Can you explain the difference please?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Genton [mailto:dave.gen...@insight.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 September 2009 3:29 PM
To: Aamir Panjwani; 'jonv...@gmail.com'
Cc: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two
That describes i
That describes integrated, vs unified, big difference.
--Original Message--
From: Aamir Panjwani
To: Jonathan Charles
Cc: CCIE Voice Study List
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V3 Attempt Two
Sent: Sep 4, 2009 1:05 AM
There is huge difference between IMAP and unified messaging!!
In case of
Yes, that is right !
--- On Fri, 9/4/09, Jonathan Charles wrote:
From: Jonathan Charles
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed, thanks!
To: "Erwan Erwan"
Cc: "jeremy co" , ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 12:36 PM
Well, to be honest, I agree, but only to the e
There is huge difference between IMAP and unified messaging!!
In case of IMAP you need to create a "second" account in your outlook, where as
in unified messaging your voicemail end up in your existing corporate email
account
That's the whole idea behind unified messaging to manage email, fax,
Well, and me so 5...
That doesn't sound like a lot...
J
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Jo Knight wrote:
> Not sure how many there are in total but IPexpert have the following listed
> on their blog having passed after July 18th - which I am guessing could be a
> big chunk of the overall
And it is not.
CUC can do IMAP just fine.
Unity is easier to troubleshoot and just all around easier.
Jonathan
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Aamir
Panjwani wrote:
> For all our customers we go for CUC unless customer requires "unified
> messaging" in which case the only option is Unity.
>
Not sure how many there are in total but IPexpert have the following listed
on their blog having passed after July 18th - which I am guessing could be a
big chunk of the overall total.
Josh Proano CCIE #25159 (Voice)
Jac Gould CCIE #18521 (Voice)
Shah Sayed CCIE #13731 (Voice)
Art Sandborgh #2508
For all our customers we go for CUC unless customer requires "unified
messaging" in which case the only option is Unity.
-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Charles
Sent: Friday, 4 Septemb
Sorry, a pair of Unity 7.0s my customers don't do CUC... they
think it is silly...
To be honest, I wished Unity had multiple holiday schedules (for sites
in Canada, the US and Mexico) and that ability to make anyone a call
handler owner... that is cool...
J
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:38 PM,
Just curious... cuz I am not hearing about a lot of people passing,
Howard in RTP (proctor) said only a few had passed just curious
where I stand...
Jonathan
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ip
U.no Unity Connection?? Sounds like a big install without voicemail!
:)
By the way...congrats! My v3 2nd attempt is in 2 weeks.
Kevin
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
Well, to be honest, I agree, but only to the extent that the v2 lab
was known by everyone... if you were at all pegged into the system,
you knew exactly what was on the lab...
What this really meant was that a lot of people go tthe v2 CCIE Voice who suck.
And when I say 'suck', I mean they blow,
Just 5 CUCM 7s, 2 CUPS, 2 UCCX, 2 CER, MPX, and 1900 phones... by
myself... with about 300 locations... local route group saved my
butt...
Jonathan
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:36 PM, DEC wrote:
> I like idiotically huge, is there any more details you could give about this
> project?
>
> DEC
>
> On
Hi Wayne,
That is what I understand before :) , but seeing the reality working with those
guys, which has much more exp and better.
I would be more careful calling myself "expert" in front of them, if I happen
to be ccie
Sorry no offence, just opinion based on exp at work
rgds,
--- On Fri
In one sense I can agree with him, in that some people only learn the *test*,
and do not develop an in-depth expertise of the subject matter and in a real
sense are worthless from a practical standpoint.
But then again, I have a high standard definition for what makes you an
expert, so meh :)
My $
Erwan - you don't think the CCIE is the "expert" of networking.are
you nuts?Do you not understand the IT industry?
Regards,
Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244
Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com
Mobile: +1.810.334.1564
:: Message sent from iPhone.
On Se
Hi Jon,
Congrats, definitely I understand your feeling , when u have to passed with
hard work compare to those that cheat the lab.
Just my opinion looking at the situation in my company on what we see about CCIE
I do not really agree if CCIE cert is the expert/doctorate in networking,
cau
I like idiotically huge, is there any more details you could give
about this project?
DEC
On 02 Sep 2009, at 23:15, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> I went with the flow... I had just come off a pretty idioticly huge
> CUCM 7 deployment with CUPS 7, CUCCX 7 and CER 7... so, I just used
> that skill..
Hi,
Would Vik or Mark (or any one who has done this before) give me some
hints on how to automate or "script" the loading of scenarios on my
home lab? (physical routers and switches with virtual servers)?
Can it be done with open source or some sort of commercial tool is
needed?
DEC
__
In the call handler, under greetings, you probably have the "system prompt"
radio button selected. Try setting it to personal recording.
Brian
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Dave Wong
Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2
Erwan -
How well did you do in the class and on the labs? How
comfortable do you feel with the new content - have you gone through
our Volume 1 labs and the 4 published Vol 2 mock labs also?
Regarding retaking the class - it's pretty simple - select the
class you're interes
hi mark and all,
I hv studied for a while and plan to take Mock Lab (1 week lab experience) w
ipexepert.
1. Need your advice, what is the best time / make sense to sit for real lab
after mock lab ?
