http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205374
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm
I heard that she was denying it by proxy through her friends.
Under no circumstances should she have leaked to the media. She should have
used the agency's internal grievance channels. We don't know whether she did
or not. After that, if she still felt something needed to be done, she could
have g
I honestly hadn't heard anything about this, and I will look into it.
If that is true, it's bullshit and illegal and I'll say so.
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Actually I would say that according to the Geneva convention we could
execute many of our prisoners out of hand, but we don't, we keep them alive.
Then I would remind you that only citizens of the US are entitled to the
rights enumerated in the constitution.
Then I would await your rebuttal.
--
I didn't say good Bush, I said best option right now. Better than the
alternative, shit, we could have been the ones born in Iran, and not the
rich ones here in the US talking politics n the internet.
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-391
Damn that sounds crazy fun. Lot's of good older acts on that bill.
--
Timothy Heald
Analyst, Architect, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: 202-228-8372
C: 703-300-3911
-Original Message-
From: Michael Slatoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 6:13 PM
To: CF-Community
S
ok well... since both sides have now accused each other of parroting a party
line... I invoke the Hitler rule, you Nazi ;)
Seriously, if I weren't so bored with this thread I'd be offended. Probably
just as well the thread die. RIP.
And on that note I think I need a break from this list.
oh boy. Try google news. I refuse to believe that that's a serious question. We
could have a megathread in which copious examples would be cited and at the end
Nick would say yeah, but they deserved it and you would say yeah but they were
Muslim and Robert would demonstrate that freedom of speec
very long very dry ug.
Dana
> Some people in the administration, does not mean all, nor does it mean
> that it is the only option.
>
> That one liner also doesn't negate the rest of the VERY long VERY dry
> article.
>
> Basically we all take our position from this article, very well
> writte
wow.
I am in awe, seriously. Denial is a powerful force.
Tim, you've never heard of Seymour Hersh, have you. Or have you just never read
careful reporting before? The article may well be coming out of Langley or the
Pentagon -- *it says those are its sources.* I see this as CIA/military conce
Yes, that is very funny.
What next, "Saudi kvetcher"?
On 4/24/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to the wonders of the media, Osama bin Laden is no longer a terrorist.
> He's not even a militant (the media's pet term for terrorists so as to not be
> judgmental). He's now a
Thanks to the wonders of the media, Osama bin Laden is no longer a terrorist.
He's not even a militant (the media's pet term for terrorists so as to not be
judgmental). He's now a dissident. Thank you for setting the record straight
for us AP & AFP.
http://news.yahoo.com/photos/ss/events/wl/080
Do you know that she didn't? Do you know how her bosses feel about the
leak (aside from Porter Goss, the President's hatchet man)?
On 4/24/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > JJ wrote:
> > But if she cares about the system/org, and just wants it to be
> > "right", then she shouldn't quit
> JJ wrote:
> But if she cares about the system/org, and just wants it to be
> "right", then she shouldn't quit, and should have done what she did,
> let some light into the nasty corner, and let it air out a bit.
>
I can buy that, but I can't get past that she should've told her
superiors that sh
If she felt that the entire system/org were corrupt, then I agree she
should quit.
But if she cares about the system/org, and just wants it to be
"right", then she shouldn't quit, and should have done what she did,
let some light into the nasty corner, and let it air out a bit.
Just my 2 cents (wh
I just noticed that The Rakes are playing on Saturday. Good stuff! Kinda
like Maximo Park and Arctic Monkeys. I'm getting super happy. YIPPIE!
- M
On 4/24/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bump will be there too
> http://www.bump.net/
>
> -Cameron
>
> On 4/24/06, Cameron Childr
wow. if only i could.
On 4/24/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bump will be there too
> http://www.bump.net/
>
> -Cameron
>
> On 4/24/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am.
> >
> > On 4/24/06, Michael Slatoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > www.coachella.com
> JJ wrote:
> Why should she need to quit her job (in protest or otherwise) to hold
> our government accountable to the people?
>
Good question, I'm not sure. There's a new wrinkle too - she's
denying she leaked classified information.
Bump will be there too
http://www.bump.net/
-Cameron
On 4/24/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am.
>
> On 4/24/06, Michael Slatoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > www.coachella.com
> >
> > Anyone going?
~|
Mess
I am.
On 4/24/06, Michael Slatoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> www.coachella.com
>
> Anyone going?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205355
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
S
www.coachella.com
Anyone going?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205354
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsub
The boys or the Mojitos?
