Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Wesley Lim
2 other methods besides vm-integration: 1. Translation pattern 2. CTI RP This topic have been discussed many times, would suggest you to search for the alternative methods. On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com wrote: Hi: Looks like I’ve

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Topics not relavent on new blueprint fromcurrent one

2009-03-21 Thread Alex
No Cat6500, no fax, no FXS/FXO, no R2, no ATA, no VG248 in v3.0 Cheers Alex - Original Message - From: Rachell Thornton rachellthorn...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:31 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Topics not relavent on new blueprint

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Hi: Actually I have tested the TP and CTI RP method when the BR1 GW is MGCP and it works fine, the problem I have is when the BR1 GW is H323, due to the fact that you need the command “isdn outgoing ie redirect” to make the VM work in AAR, in SRST you have an issue because no matter you are

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] untiy error

2009-03-21 Thread Gughan Gug
Hi, When I try to create the primary location in Unity I am hit with this message Your System Administration session has timed out. All unsaved data has been lost. Use Refresh to reload the current object. I am able to do other things in the system administration only problem associated with

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware ESXi for CCM servers

2009-03-21 Thread WorkerBee
Anyone has tried using ESXi with Quad core/8G ram instead of using VMware server on a Linux? Does ESXi gives a better performance? Thanks.

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] v3.0 personal lab quest...

2009-03-21 Thread Joel Jose
i'm trying to make a decent lab..., i have an unused 3750 at work.. but it has sfp-LH-sfm modules... buying Cat5 compatible modules are gonna be expensive... i just got another idea... i also have a 3560 unused... so i a thinking of truning between them using the existing SFP GBIC on them... and

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6500 SERVER ACL

2009-03-21 Thread Chris Parker
Here is my basic 6500 ACL for marking signaling to CS3: set qos acl ip POD15_SERVER dscp 24 tcpany eq 2000 any set qos acl ip POD15_SERVER dscp 24 udpany eq 2427 any set qos acl ip POD15_SERVER dscp 24 tcpany eq 2428 any set qos acl ip POD15_SERVER dscp 24 udpany any eq 5060 set

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Variables

2009-03-21 Thread Chris Parker
Hello, I am trying to get a picture of all the possible BACD timing parameters that they can throw at us. Here is the list I have so far: service queue param queue-len 10 service aa param max-extension-length 4 param second-greeting-time 60 param call-retry-timer 20 param

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Variables

2009-03-21 Thread Chris Parker
I found a good link for this: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucme/command/reference/cme_p1ht.html Goes through all the BACD params Chris Parker wrote: Hello, I am trying to get a picture of all the possible BACD timing parameters that they can throw at us. Here is the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Hi all: I am stuck on this, any thoughts?, points of view?, have anybody faced this issue? Any point of view would very helpful. Regards, Jose From: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) Sent: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 6:31 AM To: 'Wesley Lim' Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BACD Variables

2009-03-21 Thread Chris Parker
Based on the docs ... Here's the list I came up with. In terms of BACD timers ... I think this is all of them: param call-retry-timer To specify the time interval before each attempt to retry to connect a call to an ephone hunt group param max-extension-length To specify the maximum number

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Cliff McGlamry
Why don't you post the H323 config, and the output of the q931 trace (along with the info on what was originally dialed so we know what's supposed to go to voicemail)? It would be easier to help you if we could see what you are doing. - Original Message - From: Jose Gregorio

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Topics not relavent on new blueprint fromcurrent one

2009-03-21 Thread Alex
Sorry, rechecked the link https://cisco.hosted.jivesoftware.com/docs/DOC-3569 and found E1 CAS which is R2. I swear it wasn't there on 2 Dec 2008 when I read it first. Apologies for confusion. Rgds Alex P.S. Also, I found that explicit mention of IP softphone diappeared from v3.0 blueprint, it

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware ESXi for CCM servers

2009-03-21 Thread Arun Kumar
Hi I'm running CUCM 7 and Unity Connection 7 on ESXi with 6GB of RAM and 500GB of HDD and it's working fine. Not tested on Linux. Thanks On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 6:44 PM, WorkerBee cisco...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone has tried using ESXi with Quad core/8G ram instead of using VMware server on a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Chris Parker
I think you can get around this if you don't use the alias command. Heres the way I usually do SRST VM: voicemail 912122251600 call-forward busy 91212225169. call-forward noan 91212225169. timeout 12 I create alternate extensions for the full DID in Unity for the button to work, and I create

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Cliff McGlamry
Agreealias is the wrong way to go to get this to VM. - Original Message - From: Chris Parker cpar...@cparker.us To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) jlin...@cisco.com Cc: Cliff McGlamry cl...@mcglamry.net; Wesley Lim lim.wes...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Hi Chris, Cliff: I tested with call-forward X commands and with the configuration you suggested me and the same result, have you tested this configuration when the Gateway in SiteB is H323?, have you tested this configuration and make it work without breaking the VM functionality in AAR? If you

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Hi Chris: Thanks for your answer, actually in Unity call viewer I am seeing the call as a direct call instead of redirected call, if I erase the command isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number from the ISDN serial interface everything works fine for SRST but I have problems with the AAR and the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Chris Parker
Just tried it H323 only and it worked too. Heres my config: Pod15-BR1-RTR#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 5831 bytes ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname Pod15-BR1-RTR !

