Q2
Copy the MAL entry into your own directory
cp $CLIBD/monomers/m/MALcif ./
Then correctt it in your directory
And assign LIBIN ./MAL.cif
The program will read your corrected version and ignore the distributed
one.
Q1
If you run REFMAC the GUI under review restraints, it will detect and
If you have used TLS the B factors listed for the residues are the
residual values AFTER the TLS is applied so they are correctly
restrained to be quite close - the differences in the molecules should
be expressed in the hard-to-visualise TLS parameters.
The first check is to run
TLSANL and as
Are you using TLS? If so the B factors in the PDB file are relative to
the TLS parameters..
Or have you lost low resolution data - you can see that in many plots -
one in REFMAC gives v as a function of resolution?
If so you probably need to use SCALE SIMPLE - in gfact that is usually
the
REFMAC expects F not I so you need to convert the file..
You will need to run TRUNCATE to convert I to F or the GUI task under
Data processing
Eleanor
John Bruning wrote:
Hi,
I have an mtz file from Phenix I am trying to convert for use in
Refmac. The labels are currently:
H
K
L
I-obs
It is hard to get a resonable estimate of Wilson B with 4.5A to 3A data,
but yes - if the crystal stops diffracting at 3A that seems reasonable to me
Eleanor
Michael Colaneri wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I have a B of 75A**2 from Wilson statistics 4.7 to 3 A res, good
straight line. Has anyone
Does the mtz file you are using for refinement have the correct
spacegroup in it? Sometimes it gets left as the pointgroup P222 and
causes disasters
(you just need to run
mtzutils hklin1 now.mtz hklout x.mtz
SYMM P21212
end
Eleanor
Satinder K. Singh wrote:
Hello,
I have a SAD data set to
The new pointless which is the underlying program for the "Test
Alternate Indexing" task from the CCP4-6.0.2 GUI works brilliantly for
matching 2 data sets.
However in P21212 if a not-equal b not-equal c it is hard to confuse them..
Like Tassos I think you should start your experiment by mergi
Does your cell show pseudo symmetry or NCS translations?
Eleanor
Wu, Mousheng wrote:
hi, everyone!
I am struggling with my crystal structure in a very big unit cell. my protein is about 16KDa. probably there are about 20 molecules in the asymmetric unit. I tried to use molecular replacement t
CNS format changes with the time of day and unfortunately f2mtz requires
that you give a correct fortran format stt.
This command script works from the GUI:
Note that
1) you must the "skip lines"
2) you need X entries to skip unwanted characters . These include INDE
(7x) FOBS= (6x) and also
I think the error is in BALBES - there is a peak I guess at 0.95 0 0.01
but it must be too close to the origin to be a translation vector from
one molecule to another.
There are reasons for such peaks - sometimes spurious large terms in the
data..
but they dont usually represent true molecula
There are many many kinases with different conformations of the C
terminal and N terminal domains.
I would first refine the Cterminal as far as you can go - correct the
sequence etc etc.
Then align a selection of kinases on your C-terminal coordinates (
MSDfold at www.ebi.ac.uk/msd will return
Well - there will be a ripple, but is it there in the difference map as
well? that is meantto be less affected.
REFMAC5 claims to be able to refine some atoms anisotropically and
that would be a good place to start
Maybe you will need to read the documentation! There is some way of
request
Try submitting your coordinates to www.ebi.ac.uk/ msd and choose the
task MSDpisa
It gives you lots of info including that..
Eleanor
Sreeram Mahesh wrote:
Hi All!
I have found stacking interaction between aromatic residues of a
structure of an enzyme. does anybody knows any server which
Well - this (expert??) would suggest using SCALE SIMPLE -
SCBULK is a fudge which has some theoretical justification if you have
measured very complete and accurate low resolution data, but seeing most
people havent done this it remains a fudge factor
The justification is related to average s
Jie Liu wrote:
> Dear CCP4ers:
>
> Does anyone know an existing program to calculate the lateral
> displacement---the vertical offset, measured as a fraction of the
> the heptad repeat---of neighboring helices in coiled coils or helix
> bundles, either parallel or antiparallel?
>
> Your input is g
Well - I seem to get many things twice! Prob. my fault - and it fills
up my "Deleted" box..
Eleanor
Thomas Stout wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that they're only getting some of the postings
on the CCP4 mailing list?
Lately I've been noticing that I often see responses to queries, but
n
There might be many reasons..
Do you have a spacegroup with alternate indexing? If so the two crystals
may not be using the same convention.