Erika L. Walker wrote:
> Sorry ... When I got out of the shower - they were ready ... :D
>
> ##| -Original Message-
> ##| From: Jillian Koskie
> ##|
> ##| You started without me? :(
>
>
>
>
~~~
Sorry ... When I got out of the shower - they were ready ... :D
##| -Original Message-
##| From: Jillian Koskie
##|
##| You started without me? :(
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205352
Arc
You started without me? :(
>OK. So they had a bucket of Mango Mojito Mix at Target yesterday that
>practically lept off the shelf and into my arms as I walked by.
>
>Well, after my run, the boys decided to mix it up.
>
>Wow. It's good.
>
>Very good.
>
>Certainly helps me get thru this mundane work
Actually, more of their children crossed the boarder than their adults, but
that's just the cult of death that the current president was a member of.
Actually, it's the same cult of death that suicide bombers belong to. Hmmm,
I'm seeing a trend here.
> Hmm. This century is only 6 years old, so
apples and lug nuts. They're both kind of round but there is no real
comparison.
> Which one has invaded another soveriegn country this century?
>
> Not that I think we are worse than Iran (as John Stewart would say,
> they are bat-shit crazy), but the facts in this case are NOT in our
> favor.
Lets ask what came first. The threats from Iran to 'cause great harm' if
they were brought to the UN security council? The threats of suicide bombers
in America and Britain? The threats to remove Israel from the map.
or
the implied use of nuclear weapons against what in all reality should be
see
I don't know, it seems that before the last election they did care, they did
get reelected, the American People felt that he could do a better job than
the other guy.
Also, I'm not certain things could have been done any different from a post
war standpoint. A bunch of retired people are complaini
But you have to agree we lost all sorts of moral high ground with our
unilateral preemptive strike in Iraq.
Whether Iraq was a good idea or not, we certainly did not enter it as
smartly as we have in the past.
And however we went in, we certainly did not handle the post-invasion
as smartly as we
with all due respect gel, i do not see how anyone
can turn a blind eye to what you call, just "Words"
If the crazy kid down the street says my dog shouldnt exist, a i know that
kid has an Uzi, I have to assume he will use whatever it takes to remove
my dog. And I will do whatever it takes to make
In the US reporters get to ask questions like that. I'm sure that if those
questions were asked they wouldn't have been answered.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vivec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 4:11 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Iranian president says Isr
Hmm. This century is only 6 years old, so that is a little hard. However
last I checked Iran had a spat a few years back. I think they crossed the
border.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 4:11 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subjec
I don't see it as unreasonable, but for a counterpoint, see Chris Hitchens'
comments here:
http://www.radioblogger.com/#001552
Here's an excerpt:
"By the way, I can't say that I think that Mr. Bush at his worst is as bad
as President Clinton was. That's eight years down the American drain right
Funny that this came up the other day...
http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2006/04/code_monkey_the_song.html
tw
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205341
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/
OK. So they had a bucket of Mango Mojito Mix at Target yesterday that
practically lept off the shelf and into my arms as I walked by.
Well, after my run, the boys decided to mix it up.
Wow. It's good.
Very good.
Certainly helps me get thru this mundane work I am currently doing ...
Cheers,
Er
America can do no right. Bush can do no right. Israel can do no right.
Welcome to the way world politics and opinion works.
> Its is pretty amazing to watch Iran make these overt statements and the UN
> ignore them like they didn't even happen.
>
> If Israel claimed that Egypt shouldn't exist the
Which one has invaded another soveriegn country this century?
Not that I think we are worse than Iran (as John Stewart would say,
they are bat-shit crazy), but the facts in this case are NOT in our
favor.
On 4/24/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Iran all but threatens nuclear action,
Whats the difference between the US threatening to destroy another
member of the UN with
'implied' nuclear weapons over Nuclear arms which they have no proof
the country has?
Can you find a quote where Iran threatened israel with Nuclear Weapons btw?
I've seen teh words "should not exist" ,"False
Its is pretty amazing to watch Iran make these overt statements and the UN
ignore them like they didn't even happen.
If Israel claimed that Egypt shouldn't exist there would be cries from all
over the world. But Iran, a country that is enriching uranium makes such a
claim and it just goes right by
increasingly shrinking to its final phase, what we like to call, the
landing strip phase and THANK GOD!
tw
On 4/24/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> My mind quipped "just like everyone else, through a browser"
>
> On 4/24/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Di
Yes.
My mind quipped "just like everyone else, through a browser"
On 4/24/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did anyone else think something else when they read this subject line
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusio
Did anyone else think something else when they read this subject line
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205333
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www
> Iran has gained exactly what they've contributed.
