Anyone having an issue with proctorlabs pods?
I am able to ping CCM servers but remote desktop will not work.
I am using my own router for eZVPN and able to ping all the interfaces
and servers, but remote desktop will not connect.
Also I am getting duplex mismatch errors on the HQ3750 for VM
V2
I had this one bookmarked but I cann't seems to find it.
This was under old Cisco Tech docs, but Now with updated web site under
support, I am not able to get to this page,
Does someone know how to get to IPCC web link for adding ip service page
under support page.
I got it
just in case anyone is interested,,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_6_0/installation/guide/cad65ig.pdf
CCIE OSL wrote:
V2
I had this one bookmarked but I cann't seems to find it.
This was under old Cisco Tech docs, but Now
I think this question has been asked before,
I have searched achieve but did not find the answer yet.
I thought I know this one, but after spending 3 hours into QOS LFI and
LLQ now I am more confused.
So I have 768k to BR2,
I am configuring all shaping command to 95% of bandwidth.
729.6K
I think I have all the configs, and I can even call manually dial from
the phone 39993001 for MWI on and 39983001 for MWI off. And it works find.
It seems like the CUE is not sending MWI on/off.
I check the CUE and it's configured with correct numbers.
What am I missing??
This is all within BR2,
CME address.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 8:15 PM, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
mailto:ccie...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I have all the configs, and I can even call manually dial
from the phone 39993001 for MWI on and 39983001 for MWI off. And
it works find.
It seems like the CUE
on the cue:
e.g.
ccn subsystem sip
gateway address 10.20.202.1 ---make sure this is correct in cue.
end subsystem
Tech Guy
- Original Message - From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
To: Scott ODonnell scott.odonn...@gmail.com
Cc: OSL Group ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Sunday, April
Folks,
I been playing with soft conference bridge load balancing today.
I done the following steps
1. create a MRG - soft-only-cfb
2. put in soft cfb from SUB first and PUB second
3. Create MRGL - softCFB
4. configured HQ phones to use this MRGL
5. created two meet-me numbers 2700, 2701
test 1:
Do you have max-reserved-bandwidth 100 in you serial interface?
If so, you need to either change this to 95%
Or try to create class-map for routing updates.
You may be running out of bandwidth.
Normally, fair-que on the class default should work.
/Jin Jung...
sean hurricane wrote:
update:
I run into little minor problem today.
I am using VM for my home lab, I just copied one VM to another PC and
now I am trying assign it as second CCM.
I change IP and the Name of server.
Well, now the SQL server is complaining.
It looks like I have change all the database users from old server
Yep!
Not too fun,,
Duy Nguyen wrote:
Are you trying to make a subscriber from the publisher vm?
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:36 PM, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
mailto:ccie...@gmail.com wrote:
I run into little minor problem today.
I am using VM for my home lab, I just copied one VM
and also
run the newsid.exe tool on the image before installing stuff on top of
it. Makes life a lot easier.
Cliff
- Original Message -
*From:* Duy Nguyen mailto:ccieid...@gmail.com
*To:* CCIE OSL mailto:ccie...@gmail.com
*Cc:* OSL Group mailto:ccie_voice
GK 1* gw-priority 9 Pub_Trunk_2
--- On *Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL /ccie...@gmail.com
mailto:ccie...@gmail.com/* wrote:
From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper question
To: kapil atrish nice_cha...@yahoo.com
Cc: ccie Me
of the destination
pattern - for eg 2...T
On 3/31/09, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you need new dial-peer with
diall-peer voice 2400 voip
destination-p 2[23]...
to match 22... and 23...
and may need to create GK prefix match this as well. 23*, 22*
and setup call forward all,
On CCM, need RP
Hey, Cliff,
Man!
First, Thanks for all you time on this.
I see your method, and it's wonderful that this works..
One question,
Let's say, if you are allow to use bandwidth command on Gk, would you
use same method??
bandwidth interzone 16
/Jin Jung...
Cliff McGlamry wrote:
This bugged me.
I hope, you are not dreaming about it!