See $CHTML/reindexing.html for more details.
Or is one data set a high resolution pass and one a low resolution pass?
Sometimes then there are saturated
Xue-Yuan Pei wrote:
Dear ALL:
I am runging AMORE and get an error message:
AMORE: NSOL set too small
When I checked the document, I could not find the keyword to reset NSOL.
Any one can give a suggestion?
Regards,
xue
This is a program parameter - it means you are working with more tha
Can you combine the PHIC and FOM from each of your solutions, then do
the Phase comparison in Clipper utilities checking for alternate
origins? That gives a good indication of what is going on.
Do you have more than one molecule in the asymm unit? You can finish up
with A_phaser matching one
You dont seem to have assigned LIBIN as 1pe.cif - you need to assign
your library file - are you using the GUI?
Enter 1pe.cif in LIB In slot.
Craig McElroy wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to refine a structure with a PEG400 molecule using
refmac 5.3. I have created the necessary library file and
The choice of origin is completely arbitrary as far as I can see - any
or all of the alternates satisfies an MR search equally well..
Eleanor
Kolstoe S.E. wrote:
Thanks for the help everyone.
I followed Jan's suggestion of running lsqkab which gave a translation
vector in fractions of cell ed
ping sun wrote:
Thanks for your answer.
I guess I did not make it clear. I used the data file for refinement
which is also used for phasing (peak_anomalous.hkl).
Traditionally, people will reprocess the same set of data for
refinement (rescale it in hkl2000 without using the option
"anomalous
Whats in the cif file?
Is it a set of coordinates or a library description?
Eleanor
Mark A Saper wrote:
I'm new to using LIBCHECK. I'm trying to make an appropriate library
for the MSO ligand. I have a .cif file that I downloaded from
Gerard's site. When running LIBCHECK, if I use MON MSO and
I just have to write out matrices:
CCP4 rotation matrix:
[R11 R12 R13] [x]
[R21 R22 R23] [y]where x y z are orthogonal coordinates relative
to fixed axes...
[R31 R32 R33] [z]
represents a rotation of ccordinates by first gamma then beta then alpha
as Phil says:
[R11 R12 R13]
[R21 R22
Ditto - I am getting everything in duplicate
Eleanor
Andy Purkiss-Trew wrote:
Hi Ian and list,
I don't know about rejected postings, as I've not made any recently, but
I am getting two copies of each posting made and the second has gone
through the same server as below:
Received: from ms1.kiss
test 2
test..
What does the matthews_coeff indicate? You would expect more water than
that, but maybe you have a low Matthews_coeff indicating little solvent?
maybe you have lost the low resolution data which makes it harder to
find water? Maybe you have refined with bulk solvent scaling -
sometimes that
Not enough information but some suggestions.
Are you sure the data is OK? Any sign of twinning? That is suspicious
if you cant decide between P43 and P43212
(Run SFCHECK on the amplitudes and try to understand output! )
Or send it and I will provide commentary.
Eleanor
Yanming Zhang wrote:
rfactor?
Quoting Eleanor Dodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The weighting in REFMAC is a function of SigmA ( plotted in log file).
For this example it will be nearly 1 for all resolutions ranges so
the weights are pretty constant. There is also a contribution from
the "experimental" sigm
Refmac will not introduce a repulsion unless the sum of the occupancies
of the two neighbouring atoms id > 1.00 . Is that the case for you? ( It
might list the close contacts - but shouldnt use them)
If you want a link between the ligand and something else though you must
label them both A or B
://web.usc.es/~vanraaij/ <http://web.usc.es/%7Evanraaij/>
On 16 Aug 2007, at 15:22, Randy J. Read wrote:
On Aug 16 2007, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
The weighting in REFMAC is a function of SigmA ( plotted in log file).
For this example it will be nearly 1 for all resolutions ranges so
the weights
I am trying to keep track of, and notes on these Emails, many of which
raise very important Qs for our community, much more so than any
problems with a particulat structure..
But it would be a lot easier if you would all stick to the same Subject
header!!!
Eleanor
There are obvious ones like - incomplete structure etc, but have you
tried TLS? Sometimes this can dramaticaly improve the R factors.
You seem to have lost of lot of the low resolution data - could this
mean you had overloads which naybe could be rescued.. That can down
grade the maps a good
I think Garib or Alexei must answer this and they are both on holiday
till the end of August
Eleanor
juergen J. Mueller wrote:
Dear all,
using refmac5 to provide H-atoms for a known protein structure the
distance between CYS-CG and HG is defined to 1.34 Ang. in CYS.cif.
