Bullshit. Same crap you posted last year:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00357.html
This guy is a spammer for cciecert.net. He does this same crap all over
the place.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cc
Hi,
Is anyone able to connect to ipexpert vRack right? I just can't get
connected right now!!
C:\>ping 209.124.41.250 <-- proctorlabs security gateway
Pinging 209.124.41.250 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 2
I am glad it works if can keep me updated about the west AA I will
really appreciate. I could not get it to run. It only says your call
will be disconnected and disconnects it.
Cheers,
Onur
Sent from my iPhone.
On Apr 11, 2008, at 11:28 PM, "Paul and Bobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
T
I have added that cm-manager fallback-mgcp and it is now working.
Thanks so much guys. I thought i only need this if i had more than one
ccm-manager
Paul
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> That command is in the config above. Wheh i enter it , it change
ine support and peer group communities:
> > > > > > > http://www.IPexpert.com/communities<http://www.ipexpert.com/communities>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based,
> > >
That command is in the config above. Wheh i enter it , it changes to
application
global
service alternate DEFAULT
I dont have cm-manager fallback-mgcp in the config either.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 1:23 PM, ccievoice1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes,
> Your config has ccm-manager fallbac
Yes,
Your config has ccm-manager fallback-mgcp and call application alternate
default missing ...
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Onur Tufekci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> it should be ccm-manager fallback-mgcp
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Onur Tufekci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
it should be ccm-manager fallback-mgcp
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Onur Tufekci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> check this out
>
> ccm-manager fall-back
>
> call application alternate DEFAULT
>
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/AVVID/mgcpfallback.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 20
check this out
ccm-manager fall-back
call application alternate DEFAULT
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/AVVID/mgcpfallback.html
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> BR1 Config
>
> BR1-RTR#sho run
> Building configuration...
>
> Current config
BR1 Config
BR1-RTR#sho run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 6844 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
!
hostname BR1-RTR
!
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c2801-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.1
*Still not winning*
*I tried the ACL with no success. This time i have shut down the serial
interface*
interface Serial0/2/0.16 point-to-point
ip address 192.168.211.13 255.255.255.252
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
shutdown
snmp trap link-status
frame-relay interface-dlci 16
*my phone has regis
I agree with you all. Who is this person any ways!
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Chad Stachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Yeah, the commitment that IPExpert makes to their candidates is amazing.
> Unmatched in the industry, and highly appreciated by all its students.
> Thanks guys!!
>
> C
you should also block port 2427 (udp) inbound on the WAN interface of the
gateway router. CallManager uses source port udp 2427 for MGCP communication
(and also TCP source 2428). 2000 will only block skinny traffic which means
that the phones will go into SRST mode with the ACL as you currently hav
Yeah, the commitment that IPExpert makes to their candidates is amazing.
Unmatched in the industry, and highly appreciated by all its students.
Thanks guys!!
Cheers,
Chad
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Jacob Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah,
> Plus the so called "Practical Labs" from In
I dont see that. I have put an access list on my WAN interface that blocks
port 2000. When I apply it my phone fallback to SRST and I can see them
registered with the show ephone command. But the show isdn status is still
showing ccm-manager. Any other ideas.
Thanks
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 9:3
Yeah,
Plus the so called "Practical Labs" from Internetwork
expert haven't even been released yet. Nothing like
coming on a mailing list that is supported by IPExpert
who does a fantastic job supporting voice ie
candidates and talking up some other vendor that has
been talking about releasing a wo
Dude,
A monkey can pass the test given the questions.
Please keep your tips and ideas to yourself.
I am sure you will pass your next CCIE using cciecert.net
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, ccie2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just passed yesterday on Tokyo
>
> I am really pleasure with
I just passed yesterday on Tokyo
I am really pleasure with this achievement
First my recommendation for all guys to understand all topic of the blue
print
from Cisco site and documentation CD as a main resource
Second I use Internetwork Expert's as practical Labs which contain a lot
of the real
When you are in SRST mode you should not see "CCM-MANAGER" in the output in
the sh isdn status. This means that your gateway is not in fallback mode-
try stopping your CallManager services or shutting down the WAN interface of
your MGCP gateway so you cannot communicate with CallManager.
You know
When i fail the BR1 to SRST mode and run the show isdn status command I
still see that the idsn is controlled by cam-manager. Any other ideas on how
to release this.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Vik Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use the show isdn status command. If you see "ccm-manager"
Use the show isdn status command. If you see "ccm-manager" then it is
controlled by the callmanager using mgcp. Otherwise it is controlled locally
on the router and will use dial-peers.
ISDN Serial0/0/0:23 interface
dsl 0, interface ISDN Switchtype = primary-ni
L2 Protocol = Q.921
I think the command "show ccm-manager music-on-hold" and "sh ephone summary"
only shows you information when the MOH is being streamed to an PSTN Phone,
when you put on hold an internal phone, in that case it will not show you
anything.
The only command to check if the Multicast MOH is working
reboot. Everything started working as expected.
I have this very nasty habbit of not rebooting things
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Scott Monasmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't know why the stats are displaying under show call-manager-fallback
> since you don't have 'moh music-on
I think those that were not aware of the Pub's in the
Proctorlabs setup were most likely not reading the
hundreds of emails that come through this mailing list
and also are going off the Lab workbook which
specifically states their is no Pub.
--- Devildoc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Proctor
Proctor Lab does have a PUB for every pod. The PUB was added to every pod for
quite sometimes now.