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Hi Chris: Thanks, I am seeing that you are testing with the IOS version 12.4(3g), I am testing with the IOS version 12.4(5b), could you please post the output from the command debug isdn q931, that is to see if this version is affected by the bug. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Chris Parker
Thing that puzzles me too is if you use the CTI route point, the redirect that Unity sees would actually occur there and the redir number should be 200X due to the vm profile mask. You should see the call come in as a redirect not as a direct call. If it comes in as a direct call you will not

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Yes, I am stuck on it, please post the output from the debug isdn q931 to see if your IOS version is affected by the bug. Regards, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 1:40 PM To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) Cc: Cliff

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Chris Parker
Here you go ... I do see the FF thing you were pointing out before Pod15-BR1-RTR#debug isdn q931 debug isdn q931 is ON. Pod15-BR1-RTR# *Mar 21 19:53:05.367: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0010 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability =

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero)
Thanks Chris: I am going to check it again and see, it does not work for me, but it is working for you, strange. Thanks, Jose -Original Message- From: Chris Parker [mailto:cpar...@cparker.us] Sent: Sábado, Marzo 21, 2009 1:48 PM To: Jose Gregorio Linero (jlinero) Cc: Cliff McGlamry;

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 GW SRST and AAR Voicemail Redirection

2009-03-21 Thread Chris Parker
You might want to check other things too like your CCM / Unity setup. I'm starting to feel like this bug isn't what is causing your problem at all. I am familiar with this redirecting number bug. The whole point of using the call forward to a CTI RP hack-around is to overcome this bug. If the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware ESXi for CCM servers

2009-03-21 Thread CCIELabRat
Any tricks to getting CUCM 7 working on ESXi ?My install keeps failing . I haven't invested too much time yet, as I'm trying hard to pass with the current blueprint :) On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Arun Kumar arunv...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I'm running CUCM 7 and Unity Connection 7 on ESXi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware ESXi for CCM servers

2009-03-21 Thread Duy Nguyen
Make sure during the initial install that you allocate 74GB of hd and @ least 2GB of ram. On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:35 PM, ccielab...@gmail.com wrote: Any tricks to getting CUCM 7 working on ESXi ? My install keeps failing . I haven't invested too much time yet, as I'm trying hard to pass with

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through

2009-03-21 Thread Yung Hung
Hello experts, I've been working on B-ACD, everything seems to be working properly, I just can't seem to get drop through working properly, or I don't know how it's supposed to work. Here's my config: application service queue flash:app-b-acd-2.1.0.0.tcl param queue-len 15 param

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6500 SERVER ACL

2009-03-21 Thread Christian Hennrich
Hi Chris, I would mark the RTP also with the ACL: set qos acl ip POD15_SERVER dscp 46 udp any range 16384 32767 any set qos acl ip POD15_SERVER dscp 46 udp any any range 16384 32767 I think, you will not see a question, where you should mark and trust at the same time. And as far as I have

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD drop through

2009-03-21 Thread Josmar Ramirez
service aa2 flash:app-b-acd-aa-2.1.0.0.tcl param voice-mail 3600 paramspace english index 1 param max-time-call-retry 700 param aa-pilot 3501 param number-of-hunt-grps 2 -- when using drop through option you must set the number of hunt groups to 1, Don't forget to reload

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VMware ESXi for CCM servers

2009-03-21 Thread J Hogan
I managed to get it running on 40 gig and 512 mem of ram On 3/21/09, Duy Nguyen ccieid...@gmail.com wrote: Make sure during the initial install that you allocate 74GB of hd and @ least 2GB of ram. On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 2:35 PM, ccielab...@gmail.com wrote: Any tricks to getting CUCM 7

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Location issue

2009-03-21 Thread Allan Ren
Dear all, I'd like to put restriction between HQ and BR1 that just allow 1 g729 call over WAN. So I create a location named HQ and put all HQ phones under this location. Then I put 24k on audio bandwidth. It works on HQ-BR1 connection. But it impacts BR2-HQ connection as well. Just 1 call can

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Location issue

2009-03-21 Thread Cliff McGlamry
If BR2 - HQ connections are affected then you have somehow tied BR1 and BR2. Did you create a trunk to BR2 and assign the location to BR1perhaps? That's what it sounds like. I leave my trunks to BR2 in the HQ location. Normally bandwidth restrictions to BR2 are gatekeeper bandwidth