This distance has been
I guess this is the old fashioned way, but it seems simpler to me!
There are 2 strands labelled T
I find it easier to run a program than use coot.
distang xyzin 65*pdb
RADI CA 3
end
This shows you that A 85 -ish is linked to T 11-23 with symop
X-1/2,-Y+3/2,-Z
and B ??? is linked to T 41-53 wit
Raja Dey wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to solve a multi-protein DNA complex structure from a 3.6
A native data set. The target structure is a dimer (95 aa in each monomer) in
complex with DNA( 15 base pairs) plus a second protein of 131 aa. The data has
been scaled to P6(1)22 sp. gr. and
ALMN will do this ..
It does not have a GUI - Gr
#!/bin/csh -f
#
almn \
hklin /y/people/ccp4/projects/insmon/ins_p1_1,55A-I422cell.mtz \
hklin2 /y/people/jean/Youshang/monomeric/datproc/*mtz <
Hi,
I have two patterson maps created from two observed data sets of similar structures. I
ZO has a good point - it is a pain trying to get decent simulated
material - maybe there is an employment opportunity here?
Eleanor
Zbyszek Otwinowski wrote:
James Holton wrote:
How MUCH do you want to bet?
;)
Any amount, as long as we are taking about real diffraction images
correspondin
Look at the MSDpisa page:
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/prot_int/pistart.html
reached from http://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd/
It probably tells you much of what you wantt o know..
Eleanor
Mary Rorick wrote:
Hi,
I'm a evolution/genetics grad student trying to address protein
questions. I'd like to f
If you have a high off origin peak at 0 0 0.5 you must have absences
along the 00l axis also consistent with
P63 22.
So you need to test both P6322 and P6 22
And is the tetramer generated by crystal symmetry or is the whole thing
in the asymmetric unit?
Eleanor
Jorge Iulek wrote:
Dear all,
Beware twinning tests with pseudo translation! Intensity stats are
distorted..
What does SFCHECK suggest? It pre-selects data for testing..
Eeanor
Green, Todd wrote:
I have a case that is similar to this, or at least visually similar by
diffraction pattern(ie. strong/weak intensities). I thi
Vu Thai wrote:
Hi,
I have a protein that binds nucleotides, and in my structure, it
appears that the binding pocket is partial occupied by ADP and AMP;
the beta phosphate of ADP is transfered to another molecule. I want
to refine the structure with both ADP and AMP modeled in the sight and
manu
Within CCP4
SFCHECK and TRUNCATE provide an analysis
the PHENIX Xtriage is excellent..
See http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/dist/html/twinning.html
Eleanor
Jobichen Chacko wrote:
Dear All,
Can you please inform me the programs available to find whether a crystal is
twinned and also the data reduction
Not an expert on integration at all, but is this true for mosaic
crystals when spots overlap rather messily?
Eleanor
George M. Sheldrick wrote:
Since processing non-merohedrally twinned crystals became routine in
small-molecule crystallography, the number of such twins has increased
dramatical
You would have to edit the command script for PDBSET
(From GUI - Run and View com file, then modify it..)
There are options to select CHAIN A and protein only. etc etc
Eleanor
Antony Oliver wrote:
You could simply hand-edit the PDB file to remove the offending ligand.
Regards,
Tony.
H
There are many alternate origins for different space groups..
However a somewhat arbitrary choice or origin was made for the first
listing of independent space groups, and it is simplest to accept the
established conventions.
If you shift the C2 origin from 0 0 0 to 1/4, 0 0 you generate C21
You need a LINK record in the PDB and a dictionary to describe the link.
If you run the job from the GUI with Review Restraints, the program
should write out a suitable dictionary to describe the link. Check the
distances etc to see if you agree with them. You then use the extended
pdb and tha
No comment on the Auto debate, but the RMSD of bonds is a crude measure
unless you check the outliers..
You can make REFMAC list these - I think it should do so by default
actually..
Bad metal distances for instance can distort the number enormously.
Eleanor
Mark Mayer wrote:
Hello all,
I b
That is very very peculiar!
as far as I know REFMAC doesnt really care whether you call something
ATOM or HETATM .
I suspect the problem is either in the cif file describing the co-factor
- could the atom type fpr MO be set as N? or possibly in the PDB file -
is the Atom name displaced to the
First question - is the original PDB structure twinned? Can you download
the data and check that..
And you have generated the extra models correctly have you - there are
origin shifts to consider I think..