Note : based your your experince teaching or students who already take the mock
lab
2. And
Well, I am coming up on an anniversary, next month it will be 10 years
since I got my CCNA...
Not bad, I suppose
Jonathan
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Mark Snow wrote:
> Congratulations Jonathan!!
> I know you've worked hard - and you deserve this!
> Hope you will stick around and shar
The 7961 is fine.
The only features added by the 7962 is iLBC and HHC, neither of which
are tested.
The point here is that you need a minimum of a Gen2 phone... the Gen1s
(7940, 7960) will not provide the features needed that are tested and
testable.
Granted, you can make and receive calls, but
Yes you really do have to have 7961 (or better) phones for the new
blueprint.
7961 is a fine model and does support Globalization/Localization and +
dialing
Also certainly the cheapest model to come by that does support those
things.
HTH,
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
Senior
So If I go for the 61's I'll be ok? or definitly I have to acquire the
62´s models? The 61's doesn't support "+" dialing?
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jeff Garvas wrote:
> Mauricio,
>
> I've asked this question a few times and I've come to the conclusion you
> need some number of 7962 or bette
Make sure your CCM instances are defined in IOS with ver 5.0.1 or
higher.
They will register with a lower version - but they won't engage RSVP.
If that fails, reboot both HQ and BR1 routers and try again.
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Congratulations Jonathan!!
I know you've worked hard - and you deserve this!
Hope you will stick around and share the love :)
--
Mark Snow
CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security)
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.309.413.4097
Mailto: ms...@ipexpert.com
--
Jo
yes. you need phones with globalization support.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Mauricio Aduna wrote:
> First, Congrats on your CCIE.
>
> Hi Jonathan, I have 2 7960's and 6 7940's, Do you think I have to move
> to at least the 7961's and 41's models? Regarding CUPS? Thank you!
>
> Best Regards!
Yes, but not for CUPS, for transformations, + sign, etc the 40 and
60 can't do it... it also can't do BLF and Call Park BLF, etc
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Mauricio Aduna wrote:
> First, Congrats on your CCIE.
>
> Hi Jonathan, I have 2 7960's and 6 7940's, Do you think I have to move
Mauricio,
I've asked this question a few times and I've come to the conclusion you
need some number of 7962 or better phones for SIP, + dialing, and other
features that are not supported on earlier phones. Seems to be a
re-occuring theme when the question is asked, but 40/60's don't seem to cut
First, Congrats on your CCIE.
Hi Jonathan, I have 2 7960's and 6 7940's, Do you think I have to move
to at least the 7961's and 41's models? Regarding CUPS? Thank you!
Best Regards!
Mauricio Aduna
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE
I had some issues last night with getting BR1 Phone to to take a SIP load.
It would get rejected whenever I set it up as a SIP phone. If I let it auto
register SCCP, it would register fine. I tried using the Migration tool
under Bulk Admin, but that didn't seem to work either, even though the job
r
MTP or MTPs?
You should have one for each end
J
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Post the config for BR1
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Kumar,
> Narinder wrote:
>> MTP registered.
>> Under location it is set to unlimited
>>
>> For HQ - No reservation, bri Manda
Post the config for BR1
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Kumar,
Narinder wrote:
> MTP registered.
> Under location it is set to unlimited
>
> For HQ - No reservation, bri Mandatory
>
> For BR1 - NO reservation , hq mandatory
> Debug rsvp all - no output at all
>
> Video bandwidth set to none
>
>
>
MTP registered.
Under location it is set to unlimited
For HQ - No reservation, bri Mandatory
For BR1 - NO reservation , hq mandatory
Debug rsvp all - no output at all
Video bandwidth set to none
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Charles [mailto:jonv...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 4 Septem
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> 7.0(1) for both
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Fawad asad wrote:
> > Hi All -
> >
> > Which version of CME & CUE is being used in the actual Lab CME 7.0 OR
> 7.1?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Fawad
>
Another dumb question, please post the config of the other side? Does
it match, is it assigned to the right MRGL?
Jonathan
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
> Well, RSVP initially requests 40k for a G.729 call and then drops down
> to 24k, so if it is 37k, yeah, it is goin
Well, RSVP initially requests 40k for a G.729 call and then drops down
to 24k, so if it is 37k, yeah, it is going to fail.
Under Locations, it is set to unlimited right?
And the MTP is registered and assigned to the DP of the receiving phone?
Do a debug ip rsvp all and post the results, see if t
Hi
I have a problem with question 11.3 under Unity Connections Call handling
lab 11A of the v3 voice lab work volume 1. I've configured everything
according to the proctor guide, but when i dial 5000 from any CUCM phone i
hear the greeting "Sorry AA is not available, recording your message at the
t
My knowledge about RSVP is very little
RSVP Location CAC issue not working.
After configuring RSPV all calls between HQ and BR1 invoking AAR.
Sh ip rsvp reservation return nothing
***
SiteA#sh ip rsvp
RSVP: enabled (on 2 interface(s))
Signalling:
Refresh interv
You were right
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 12:48 AM, JoJo JoJo wrote:
> Jonathan
> I'm sure this time you will passed:)
>
> JoJo
>
>
>> From: ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 43, Issue 5
>> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 00:56:45 -04
42 matches
Mail list logo
