and "libs/io/doc/index.html", we got: boost/io/array_stream.h

[boost] Re: Formal Review for Boost I/O Library

On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 11:50 PM, Paul A. Bristow wrote: [SNIP] I noted two tiny mistakes in the documentation streambuf_wrapping.html in Rationale ... is defined with the appropiate <<< mis-spelt appropriate Fixed. ..accessing that stream buffer, and checking if that stream didn't switch

[boost] Re: A complex vs valarray quandary [long & rambling]

On Monday, May 12, 2003, at 10:59 AM, Hubert Holin wrote: I believe, and hope, I got something wrong. Didn't I warn you about taking the approach you describe below? I think it was over a year ago (but I changed computers so I can't check at the moment). Updating the special functi

Re: [boost] Boost I/O Library review status

On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 8:32 AM, Ed Brey wrote: I'd like to thank those who took time to review the update to the Boost I/O Library during the review period, which ended several days ago. The reviewers raised important questions about the usefulness of the new portions of the library.

[boost] Re: Before we get too carried away...

On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 8:32 AM, Beman Dawes wrote: At 02:24 AM 3/13/2003, Daryle Walker wrote: 4. My testing was with a stock Boost 1.29.0 from a zip file. If the CVS version of Boost already has fixes for CW-DS and/or CWP8.3, I'll switch to that and apologize for wasting every

[boost] Before we get too carried away...

For the past few days, I've posted about not being able to get Boost projects set up with the CodeWarrior Developement Studio, Mac OS X Edition, v8, that I just got. I just want to make sure that it's not my setup mistakes, and not the configuration files. 1. Is there anyone out there successf

[boost] Re: Does this compiler need configuring?

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 4:16 PM, Beman Dawes wrote: At 03:49 PM 3/7/2003, Howard Hinnant wrote: [SNIP my previous message] I'm a Metrowerks expert, but not a boost expert. Your project is set up to use MSL C which correctly puts ptrdiff_t into namespace std. The above code can't find ::p

[boost] Re: Does this compiler need configuring?

On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 9:47 AM, Beman Dawes wrote: At 02:03 AM 3/4/2003, Daryle Walker wrote: I'm trying to use the more_io.zip stuff currently under review with a copy of Metrowerks CodeWarrior Developement Studio (Mac OS X Edition, v8). I haven't got anything to compile. I

[boost] Does this compiler need configuring?

I'm trying to use the more_io.zip stuff currently under review with a copy of Metrowerks CodeWarrior Developement Studio (Mac OS X Edition, v8). I haven't got anything to compile. I get errors like: //== Error : undefined identi

[boost] SourceForge computer farm

When I read a web page for a project (in this case, HTML-Tidy at ), I noticed that they built/tested their library every day automatically with computers SourceForge leaves for automation. Maybe we should use those computer for our regression testing? Daryle

[boost] Unused template parameters

On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 6:11 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: Markus Schöpflin wrote: Daniel Frey wrote: Markus Schöpflin wrote: This was the original source: template struct enable_if; ---^ Visual Age doesn't like this, it needs a name here. ^^ Ah, that's the re

[boost] About the static_log2 discussions

I haven't been following Boost that much lately. Spent the past few days catching up. Some people have been discussing changes to the algorithm used by static_log2 lately. Actually, I've forgotten why I used the implementation I did. I sometimes tend to be verbose in my code; hopefully comp

[boost] Re: status of 64bit support in integer.hpp?

On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 9:16 AM, Neal D. Becker wrote: What is the status of adding 64bit support to integer.hpp? I am looking for boost::int_t::least for n > 32. Nothing is happening right now. I'm sorry if I didn't make this clear before: I'm _not_ doing this for you; you have

[boost] Re: Review Request: I/O Manipulators and Adaptors

On Sunday, December 8, 2002, at 04:44 PM, Thomas Witt wrote: On Sunday 08 December 2002 09:41, Daryle Walker wrote: Did the people who arrange formal reviews see this? Yes, this time. Sorry for missing your first post. Can you give me a short summary of what this stuff is about and whether

[boost] Anyone got Boost Digest, Vol 201, Issue 4?

For some reason, I never got this archive, but I did get the rest of them on that day (Nov. 26, 2002). Could someone send me a copy? Is it possible to add a program to the List server for sending specific digests back to the user? Daryle ___ Unsubsc

[boost] Re: Virtual operators considered harmful

On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 11:46 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote: Daryle Walker wrote: [Apologies to the computer scientist who came up with that phrase (w.r.t. GOTOs)] I haven't looked at the serialization library that was just up for review, but some of the comments I saw on this

[boost] Re: Review Request: I/O Manipulators and Adaptors

On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 5:14 AM, Jeff Garland wrote: Could we arrange a review of the I/O stuff I currently have in the sandbox? The files are: boost/io/array_stream.hpp boost/io/iomanip.hpp boost/io/streambuf_wrapping.hpp boost/io_fwd.hpp [updated] libs/io/doc/array_stream.html libs/i

[boost] Review Request: I/O Manipulators and Adaptors

Could we arrange a review of the I/O stuff I currently have in the sandbox? The files are: boost/io/array_stream.hpp boost/io/iomanip.hpp boost/io/streambuf_wrapping.hpp boost/io_fwd.hpp [updated] libs/io/doc/array_stream.html libs/io/doc/index.html [updated] libs/io/doc/iomanip.html libs/io/doc

  1   2   >