2) How can you get an R factor of 20.7 / 25.7 with REFMAC in P6122 and
one of 27.77/36
DM will produce its own mask if you provide the operators - the only
time you really need a mask is for cross-crystal averaging.
Eleanor
m zhang wrote:
Hi All,
I was trying to make a model-mask file for ncs-averaging in DM. I noticed that in CNS, the mask file has to be O-compressed. Does
I am not clear whether you want to apply NCS restraints to multiple
copies of the same ligand type.
That is easy - you just restrain Ligand CHAIN and "residue number1
residue number 1" in the same way as for protein chains ( Presumably
residue number1 and residue number2 will be the same)
If
You need the atom name CA and CL moved one space to the left relative to
C O N etc..
And correct the atom type in cols 76?? from C to CL and CA ( again moved
one space to left)
Eleanor
Vineet Gaur wrote:
Hi all
i am having Ca2+ and Cl- as hetroatoms in my protein structure. while doing
refin
I cant answer - but this version certainly generates anisotropic scales..
We have ccp4.6.0.2 installed)
###
###
##
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd/
Go to msdpisa
E
Xiaoyi Deng wrote:
Dear all:
I used moleman2 to calculate the contacts between chain A and B. Can
anyone suggest a program to calculate the contacts between the
interface of dimer-dimer?
Thank you,
Xiaoyi
Graduate student
University of Nebraska
You havent got an incorrect CISPEP definition lurking in the PDB file
have you - COOT does NOT correct these so if you rebuild something which
has been previously flagges as CISPEP ( and that can happen if a very
ugly omega angle falls to 89.999 ) then it stays that way in the PDB
output from C
Well - PDBSET gives you the X Y and Z dimensions. (
pdbset xyzin thismol.pdb
end
If you want to align the protein along its principal axes, I usually run
the TABLING function of Amore. That takes a model, moves its CofM to the
origin and aligns it in such a way.
Eleanor
Vineet Gaur wrote
1) You dont say whether there is a non crystallographic translation
vector - if that is so the twinning statistics can be misleading.
SFCHECK analyses this or you can just run a native patterson to 4A say
and see if there is an off-origin peak.
2) The twinning tests that use the correlation be
You can just set your default FreeR value to 1.
See the REFMAC gui etc..
Eleanor
Petra Lukacik wrote:
I have a mtz file (output from phenix AutoSol and AutoBuild) where the
FreeR flag for the test set has a value of 1 and and the working set
has value 0. This is opposite to the ccp4 default wh
Yes to keeping the same FreeR
Bfactors - I doubt if it matters, but I usually start a new data set by
setting Bs to the Wilson suggestion..
Twinned data - maybe you ought to use SHELXL to refine it?
Eleanor
john kryst wrote:
Hi all !!
I am working on some deletion mutants. Mutant
There are two ways -
1) Import both sets - combine using CAD ( it is the first task of the
Experimental phasing module) - do the automatic checking that you have
the same indexing conventions -
Scale data sets together ( 2nd task of Experimental phasing module) -
that will give an R factor betw
Did you go to this web site?
http://remediation.wwpdb.org/downloads.html
It has the new dictionary stuff
Eleanor
James Stroud wrote:
Hello All,
I noticed some things different about the PDB today causing me to rub
my eyes vigorously and to put my nose right on my monitor in disbelief:
I wrote that - is a constant a Gaussian? Anyway that is how I got 5 -
and it is the
9-parameter Cromer-Mann approximation..
And Yes - each component is added to the B value to build up the real space
atomic density.
as you show.
Eleanor
Bernhard Rupp wrote:
Dear All,
I read in SFALL docu
ented
as series of Gaussians.a=0,b=0; a=1, b=0
This is called 'Gomputing'.
Cheers, br
-Original Message-
From: Eleanor Dodson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 1:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] atomic FF used
If the occupancy is 0.00 there will be no refinement - the output cds
are the same as the input, and I guess that will make for horrible
geometry - COOT will "correct" the geometry of all atoms though so you
can make a prettier picture - but with no more information content re
the model if the
These problems are horrible!
1) I usually try to run refinement using the exptl phases as restraints.
It is worth getting the best possible phases before you start - DM with
66% solvent should make a great improvement..
Then these cam be used as restraints for the refinement, and your FWT
m
You must be carefulwith assigning twinning operators in a lower symmetry
than the true one. Some twinning tests look for correlations between
reflections which would be related by the twinning operator.
eg a twinning operator for PG 4 is k,h,-l so the CC between h,k,l, and
k,h,-l is checked.