/Jin Jung...
Chris Parker wrote:
Cliff,
This looks great I will try it out tonight. Been thinking about this
all day too but my pesky job has been keeping me busy ... :-)
Good work
Chris
Cliff McGlamry wrote:
This bugged me. I kept thinking
I think you need new dial-peer with
diall-peer voice 2400 voip
destination-p 2[23]...
to match 22... and 23...
and may need to create GK prefix match this as well. 23*, 22*
and setup call forward all,
On CCM, need RP for 24xxx and point to GK, may also need GK prefix and
point to CME.
24*
I
from Site C will not be allowed due to b/w limitation
over that trunk (Location). Next call should fall back to Pub trunk
which is having gw-priority 9.
Thanks...
--- On *Sun, 3/29/09, CCIE OSL /ccie...@gmail.com/* wrote:
From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL
I have purchased a 1760 router with PVDM-12 and CME.and FXS
Just so that I can play with it at home.
I normally use Proctorslab.
Now I am trying to configure Transcoder,
But it will not work,
Accouring to the Cisco DOC, 1760 only support PVDM-256k-4,8,12..NOT
PVDM2.
However, when I call
It's really not clear what you are asking here.
But, for me, -- This is just for me of course, I am sure other folks may
have different mathods.
I believe you must use gw-priority command to give each prefix 2*, 1* 7*
point to SUB first with priority 10 and PUB with priority 9, or anything
I have some questions for you.
1. Are you running on 1 tech-prefix or two with on the gatekeeper?
2. Does entire BR2 has to able to call HQ or just a single phone?
3. Does it required to only use 1#, are you allow to use other prefixes?
Your first requirement for HQ to BR2 is fairly easy,
I have 11/16. RTP.
For now, unless I see another June date.
Kirchhof Björn wrote:
Hi,
is there anybody who is planning to take the new lab?
I've scheduled my first try for November.
Regards.
Bjoern
Hi Alex,
But that seems like its for only for one DN, Do you think this will
work for say 121?
I guess, prefix will be 1212,
I am trying to make similar concept work,
I was trying Hop-off prefix . I guess this is same thing.
Did this work for you??
And I guess, this will work
You can contact any VUE or Sylvin testing centers for written just like
your CCVP exams.
Once you passed the written, yon go to this site below to schedule a lab.
https://tools.cisco.com/CCIE/Schedule_Lab/
/Jin Jung...
Santi Cuni wrote:
Hi
I would like to take CCIE Voice
Reboot the router,
This happens to me almost every time.
/Jin Jung...
Scott ODonnell wrote:
Has anyone run into the problem where the CME dn's are registering
even though you have no-reg configured?
I've tried a couple of different IOS versions and I see the problem
show up randomly.
-
]
sess target ras
!
dial-peer voice voi 1212 voip
destination-pattern 12122216...
sess target ras
tech-prefix 2#
!
I don't have the lab handy to test this. Would you be able to help?
Rgds
Alex
- Original Message - From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
To: Alex alex.arsen...@gmail.com
Cc: anil
On the same token,
Does anyone one have right way to test FRF.12 LFI, MLP ... ?
I tried wireshark to capture packets, but it only captures from
Ethernet. and its not showing up correctly on ethennet side.
The only other way sis to use T-bird or smart-bit which I do not have.
Dobugs really
Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of CCIE OSL
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 12:49 PM
To: OSL Group
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] NM-CUE verses NME-CUE
I am trying to find a comparison document between NM0CUE and NME
2 seats in San Jose for Voice for April 15 open right now.
*
* Fast Ethernet
* Frame Relay
*Telephony Interfaces*
* T1
* E1
Larry Hadrava
CCIE #12203 CCNP CCNA
Sr. Support Engineer – IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:08 AM, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
mailto:ccie...@gmail.com wrote
On CCM, Do you have global service option for 150 or do you have one for
each scope?
You can put 150 in two different places, make sure you have this set for
each scope if you trying to get IP / TFTP from CCM for all sites.
