* Nick Arnett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What version are you using?
0.53b
haven't noticed the stuff you're describing... but then again, I'm
probably just not paying attention.
Probably not. I'm not sure why anyone would worry about the window
title bar, since the command prompt has the
Maru spoketh:
whether it is in money or other financial instruments. I
hear that farmers are paid really large sums to deliberately
curtail crop production; why not take that wasted money, use
it to buy the excess crops and give it to those retirees in
some way or other (so they don't
Robert Seeberger spoketh:
Question to religious listmembers:
Are religious peoples required to killfile this particular GOD
individual because of the first commandment?
For the Christians: Such act would violate My updated Sixth Commandment:
Thou shalt not kill(file).
For all others:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:35:03 -0500, Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The route to real pensions reform
Jan 6th 2005
From The Economist print edition
http://www.economist.com/finance/PrinterFriendly.cfm?Story_ID=3535838
Progressive indexing of retirement benefits by wage level, argues
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:24:02 -0600, Ronn!Blankenship
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Thursday 03:26 PM 1/6/2005, Nick Arnett wrote:
So... I like this:
http://www.glennbeck.com/tribute.htm
It's a montage of photos from Iraq and some beautiful music by a Mormon
choir.
But as I look at Glenn
On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:01:56 -0600, Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Massive Benefit Cuts
Progress Report
http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/pp.asp?c=klLWJcP7Hb=280916
http://tinyurl.com/56a3p
The New York Times repeats what I have been writing here
Complete editorial
January 10,
* Gary Denton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
About $100 billion a year would be freed up for stocks, bonds and
other investments under a tentative plan President Bush has floated
to fix the Social Security retirement system by creating private
investment accounts.
The fees paid to brokers and
God wrote:
Robert Seeberger spoketh:
Question to religious listmembers:
Are religious peoples required to killfile this particular GOD
individual because of the first commandment?
For the Christians: Such act would violate My updated Sixth
Commandment: Thou shalt not kill(file).
For all
Last I heard, SS was not a pension; so apparently they have no problem
living off charity.
~Maru
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:54:35 +0100, God [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maru spoketh:
whether it is in money or other financial instruments. I
hear that farmers are paid really large sums to
On Jan 10, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
If thou werest truely God, Thou wouldst be able to communicate in the
modern f*cking vernacular.
Actually, you'd think the deity would be able to produce a simplified,
unambiguous language that was easy to learn.
Hmm, perhaps god speaks
On Jan 9, 2005, at 3:53 AM, Erik Reuter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 10:33:14PM -0700, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
I also think it's rude to offer advice on a topic and, when asked
for further information, to behave as though you've been massively
inconvenienced, your attention diverted from other
On Jan 10, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Jan 10, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
If thou werest truely God, Thou wouldst be able to communicate in the
modern f*cking vernacular.
Actually, you'd think the deity would be able to produce a simplified,
unambiguous language
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Jan 10, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
If thou werest truely God, Thou wouldst be able to communicate in the
modern f*cking vernacular.
Actually, you'd think the deity would be able to produce a simplified,
unambiguous
On Jan 10, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Julia Thompson wrote:
Hmm, perhaps god speaks Esperanto. ;)
How easy is Esperanto to learn by someone who's spoken nothing but
Japanese up to the point of trying to learn it?
Much easier than learning English.
And apparently Klingon is about as useful as Esperanto
* Gary Denton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The New York Times repeats what I have been writing here
conveniently avoid having to include the cost of privatization - as
much as $2 trillion in new government borrowing over the next 10 years
If you believe that benefits have been promised to
* Warren Ockrassa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
wrong? Or is it just possible that the information we're giving you --
that you're curt at best, rude at least, and arrogant at worst online
-- might in fact be completely true?
Has it occurred to you that I don't care one whit about your opinion
On Jan 10, 2005, at 5:35 PM, Erik Reuter wrote:
* Warren Ockrassa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
wrong? Or is it just possible that the information we're giving you --
that you're curt at best, rude at least, and arrogant at worst online
-- might in fact be completely true?
Has it occurred to you that
On Jan 10, 2005, at 4:35 PM, Erik Reuter wrote:
* Warren Ockrassa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
wrong? Or is it just possible that the information we're giving you --
that you're curt at best, rude at least, and arrogant at worst online
-- might in fact be completely true?
Has it occurred to you that
On Monday 2005-01-10 16:46, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
On Jan 10, 2005, at 3:44 PM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
If thou werest truely God, Thou wouldst be able to communicate in the
modern f*cking vernacular.
Actually, you'd think the deity would be able to produce a simplified,
unambiguous
Rob wrote...
Or do we wait for Nick to kick God off the list because he might be
Jeroen?
Our false god Apophis wannabe wrote...
Thou dareth equate Me with a mere mortal thou calleth Jeroen?
Thou wisheth to violate My First and My Sixth Commandment?
Thou really wisheth for Me to
Erik Reuter wrote:
The annual fee for an index fund is about 0.1%. So, 0.1% of $100B is
$100M. In actuality, it will be lower, since such a large account
will
be able to get economies of scale. Very large pension funds
currently
can get 0.05%.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding here, but you are
* Robert G. Seeberger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding here, but you are saying that 100B is a
large account and will make less money?
Not less money. Lower percentage rate. And $100B isn't the biggest
account by itself, but $100B a year for several years would soon become
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/10jan_earthquake.htm?list11191
25
NASA scientists studying the Indonesian earthquake of Dec. 26, 2004,
have calculated that it slightly changed our planet's shape, shaved
almost 3 microseconds from the length of the day, and shifted the
North Pole by
In a message dated 1/10/2005 9:44:06 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Less
oblate means more round.
Sounds like a very confused old beer commercial routine.
Less oblate!
More round!
Vilyehm
-
CUSP: Amazon.com Sales Rank in _Books_
Warren wrote:
It's your life, your time to waste, and your problem, of course.
But of course he doesn't consider it a problem and there's not much any of
us could do or say to change that. So perhaps the right way to deal with
those mannerisms that we are uncomfortable with but that we can't do
25 matches
Mail list logo
