more global warming sceptics

Interesting article that highlights how, among actual climate change scientists (not just generic "scientists" in AlGore's movie), there is no consensus as to the causes of current global warming. http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htm -- --- Robert Munn www.funkymojo

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Well, I disagree with the conclusion that he was "appointed", because there was an election. It isn't Bush's fault that the case ended up in court. Gore was the one who went to the courts. As any lawyer will tell you, be careful what you ask for when you go to the courts, because you can never be s

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Drunken letchers living off the public trough for the last century, perhaps? ;-) On 6/14/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Descended from crooks and criminals? > > Chappaquiddick? > > Ted Kennedy in general? > > Making a family living out of politics (eating off the public their >

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

They were non-uniformed fighters supporting a murderous backwards theocratic regime in Afghanistan that housed and nutured Al Qaeda. Remember them? These thugs fought against coalition troops in Afghanistan who went there to destroy Al Qaeda's base of operations and give the Afghan people a chance

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Famous for exposing the dangers of the Ford Pinto? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Pinto More recently, it has been argued (in a well-known 1991 law review paper by Gary Schwartz [2], among others) that the case against the Pinto was less clear-cut than commonly supposed. Only 27 people ever di

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

The current recount is merely of a discovery type to produce evidence for a recount suit... The numbers don't match either. On 6/14/06, Howie Hamlin wrote: > There was a recount in Illinois. Here are some more sources for you: > > From conservative rag Free Republic (reprinted from a 1961 is

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Not you baby :) On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > Some, yeah. Which some is the next question. > > >I hear this statement all the time, usually from people outside the > >United States, who state that we deserve the hatred of the world > >because we , the American People, elected Bush. At best al

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

If you scroll down and read the rest you'll see the discrepancies were within the bounds and shouldn't have been published before they were weighted More interesting reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2004_United_States_presidential_election_controversy%2C_exit_polls#Disputed On 6/14/06,

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Pretty funny how you've never been able debunked anything he's said. On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > um... anyone who thinks Rush Limbaugh is an authority does not get to quibble > over sources, lol. ~| Message: http://www.hou

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

There you go spewing that racial hate again. Damned Canadians. She's prolly an illegal. > -Original Message- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:42 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? > > > well, I a

Re: Husbands...how to prevent being dragged along on shopping trips!!!

> tBone wrote: > wow. > > I so needed that. > > Thanks man. > Yeah, that was hilarious! ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209389 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

> Jerry wrote: > If not, who was elected in 2004? > Bush was elected in 2004, but nobody was elected in 2000; our system appointed Bush President. Part of that system was an election but it's outcome was inconclusive. ~| Message

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Nope. I said that. I read them. Did you? They were sort of considered important in my previous line of work. > -Original Message- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:40 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Yeah, all that and more. Great people huh? > -Original Message- > From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:12 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? > > > Descended from crooks and criminals? > > Chappaquiddi

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Both. I'm a bit of a nut job, I don't actually hate them. I just think they're family does a lot of dishonest shit and skates all the fucking time. > -Original Message- > From: Maureen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 8:02 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Holy cow. Someone was contingency planning. Thank god. I wish they would do more of it. > -Original Message- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 6:39 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? > > > Tom Ridg

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

who said they were? >1. Why are you racist? Not all Muslims are any one race, any more than all >Jews or all Christians. see the link I just posted. >2. Human rights? Trample? What paper rights have these people not been >given. If we treated them as criminals someone would complain they s

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Nope, you are supposed to believe it of me and the millions like me that serve. You know why? We come home. We talk about stuff. Stuff gets out. Do you think I torture people? Because if that's what you believe about this administration, then that's what you believe about me, as I am the shar

Re: heya

Yeah - was not online for some time while recuperating. I'm still not 100% but am making slow progress. Howie --- On Wednesday, June 14, 2006 10:06 PM, Dana scribed: --- > > good to see ya posting... > ~| Message: http://www.

