Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Scheduling Lab Exam within 30 Days

2011-08-25 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Ken, I have booked with only like 2 weeks left before the exam date. I'm pretty sure you have to pay the lab fees up front when you are in the 90 day period, therefore you can't be dropped due to no payment of fees. Jeff -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Scheduling Lab Exam within 30 Days

2011-08-25 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Ken, I have no experience in this scenario. I would just recommend if you aren't sure whether you're ready and/or can make it, then don't book. As Earl noted on another response and I did below, you will be charged immediately when you book in the 90 day window. I don't know what you mean by 1

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] exam cancel

2011-07-25 Thread givemeccievoice2010
I tried to cancel within the 3 month period, and they refused. Other than an absolute emergency I doubt they will grant you the ability to reschedule. Jeff From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of wilson.sam...@usc-bt.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] route group distribution algorithm

2011-06-22 Thread givemeccievoice2010
If they aren't specific in the lab, then it's not a requirement of the solution. I don't believe I've ever seen or heard of this in the lab, more of a written exam question, if anything. Jeff From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Documents in the Lab

2011-06-06 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Everything here - http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html?mode=prodlevel0=278875240 Also, a couple of the SRNDs will be available on the desktop. This is common knowledge, not breaking my NDA here :) Jeff -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SNR -- RC

2011-05-23 Thread givemeccievoice2010
If your Remote Destination is 4087773434, your route pattern in css-snr would need to look like that, not “\+.!”. Unless you are asked for redundancy with your GWs or to use the Application Dial Rules specifically, the easiest way to meet the SNR requirement is a SNR partition with a Route

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SW Version for Lab

2011-04-29 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Here is the official list of HW and SW in the lab - https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-5292 All 7.0, particularly 7.0.1 as others have mentioned below. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Amit Singh Sent:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323 gateway doesn't send the plus on outgoing PRI calls

2011-03-23 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Adam, This is correct. If you have a requirement to send the + you'll have to add at voice-port using a translation-rule. Jeff From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of adam compton Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:19

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calling and Called Party Number Type

2011-03-03 Thread givemeccievoice2010
We technically aren’t allowed to answer your question about the lab. Don’t stress out though, if the PSTN router won’t accept something or is expecting something, it’s a safe bet that you will be told the information you need. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] h245 negotiation

2011-02-22 Thread givemeccievoice2010
It most likely has to do with your incoming dial-peer on BR2 CME. What do you have configured for codec there? If you have nothing, then the codec default is g729r8. HTH, Jeff From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of natan

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Barge/CBarge

2011-02-09 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Ron, The point is that this is the expected behavior. If you don't want your screen cluttered you can use the privacy button to toggle privacy on/off in order to go from 2 displays to 1. To my knowledge there is no service parameter, feature, or anything else besides the privacy setting to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] I passed my Voice CCIE

2011-01-21 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Congrats Akash! Enjoy. -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Marko Milivojevic Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 2:51 AM To: akash patel Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA service url

2011-01-21 Thread givemeccievoice2010
You have the whole DocCD (http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html?mode=prod http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html?mode=prodlevel0=278875240 level0=278875240) and some of the SRNDs (including the Enterprise QoS SRND) available on the desktop. It's very much open book, but

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPPA service url

2011-01-20 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Doc CD Voice and Unified Communications Customer Collaboration Cisco United Contact Center Products Cisco Unified Contact Center Express Configuration Guides Configuration Examples and Tech Notes Configure a One Button Login for IP Phone Agents Jeff From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Presence btw CUCM and CME

2011-01-18 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Mritunjay, Just to clarify what I meant from my notes. In your scenario below, the SCCP phone on CME should be able to monitor the CUCM SCCP, however the CUCM SCCP phone will not be able to monitor the presence of the CME SCCP phone. If you have a CUCM SIP Phone, then in 7.0.1 you

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called # manupulation under SRST circumstance

2011-01-18 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Shingei, I misread your question. Please disregard for this scenario. Jeff From: givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com [mailto:givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 8:30 AM To: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called # manupulation

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SNR Line status

2011-01-13 Thread givemeccievoice2010
What type of phone are you using? For the remote in use, this is the correct way for it to work. Does your line turn red when you are using the mobile phone? From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of KatGuru Sent: Thursday,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Em on CME

