Josh,
I was in the same boat when I began my studies. Ultimately, my lab existed
in about 3 phases:
Phase 1:
3x 1720s
1x 2600xm
1x 2600
1x 3640
1x 3500xl
4x 7940
This allowed me to do the basic UCM configuration, but DSP configuration was
based on the older config style, and CME/CUE support was l
Way to go, Mark!
I'm not sure that I would have been able to handle testing on Friday and not
getting results for four days! :)
mike
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Mark Holloway wrote:
> I want to say thank you to everyone on the OSL who has participated in any
> of my discussions or helped r
I'd guess that your phones are configured with E.164 numbers as the external
number mask.
Remember that in SRST mode, the External Number Mask gets configured as the
calling name for the SRST ephone, and you'll see this behavior.
mike
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Afzal Bhutta wrote:
> Hello
Congrats Jim!
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Jim Engel wrote:
> So happy to have passed! J
>
>
>
> Anyone interested in purchasing any of my remaining vouchers please email
> me direct.
>
>
>
> jim.en...@ironbow.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Jim
>
> CCIE #6269 (Voice/RS)
>
> _
same MRGL will result in one resource being
> usable at a time?
>
>
>
> I’m just confused at the wording.
>
>
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
Keep in mind these guidelines when configuring MRGL:
Resources are searched in the order listed in the MRGL, so if you insert
three MRGs into the MRGL, UCM will search the first MRG for an appropriate
resource, then search the second MRG, then search the third.
Resources within an MRG are selected
If I'm following your example correctly, Mark, then you aren't hitting on
the translation pattern.
The SNR call is matching the \+1408.6347694 RP, to go out, why would it be
hitting the translation pattern? Perhaps you meant to configure this as a
Calling Party Transformation?
mike
On Fri,
Congrats Jeff!
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Cotter wrote:
> Finally….took more times than I care to admit! A big thanks to IPexpert
> (especially Vic) and everybody who has been a part of this list.
>
>
>
> Jeff Cotter
>
> CCIE #27033
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __
eat job to prepare you for the lab.
Just look at all the people who have passed in the last few months!
Thanks!
mike
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Ashar Siddiqui wrote:
> Well done! Congrats..
>
> Ash>
> CCIE#26244 (Voice)
>
> groganhockey wrote:
>
> 26966!
>
&
In our case, they actually brought lunch in and we ate in an adjoining
conference room rather than head to the cafeteria. At the time, I didn't
think to ask if it was out of character for RTP or not?
mike
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Amy Ryan wrote:
> Bill,
>
> Lunch is usually between 3
26966!
I'm not sure how often it'll come up in everyday life, but there it is.
I took the lab Monday in RTP and finally got my score report last night.
IPExpert/Vik/Amy: Thank you for the excellent study guides, walkthroughs,
audio and everything!
Mike
CCIE #26966 Voice
efore you restart your pools.
>> SCCP phones don't require the "create cnf-files" every time, but sip
>> phones do require the "create profile" to be issued with every change.
>>
>> Hope some of that helps.
>>
>> As an aside, you should also
You need a LOAD statement under voice register global.
mike
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:43 AM, linuxboss.9 wrote:
> I used below configuration to register 7961GE as SIP to CME but it is
> showing as SCCP registered.
>
> I have all the SIP firmware in root directory of flash.
>
>
> It should star
or is it just me?
mike
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Yes, you can. They will show up and act as a shared line.
Is the system prompting you for a PIN, or what specifically?
mike
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Leslie Meade wrote:
> Can you have the same number both as an extension mobility number as well
> as a normal number on a phone ?
>
> I ge
Nope, just wrapped up a session with no disconnects.
mike
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:30 PM, chase mergenthal wrote:
> I'm not sure what happened; but my connection to the PSTN router / BR1 /
> BR2 dropped in my lab session and i cant reconnect; anyone else having
> problems?
> -Chase
>
> __
I think this is the Connection Monitor Duration paramter under UCM
Enterprise Parameters.
mike
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Damon Chaput wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on Vol 2 Lab 3 section 3.1. When I take the WAN down,
> fallback works as expected and occurs immediately. When I bring the W
And the URL for the Product / Technology support page is:
http://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html?mode=prod
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:54 PM, groganhockey wrote:
> Amy,
>
> I wasn't sure if Ben meant the CME Admin Guide (which is more helpful than
> the SRND, I thin
Amy,
I wasn't sure if Ben meant the CME Admin Guide (which is more helpful than
the SRND, I think) in the Ask the Expert forum.
Does anybody know for sure?
mike
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Amy Ryan wrote:
> David,
>
> Based on the voice techtorial offered at Cisco Live this year, below
According to the most recent Ask the Expert with Ben Ng, there are four
documents on the desktop:
We have four SRND documents ready to be opened, also you have the online
Cisco document page.
1. UC 7 SRND
2. CUCME 7 SRND
3. UCCX 7 SRND
4. Enterprise QoS SRND 3.3
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1
, groganhockey wrote:
> All,
>
> Working through a SIP integration between UCME and UC using SIP, and I've
> got a couple of issues versus how the solutions guide lays out the solution.
>
> Item 1.4 states "Make sure that calls within the HQ or BR1 site use
> g711ulaw a
All,
Working through a SIP integration between UCME and UC using SIP, and I've
got a couple of issues versus how the solutions guide lays out the solution.
Item 1.4 states "Make sure that calls within the HQ or BR1 site use g711ulaw
and calls between sites use g729." (1 pt)
But in item 6.2, the
Tyson,
I had my first session on PL on Friday night, and this was one of the issues
that I ran into. I could not get the servers to reload no matter what I
tried (it seemed).
I had another session scheduled for this morning, but cancelled it as a
result of the frustrating session I had on Friday.
i, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:01 PM, groganhockey wrote:
>
>> Am I missing it? I don't see it on the IPCC server?
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading C
Am I missing it? I don't see it on the IPCC server?
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
Congratulations, Matthew. You're a great inspiration and you have made great
contributions to the list and via your blog!
mike
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Matthew Berry wrote:
> I just got my score report. I passed guys.
>
> More follow-up to come later. Right now I'm now on cloud nine. :
All,
I'm trying to understand a behavior I'm seeing in setting up a GK-controlled
ICT between UCM clusters.
When I place a call across the GK-ICT, the receiving cluster attempts to
allocate an MTP for the call.
On the trunk:
MTP Required is not checked
Inbound/Outbound Fast Start are not checked
I'm just glad I can finally contribute *something* to these discussions! :)
FYI, cisco has moved the doc in the past, so make sure you remember the
title in case it moves again.
mike
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:38 AM, shikamaru wrote:
> MUCH respect, Mike. This is the perfect document for this
28 matches
Mail list logo