They've contributed lies, deciept and warmongering. They've gained a LOT
more than they've put in.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205331
Archives:
> RoMunn wrote:
> But sadly, it seems that Chavez will be the one doing the stealing in
> Venezuela. Not from the multi-nationals, from the Venezuelan people. He'll
> do it in their name, to be sure, but somehow loads of money will end up in
> numbered accounts in Switzerland that he controls. Just
Japan has been at peace for the last 30 years, has not been funding terrorist
groups, gone to war with others, sacrificed their children, etc.
What has 30 years of the NNTP gotten Iran? Exactly as much as they've put into
it.
It suprises me that no one calls to point that this is a member of t
That's what I'm saying. They gained the legitimate ability to work with
Russia ona nuclear energy program. Russia built them a nuclear power plant,
and is perfectly willing and able to provide them with nuclear fuel, all
under the auspices of the NNTP and the watchful eye of the IAEA.
On 4/24/06,
> Gel wrote:
> No, he asked what has IRAN gained from being in the NNTP for 30 years,
> not what Japan or other nations have gained.
>
Iran has gained exactly what they've contributed.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lis
But sadly, it seems that Chavez will be the one doing the stealing in
Venezuela. Not from the multi-nationals, from the Venezuelan people. He'll
do it in their name, to be sure, but somehow loads of money will end up in
numbered accounts in Switzerland that he controls. Just wait and see.
In terms
I did recognise the sarcasm, and I ignored it to point out that you
failed to answer my question, most probably because you are unable to
do so.
On 4/24/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the only thing I can determine with any validity or correctness, is
> that you can't recognize sarcas
No, he asked what has IRAN gained from being in the NNTP for 30 years,
not what Japan or other nations have gained.
On 4/24/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, he's asking what membership in the NNTP has given them. As to what
> benefit they derive from abiding by the NNTP, look no
> Yes, you are saying that you would break the law and steal a country's
> resources if you were put in the same situation.
>
> In other words, despite what you may think, you actually are in no
> position to determine the validity or correctness of Chavez's national
> policies.
I guess the only t
Well, he's asking what membership in the NNTP has given them. As to what
benefit they derive from abiding by the NNTP, look no further than Japan,
which is an NNTP signatory and has significant nuclear energy capability.
Nations that sign- and abide by- the NNTP gain respect for themselves in the
Yes, you are saying that you would break the law and steal a country's
resources if you were put in the same situation.
In other words, despite what you may think, you actually are in no
position to determine the validity or correctness of Chavez's national
policies.
On 4/24/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECT
Some interesting speculation.
http://rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history?rnd=1145891049484&has-player=true&version=6.0.12.1465
I found this a fairly reasonable interpretation. I'm sure others will see it
as unfounded Bush bashing.
--
Ian Skin
> So you are saying that if you were in that situation you would steal.
"Steal" is such a nasty word. Besides, it's not stealing if i'm just undoing
what an evil, corrupt previous regime did, right? Plus we can stick it to
the Americans...which is the ultimate justification for any means.
> And
Why should she need to quit her job (in protest or otherwise) to hold
our government accountable to the people?
On 4/24/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > JJ wrote:
> > Who was she supposed to tell above her (that didn't already know?)
> >
>
> That's my point! So she should've resigne
> JJ wrote:
> Who was she supposed to tell above her (that didn't already know?)
>
That's my point! So she should've resigned in protest and told her story.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205318
Arch
So you are saying that if you were in that situation you would steal.
And thus you are projecting your own motivations with that of the
leader of Venezuela.
I see.
On 4/24/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What do you as a new government do in that case?
>
> I'd take it over myself, using the
> Gel wrote:
> What if the agreement was made under a corrupt regime which gave the
> foreign partner all the benefits in exchange for a healthy bribe?
>
You re-negotiate!
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i
What is the protocol for questioning hidden, illegal prisons and
torture in other countries?
Who was she supposed to tell above her (that didn't already know?)
On 4/24/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > JJ wrote:
> > I think it is important when our goverenment is lying to us, possibl
> What do you as a new government do in that case?
I'd take it over myself, using the guise that I'm doing it for the
betterment of the people and correcting the ills of a previously corrupt
regime, then I'd rake in the profits for myself. The public could be easily
appeased because in the shor
What if the agreement was made under a corrupt regime which gave the
foreign partner all the benefits in exchange for a healthy bribe?
What do you as a new government do in that case?
On 4/24/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1.) Venezuela has natural resources that it has neither the
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 1:32 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: "Silent Hill" Anyone?