JD
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 09:35:15 -0700From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: [OSL |
CCIE_Voice] 6608 Incoming call troubleshootin
I don't know why the stats are displaying under show call-manager-fallback
since you don't have 'moh music-on-hold.au' configured. I don't know if
these stats reflect multicast group announcements. I would venture to guess
that since the phone was configured to use multicast moh (via the mrgl)
usin
Thanks Scott,
That is what I wanted to know. I thought so too, but your confirmation adds
to my confidence.
I do see the ccm-manager music-on-hold stats, but I have not configured any
moh source under call-manager-fallback so why do i see the stats?
Is the router acting up and picking up old con
I am also a fan of show ephone summary to see if the moh ephone got
created successfully...
Jonathan
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Scott Monasmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct. I was just answering his initial question regarding the perfmon
> counters.
>
> you can also run 'debug ep
Correct. I was just answering his initial question regarding the perfmon
counters.
you can also run 'debug ephone moh'
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Jonathan Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Right, but that does not prove it is working, the show ccm music will
> prove it tho...
>
>
> Jon
Right, but that does not prove it is working, the show ccm music will
prove it tho...
Jonathan
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Scott Monasmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason,
>
> If you configure your branch router to source Multicast MoH via SRST, you
> should still see the MoH perfmon co
Jason,
If you configure your branch router to source Multicast MoH via SRST, you
should still see the MoH perfmon counters increase even though the MoH is
not traversing the WAN.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:53 AM, jason sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I see my perf mon counters increase
Hey Guys,
I thought Id chime in really quick to clear up what confusion I could: All
Proctor Labs Voice vracks have both a CCM Pub and Sub. SQL replication
between them is broken by default as Jacob stated previously, and must be
rectified by the student.
Pub: 10.200.X.21
Sub: 10.200.X.20
X =
procotor labs doesn't have a PUB in the Pod. everthing should register with
the sub.
Scott
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Onur Tufekci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The gateway set up to 4 significant digits. It is registered with the sub
> and phone is registered with the pub. I dial in from
Is your remote router running SRST? Try doing a show ccm-manager
music-on-hold when you place a call to PSTN, and put the PSTN on hold.
P13-BR1-RTR#sh ccm-manager music-on-hold
Current active multicast sessions : 1
Multicast RTP port Packets Call CodecIncoming
Address
Should I see my perf mon counters increase when i am using remote site
router as the moh source.
Here is how I am trying to isolate.
I have multicast-routing disabled on the wan interfaces (no ip pim
dense-mode)
My MOH server source hop count is set to 1.
Remote Site MRG is set to use Multicast
Onur,
I am wondering if the Pub/Sub registration issue could
possibly have something to do with the SQL replication
between the Pub/Sub. I believe I have heard that it
is broken by default in the proctorlabs hardware to
allow candidates to learn to fix it. I am hoping
someone else can chime in he
The gateway set up to 4 significant digits. It is registered with the sub
and phone is registered with the pub. I dial in from the pstn phone
(IPEXPERT POD) and get fast busy. To solve this I register the gateway to
the same server as the HQ phone (ext 1000) then it works. I am not sure if
this is
Onur,
Are you using 4-digit dialing on your phones within
your pod or network? Are you telling the Gateway to
expect 4 digits on the 6608 GW configuration page?
This caught me the other day and I fought with it for
quite some time, excessive labbing is making me forget
things I think.
As for wh
So I figured that the 6608 registered to sub and the HQ phone registered to
pub does not work or vice versa. I get fast busy. If i register both to same
server then all good. I could not understand much about the Tracy tool
output what was going on.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Jacob Owen <[E
Are the CCM and TFTP services running on CallManager?
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Paul and Bobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trying to get the 6608 gateway to register.
>
> I have enable the interface in 6500 and can see that it has ip address and
> address of tftp server.
>
> I have then add
Onur,
What issues are you having exactly or are you just
wondering for future reference? I have made about
every mistake you can on the 6608 T1 Module so I
figured I might be able to help should you be having
issues.
--- Onur Tufekci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Is there a
You have to use the Dick Tracy tool.
Please see the following link for more information:
http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=1587050757#info5
On this page, click the 'downloads' link under the More Inforation section.
There at the bottom of the page will be the link to the Dick
Hello everyone,
Is there a way to debug the incoming call on 6608 T1 module?
Thank you,
Onur.
I took CRSD years ago and it was good enough. But with anything, you still need
your own practice time to fully understand what you've learned by the fire hose.
I think it took me a week of scripting on my own after the class to really
understand everything.
Erin
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 11
I started with the IPExpert DVD bootcamp, which gives a very good
tutorial on basic ACD scripting (better than any of the Cisco
documentation). I then took the Advanced Scripting Class a few months
back from a Cisco partner which was great (5 days of pure scripting
labs). I went in with very basic
The UCCX exam is an admin and design test... hell, the class doesn't
even cover enough material for the lab.
Jonathan
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:13 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have my CCVP and CCIE Voice Written passed but I don't have any hands-on
> experience with IPCC Express.
>
> If
SBC (aka IPIPGW) is definitely still on the exam.
You can skip the ATM stuff and the security stuff.
Jonathan
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:17 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The CCIE Voice audio CDs that I recently purchased mention ATM, SBC and
> possibly some other technologies that are no l
The CCIE Voice audio CDs that I recently purchased mention ATM, SBC and
possibly some other technologies that are no longer on the CCIE Voice exam.
I hear references that imply that this was recorded prior to January 2006.
Are there are specific tracks on specific CDs that I should skip? If ther
I have my CCVP and CCIE Voice Written passed but I don't have any hands-on
experience with IPCC Express.
If I took the UCCXD class, is this enough knowledge for the scripting I
would need to do on the CCIE lab?
I heard that there isn't much scripting in UCCXD and that you need the
second class
49 matches
Mail list logo
