Hi Mark,
I was cross checking my archives for the QOS to config in IOS. In your
example below, for the scenario:
Scenario Voice Bandwidth( Layer 2 Overhead), NO cRTP compression, ADD
use MLPPP over Frame Relay, (No FRF.12 - not compatible with MLPPP anyhow),
sampling rate - 20ms:
you count
Hi,
I was trying to setup a transcoder on BR2 yesterday and could not configure the
dspfarm profile. I was getting errors as if the router did not recognise the
commands. This is the partial config that I had on BR2. Any explanation to help
me understand what is going on will be appreciated.
I
All,
I usually don't use mailing list to try to sell stuff
but I have a piece hardware for sale that would ideal
for people pursuing their IE Voice.
I have an NM-HDV-1T1-48, please contact me directly if
you are interested. Thanks.
--- Brad Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This should help.
Hi,
I am a big fan of the online labs however I prefer to run my own lab for
most things.
If you want details mail me off line and Ill be happy to help.
HTH
S
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marwa Ahmed
Sent: 28 May 2008
Hi,
I am also building my own lab and have been following this thread and I have a
question. I have 2611xm for branch 2 with max mem, CUE mod and I am adding a
1MFT-E1. I am little confused by the documentation on the Cisco web site.
Apparently the AIM ATM Voice 30 In order to use the E1
What were the errors exactly?
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Join our free online support and peer group communities:
http://www.IPexpert.com/communities
--
In that last example - yes - you are correct (I thought I posted a
correction - but maybe I didn't - don't remember now).
So 4 bytes for FR with No FRF.12 (which we couldn't use anyhow since
it is technically incompatible with MLPPP).
Good Catch!
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
Hi Chris,
Honestly - you don't want to use either. AIM-VOICE-30 - while a nice
concept - was mostly a headache (read:disaster) in the field. Not to
mention it is not the hardware in the lab - so your testing results
WILL vary a lot from the mileage you would get from the lab equipment.
I have a few nm-hdv's with 2 PVDM-12's each. My problem is that I have
a CUE mod installed, that is why I thought that I could use the
AIM-Voice-30. 2811's nice but expensive.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi,
Below is an example of the DSP config I employ, with a few annotations. HTH
S
voice-card 0
dspfarm- Make this cards DSP resources available to FARM pool.
dsp services dspfarm - Enable the DSP resources as a DSPFarm.
!
sccp local GigabitEthernet0/1.923 - Local SCCP bind
sccp ccm
Not sure what that means: My problem is that I have a CUE mod
installed, that is why I thought that I could use the AIM-Voice-30
Could you explain how having CUE is seemingly a problem?
Oh wait - I think I just got it - you have a NM-CUE not an AIM-CUE.
Got it.
Hmm - you could probably sell
only on module slot in the 2600Xm. Can't run both.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 1:34 PM
To: OSL CCIE Voice Lab Exam
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab equipments
Not sure what that means: My
If I Go to the AIM CUE then again, not what is in the Lab. I guess it is
a trade off on which piece is more important to the big picture. How I
configure my DSP's or How I configure the CUE.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent:
AIM-CUE / NM-CUE doesn't really matter.
Difference of flash-based 'hdd' or actual 2.5 hdd. and a difference
of how many ports it supports.
no difference in software for the version on the lab.
so if you can - I would say exchange the NM-CUE for the AIM-CUE.
Cheers,
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073
Hey folks,
Most of you that ordered your HDD (either Box Set or the full BLS)
should have received your HDD's by now.
For those of you that have not ordered yours yet and haven't heard any
feedback from others that have yet (most likely due to the
overwhelming amount of information
I have a general question regarding lab gear.
Cisco specifically states a 6503, 3725, 2651XM, VG248 and ATA186 are used in
the lab. However, I see the PDF Brad sent out along with what is in the
vRack and it differs. If one is gathering lab attempt gear, what should one
get?
Thanks,
Depends on your budget.
We purchased over $5M in all new gear (all ISRs) based on many
conversations that we had with the top level CCIE Team at Cisco a few
years back, and at the time they had indicated a 'soon to be executed'
timeline of upgrading nearly all of the IE Lab hardware.
Hey, Mark,
The demo web page says that what you can watch for free is Lab 2 Media
Resources Task 2.24, but what actually comes up when you click on the
link is task 2.42, which is B-ACD. (It looks like whoever developed the
web page just transposed digits.) From a demo perspective, that's
Hi group,
pattern#1 = destination-pattern 7[^4]...$
pattern#2 = destination-pattern 74...$
Can anyone tell me whats the difference between patter1 vs pattern 2?
--
Smile, you'll save someone else's day!
Frog
I am testing various scenarios between BR2 and HQ and have a few
questions. While running deb voip ipipgw I do NOT see activity when
using running SIP on both the inbound and outbound call legs. When
using H323 on one leg and SIP on the other I see activity. Is this
normal activity? Running
Jane - thanks! I'm on this!
Regards,
-Wayne
Wayne A. Lawson II, CCIE #5244
Founder President - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cell: 810.278.1662
:: Message sent from iPhone
On Jun 4, 2008, at 7:00 PM, Jane Ryer (jryer) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, Mark,
The demo web page
Thanks Jane,
Having the web developer re-transpose the digits now!
Maybe I will have him include a CCM demo as well.
And yes (it should prompt you - didn't the web page??) - you will need
to download and install the latest which is Flash Player 9 rev 3.
Thanks!
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073
um - a [^]
nothing is different - they both match the same pattern :-)
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Join our free online support and peer group
I will try to look for a good explanation as to why for you - but
that is the expected output (e.g. nothing on a SIPtoSIP, but as long
as a H323 is involved then debug output).
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone:
You are of course correct.
I answered quickly about to run out the door without thinking the
whole thing through and was quickly thinking about a ^ matching the
beginning of a literal string.
Which it does. Except as Matthew pointed out - when directly following
a open sqaure bracket with
You can prove the transcoder is good by making a direct call into the CUE.
This also would prove the allow-connections is configured correctly. If you
can transcode SIP to SIP then that is big news to me!
Now assuming the test above is successful see if call forwarding to CUE from
another CME
Thanks Mark and matthew.
This was really tricky. normally i use rule 1 ^515 the marker there
without squire bracket matches string which start with 515
Cheers
--
Smile, you'll save someone else's day!
Frog
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:59:30 -0700
From: Matthew Bynum [EMAIL
I believe when you're referring to per-port policing you're talking
about per-port per-vlan policing we would use on a 3550.
Microflow policing is witnessed on the 6500 where we use an ACL (ACE) to
match flows in the switch and police them individually.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul,
Yes. Each device's CCM registration is independently controlled.
--
MARK TURPIN | Senior Consultant - UC | Calence / Insight Networking
Solutions | www.calence.com http://www.calence.com/
t. 314.656.2315 c. 314.660.5800 f. 314.656.2355
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
29 matches
Mail list logo