Also,,
Have you clear / reset phones on BR2?
adefila seun wrote:
I have a simple question,
Say I want to connect my 1760 with FXS port to ProctorLabs Vrack.
Is there a way I can connect this router?
I have 3640 router providing VPN,
I just want to ride the VPN but connect instead of phones, 1760 router
with FXS.
and test SIP or MGCP.
Anyone done this
Does anyone has exact version of new V3.0?
Thanks...
I just activated bandwidth for my gatekeeper,
bandwidht interzone CME 64,
My calls from HQ to BR2 is no longer working.
Check location, region, and other settings, still does not work.
where should I look??
/Jin Jung...
Yep,,
My Trunk was in HQ.
Thanks...
Christian Hennrich wrote:
hi, your device pool of the GK Trunk needs a g729 only region. Ensure,
that there is definitively no g711 relationship on the region used on
your GK Trunk.
HTH
CCIE OSL schrieb:
I just activated bandwidth for my gatekeeper
how to make CME phone to have same number on button 1 and 2?
Is there a way to make 3001 appear on both button 1 and 2?
I am not talking about description field.
So it will show up
6727653001 --description
3001 -- button 1
3001 -- button 2
/Jin Jung...
Thanks folks,,
kapil atrish wrote:
Put max-conn under dial-peer.
--- On *Fri, 3/13/09, CCIE OSL /ccie...@gmail.com/* wrote:
From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] How to only allow one international or
LD call?
To: OSL Group ccie_voice
, at 7:51 PM, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
mailto:ccie...@gmail.com wrote:
This may sound strange,
For some reason, I was not able to type in a command in 6509.
I was able to log into 6509, but when I put in sh port or sh
vlan, it freezes and will not come back
It look like I can use num-exp,
but why not voice translation
CCIE OSL wrote:
I must be missing something,
Why is 8 not getting strip by voice translation rule
Debug
assrv_get_addrinfo: (1#82002) Matched tech-prefix 1#
Mar 12 04:08:57.692: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (1#82002
Yep,
I must be falling a sleep,,
Thanks...
anil batra wrote:
voice translation-profile strip8
translate calling 37 Should not this be Called
--- On *Thu, 3/12/09, CCIE OSL /ccie...@gmail.com/* wrote:
From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice
I put in no-reg both all ephone-dn for BR2.
But I am still getting
E164-ID: 85221314001
E164-ID: 85221314002
E164-ID: 85221314003
E164-ID: 85221314004
E164-ID: 85221314005
E164-ID: 852213140
E164-ID: 85221314007
E164-ID: 85221314008
registered to my gatekeeper from BR2.
work, Post the BR2 config and the output of the SHOW
GATEWAY command on the BR2 router.
- Original Message -
From: CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 8:29 PM
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] gatekeeper E164 ao-reg both address
Peer Groups Study Communities at
www.IPexpert.com/communities
On Mar 10, 2009, at 5:29 PM, CCIE OSL ccie...@gmail.com wrote:
I put in no-reg both all ephone-dn for BR2.
But I am still getting
E164-ID: 85221314001
E164-ID: 85221314002
E164-ID: 85221314003
E164-ID: 85221314004
E164-ID
This may sound strange,
For some reason, I was not able to type in a command in 6509.
I was able to log into 6509, but when I put in sh port or sh vlan, it
freezes and will not come back.
This is from my 3640 EZVPN router.
So, I tried via regular Cisco VPN, it work fine.
I am using standard
Where is the proper place to strip tech prefix in call manager?
??
PIM Dence mode is more for local area network or samll size network,
more of broadcast, push. Not recommended for WAN
PIM sparce-mode is recommended for traffic over WAN. OR LAN.
ip pim sparce-dense mode activates both space and dence mode - sparce
first and dense,
This command is mainly used
CCIE OSL wrote:
Quick question,
I am trying to configure my FXS port to only allow call local and 911.
I know how to do it with COR,
But I do not want to create COR, it seems bit too much for simple
restriction for PSTN phone.
Is there any other way to restrict this phone with out using
48 matches
Mail list logo