B
If you put the coordinates into COOT it will give you a validation score.
If you use the CCP$i map correlation procedures it will also give you a
CC for the density match.
The input in each case is the reflection file with appropriate amplitude
and phase terms.
What you use depends on what p
Well - the wilson plots only indicate ice rings - they dont tell much
about twinning, except that I would prob restrict the tests to exclude
the suspect data.
( use resolution range low - to 3.5 for one, low - 2.4 for the other or
some such..)
The moments are the best indicators providing th
The cumulative intensity depends on correctly estimating weak
reflections, so it is a bit vulnerable to the integration procedures.
I prefer the 4th moment of E - 2nd moment of I. Providing there is no
pseudo-translation they are pretty reliable indicators of twinning
Eleanor
Bryan W. Lepore
Use the CCP4i Reflection utilities
Convert to MTZ and say you are importing mmCIF
It will sort it out for you
Eleanor
Zheng Zhou wrote:
Hi,
Could anyone give a quick hint for the Fortran format for the following
structure factor mmCIF file? or Is there any easy program or better way to
conver
Yes- ALMN seems to have given one excellent match between the data sets
which is encouraging.
But since you are matching hexagonal to trigonal you get a large number
of symmetry equivalent peaks, relating a molecule from the P1 set to one
of the hexagonal set.
The angles are defined so that:
"T
I would stop trying to use a map! that is an act of desperation when you
have uninterpretable but possibly somewhat true experimentally phased
density..
If you have a model it is MUCH MUCH easier!
So as I said - I would find the best hexagonal dimer - you may know this
or you can dispatch the s
As I often say!!! The mtz format should carry point group and alternate
SGs - then be upgraded when youknow the correct SG..
Eleanor
Phil Evans wrote:
It just picks the first in the list, to store in the output MTZ file,
which can only handle one (92 < 96)
Phil
On 8 Nov 2007, at 22:26, Brya
te task would be an improvement.
Phil Evans wrote:
I agree
On 9 Nov 2007, at 13:50, Eleanor Dodson wrote:
As I often say!!! The mtz format should carry point group and
alternate SGs - then be upgraded when youknow the correct SG..
Eleanor
Phil Evans wrote:
It just picks the first in the list,
Can you attach the input file to sortmtz - the error is cryptic! I
suspect the input file is corrupted somehow, but it needs testing.
eleanor
hari jayaram wrote:
> Hi ,
> I have a low resolution dataset at 3.2 to 3.5 Å resolution , upon running
> scala I get the following rather cryptic error
>
Dont forget pointless gives a point group so you could have spacegroup
P4123 too - check that in MR
Could might well have a trimer sitting on the cubic 3-fold, but then the
oligimer will be generated by the crystal symmetry, and you need only
search with a monomer.
Eleanor
Kristof Van Hecke
These things are always very difficult.
It is obvious from the TRUNCATE log that your data is incomplete past
about 2.5A and that it is very anisotropic
(See wilson graph and the anisotropy fall off graph.) ( but why do you
say the data stops at 2.2 when the graphs go to 1.9A?)
There doesnt se
Hurrah!!! I have quite often found that the packing requirements are too
tight and ifell that they need at least to be given as a % of the CAs .
MOLREP actually has a more sensitive packing check which looks at the %
of the molecule which overlaps, and that is less likely to reject good
soluti
If you use the Clipper utiity HL to/from PHI/FOM it will generate HLA
HLB HLC HLD
of course HLC=HLD=0 but it serves to trick programs..
Eleanor
Jan Abendroth wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to include exteral phase information in a sharp refinement. The
phases come from dmmulti.
Steps this far:
- c
A bit late but I didnt answer in time.
This is one of the cases where I still wheel out ALMN to do the self
rotation. It generates ALL symmetry peaks and allows you to select which
axis you want to take as the polar axis. (ncode = 1 c*, ncode = 2 a*,
ncode = 3 b* and so on)
And the program out
Not enough information! Does the XYZIN file exist?
Eleanor
Raja Dey wrote:
Hi All,
I was trying to run NCS Phased refinement in the gui of CCP4
(Refmac_5.2.0005) and getting the following error. I just
pasted below the last part of the log file. Any help is
I dont think REFMAC can refine occupancy, but the way I would tackle it
is to first refine B factors, then if those for the ligand are much
higher than for the protein maybe test changing those occupancies to 0.7
, 0,5 and so on..