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Doh :) Laws regarding equality in voting do kick in once a state decides to allow its citizens to vote, however. And, of course - as you mentioned, there is no law compelling delegates to vote for the candidate that was voted for by the ballots. And, of course, the winner of a presidential el

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

and associations Ok. 1. Why are you racist? Not all Muslims are any one race, any more than all Jews or all Christians. 2. Human rights? Trample? What paper rights have these people not been given. If we treated them as criminals someone would complain they should be treated as POWs. Now

heya

good to see ya posting... On 1/11/06, Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've got a bit of a favor to ask while I'm laid up (from my recent car > accident). > > A web page designed by a colleague of mine displays properly in some > browsers (Netscape, for example) but has a small glitch w

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

I was holding that fact in my quiver for the next exchange. Robber!! Yes, a state could make it a lottery winner, the state pogostick champion, or the Teacher of the Year. There is no federal requirement that a vote decide the convention delegates, and there is no way to force the delegate to vote

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/editorial/14803724.htm >Nope, they are there because the intelligence knowledge they contain makes >them important, or they would be dead in Afghanistan like they should be. > >> ~| Message

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Not in direct response to this - just a related factoid: No state in the union, by federal law or the constitution, has to allow its citizens to vote for the president. Of course, all 50 states do allow their citizens to vote toward how the state uses its own electoral votes. --- On Wednesday,

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

There was a recount in Illinois. Here are some more sources for you: >From conservative rag Free Republic (reprinted from a 1961 issue of Look >magazine) http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a846f103436.htm Reprint from a 1960 chicage Tribune article: http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:Z7Fv-

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

If you are done calling names, want to let us know if you have anything of substance to say? >ok ok... I see you with you hand raised already. > >On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~| Message: http://www.

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

ok ok... I see you with you hand raised already. On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bush has made a career out of delegating responsibility, lol. > > >When I said "suckers" I didn't expect you to jump up and raise your hand... > > > >-Cameron > > > >On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

cmon Jerry. This is a better defense of the statement than we have seen so far, but where in the constitution does it say that we shall have voting machines that do unknown processing on the totals? Where does it say that the vote-counting will start with a few extra votes talled on the Bush sid

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

No, the American People, a single collective unit, did elect Bush. If not, who was elected in 2004? It does not mean that ALL people VOTED for him. It does not mean a majority VOTED for him. It does not mean even a plurality voted for him (since this is not a factor in how an American President i

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Nope the American people achieved mind meld and made a decision ;) And just for the sake of accuracy she said a manipulation of the electoral college, which does not necessarily mean she disagrees with the electoral college. She may, but you can't draw that conclusion from that post. >> Jerry w

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

> Jerry wrote: > How could you possibly construe these statements to be the same. > I bet if you asked 100 people, you would be the only one to equate the two. > I took her point be that she took exception to any statement that *may* imply even a majority elected Mr. Bush. Her core point seems to

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Kerry was always the Repugs favorite candidate. His concession was as bad as the French at the Maginot line. On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to know why, too. I dunno why it's so irresponsible to count the > freaking votes. Kerry especially, after pledging to make

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Some, yeah. Which some is the next question. >I hear this statement all the time, usually from people outside the >United States, who state that we deserve the hatred of the world >because we , the American People, elected Bush. At best all you can >say is that some American people voted for Bush

RE: Husbands...how to prevent being dragged along on shopping trips!!!

wow. I so needed that. Thanks man. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209365 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Un

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

I'd like to know why, too. I dunno why it's so irresponsible to count the freaking votes. Kerry especially, after pledging to make sure all the votes were counted. It was that above all else that really made me angry with him. >So in that sense, due to the irregularities, Bush wasn't elected as

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

I hear this statement all the time, usually from people outside the United States, who state that we deserve the hatred of the world because we , the American People, elected Bush. At best all you can say is that some American people voted for Bush. On 6/14/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

> Maureen wrote: > He is in office solely because > of the manipulation of the Electoral College by what I feel I is a > tainted political and judical process. > Stated that way, it's unreasonable to criticise you due to the election irregularities: as I understand it what "won" the election was M

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

No, your opinion doesn't count (your words, not mine, I'm just kidding), because of this statement (and others like it). > "the American People elected Bush". > It implies that all American People voted for Bush. How could you possibly construe these statements to be the same. I bet if you asked

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Descended from crooks and criminals? Chappaquiddick? Ted Kennedy in general? Making a family living out of politics (eating off the public their whole lives, seldom working an honest job) Just some guessed. On 6/14/06, Maureen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm curious. Why do you hate the Kenn

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Just to clarify my position, the original statement I disputed was that "the American People elected Bush". I have two issues with that statement. It implies that all American People voted for Bush. My rebuttal, which was ignored in the barrage of personal attacks against me, was that not only d

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

I'm curious. Why do you hate the Kennedys? Do you have a specific reason, or just is it just a generalized hatred? On 6/14/06, John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hate the Kennedy's more than just about anyone else. ~| Me

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Bush has made a career out of delegating responsibility, lol. >When I said "suckers" I didn't expect you to jump up and raise your hand... > >-Cameron > >On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~| Message: http://w

