"Any comments on your experience with it vs DropBox?"
Seem to work about the same. Drive incorporates google documents in with
the folder.
I just store bric-a-brac in each (mp3's, pdf's, epubs, downloads). I'm not
real concerned about privacy. I would not, at this point, store important
info
sadly, the player in the lead is "Computer", her only other friend
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> We run a weekly poker tournament... I'm the tournament director. So yups.
> My poker players. :)
> And I win plenty, I'm in second place. ;)
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:
We run a weekly poker tournament... I'm the tournament director. So yups.
My poker players. :)
And I win plenty, I'm in second place. ;)
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions <
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> "Your" poker players... Sounds like someon
I think there is a huge potential market for a private DropBox(ish) product
that you point at your own storage location. You own S3 bucket, or a server
in your office, or whatever... Then you control the level of security, and
bear the cost of storage yourself as well...
-Cameron
On Tue, May 22
no comments either way, I rarely use both/either anyway.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Any comments on your experience with it vs DropBox?
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
>> Google Drive bab!
>>
>> https://drive.google.com
>
>
>
I don't trust either? ;)
Rackspace Cloud Drive whoo!
On 5/22/2012 10:53 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Any comments on your experience with it vs DropBox?
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
>> Google Drive bab!
~~
Any comments on your experience with it vs DropBox?
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
> Google Drive bab!
>
> https://drive.google.com
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com
every woman i mounted before my woman now, never had all her
directories either.
and some had different ones than others ;)
btw, it works on a mac just fine!
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Sam wrote:
>
> Doesn't work, just randomly syncs directories. Can't figure out why
> every computer I m
Doesn't work, just randomly syncs directories. Can't figure out why
every computer I mount has different directories and none have all.
Give it time.
.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> Google Drive bab!
>
> https://drive.google.com
>
~~
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
> If they really want to know how many points my poker players have
> accumulated over 9 weeks, they can have it! LOL
>
"Your" poker players... Sounds like someone needs to win a few hands LOL
~~
well yeah, like 3 weeks ago and stuff :0
runs. fast.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> Google Drive bab!
>
> https://drive.google.com
>
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www
Oh I am not using it for anything important. Just crappy stuff, I don't
need taking up space on my drive.
If they really want to know how many points my poker players have
accumulated over 9 weeks, they can have it! LOL
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Vivec wrote:
>
> partsy poopers!
>
> On 21
partsy poopers!
On 21 May 2012 20:00, LRS Scout wrote:
>
> I don't know, their refusal to talk about what their relationship is with
> the NSA, and the way they data mine for adsense and stuff, I'm not sure I'd
> be using it anytime soon.
I don't know, their refusal to talk about what their relationship is with
the NSA, and the way they data mine for adsense and stuff, I'm not sure I'd
be using it anytime soon.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
>
> Google Drive bab!
>
> https://drive.google.com
>
>
>
~~
Google Drive bab!
https://drive.google.com
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-comm
The worst ever depiction of tech in a movie was in Swordfish, where
the hacker figured out the encrypted password by staring at the
screen.
The tech I want, which is somewhat available, is the system on CSI:
Miami, where you control what is on the screen by the motion of your
hand.
On Fri, Apr 1
my personal favorite is the Jurassic Park control-room scene.
the little girl sits down in front of the terminal and says, "This is
Unix, I know this!"
and then proceeds to "fly" (much like TRON or the aforementioned
Hackers) through the system.
I like 24's depiction of computer systems, still
dork.
/me runs
Mr. Gruss Gott wrote:
> My wife and I were laughing the laughter of geeks, but nobody else in
> the theater seemed to know what we found so funny.
>
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and
> Cam wrote:
> I find that the way technology is represented on shows like CSI/Law &
> Order is a great source of humor.
>
Back when when my wife and I were power dorks (not like now), we were
in the theater watching Boiler Room (great movie, esp these days).
At one point, the FBI orders their i
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> Doesn't mean it won't get passed. Or slipped through as part of some other
> bill.
True.
> And you are not required to produce them if you have them. You are
> required to produce them regardless. And if you don't have them, jail
> time.
Oh, yeah, painfully stupid law.
Doesn't mean it won't get passed. Or slipped through as part of some other bill.
And you are not required to produce them if you have them. You are
required to produce them regardless. And if you don't have them, jail
time.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Camero
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> If you don't or can't figure out how, that is your problem. You are
> still required to produce the records when required.
You are required to produce them if you have them, which most people will not.
As I said, I think we all see why it
Enforce = easy. Compliance = hard. Because the law puts the burden on YOU.
It isn't up to them to figure out how. They just say you have to.
If you don't or can't figure out how, that is your problem. You are
still required to produce the records when required.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:54 AM
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> I find that the way technology is represented on shows like CSI/Law &
> Order is a great source of humor.
>
Tech in movies is always enjoyable...specially computer tech. Was watching
one of my all time favorites the other day"Hack
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> log IPs and _who was using them_.
