I was thinking the same thing too Erika...
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 11:10 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Bruce, LRSScout...
Awww. Now come on peeps. You guys are all far more visionary than that.
I know for
Message-
From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 11:33 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Bruce, LRSScout...
Now THAT makes perfect sense, and I can see it from that scenario. But
that's really the only reason why a secret clearance couldn't t
That makes sense too. I know it's dependent. With Iraq and that area as
unstable as it is, I just wondered why this particular job had to be onsite,
that there really wasn't another way for them to work it.
But that's ok, curiosity satisified. ;) :)
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Cameron Child
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
> 2nd question. Why cant the person commute to a government office here in the
> states? The office in Iraq has to be associated with a place here in the
> states. DC? Why endanger civilians in Iraq? Keep their workstation in a
> government co
Now THAT makes perfect sense, and I can see it from that scenario. But
that's really the only reason why a secret clearance couldn't telecommute.
:) You can't throw the hardware and internet connection at me.
SOo. Based on that.
2nd question. Why cant the person commute to a government offic
guarantee that the bad guys won't get physical access with
telecommuters.
-Original Message-
From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10:10 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Bruce, LRSScout...
Awww. Now come on peeps. You guys are all far more
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
> So if an insurance company has the knowledge, power and resources, ...
> surely the government can?
Surely, anything is possible. It's still a different situation
though. I am not sure that the threat from agents of foreign
government are
Awww. Now come on peeps. You guys are all far more visionary than that.
I know for a fact that you can be issue a desktop (or laptop), locked down
to use ONLY stuff that that company has installed has installed, not allow
you to attach anything to it that they don't approve, and secure it. AND
ma
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Chris Stoner wrote:
> Well technologically it's feasible to have a secure connection between
> my home and Iraq, that much certainly is true. The part that I think
> you are not considering is that the government wouldn't have control
> over our workstations.
Yes
Well technologically it's feasible to have a secure connection between
my home and Iraq, that much certainly is true. The part that I think
you are not considering is that the government wouldn't have control
over our workstations. First off, you will never be allowed to
connect a personal compu
My thoughts exactly. The governments talk to each other on a daily basis
over high tech super secret connections. We all know that :) I don't believe
that's a reason for a telecommute position, secret or otherwise.
But I get that each case is different.
Just wondering aloud.
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010
plus
other measures, a secure connection could be made that would meet even
government security measures.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Chris Stoner [mailto:csto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 04, 2010 2:30 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Bruce, LRSScout...
Just like my job he
Just like my job here in Iraq, it requires a Secret Clearance. You
cannot telecommute work on a Secret system from your home internet
connection. Thats the biggest reason I have been told as to why they
need us out there physically. Also in my experience the Army is super
reactive, as in drop t
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote:
> You know what I don't understand about this job? Why does the developer need
> to be onsite? With all the technology at our fingertips ... I will never
> understand why someone has to have a developer on site.
I tend to look at this on a cas
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Eric Roberts <
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote:
> I don't get why a lot of places don't pick up telecommuting. It opens you
> up to a much wider range of talent and makes you way more flexable.
>
Flexible and Happy!
With private jabber network for IM and
talent and makes you way more flexable.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9:32 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Bruce, LRSScout...
>
>
> You know what I don't understand about th
nt and makes you way more flexable.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2010 9:32 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Bruce, LRSScout...
>
>
> You know what I don't understand about
ubject: Re: Bruce, LRSScout...
You know what I don't understand about this job? Why does the developer need
to be onsite? With all the technology at our fingertips ... I will never
understand why someone has to have a developer on site.
And I know not all people can telecommute ... but you find s
You know what I don't understand about this job? Why does the developer need
to be onsite? With all the technology at our fingertips ... I will never
understand why someone has to have a developer on site.
And I know not all people can telecommute ... but you find someone that can.
Blah. Seems s
This was on jobs. Seems like it's your kind of gig.
http://vykincorp.iapplicants.com/ViewJob-78863.html
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/143027215
20 matches
Mail list logo