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Actually, you, know, I spent some time looking around when I came back to this and I can't find anything about a change of weighting. You don't happen to know where you saw that do you? I did find this, which appears to be a mathematical refutation of Sam's points... >I think most people are t

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

When I said "suckers" I didn't expect you to jump up and raise your hand... -Cameron On 6/14/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's never Bush. He appoints people for that ;) > > >REVISED - You know, Uncle Larry, Aunt Edna, that wiley neighbor Billy, > >and some random guys in DHS. T

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

I know. And you aren't going to worry about rights violations until one happens to you. Your faith in government is touching. > Nothing in this article scares me. It sounds like they were running > what-if > scenarios. For instance, what if there was a radiological terrorist > attack > on elec

Re: Image Maps

Well, I am going to take 3 0minutes and find something. This was an interesting css display that looks like what I want (not for image maps, though.) I especially like # 3 and #4 ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

um... anyone who thinks Rush Limbaugh is an authority does not get to quibble over sources, lol. > Sorry. > > Your source made it up? > I always check a backup source whenever Slate is involved, but hey > that's me. > > > On 6/14/06, Howie Hamlin wrote: > > I'm not going to argue the validity

Re: PA DMV: No motorcycle license...

yeah, my wife has no interest whatsoever in this story, either. On 6/14/06, Dana wrote: > > I *guess*.. > -- --- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209351 Arch

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Nothing in this article scares me. It sounds like they were running what-if scenarios. For instance, what if there was a radiological terrorist attack on election day that took out all of NYC? Would voting be postponed? Extended? I don't know, but it sounds like they were asking the question of how

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

you passed over a statement like this to focus on a 6% discrepancy? Who says the women voted Democratic? From the wikipedia article: "Voting locations that used electronic or other types of voting machines that did not issue a paper receipt or offer auditability correlate geographically with a

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_Jones_%28magazine%29 ::shrug:: I stand by the source. If you're that worried in the Michael Moore thing some years back, well, they fired him... > In your eyes or mine? An editorial opinion still has validity you know, > depending on how well-grounded it is.

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

but but but... it's central to his point that Democrats are evil! > I'm not going to argue the validity of a 46-year-old election ... > there's too many things happening now that are important. Your > response also does nothing to excuse you from calling me a liar. > > Thanks for playing... >

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Tom Ridge the color-coded man. http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-07-12-postpone-elections_x.htm >Who was saying it? > > > > _ > >From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:29 PM >To: CF-Community >Subject: Re: So, d

Re: New Pew Global Poll: American & Iran both down.

I don't think he's comparing countries so much as wars -- in both cases there was an invasion with inadequate preparation or understanding of political dynamics. >Vietnam is a much different country than Iraq. Iraq is more like the Balkans >with its religious and ethnic divisions. The big failur

Re: Image Maps

you can drag and move the info palette by mousing over the top bar of the palette until you get the system Move icon. a visual overlay would be totally cool. On 6/14/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is good, but two problems. > > The info palette is anchored to the top left of

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

I got a ticket because I parked there anyway, but not according to your logic ;) and I do use the term with a large doese of generosity ;)It isn't your nouns or your adjectives that bother me -- though you refuse to define them, which means we aren't dealing in logic -- but your verb. So... t

Re: New Pew Global Poll: American & Iran both down.

I don't think we created any new opposition among the Sunnis; it was there already. What we did was turn the overlords into the opposition by removing them from power. I'm not sure how that compares to French occupation of Algers. Another comparison might be the U.S. occupation of the Philippines.

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

I think most people are trying to refine their model in most fields, don't you? >I think they got it wrong. I think the model they designed was flawed. Why >would news outlets have gone back and changed the weighting if they believed >in the exit polls? > >> ~~

Re: PA DMV: No motorcycle license...

I *guess*.. >Starting QB for defending Super Bowl champions. Football is the national >pastime and a multi-billion dollar industry, so it's news. It is more news >in Pittsburgh and in ESPN circles than general news, but it is still news. > >On 6/14/06, Dana wrote: >> >> football player? I googled.

RE: Anybody playing "Uno" on Live?

Well I don't have UNO just yet but would love to get it eventually, in the meantime I'll add you to my friends list to if you don't mind. Senior Coldfusion Developer Aegeon Pty. Ltd. www.aegeon.com.au Phone: +613 8676 4223 Mobile: 0404 998 273 -Original Message- From: James Smith [ma

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

See, when I think election fraud, I am thinking Diebold. The right wing got its knicks all in a twist here over the fact that a hundred some people registered from the same address here... come to find out, that address was a day shelter for street people, who should, I think, be able to vote if

Re: PA DMV: No motorcycle license...

