Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

2011-06-30 Thread Mini Me
Do we really need the "switchport trunk encap dotq1" command? Thanks On 6/30/11 11:18 PM, "Bill Lake" wrote: >Definitely > > >switchport trunk encap dotq1 >switchport mode trunk >switchport trunk native vlan XX >switchport voice vlan XX >spanning-tree portfast trunk >mls qos trust cos > >On Thu

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME to CUCM Via CUBE configuration assistant

2011-06-30 Thread Art Joe Babakhani Gharibian
Has anyone tested a call from CME >> to >> CUCM via Gatekeeper and CUBE? Could you please provide a working configuration sample? I have configured the gatekeeper to send the calls from CME to CUCM via CUBE. CME calls drop after matching an incoming voip dialpeer in the CUBE. I can’t figure out

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

2011-06-30 Thread Cristobal Priego
thank you guys 2011/6/30 Peterson, Ryan > I would personally keep it as simple as possible unless the book tells you > to add something else… > > ** ** > > switchport mode trunk > switchport trunk native vlan XX <<< Add only if it tells you to have a PC > behind the phone. > switchport voi

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

2011-06-30 Thread Peterson, Ryan
I would personally keep it as simple as possible unless the book tells you to add something else... switchport mode trunk switchport trunk native vlan XX <<< Add only if it tells you to have a PC behind the phone. switchport voice vlan XX I would not go with the access method unless spanning-t

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

2011-06-30 Thread Bill Lake
Definitely switchport trunk encap dotq1 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk native vlan XX switchport voice vlan XX spanning-tree portfast trunk mls qos trust cos On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Cristobal Priego wrote: > Hello all > > for the lab on the ESW modules on SiteB and SiteC which

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ESW configuration

2011-06-30 Thread Cristobal Priego
Hello all for the lab on the ESW modules on SiteB and SiteC which one is the best approach switchport trunk encap dotq1 switchport mode trunk switchport trunk native vlan XX switchport voice vlan XX spanning-tree portfast trunk mls qos trust cos or switchport mode acess switchport access vlan X

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Congrats

2011-06-30 Thread Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier
Congratulations De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] En nombre de adam compton Enviado el: jueves, 30 de junio de 2011 18:52 Para: gogli...@gmail.com; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Asunto: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Congrats George, You are

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Congrats

2011-06-30 Thread adam compton
George, You are tenacious like Bull! Peggy On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Pithog Oil wrote: > Hi George, > > Congratulations, i salute you persistence and determination. > > You have been a blessing to the ipexpert community, thanks for questions > you have answered and help you have rendere

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] B-ACD Drop Through

2011-06-30 Thread Pablo Meneses
Hi experts, Is there a way to display "1 call on phone" when using B-ACD Drop Through? I think that it will display "1 call on queue" and that there is no way for it to display "1 call on phone", but, I better ask. Regards, -Pablo Meneses. ___ For mor

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE in SRST.. Failover and Fall back

2011-06-30 Thread Cristobal Priego
If you test failover by stopping the ccm service, it is expected If you shut down the wan ports the ports should register back Enviado desde mi iPhone El Jun 29, 2011, a las 21:06, escribió: Hi All, I have CUE in SRST mode and it works fine, but when i bring back CUCM i dont see the CTI Ro

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 64, Issue 228

2011-06-30 Thread shelesh
Congratulation Man, you really deserve it, I know you help me lot that day. God bless you. I am very happy. Please be in touch in forum. Shelesh __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6033 (20110411) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 egress priority queue

2011-06-30 Thread Emin Guliyev
Three different configurations are available for the switch interface. The configurations are bandwidth shape, share, and limit. You can also configure egress queue 1 as the priority queue. If the priority queue is enabled, SRR services it until it is empty before servicing the other three queu

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Congrats

2011-06-30 Thread Pithog Oil
Hi George, Congratulations, i salute you persistence and determination. You have been a blessing to the ipexpert community, thanks for questions you have answered and help you have rendered. Victory deserved Cheers Pithog oil ___ For more informatio

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Can i Daisy Chain phones of Different device pool

2011-06-30 Thread Pithog Oil
Hi Experts, Please i will like to know if i can daisy chain phones of different Device pools. Thanks for you assistance. Regards Pithog oil ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 3750 egress priority queue

2011-06-30 Thread Sam Park
Hey Adam, As promised, here is the test you can do for the priority-queue out. (Double check me on this, since I don't come from a R&S background) On my HQ Switch, I enabled auto qos on all the phone ports (trust phone) On the uplink port to HQ-RTR (for me is fas0/23) I set srr-queue bandwidth sh

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUBE lose caller name

2011-06-30 Thread Ki Wi
This is not ccie question. I'm doing a integration with avaya. CUCM 8.5SU1 via IOS GW to Avaya. H323 is used between them. When I use my ip phone and registered to IOS GW(cme). Incoming call from avaya I can see alerting name. However, if I register the same phone to cucm, I can't see the ale

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] What switches are there in the CCIE Voice lab? 3560 or 3550?

2011-06-30 Thread Divin Mathew John
Thanks guys! :) On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Bill Lake wrote: > Did you check the blue print? > > https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-5292 > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Divin Mathew John > wrote: > > > > > > ___ > > For more informat