[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAN QOS priority-queue out

2010-06-16 Thread Mouhammad Nasser
Hi Jammer, As per my understanding for this, yes Q1 will become a priority queue after we issue command priority-queue out Anyway, it is shaped to %20 so it will not starve other traffic. i.e. as long as its traffic are within the boundaries of %20, it will be served before anything

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] srst phones in fallback

2010-06-16 Thread Mouhammad Nasser
Hi Jammer, If it is CME in SRST mode this can be done through defining ephone-template like below: ephone-template 5 fastdial 1 1101 name Front Register fastdial 2 918005550111 Headquarters softkeys idle Newcall Cfwdall Pickup softkeys seized Endcall Cfwdall Pickup softkeys

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 8 - iLBC Locactions Setting

2010-06-16 Thread Roger Källberg
Hi Matthew, If you set the codec to other regions to g728 and link loss type to lossy it will use iLBC, that is if the phone supports that, just as Vik wrote in his reply to you. And of course you need to have the proper SP set so that iLBC isn't deactivated. Regards, Roger Källberg CCIE

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] voice mail port AAR CSS

2010-06-16 Thread Peter Farkas
I get the sccp service down on HQ which is an RSVP agent. After this when the CUC would reach (by MWI or transfer) a phone at BR1 AAR is activated. In my opinion AAR CSS of a VM port has to take effect in this case. However this CSS is None here but MWI still works. In addition a call can be

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: how to forward calls from UCM to an Auto Attendant at CUC

2010-06-16 Thread Peter Farkas
Any consideration why the recommended method is using a CTI port instead of a hunt pilot? If a hunt pilot is configured for AA then a user sees the call as a directed rather than forwarded which happens in case of CTI. - Original Message - From: Peter Farkas To: ccie list Sent:

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 8 - RSVP Remarking to CS1

2010-06-16 Thread Matthew Berry
In Question 5.6, we are asked to police traffic that was not admitted via RSVP-enabled Locations-CAC. The Proctor Guide provides a solution that identifies such traffic as CS1: class-map match-all RSVP-REMARK match ip dscp cs1 ! policy-map RSVP-REMARK-POLICY class RSVP-REMARK police

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Real time tracing of IP phone activity

2010-06-16 Thread Paul Dardinski
All, Is there something beyond enabling trace level in Servicability that is required to get this to work? I have enabled serv level to significant and I can see the SDI traces appear in RTMT (with delay), but the “file tail activelog /cm/trace/cmi/sdi recent” isn’t working for me. I get a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 8 - RSVP Remarking to CS1

2010-06-16 Thread Matthew Berry
This solution was in the Proctor Guide after all. I think I might have been using an older version of the guide that did not have this solution in it. Thanks. *Matthew Berry* /A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/ *_Vitals:_* *GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044 *Gmail*:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Real time tracing of IP phone activity

2010-06-16 Thread Matthew Berry
Paul - Try fail tail activelog /cm/trace/ccm/sdi recent. If you look at your command below, you are using /cm/trace/cmi/sdi. *Matthew Berry* /A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Voice Written/ *_Vitals:_* *GVoice: *+1.612.424.5044 *Gmail*: ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com *Skype*:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE caller id

2010-06-16 Thread Peter Farkas
You can record a spoken name via AvT menu. It works for me. - Original Message - From: Angel Perez To: osl osl Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 2:23 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE caller id Hi: I was trying to setup CUE to say voicemail user name instead of phone

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 8 - Question 5.5 // RTP Priority Queue

2010-06-16 Thread Matthew Berry
In question 5.5 we are asked to create a priority queue of 128 kbps for RTP traffic between HQ and BR2. The Proctor Guide told me to set: interface Virtual-Template 200 no service-policy output AutoQoS-Policy-UnTrust ip rtp priority 16384 16383 128 I would have normally set this with a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 8 - Question 5.5 // RTP Priority Queue

2010-06-16 Thread Roger Källberg
Yet again 100% correct :) Roger Källberg CCIE # 26199 (Voice) Unified Communication Consultant Cygate AB From: Matthew Berry [mailto:ciscovoiceg...@gmail.com] Sent: den 16 juni 2010 13:41 To: OSL Group; Matthew Berry Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 8 - Question 5.5 // RTP Priority Queue In

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cisco.com link

2010-06-16 Thread Randall Crumm
Him, I wanted to confirm the link we have access to in the lab for cisco.com. Is it http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/configure.html Thanks, Randall ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 3 Volume 2 CUE-CUCM JTAPI integration and MWI

2010-06-16 Thread Daniel Berlinski
Hello Could someone clarify the mechanism behind MWI on/off in this CTI integration scenario? It works even without assigning the end device (phone of CUE subscriber) to the cti application user. I’m reviewing the steps I took to complete the lab and can’t see what was done to have it

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 3 Volume 2 SRST CUE Unknown caller

2010-06-16 Thread Daniel Berlinski
Hello In the following scenario: Phone 1002 rings 3002 in SRST mode, calls are unanswered and forwarded to CUE. I leave a msg for 3002 and when collecting it the following is played by CUE “from unknown caller”. I see the call is sent to CUE as follows: From: BR1PH2

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] max calls and inbound calls on cucm

2010-06-16 Thread jammer jones
if i have a scenario where i have a phone on cucm that has a shared line of and i want the following below how do i accomplish phone 1 shared line has 6 max calls and 3 inbound calls phone 2 shared line has 6 max calls and 2 inbound calls i understand that each line has maximum number of

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] cisco.com link

2010-06-16 Thread Kevin Damisch
It is http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html?mode=prod. Familiarize yourself with it. Go through the various labs and blueprint sections and know how to find the documentation for the topic you need assistance with. Matthew Berry has some good examples at www.ciscovoiceguru.com that

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Question on Alias Static configuration.

2010-06-16 Thread CCIELabRat
Assuming the following requirements for BR2 to HQ calling via Gatekeeper: - Do not use tech prefix or default tech prefix - Route calls to Sub and then to Pub if Sub unavailable. So in this case a Static Alias configuration would be needed to allow the call to route to CUCM without having the