Starting QB for defending Super Bowl champions. Football is the national pastime and a multi-billion dollar industry, so it's news. It is more news in Pittsburgh and in ESPN circles than general news, but it is still news. On 6/14/06, Dana wrote: > > football player? I googled... not very smart bu

Re: What would you do...

my take --- better to call 911 when it's nothing than not to call it when you should have. This way, even if you find out that bad stuff happened, you did try to stop it so you don't feel guilty. I do agree on the realtor... >So, I am sitting in my apartment, and have about a view of about 15 >

Re: PA DMV: No motorcycle license...

football player? I googled... not very smart but why is this news? >nope. he had a learners permit that exp. in march. > >he has the money to pay for this, i'd imagine. > >tw > >On 6/14/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> msnbc just reported that the PA DMV says that Rothlesberger did

Re: laptop on the cheap... help!

Just pointing these two options out: ( PCMCIA video Card; will support two monitors ) (USB Video card ) I expect that either would be a viable option for most laptops.

Re: New Pew Global Poll: American & Iran both down.

> RoMunn wrote: > The war is now a war of liberation from > Sunni (and to a lesser extent) Al Qaeda tyranny. > I agree, but my point was more to ask this question: what kind of opposition does an Iraq occupation generate? That is, even if we were to eliminate Al Quaeda in Iraq, that doesn't crea

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Sorry. Your source made it up? I always check a backup source whenever Slate is involved, but hey that's me. On 6/14/06, Howie Hamlin wrote: > I'm not going to argue the validity of a 46-year-old election ... there's too > many things happening now that are important. Your response also does

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

I'm not going to argue the validity of a 46-year-old election ... there's too many things happening now that are important. Your response also does nothing to excuse you from calling me a liar. Thanks for playing... --- On Wednesday, June 14, 2006 5:20 PM, Sam scribed: --- > > Slate is the onl

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

I left out the best part :) On 6/14/06, Sam wrote: > Slate is the only place that mentions a recount. All other references > state there wasn't a recount and if there was it wouldn't have > detected the fraud. > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A36425-2000Nov16 > Even Nixon's 12-year-ol

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Slate is the only place that mentions a recount. All other references state there wasn't a recount and if there was it wouldn't have detected the fraud. http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A36425-2000Nov16 Even Nixon's 12-year-old daughter Julie was angry. "Not a day was to pass until after K

Re: Image Maps

It is good, but two problems. The info palette is anchored to the top left of the page, and my imagemaps are a page scroll down. I was hoping for a visual color overly of the shape and location of the spots themselves, drawn in position over the image. On 6/14/06, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

No, I'm not someone like Limbaugh that makes stuff up on the fly. How about two sources: http://archive.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/10/nixon/index.html http://www.slate.com/id/91350/ Please don't accuse me of lying unless *you've* done your research. --- On Wednesday, June 14, 2006 4:0

Re: What would you do...

Actually, I rent in a very safe area, although Boston as a whole is not always safe (the drawback with public transportation is that trouble gets cheap transport too.) FWIW, the police got here literally within 120 seconds. Both local and one state trooper car, and they surrounded the whole area.

RE: What would you do...

+1 on the realtor :) > -Original Message- > From: Paul Ihrig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 4:26 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: What would you do... > > what would chuck norris do? > ask your self that... > > just kidding. > call 911 then call a realtor.

Re: What would you do...

i would also say a little pray for both kids, but thats just me. On 6/14/06, Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what would chuck norris do? > ask your self that... > > just kidding. > call 911 then call a realtor. > ~| Me

Re: What would you do...

what would chuck norris do? ask your self that... just kidding. call 911 then call a realtor. ~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209323 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subsc

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Remember, it was doing a heck of a job keeping the blame from hitting Bush _ From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 3:58 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? And we are to believe this assessment, coming from

Re: What would you do...

911 all the way. Let the police sort it out. On 6/14/06, Jerry Johnson wrote: > > So, I am sitting in my apartment, and have about a view of about 15 > feet of walkway outside my apartment complex from my chair. > > I just saw a young kid holding a pistol to another kid's head, and > pushing him d

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

The problem I have with this is the statement of that many of those businesses are patently partisan, and therefore I do not trust their impartiality in system development. The most eggregious example is, of course, the infamous Wally O'Dell guaranteed in that he would deliver Ohio's electoral vot

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Who was saying it? _ From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:29 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? It was more than a contigency plan. They were saying there *were* threats of terrorism. So you postpone th

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Both article say either women or democrats were over sampled. Like Morris said they normally adjust for this but for some reason they didn't. Can you guess the reason? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22188-2005Jan19.html Interviewing for the 2004 exit polls was the most inaccurate o

MS Clipart Gallery

I have dug too deep yet - but... I have a friend who has 5 CDs of scanned images to be distributed to many offices scattered through out Canada. These images will be used mostly within OFFICE documents for desktop publishing. Has anyone worked with MS clipart galleries? I need to be able to impor

Re: What would you do...