2011-01-12 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Refer to the Administration Guide available on Cisco.com -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:51 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CUE intergarion in CUCM

2011-01-12 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Associate those CTI RP to the Application User and restart CUE. That should do the trick assuming everything else is ok. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Joli-coeur Wouter Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 12:31 PM To:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Em on CME

2011-01-12 Thread givemeccievoice2010
You add that URL under telephony-service. After that you'll have to reset the phones to download the new config with that URL. Jeff -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of iptuse...@hotmail.co.uk Sent:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CallManager 6.x/7.x web page issue

2011-01-11 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Can you ping your PC from the server? Can you ping the server from your PC? Make sure you have connectivity first. Then look into other possible issues. Jeff From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Chevy Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Inter- Presence CCM-CME

2011-01-11 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Francesc, Here is what I have in my notes. I know in the past I had issues getting it to work with a CUCM monitoring a CME phone, but the CME monitoring CUCM worked fine. I had written notes that Vik said CUCM SCCP Phone can't monitor CME phones in 7.0, but SIP should work fine. That

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] auto provision none versus all

2011-01-11 Thread givemeccievoice2010
auto provision all will gather ephone and ephone-dn configuration using SNAP and store in the running config. auto provision dn will only gather and store the ephone-dn in running config. auto provision none will not store anything in the running config. From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BUSY Trigger

2011-01-10 Thread givemeccievoice2010
There is a setting on the directory number configuration page busy-trigger-per-button and max-calls-per-button. The busy trigger will accomplish what you want if you set to 1. It's easier to think of these two settings as channels. Imagine 8 channels and there are 2 active calls on the line.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 56, Issue 198

2011-01-07 Thread givemeccievoice2010
You have to create an Alternative Number for that user in CUC. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of akash patel Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 2:58 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] T1 Pri Issue

2011-01-06 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Do you have this GW configured on CUCM? Is the gateway showing registered on CUCM? Do you have mgcp configured/enabled on the router? Have you bounced the MGCP (no mgcp/mgcp) after configuring the pri? You will see TEI Assigned until you have successfully configured all aspects of the MGCP

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Voice Access

2011-01-05 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Shrini, If you follow the Features and Services Guide as mentioned before, you will have success. You need to configure hairpinning for MGCP to work with MVA. The idea is that you will accept the call using 5999, but the MVA pilot number will be a different number. You will have to

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP LLQ priority value calculation

2011-01-05 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Francesc, A payload of 20 and 10 is not correct. RSVP and LLQ calculations are two different things. For RSVP, you calculations are correct. Correct Payloads (20 ms) G711 - 160 G729 - 20 For example, FRF.12, G729, with compression: IP/UDP/RTP - 2 bytes G729 - 20 bytes FRF.12

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP LLQ priority value calculation

2011-01-05 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Francesc, As I noted before, the RSVP bandwidth calculation is different from the LLQ bandwidth calculation. For the scenario of 2 RSVP calls, you will need to calculate as follows: 40 + 24 = 64 (one worst case 10ms call and one normal 20 ms) So under the serial interfaces you will

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP LLQ priority value calculation

2011-01-05 Thread givemeccievoice2010
I looked at the PG and they add in the calculation as I detailed in my most recent email. However, I am totally with you. The RTP/LLQ is different from the RSVP CAC and I would think that only a few extra Kbps would account for the RSVP control traffic in the PQ. Jeff From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP LLQ priority value calculation

2011-01-05 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Definitely, I’m sorry I didn’t understand at first J Happy studies! Jeff From: Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier [mailto:francesc.ro...@tecnocom.es] Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 12:12 PM To: givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com; 'Shrini' Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP LLQ priority value calculation

2011-01-05 Thread givemeccievoice2010
After I just agreed with you! J Below is not the RSVP calculation. That is the LLQ bandwidth calculations. After I reviewed my notes and figured out the value necessary, I referred to the PG. The PG calculates the PQ bandwidth by using 1 call at 10ms and 1 call at 20ms. I am confused

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP LLQ priority value calculation

2011-01-05 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Shrini, I believe you’re correct as well, but you were detailing the RSVP BW calculation not the LLQ which the question was asking. Jeff From: Shrini [mailto:linuxbos...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:32 PM To: Roig Borrell, Francesc Xavier Cc:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RSVP CAC

