> Hi,
>
> May I have this update reviewed? With this update, the result will be
> reduced if required in EC limbs operations in the JDK implementation.
>
> In the current implementation, the EC limbs addition and subtraction result
> is not reduced before the value is returned. This behavior
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:47:20 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
> The problem is that this bug is very insidious: the user probably doesn't
> know that there's anything wrong, and almost certainly has no idea that it's
> anything to do with JNI.
I'm still trying to grasp why the current problem is somet
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 08:41:35 GMT, Ludovic Henry wrote:
>> Currently, when passing --with-binutils-src, binutils is built in the source
>> tree. That leads to conflicting targets when compiling for different
>> architectures (ex: amd64 on the host, and riscv64 or aarch64 for the target)
>> from
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 08:41:35 GMT, Ludovic Henry wrote:
>> Currently, when passing --with-binutils-src, binutils is built in the source
>> tree. That leads to conflicting targets when compiling for different
>> architectures (ex: amd64 on the host, and riscv64 or aarch64 for the target)
>> from
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 08:41:35 GMT, Ludovic Henry wrote:
>> Currently, when passing --with-binutils-src, binutils is built in the source
>> tree. That leads to conflicting targets when compiling for different
>> architectures (ex: amd64 on the host, and riscv64 or aarch64 for the target)
>> from
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:07:36 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> > @shipilev In a "tenth time's the charm" spirit, here's what I do think is
> > actually a PR that can be integrated.
>
> Cool! I'll try to schedule the overnight build-matrix run to see if anything
> is broken.
I was able to build t
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:04:14 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> After [JDK-8294281](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8294281), it is now
>> possible to disable warnings for individual files instead for whole
>> libraries. I used this opportunity to go through all disabled warnings in
>> hots
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:56:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Ludovic Henry has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional
>> c
> Currently, when passing --with-binutils-src, binutils is built in the source
> tree. That leads to conflicting targets when compiling for different
> architectures (ex: amd64 on the host, and riscv64 or aarch64 for the target)
> from the same jdk source tree.
>
> The simplest solution is to b
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 17:00:15 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> A bug in GCC causes shared libraries linked with -ffast-math to disable
>> denormal arithmetic. This breaks Java's floating-point semantics.
>>
>> The bug is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
>>
>> One solution is to sav
On Thu, 13 Oct 2022 07:43:33 GMT, Ludovic Henry wrote:
> Currently, when passing --with-binutils-src, binutils is built in the source
> tree. That leads to conflicting targets when compiling for different
> architectures (ex: amd64 on the host, and riscv64 or aarch64 for the target)
> from the
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:26:34 GMT, Jorn Vernee wrote:
> Following that logic: from our perspective `dlopen` violates its ABI in
> certain cases. Preserving the control bits across calls to `dlopen` seems
> like a pragmatic solution. I'm not sure how important it is to have an opt-in
> for the c
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 20:35:09 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> Isn't it an illustration of a more general problem we have with native code
> where it can mess with FP environment at any time?
Yes.
> We already have similar problems with MXCSR register and provide verification
> logic (part o
Currently, when passing --with-binutils-src, binutils is built in the source
tree. That leads to conflicting targets when compiling for different
architectures (ex: amd64 on the host, and riscv64 or aarch64 for the target)
from the same jdk source tree.
The simplest solution is to build binutil
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 14:28:02 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> If is is a big change or not depends on how it affects builds on macos. I
> assume that clang functionality that was published in 2017 is already
> incorporated in the minimum supported version of Xcode on mac. (This needs to
> be v
15 matches
Mail list logo