This is akin to asking the phone company to track who's using pay
phones. I know we are the choir preaching to itself on how
ridiculously impossible that would be to enforce.
-Cameron
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>> CamChi wrote:
>> Traceroute that you CSI b*tches!
>
> That's a great piece of homespun wisdom we'd all do well to remember.
I find that the way technology is represented on shows like CSI/Law &
Order is a great source of humor.
-Cameron
And to be clear, the paragraphs of analysis came from an article someone
else wrote, they are not mine.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
>> > There is a
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> > There is a bill proposed in both the house and the senate that would
> require
> > ISPs (and anyone that runs a wifi node) to keep records of all ips and
> who
> > was using them
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 12:11 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: All your google belong to us...
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Jim Davis
> wrote:
> > The
> CamChi wrote:
> Traceroute that you CSI b*tches!
>
That's a great piece of homespun wisdom we'd all do well to remember.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Jerry Johnson wrote:
> There is a bill proposed in both the house and the senate that would require
> ISPs (and anyone that runs a wifi node) to keep records of all ips and who
> was using them for 6 months. But it is not law yet.
Okay - so if I run a WiFi node an
There is a bill proposed in both the house and the senate that would require
ISPs (and anyone that runs a wifi node) to keep records of all ips and who
was using them for 6 months. But it is not law yet.
I don't know of any email retention laws for ISPs.
But, with all the secret ISP rules that t
> Isn't it law in the U.S. that ISP's have to do the same
> thing? I seem to remember seeing an ad about email
> storage systems in the Las Vegas airport saying something
> along the lines of it now being law to store all email so
> you should use Barracuda or something. Is that correct?
Regulat
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:36 AM, Erika L. wrote:
>
> I was thinking to myself during a moment of lucidity ... some people are
> afraid to put their life into Google, using them for everything: files,
> email, calendar, etc.
>
In a handful of years we have gone from hosting everything on our compu
Isn't it law in the U.S. that ISP's have to do the same thing? I seem to
remember seeing an ad about email storage systems in the Las Vegas airport
saying something along the lines of it now being law to store all email so
you should use Barracuda or something. Is that correct?
On Thu, Apr 9, 200
My ex is a product manager for M$. That contributes to my reluctance
to trust them. :-;
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Erika L. Walker wrote:
>
> It might be because I like the taste of the koolaid, but I'm right there
> with you. I'd trust Google far quicker than MS. And dont get me wrong,
It might be because I like the taste of the koolaid, but I'm right there
with you. I'd trust Google far quicker than MS. And dont get me wrong, I'm
not an MS hater, by any stretch of the imagination. It's just the warm
fuzzies I get for Google. :)
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Maureen wrote:
> Eri-k-a wrote:
> As for info on their servers? I don't know. So much of our personal
> information is in cyberspace right now, info we dont even know is out there,
> that I'm of the mindset now that unless I'm going to run for president, or a
> high position in the government where the press wou
When Microsoft hired Ralph Reed to lobby for them, I went on a
campaign to purge them from my life. I can't get totally away from
them because of client requirements but I use Google for email, Open
Office for desktop apps, Linux for OS when possible, etc. I sometimes
worry about my email disapp
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Erika L. Walker wrote:
>
> Well all that is absolutely true and I have to admit - I was really
> thinking on a personal level, not corporate. I do understand your point for
> some people.
>
> As for info on their servers? I don't know. So much of our personal
> i
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
> Google is a large enterprise environment, they sue it. They are
> definitely an exception.
*us
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic r
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Jim Davis wrote:
> The tool still have an "experimental" feel to them and features and behaviors
> often change.
100% agree.
> They also don't integrate as easily into
> large enterprise environments
Google is a large enterprise environment, they sue it. They
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Justin Scott
wrote:
> If you standardize on Microsoft, they don't have access to
> all of your information, but Google does (because it's on their servers).
It's worth noting that Microsoft is moving towards a hosted online
edition of Office as well. I doubt the
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Scott [mailto:jscott-li...@gravityfree.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:23 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: All your google belong to us...
>
>
> > But now that Google has offline access now to at least
>
Well all that is absolutely true and I have to admit - I was really
thinking on a personal level, not corporate. I do understand your point for
some people.
As for info on their servers? I don't know. So much of our personal
information is in cyberspace right now, info we dont even know is out t
> But now that Google has offline access now to at least
> two of their big main items: email & calendar (I think
> docs does too now? havent checked) this argument
> doesn't really hold water anymore does it?
That is only one part of the pie though. Many are fearful of giving one
company too mu
yeah, i am a fanboy too.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups
I was thinking to myself during a moment of lucidity ... some people are
afraid to put their life into Google, using them for everything: files,
email, calendar, etc.
But then they will quite happily use MS for their life organizational needs:
Outlook, Word, Excel, Access, OneNote, Powerpoint, et
48 matches
Mail list logo