2010-12-24 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Shrini, CUCM will always request the worst case scenario in bandwidth first. The easy way to do this is to increase the max bandwidth command and use the show ip rsvp bandwidth command. For example: 1. Increase the ip rsvp bandwidth command to 120 2.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 5 Task 2.3

2010-12-20 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Brian, I would change back their pattern as they are testing you on the following concepts. When the call comes into the GW on CUCM, the prefix values configured will be added to the front of the number. In order to figure out how you will prefix this you need to look at the debug

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR display For and By

2010-12-09 Thread givemeccievoice2010
I know this doesn't make much sense, but it is done through a VM Profile. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of study2b ccie Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 10:10 AM To: OSL Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CFUR display For and

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] H323-CUCM strange behavior

2010-12-07 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Actually, I don't see a gateway command. Try adding that next time and calls should work with CUCM. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of study2b ccie Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 6:18 PM To: OSL Subject: [OSL |

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Service Parameters Configuration in CUCM

2010-12-03 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Randall, When on the Service Parameters page, either click on the actual parameter link or go to Help This Page That is the best and easiest way to see what a specific parameter is all about. Jeff From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] URL's for phone services

2010-12-01 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Randall, There is no central location for the phone services you may need for the exam. You’ll have to do throughout the Cisco.com documentation. IPMA can be found in the Help provided in CUCM, just search for IPMA and look at the checklist for the IPMA Proxy Line mode. IPPA can be

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] URL's for phone services

2010-12-01 Thread givemeccievoice2010
I believe you can find that stuff in the Release Notes. I know that's where you find the sql statement to insert the Voicemail button functionality back into CUCM. HTH From: khaled Saholy [mailto:khaled_sah...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:53 PM To:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from CUCM to CME : VIA Zone

2010-11-30 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Why do you have a different tech prefix for VIA zone? I don't believe you need a tech prefix at all for a VIA zone / CUBE. Just have your dial-peers configured to receive what CUCM is sending. Also, make sure that you have your allow connections commands. Do a show gatekeeper endpoints and

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from CUCM to CME : VIA Zone

2010-11-30 Thread givemeccievoice2010
I still think your problem most likely lies in the tech prefix on the CUBE. You don't need a tech prefix and I would make the dial-peer a little more specific. I'm not sure completely sure that this is accurate, but I would think that having a tech prefix on CUBE of 1# would not allow you route a

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ-RTR in Vol2 Lab1

2010-11-30 Thread givemeccievoice2010
I think what Randall is getting at is the fact that you would put the h323-gateway voip bind source ip under the voice vlan interface. The gatekeeper source is defined under the gatekeeper with the zone local commands. Hope this helps, Jeff -Original Message- From:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A

2010-11-29 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Rafay, Can you send the configuration from Site C? He was referring to the translation profile applied incoming on the voice-port on R3. It should look something like this: Voice-translation-rule 1 Rule 1 /^32143/ /3/ Or (I see two different called numbers below) Voice

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] I PASSED

2010-11-24 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi everyone, It's been a long journey, but it's finally over. Thanks for the many nights where I needed your help and you all chimed in. Thank you IPExpert for your great study materials and Vik for the final push in the 5-day bootcamp. I would recommend anyone who is about to attempt the

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Intergration of Unit express with SRST router

2010-11-24 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Hi Jason, In SRST you should point to a dial-peer that goes directly to CUE. Also add the voicemail command under telephony or voice register global that matches this pilot number. For example: Dial-peer voice 1 voip Destination-pattern 3600 Session target CUE IP address Session

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP issue on BR-1 Router

2010-11-19 Thread givemeccievoice2010
All you would need to do is re-enter the bind statements if that is the case in the future. -Original Message- From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of cciefo...@hotmail.com Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:49 AM To:

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild card....

2010-11-15 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Try the ! wildcard instead. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of mudassar Khalid Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 2:51 AM To: roger.car...@gmail.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ? wild

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCCX Script Question

2010-11-09 Thread givemeccievoice2010
For the first question - You need to either record a prompt in CUC or CUE, upload to UCCX, and then use the Play Prompt step to play to the caller. Then use the Terminate step and go to the end of the script using a label. For the second question - Once again record the prompt and upload.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK and cube problem

2010-11-04 Thread givemeccievoice2010
Could you also send the output from the command debug voice ipipgw when you attempt a call. This would also help find the problem from a CUBE standpoint. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego Sent: Thursday,