>
> You thought the first Resident Evil movie was better than the first
> Mortal Kombat movie? I don't think I can agree with you
> JJ wrote:
> I think it is important when our goverenment is lying to us, possibly
> breaking the laws of the US and other countries, violating treaties,
> and possibly torturing people, that we know about it.
I agree, but I think if the gov't is doing something like that the
proper method for "c
> Gel wrote:
> What is the solution out of that situation then?
>
To what problem??? Here's the situation:
1.) Venezuela has natural resources that it has neither the
infrastructure nor the technology and knowledge to develop.
2.) There are many private firms that DO have the knowledge and
tech
In my opinion, yes.
I think it is important when our goverenment is lying to us, possibly
breaking the laws of the US and other countries, violating treaties,
and possibly torturing people, that we know about it. Without that
knowledge, we cannot hold those responsible to account.
If this was so
> JJ wrote:
> As for this specific example, we have as a society passed legislation
> to protect or shield whistleblowers from persecution and prosecution.
>
Would that apply in this case, though?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffu
> The odd thing is that the failure of this concept has been proven over
> and over in just about every country in the history of the World,
> including the US.
But it still seems like such a great idea in the short run, that people's
knee-jerk reaction is always "Yeah, do that!"
For a quick exa
What is the solution out of that situation then?
Where foreign enterprises are taking all your natural resources out
of your country and you aren't benefitting maximally from them?
What's the solution?
On 4/24/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now we've got yet another experiment: l
Not what I said, but yes, always.
It is your inherent right to break any law at any time. But with that
right comes a responsibility. As they say, you have got to be willing
to do the time if you do the crime. It is a kind of contract between
yourself and society. For society's part, we honor that
> gMoney wrote:
> But i'm tired of trying to lecture on the successful dynamics of a free
> market vs. the inevitable decay of a state-run market..live and let die
> I guess.
>
The odd thing is that the failure of this concept has been proven over
and over in just about every country in the hi
> JJ wrote:
> I would agree, although she shouldn't need to resign. That is the
> reason that whistleblower laws were passed.
>
So you agree with breaking the law as long as the reason behind it is
based in ethics?
~|
Message: ht
One wonders what effect such a seizure would have on Venezuela's standing in
the international community? Is Venezuela part of the WTO? Do WTO rules
prohibit arbitrary behavior like this? Will Chavez pull Venezuela out of the
WTO in order to have his way? One can only imagine such a course of actio
does it count when "better than" is synonymous with "only slightly less crappy"?
> You thought the first Resident Evil movie was better than the first
> Mortal Kombat movie? I don't think I can agree with you on that one,
> sorry.
/me hoping the HALO movie is "a lot slightly less crappy" than al
You thought the first Resident Evil movie was better than the first
Mortal Kombat movie? I don't think I can agree with you on that one,
sorry.
--Ben
On 4/24/06, Jim Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I convinced my (rather squeamish) bride to take me to see it for my birthday
> yesterday.
>
> I
Start sending the department email that says their email is not
downloadable, but it they want to recieve it, they should send a SASE
and a check for $4.95 shipping and handling to
--Ben
On 4/24/06, Dawson, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On our intranet site, I am creating a couple page
What is the reasoned response to this comment:
[Ahmadinejad also hinted that Iran would consider withdrawing from the
United Nations nuclear agency if membership produced no benefit.
"What has more than 30 years of membership in the agency given us?" he
asked rhetorically at a press conference.
Anyone here have a Canon Imagerunner 2200 or similar model copier at their
office that they know has a working parallel port? We have one but were
told we can't print through the parallel port without buying a network card.
The network card has the software to enable printing to this port. I kinda
Israel can't invade Iran, they can bomb, but if they were to put troops into
Iran they could open their borders to attacks from their neighbors.
Any actual invasion will be done on the backs of somebody else.
> -Original Message-
> From: G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> They'd better w
> Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez is planning a new assault on Big Oil,
> potentially taking a major step toward nationalization of Venezuela's
> oil industry that could hurt oil-company profits, reduce production
> and put further pressure on global oil prices.
>
I'm sure Gel thinks this is a wo
> I don't think he has any, or only vaguely. He's purposely
> antagonizing the west to see what sticks. Do Muslims rise up? Does
> the US or Israel do something stupid? Can he get away with continuing
> to build WMD? If not, how would the west stop him?
>
> It's a win-win in his view no matter
I would agree, although she shouldn't need to resign. That is the
reason that whistleblower laws were passed.
I DO think she should be willing to suffer the consequences of her
actions if it is determined that her whistleblowing was not in the
interest of the public good.
For the same reason that
You mean I have to mod sommething?