Calling 911 is pretty much the best way. Unless you know how to safely disarm someone. On 6/14/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, I am sitting in my apartment, and have about a view of about 15 > feet of walkway outside my apartment complex from my chair. > > I just saw a young

RE: What would you do...

I would have called it in also. > -Original Message- > From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 4:14 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: What would you do... > > So, I am sitting in my apartment, and have about a view of about 15 > feet of walkway outsid

What would you do...

So, I am sitting in my apartment, and have about a view of about 15 feet of walkway outside my apartment complex from my chair. I just saw a young kid holding a pistol to another kid's head, and pushing him down the sidewalk. The unarmed kid did not look happy. I couldn't get out of my chair quic

Re: Image Maps

The Information - Display Element Information menu selection in the Web Developer toolbar will show you links and attributes for the hot areas of an image map onscreen. It's pretty cool. On 6/14/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was hoping for something browser side (for existing

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

That's an outright lie. Did you just make that up on the spot? On 6/14/06, Howie Hamlin wrote: > There was a recount in Illinois and Nixon gained an additional 943 votes > which were far less than the number he needed to change the election. And, > the Illinois State Board of Elections was 80%

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

As I have stated before, there are no objective references. Let's use mainstream references as a substitute. There is no serious debate in the mainstream media about whether the 2004 election was stolen. The BS piece by RFK, Jr. doesn't count. Realistically, how can you keep people from breaking t

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

No you got a parking ticket because you couldn't read the sign, which of course is what happened in Florida in 2000. The American People isn't a logic statement. It is a singular noun, not plural. The noun is actually people, American is an adjective modifying people. > -Original Message-

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

oh! I missed the accusation, buried as it is under the assertion that CBS news has a jihad ;) What about the other two though? I gave them more time as they are more serious sources. They said there were hijinks, but I didn't see anything about it being against Bush. >Read it again >http://www

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

But what about the thousands of dead voters? > -Original Message- > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 3:55 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? > > There was a recount in Illinois and Nixon gained an addit

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

In your eyes or mine? An editorial opinion still has validity you know, depending on how well-grounded it is. I read George Will all the time, and respect him quite a bit, even though we don't agree on much. >Doesn't the fact that Michael Moore was an editor there destroy all >it's credibility?

RE: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

The Rolling Stone article stated: "In fact, the exit poll created for the 2004 election was designed to be the most reliable voter survey in history. The six news organizations -- running the ideological gamut from CBS to Fox News -- retained Edison Media Research and Mitofsky" I think they got i

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

And we are to believe this assessment, coming from the same people who thought that Brownie was doing a heck of a job ;) >Nope, they are there because the intelligence knowledge they contain makes >them important, or they would be dead in Afghanistan like they should be. > >> ~~~

Husbands...how to prevent being dragged along on shopping trips!!!

Husbands...how to prevent being dragged along on shopping trips!!! Dear Mrs. Fenton, Over the past six months, your husband, Mr. Bill Fenton has been causing quite a commotion in our store. We cannot tolerate this type of behavior and have considered banning the entire family from shopping in

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

Read it again http://www.hillnews.com/morris/110404.aspx This is, dear Watson, elementary. Next to the forged documents that sent CBS on a jihad against Bush's National Guard service and the planned "60 Minutes" ambush over the so-called missing explosives two days before the polls opened, th

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

huh. You can think that if you like of course, but that isn't logic, it's mysticism. Kind of like saying that I got a parking ticket because the zen of the city selected me for enforcement. >Nope. The American People is an entity in which when asked a question across >the board, came up with a m

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

There was a recount in Illinois and Nixon gained an additional 943 votes which were far less than the number he needed to change the election. And, the Illinois State Board of Elections was 80% Republican. --- On Wednesday, June 14, 2006 3:41 PM, Sam scribed: --- > > It was actually Texas and I

Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys?

oh so you aren't saying they gave wrong data on wlection night, you are saying that they changed model for this election then made stuff up as excuses? >Yes, I do think that is irrelevant, of course they came with completely new >models for this election. Where as the previous more accurate model

  1   2   3   >