Re: Performance problem with 16x audio burns in Linux

2002-03-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On Mar 12, Joerg Schilling wrote: >> >From: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> j >> >> >Try increasing the fifo size to 16m or so (-fs=16m). You may also >> >want to see if you can find a firmware upgrade for the CD-R drive. >> >> >Also running cdr

Re: Performance problem with 16x audio burns in Linux

2002-03-12 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Mar 12, Joerg Schilling wrote: > >From: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > j > > >Try increasing the fifo size to 16m or so (-fs=16m). You may also > >want to see if you can find a firmware upgrade for the CD-R drive. > > >Also running cdrecord at nice --19 (i.e., -19, not +19) or so will

Re: isofsck ?

2002-03-12 Thread Geoffrey
Danilo Godec wrote: > On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:03:31AM +0100, Danilo Godec wrote: >> >>>Is there a simple way to check an ISO image for consistency? To check >>>whether an ISO image is complete and all files are where they are supposed >>>to

Re: Performance problem with 16x audio burns in Linux

2002-03-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> j >Try increasing the fifo size to 16m or so (-fs=16m). You may also >want to see if you can find a firmware upgrade for the CD-R drive. >Also running cdrecord at nice --19 (i.e., -19, not +19) or so will >help. You have to do that as root, though. YO

Re: Performance problem with 16x audio burns in Linux

2002-03-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From: Anssi Saari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I have a performance problem writing audio discs at 16x in Linux. Cdrecord >1.11a17 can just barely keep its fifo filled during the burn, mostly. Data >burns are not a problem, 12x audio burns are also not a problem, or >it seems I have barely enough horsep

Re: 4 Year anniversary for cdrecord-ProDVD

2002-03-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
>From: csj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >On Sat, 9 Mar 2002 13:05:25 +0100 (CET) >Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Some people may already noticed that since January 1st 2002, >> cdrecord-ProDVD is free for Educational and Research purposes, >> starting from now, it is also free for priva

Re: isofsck ?

2002-03-12 Thread Karl-Heinz Herrmann
On 12-Mar-02 Danilo Godec wrote: > cd /image_mountpoint ; tar czf - . | tar tzvf - > > This should do the trick, right? This should test readability all right. If you've still the original data around you just burned compare them: diff -r /original/dir /cd/mountpoint K.-H. -- To UNSUBS

Re: 4 Year anniversary for cdrecord-ProDVD

2002-03-12 Thread jarausch
On 9 Mar, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Some people may already noticed that since January 1st 2002, > cdrecord-ProDVD is free for Educational and Research purposes, > starting from now, it is also free for private non-commercial use. > > Although you are definitely not a fan of Linux cdrecord bu

Re: isofsck ?

2002-03-12 Thread Danilo Godec
On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:03:31AM +0100, Danilo Godec wrote: > > Is there a simple way to check an ISO image for consistency? To check > > whether an ISO image is complete and all files are where they are supposed > > to be? > Mount it with the loop