But in fact B factors and occupancies are highly correlated, an
You probably dont need to refine the positions but i guess there is no
harm in it.. You do need to refine the ano occupancy which reflects the
f" values.
Your sites 2 and 4 are quite close so the MSE might be disordered?
It doesnt really matter what you call the atom type since nothing is on
th
I doubt if you should ever t hrow away data if the I/SigI is sensible in
the outer shell.
Have you tried TLS refinement or loosened the B restraints? Often higher
Rfree at higher resolution are related to B refinement problems.
Eleanor
杨柳青 wrote:
> Hi,dear all:
> I try to refine one protein
As you say - it is 17.006 in all versions of atomsf.lib I have access to!
It is good that f' and f" will now reflect the wave length, although the
wavelengh is so often wrongly recorded that this had better be an
optional request rather than the default!
Eleanor
Ethan Merritt wrote:
On Th
Yongchao Li wrote:
I have a large molecule to refine.There are about three thousand residues in one asymmetric unit.
Except for the lack of electron densities in several places, where the
loops have been deleted, the rest parts fits well with density. But the R free and R work are all beyond 0.
With such good data you would expect lower R factors I agree.
I use all the COOT validation tools - Ramachandran, diff map peaks etc
to try to pinpoint errors.
Also anomalous difference maps hoping to verify S positions and check
the sequence fitting.
You could let Arp/Warp rebuild it from t
Bong angels are probably ideal already!
There is really no such animal as an ideal bondlength or angle - they
depend to some extent on the atomic environment.
There are papers by Engh and Huber who looked at small molecule highly
refined structures to get AVERAGE bond lengths and standard devi
Jie Liu wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I have a sulfate ion sitting on a 2-fold axis. Should I put in pdb file
> one S atom with occu=0.5 and two O atoms with occu=1, or should
> I put one S and four O atoms all with occu=0.5?
>
> Thanks for your inputs.
>
> Jie
>
>
>
It should be more or less equivalent
Please do NOT use the BB for abuse.
Eleanor
Gerard DVD Kleywegt wrote:
Be care, you insolence might get someone sent disappear.
is the chinese secret service editing my incoming mail already, or are
you merely using a microsoft grammar checker?
--dvd
*
The task - Sort/ Modify / Combine files
does just that..
Eleanor
Huiying Li wrote:
I tried to scale, using SCALA through CCP4i GUI, three blocks of data
collected with one crystal (3 mtz files output from MOSFLM). The GUI
has only one MTZ input slot. Which program can be used to combine the
3
It needs Garib to answer this!
Eleanor
Charlie Bond wrote:
> Eleanor Dodson wrote:
>
>> It should be more or less equivalent, but better I think to put 1S at
>> 0.5 occ and 2O at occ = 1
>>
>> At least in REFMAC the restraints to the symmetry atoms should be se
PDBSET xyzin model.pdb
ROTA EULER a b c
SHIFT FRAC tx ty tz
CELL new cell
end
Vellieux wrote:
Dear all,
We have a phaser output with 2 alternative solutions. Not differing
much by the statistics. Phaser provides the solution with the highest
LLG. However I am not convinced by that solution.
It isnt a bad approximation for any organic compound to take the number
of atoms including hydrogens, and multiply it by 10A^^3
Eleanor Dodson
Rajan Pillai wrote:
Hi All,
Can anyone tell me any program that calculates voume of a ligand? Moreover,
is there also any program that can calculate
LLI agree the difference between sd and SigI are a bit obscure. One
referes to the spread of values about your mean I (The Sd of the
reflection distribution)
SigI is derived from the SIGI values estimated by the integration.
There is some description in the CCP4 study weekend article by Phil Evans
These decisions are always going to be individual but I have been
pushing for a long time for the mtz output to have a pointgroup at the
data processing/merging stage with a check list of spacegroups in the
order of their probabilities ( as pointless now suggests..) .
There could then be a seper
Yes - you are right! It doesnt work on my PC either..
I dont understand the code at all.
Did it work on an older version of CCP4?
Eleanor
Anita Bentley wrote:
Dear CCP4-programmers,
I have recently installed CCP4 6.0.2 on a Mac G5 running (still) under
OS 10.4. So far it was running OK - u
Hard to say without more information.
Have you refined the B factors for these residues? Most building
software gives some arbitrary b value, which must then be refined. (In
fact after any rebuilding activity you need to do a few cycles of
refinement before looking at the maps again)
Eleanor
601 - 700 of 1655 matches
Mail list logo