Hi Katja,
You mapping for the key is as follows:
So you're telling castor that you only care about one field, but then
you mark it as transient, I have a feeling you want the following
instead:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Removing 'container="false"' didn't really help.
> Wha
Removing 'container="false"' didn't really help.
What happend is following but the missing attributes didn't show up.
This is the new xml file without 'container="false"' and two elements in the
HashMap:
-
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"; />
-
-
50
200
-
Hi
I'm sorry, I'm not using the same thread. My computer broke and I have to use a
wired webmail support on a friends computer.
I posted this question a view days ago
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17461.html
I solved the problem by writing a second get-method that gives back a
I think the problem is coming from the container="false".
Try removing that and it should work ok.
--Keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm un/marshalling a HashMap but not all attributes of the key are getting
> marshalled. Of course I can't unmarshall them either.
> Following i
You need to modify your mapping.xml file as such:
should be:
--Keith
jose luis campos wrote:
>
> org.xml.sax.SAXException: unable to find FieldDescriptor for
> 'product_group' in ClassDescriptor of org.sibum.amazon.Catalog{file:
> [not available]; line: 6; column: 16}
>
>
> What im
Hello,
I'm un/marshalling a HashMap but not all attributes of the key are getting
marshalled. Of course I can't unmarshall them either.
Following is a part of my mapping file. graphicData is the HashMap I'm saving.
..
org.xml.sax.SAXException: unable to find FieldDescriptor for 'product_group' in ClassDescriptor of org.sibum.amazon.Catalog{file: [not available]; line: 6; column: 16}
What im doing wrong? Please check the xml file at http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=universitstea-20&l=st1&search=XML&mode=books&p=
Thank you Werner and Bruce,
If this is the answer that "read-only" could only be used for simple
data types, yes than I would submit this as bug.
I added below the code of my problem. As you have guessed, yes, I use
there the "DataBase.load()" feature. Does this make any difference as
using OQ
Thanks Keith, I really should read the docs before ploughing in.
Quoting Keith Visco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Damian,
>
> That's because your binding-file is not a binding-file, but rather a
> mapping file. They are different file types, so you are giving Castor
> the wrong file type.
Damian,
That's because your binding-file is not a binding-file, but rather a
mapping file. They are different file types, so you are giving Castor
the wrong file type.
Please see the following for more information on binding-file:
http://castor.exolab.org/sourcegen.html#Binding-File
Please s
Robert,
please see my previous reply...it's the difference between using
non-static and static unmarshal method. All non-static configuration on
the Unmarshaller cannot be accessed via the static unmarshal method,
which you were using in your first example.
Now you are using a non-static method
Hi Robert,
It's not a bug...you are using a static unmarshal method, so any of your
changes done on the Unmarshaller will not be accessible from the static
method.
--Keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am trying to parse a file that may have additional elements that are unforeseen.
> I do
Thanks Roman,
I'll mark that as PCDATA for now instead of ID.
--Keith
Roman Maeder wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I am using the new nested class mapping feature to map key/value pairs to a
> Java HashMap. The XML mapping doc says that this can be used if more than
> one mapping for a particular class
Folks I have attached an xsd and a binding file. I have an xsd that defines
node and Node, subsequently I get a class name collision. If I use the binding
file attached I get the following error when I execute the generation command.
C:\syncml>java -cp castor-0.9.5.3.jar;xerces-2.4.0.jar
org.ex
Hi,
I am trying to do the following operation
vmd
= (VIDEOMD) mets.getAmdSec(5).getTechMD(0).getMdWrap().getXmlData().getAnyObject(0);
and I get the following exception:
Unmarshaller Exception: java.lang.ClassCastException
VIDEOMD is a Castor generated object and so it “mets”. The
Hi,
We are seeing this behavior that for primitive types fields. The hasXXX() method
generated always returns true even when our xml does not have a value. Any idea why. I
downloaded Castor's example and ran InvoiceTest.java by adding "System.out.println("my
quantity = " + item[i].hasQuantity()
This is definitely a bug in Castor. If you instantiate the Unmarshaller
using a class, it works fine:
unmarshaller = new Unmarshaller(MyType.class);
unmarshaller.setIgnoreExtraAttributes(true);
unmarshaller.setIgnoreExtraElements(true);
reader = new FileReader(filename);
myobj = (MyType)unmarsha
I am trying to parse a file that may have additional elements that are unforeseen. I
do not need to parse those elements. Therefore, I tried telling the unmarshaller to
ignore extra elements. It does not seem to work.
Here's the exception:
org.xml.sax.SAXException: unable to find FieldDesc
I also receive this problem. I posted about it this problem two weeks
ago, but was not able to resolve the issue. See the following post:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17337.html
I still have this issue today and am forced to run Castor with validation
turned off. I would ap
Sorry, I forgot to delete the attachment of xerces library in my previous email. It
was not meant to be sent.
Sunay
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Yaldiz, Sunay
Gesendet: Montag, 15. März 2004 12:51
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [castor-dev] org.exolab.castor.indent=true causing
Hi,
The question of Roman helped a little bit to solve my problem.
Un/marshalling workes fine now. However when I unmarshall my HashMap the value
and the key are both of type org.exolab.castor.mapping.MapItem. The problem is
that I can't cast the value back to the original type. Can somebody gi
Hi Bruce,//the tx context above is never made aware of the testEntry object. Because each tx above contain separate contexts, you must make use of long transactions whereby an object is read in the first tx and persisted in the second tx. In order to bridge the gap between each tx, the objects in
Hi
I am using the new nested class mapping feature to map key/value pairs to a
Java HashMap. The XML mapping doc says that this can be used if more than
one mapping for a particular class is needed. I am using the
org.exolab.castor.mapping.MapItem class to map my XML data to.
23 matches
Mail list logo
