On 6/12/07, Jim Davis wrote:...
There's no reason that vast areas of our current knowledge CAN'T be wrong
-
but it's very unlikely. To even consider it extraordinary proof will be
demanded. Even Hancock admits that his work isn't scientific - he terms
its advocacy.
I don't know how
On 6/12/07, Gruss Gott wrote:
The Prince wrote:
I'll have to dig it up, but there's video out there of one man building
HUGE
freaking examples of pyramids and stonehenge, using just himself and
the marvel of the lever and fulcrum.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRRDzFROMx0
Huh. Well
Jim wrote:
Unknown techniques are very probable - even unknown technologies. Where
things get flakey is the idea that there was a highly advanced technological
civilization that was the source of these wonders
But highly advanced is pretty subjective. Hell, maybe they found a
meteorite that
Anybody read this book?
http://tinyurl.com/2kz95s
The bestselling author of The Sign and the Seal reveals the true
origins of civilization. Connecting puzzling clues scattered
throughout the world, Hancock discovers compelling evidence of a
technologically and culturally advanced civilization
I own some beach front property around here Grussyou interested?
On 6/12/07, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody read this book?
http://tinyurl.com/2kz95s
The bestselling author of The Sign and the Seal reveals the true
origins of civilization. Connecting puzzling clues
Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
And the reason that other countries would not attempt it is the
inevitable loss of life?
~|
Deploy Web Applications
Gel wrote:
Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
No. For example, you can't get enough people under a 200 ton
limestone block to lift it into place over the Queen's gallery. It's
not just the labor, btw. It's the
Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
And the reason that other countries would not attempt it is the
inevitable loss of life?
Yeah - the pyramids really haven't been mysteries for many years. A workfoce
in the millions with
Anybody read this book?
Pretty convincing if you ask me and, if I understand him correct, the
next end of civilization is predicted to be Dec 23rd, 2012.
People have been scientifically predicting the end of the world to the day
for centuries... we're still around.
If you read the book, it's
Gel wrote:
Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
No. For example, you can't get enough people under a 200 ton
limestone block to lift it into place over the Queen's gallery. It's
not just the labor, btw. It's the
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/question.php?number=686
I believe that date's based on the Mayan Calendar...
On 6/12/07, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gel wrote:
Umm...haven't they already shown how the Pyramids were built?
I mean didn't they have an endless workforce?
No. For
I did, and thought that Carlos Casteneda did a better job with his science than
this guy.
Hey! Let's go play with mescalito and the dog.
Anybody read this book?
http://tinyurl.com/2kz95s
The bestselling author of The Sign and the Seal reveals the true
[snip]
I saw the discovery channel one day and they had a show depicting our
ancestors. The between ape and human kind. What I don't understand is, why
do they always depict them acting like...dumb? Like scratching their heads and
walking funnymaking chimpanzees seem much smarter! I think they
Jim wrote:
Why would you need to get enough people under it?
Due to the architecture - as I understand it, it's a false ceiling
that was put in place after the original one. Therefore the blocks
had to be lifted into place just like you'd install a suspended
ceiling in your basement.
Jim wrote:
The specificity of the prediction alone sets my bullshit detector clanging.
Mine too, which is why I read the book.
To be fair, the book doesn't use this date as the prediction, it
simply points out that that's what an ancient culture had said. It
further ties that date to
Jim wrote:
The specificity of the prediction alone sets my bullshit detector clanging.
Mine too, which is why I read the book.
To be fair, the book doesn't use this date as the prediction, it
simply points out that that's what an ancient culture had said. It
further ties that date to
Jim wrote:
Why would you need to get enough people under it?
Due to the architecture - as I understand it, it's a false ceiling
that was put in place after the original one. Therefore the blocks
had to be lifted into place just like you'd install a suspended
ceiling in your basement.
I'm
+1000
*clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
On 6/12/07, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In short these theories tend to insult the intelligence of the ancients.
There's also a (giving the benefit of the doubt, problably unintentional)
racism at work. These theories tend to focus
Gel wrote:
+1000
*clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
Which of those are 4000+ years old and made of 100+ ton blocks?
Either way, all of this is supposition - but, if the book is true, it
explains a lot of stuff. If not, it's an interesting read.
Ultimately none of anything you're saying (or
Jim wrote:
I'm having trouble finding anything specific on the Queen's chamber in this
regard...
This book covers that issue and about 500 others. For example, even
if they use, say, a ramp, to haul up blocks, it'd have to have been
over a mile long.
http://tinyurl.com/2kz95s
The
Jim wrote:
Just so we're starting clear: where are these figures from? Many of them
seem wrong.
They're 10 years old. Bottom line, read the book. It's a little far
fetched but, if it wasn't, it would be absolutely NO fun to read.
On 6/12/07, Gruss Gott wrote:
Gel wrote:
+1000
*clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
Which of those are 4000+ years old and made of 100+ ton blocks?
I'll have to dig it up, but there's video out there of one man building HUGE
freaking examples of pyramids and stonehenge, using just
The Prince wrote:
I'll have to dig it up, but there's video out there of one man building HUGE
freaking examples of pyramids and stonehenge, using just himself and
the marvel of the lever and fulcrum.
Huh. Well how about this one:
The author ties the flood legends, of which he claims there
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:21 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Fingerprints Of The Gods
Gel wrote:
+1000
*clap* *clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
Which of those are 4000+ years old and made of 100+ ton blocks
-Original Message-
From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:22 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Fingerprints Of The Gods
Jim wrote:
I'm having trouble finding anything specific on the Queen's chamber
in this regard...
This book covers
25 matches
Mail list logo
