Check with PISA@EBI, it has database searches where you can fetch all
dodecamers in the PDB
Eugene
On 20 Feb 2013, at 06:29, Hui Wang wrote:
Dear all,
I am looking for proteins that form a dodecameric ring structure (Not two
rings of hexamer Nor tetrahedral distribution of subunit trimers).
Hi
You can do this type of selection from this service at PDBe. It provides
you with many options that you can combine into a query to make selections
of PDB-ID.
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe-as/pdbeselect/PDBeSelect.jsp
From this page :
select from the drop down [Assembly] - Assembly Name
Click
Dear all,
I have a problem while running CNS DEN refinement. After running the CNS
minimize refinement, the program was aborted and an error message was displayed
as:
**
Error: test set array test does not exist
Dear all,
Recently I have measure a set of kinetic data of a receptor ligand
interaction using BIAcore 3000. To my surprise, the dissociation rate is
very low (~ 10e-6). During the measurement, I use a long dissociation time
(2 hours) .I repeat several time which give very similar results. So I
Hi Folks,
Sorry this isn't a non-ccp4 post.
I am working with a membrane protein for which I am finally able to scale
up expression. I am now also able to partially purify my protein from a
medium-scale (12-18L) bacterial culture using a two-step tandem affinity
purification protocol (Talon
I assume you use CM5 chips ?
I further assume you run at pH 7.5 perhaps ? What's the pI of your analyte ?
7.5 ? Do you get significant binding to your reference cell under the
conditions you are running ?
You might get rebinding to your negatively charged surface and the dissociation
you are
Hi Raji,
Thrombin is a rather good protease and behaves well in a large set of
different detergents ( there is a paper by Michael Wiener that describes
the relative efficiencies of several usual proteases, amongst those
thrombin is inlcuded, used routinely for cleavage of membrane protein
fusions
Hi Raji,
I addition to the tips from Pascal, I would like to say that for a memb
protein I worked on with a his-tag separated by a thrombin site, I used
thrombin cross linked to agarose from Sigma (1 mL). The beads can be
collected, washed and reequilibrated, making it ready for use so many times.
Dear Xianchi,
unfortunately, dissociation rate constant kd 10^-6 s^-1 was just
beyond the limit of Biacore in 1999 (e.g. see Fig. 1 in
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10556876). I am not sure about
these days.
As Juergen noted, you may have a problem with rebinding (you could try
to reduce
Dear Pascal and Toufic,
Many thanks to both of you for the pointers. Toufic, I actually poked
around online and bought exactly the same kit that you are suggesting,
especially because the beads are reusable. So your experience is
reassuring. So I'll find out soon.
I also plan to play around with
Hi Xianchi,
First of all: a very slow dissociation rate can also be an artifact: the
analyte can be simply precipitating on the surface. You do need to rule this
out by proper controls.
But there is no rule saying that 10e-6 s-1 off rate is not realistic. Even with
protein-small molecule
Hi All,
I am about to order some linux boxes for protein crystallography use from
DELL. Could you guys share the experience which model would be the best for
this purpose?
Also I know the stereo monitor topic has been discussed previously, but I
would like to get the opinion for the current best
Dear CCP4bb readers,
We have an opening for a talented Post Doc in X-ray crystallography in
the Genentech Department of Structural Biology. If interested, please
apply online at http://www.gene.com/careers/detail/00411397/Postdoctoral-Research-Fellow-Xray-Crystallography
.
Postdoctoral
Dear Crystallographers,
it has been my experience that homology modelling programs get folds pretty
well, but sometimes the details are pretty obviously bad, like too-close
contacts. One might think that the modelling software would put in a sort
of polishing step, but they don't seem to. Is
My 0.02 on this as always. For monitors, I was worried about this at
first. I replaced all my SGI units (with what was good graphics and CRT
displays), and I worried about getting a new monitor and losing
information with different stereo options.
I bought zalman monitors, and they work
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Jacob Keller
j-kell...@fsm.northwestern.edu wrote:
it has been my experience that homology modelling programs get folds pretty
well, but sometimes the details are pretty obviously bad, like too-close
contacts. One might think that the modelling software would
I am attempting to purify a protein complex of two proteins. The Protein A
and Protein B have been co-expressed in media containing N15-Cys. Protein
A has a 6-histadine tag. I am able to purify this complex via a Ni-NTA
column with good results. I now have the Protein A-labled/B-labled
Protein A must be co-expressed as it does not express well alone.
Have you tried separating A+B on the Nickel column by flowing 2M urea to help
tickle off protein B. The amount will vary depending on the affinity. In my
case (~50nM) requires about 1000-1700ml of 20mM Tris, 2M urea pH 7.5. Then
Thanks a lot for the kind reply.
I used CM5 chip at pH 7.4. I am not quite sure about the PI of my protein
but I have different truncations of my protein which behaved similarly.
I can fit my data quite good with the Chi2 around 1 and Rmax 150. The kon
is about 10e4 and the KD is around 0.2 nM.
Hi Jacob,
In our experience using MODELLERhttp://salilab.org/modeller/ for the homology
modeling part, followed by refinement with CHARMMhttp://www.charmm.org/ leads
to structures with very reasonable high quality statistics as reported by
MolProbity.
Both programs are integrated in our
I used proteinmodelportal.org to generate homology models. It worked well for
us.
Huiming
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 20, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Jacob Keller j-kell...@fsm.northwestern.edu
wrote:
Dear Crystallographers,
it has been my experience that homology modelling programs get folds
Well that looks pretty real then. You might have wrong concentrations in one or
the other experiment perhaps hence the difference.
Jürgen
On Feb 20, 2013, at 5:45 PM, xianchi dong wrote:
Thanks a lot for the kind reply.
I used CM5 chip at pH 7.4. I am not quite sure about the PI of my protein
Hi Xianchi,
How did you treat the control flow cell? And what is the composition of the
control buffer that you use to disrupt binding? Is it denaturing or a mild
condition?
If the Rmax=150 and Koff=1e-6, then at 7200 s (2 hr), the signal will only drop
1RU from 150RU (assuming you can reach
many thanks. I'll try again.
best,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Mecy Shi mecy...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I have a problem while running CNS DEN refinement. After running the CNS
minimize refinement, the program was aborted and an error message was
displayed as:
24 matches
Mail list logo