**gasps** I haven't touched code in ages ...
Ok, ok. Thanks!
Cheers,
Erika
Sadly rusty with CF ...
--
##| -Original Message-
##| From: Raymond Camden
##|
##| Erika, the use of CFMX7 is _extremely_ smal
> Nick wrote:
> I wonder what his plans are for accomplishing this?
>
I don't think he has any, or only vaguely. He's purposely
antagonizing the west to see what sticks. Do Muslims rise up? Does
the US or Israel do something stupid? Can he get away with continuing
to build WMD? If not, how wo
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/spages/708832.html
I wonder what his plans are for accomplishing this?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205290
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.
I convinced my (rather squeamish) bride to take me to see it for my birthday
yesterday.
It was good. Stuck to the main premises of the game without either getting
bogged down with them or going too far a field.
The ending was disappointing, but perfectly within the realm of (the game's)
reason.
Chávez Plans to Take More Control
Of Oil Away From Foreign Firms
By DAVID LUHNOW and PETER MILLARD
The Wall Street Journal
April 24, 2006; Page A1
Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez is planning a new assault on Big Oil,
potentially taking a major step toward nationalization of Venezuela's
oil indust
i just love "hornswaggled"
that was nice!
oh, and yeah, what jerry said.
tw
On 4/24/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Um, your people are idiots?
>
> Seriously though, I'd probably give a couple of solutions.
> Color code the non-available documents differently.
> Change the link fr
I do! My opinion on the issue is that if the lady wanted to leak
classified info that she felt violated ethics, she should. But she
should resign first.
JJ will likely disagree with this, but breaking the law is perfectly
acceptable (to me) in some circumstances; civil rights springs to
mind. W
Um, your people are idiots?
Seriously though, I'd probably give a couple of solutions.
Color code the non-available documents differently.
Change the link from a popup word doc to a named anchor at the bottom
of your page containig a section describing how to get unlinked forms.
On 4/24/06, Daws
On our intranet site, I am creating a couple pages for departments to
place commonly-used forms (in .DOC and .PDF format) for users to
download.
Some of the forms we use are multi-part forms that cannot be downloaded,
obviously. However, the departments still want these forms listed on
the page
I just reviewed all.
>Hey folks, it's time for me to beg for more site reviews for my Web
>Scripting & Authoring students. I have 13 sites that need reviews for
>a grade. Your comments were a good source of insight for the last
>batch you reviewed and I sincerely appreciate your assistance. Thi
Screw the t-bills... You can do better with Muni bonds. You'll average
~4.5% but that's completely tax free (federal and state). Or if you are
really gutsy, I'm averaging ~35% across my mutual funds and stocks... No
bonds.
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, as long as you remember I was right. ;)
Btw - if I'm wrong about it being simple, let me know. I may even
consider "downgrading" the app just for 6.X people. Seems silly to
require if I really am just using isValid().
On 4/24/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A. Not fair. I
Heh, ok. So I figure all I need is 4 million. 4 million is 2.25 or so
after taxes. The .25 would pay off mortgage, bills, etc. The 2 million
could be put in tbills at close to 5% which is around 100k a year
before taxes, which is dang good for interest. I could get a less
stressful job at a smaller
ray camden
- famous web inventor and horrible speller
On 4/24/06, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Erika, the use of CFMX7 is _extremely_ small, like I believe just
> isValid(). I'm pretty sure you could mod it in about 10 minutes to run
> on CFMX6.1.
>
> On 4/24/06, Erika L. Walker <[E
Erika, the use of CFMX7 is _extremely_ small, like I believe just
isValid(). I'm pretty sure you could mod it in about 10 minutes to run
on CFMX6.1.
On 4/24/06, Erika L. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Crap. Don't have MX 7 --- any others?
>
> Also Ray: Typo
>
> "Canva requires ColdFusio
> Nick wrote:
> The heads of large companies rarely know that type of stuff. That is what
> the VP of finance does.
>
That's somewhat true, but this is not one of those cases. In this
case, the industry as a whole DOES NOT KNOW what their admin costs
are.
For comparison most businesses turn on t
Crap. Don't have MX 7 --- any others?
Also Ray: Typo
"Canva requires ColdFusion MX 7 and the Model-Glue framework."
Thanks!
Cheers,
Erika
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:205276
Archives: ht
A. Not fair. I didn't fight with you on it - it was a personal
choice thing :P
Thank you very much though ... Perfect :)
Cheers,
Erika
--
##| -Original Message-
##| From: Raymond Camden
##|
##| It's free, but I think you and I fought
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
