Economism?
Yeah I agree. That's why I have a day job.
.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> So the dollar is so low that we need to devalue it. Or not. The people
>> socking away money are itching to spend it. They must have saved a
>> little security nest a
Sam wrote:
>
> So the dollar is so low that we need to devalue it. Or not. The people
> socking away money are itching to spend it. They must have saved a
> little security nest and now feel the won't lose their jobs at this
> point.
>
Your religion is difficult to comprehend.
~
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> So you're not going to respond> Just pick random points and claim they
>> mean other things?
>>
>
> What'cha talkin 'bout? You said high gas prices were due to
> irresponsible Presidential monetary policy.
Actually it's th
Sam wrote:
>
> So you're not going to respond> Just pick random points and claim they
> mean other things?
>
What'cha talkin 'bout? You said high gas prices were due to
irresponsible Presidential monetary policy.
Now, I'm not so sure gas prices are correlated to this irresponsible
monetary pol
So you're not going to respond> Just pick random points and claim they
mean other things?
.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> Prices of those items have gone up but they are not traded in dollars
>> so it depends on the value of the currency used. Also, a
Sam wrote:
>
> Prices of those items have gone up but they are not traded in dollars
> so it depends on the value of the currency used. Also, a company like
> BMW is going to be willing to take a pay cut to stay in the market. If
> they lose dealerships now then they're gone for the long hall.
>
They would still be effected by the value of a dollar or inflation...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 07:40 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not So Much: Taxes Discourage Millionaires
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Gruss Gott
Now he is channeling Glen Beck...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 04:58 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not So Much: Taxes Discourage Millionaires
I heard the main reason to get off the dollar is you need to transfer your
funds
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>>
>> We still get paid in dollars.
>
> So let's talk about that plumber. Let's say he works 1 hour = $40.
>
> At $2/gallon that would mean he could buy 20 gallons of gas.
>
> But you claim that the Fed's purchase of government b
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Is that just a guide or is there a reason for it. Isn't milk
> subsidized? I remember Uncle Sam paying them to dump it to keep the
> prices stable back in the day.
>
> .
>
commodities markets...
I think it's actually "butter" that derives the cos
Sam wrote:
>
> We still get paid in dollars.
So let's talk about that plumber. Let's say he works 1 hour = $40.
At $2/gallon that would mean he could buy 20 gallons of gas.
But you claim that the Fed's purchase of government bonds means this
imported gas is now twice as expensive thus gas is
I heard the main reason to get off the dollar is you need to transfer
your funds to dollars to purchase oil. By the time your transfer
happens you might have lost a few hundred million because it's
dropping so fast
.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 201
Is that just a guide or is there a reason for it. Isn't milk
subsidized? I remember Uncle Sam paying them to dump it to keep the
prices stable back in the day.
.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> The price of milk actually regulates much of the food industry.
~~
We still get paid in dollars.
So prices aren't the same if compared to gold but seems the same to
us. You notice when you buy imports or travel abroad.
The plumber still get's $40 an hour but he can't buy as many silver
coins each week.
Same as the example I gave with lettuce, the local product i
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> The more dollars out there the less they are worth.
> $2 buys a gallon of gas.
> Now there are twice as many dollars so the same gas cost you $4
>
> You said so yourself, Swiss francs are stable and they pay the same
> for oil as they did three yea
Monday, April 25, 2011 11:10 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Not So Much: Taxes Discourage Millionaires
>
> What will tank the economy the same way it did in 2008 is five dollar a
> gallon gasoline, price gouging, greed and corruption.
~~
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
> >
> > The more dollars out there the less they are worth.
> > $2 buys a gallon of gas.
> > Now there are twice as many dollars so the same gas cost you $4
> >
>
> Then how come all prices haven't doubled?
>
>
Because everyone
Sam wrote:
>
> The more dollars out there the less they are worth.
> $2 buys a gallon of gas.
> Now there are twice as many dollars so the same gas cost you $4
>
Then how come all prices haven't doubled?
~|
Order the Adobe Cold
You know I'm guessing a little inflation for everyone is still better
than having these unemployment levels.
.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Casey Dougall
wrote:
>
> http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/138260/20110426/inflation-is-coming-to-america.htm
>
> Currently, Federal Reserve chairman Ber
The more dollars out there the less they are worth.
$2 buys a gallon of gas.
Now there are twice as many dollars so the same gas cost you $4
You said so yourself, Swiss francs are stable and they pay the same
for oil as they did three years ago.
The cost of oil hasn't changed, the worth of the do
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
> >
> > Because the dollar is now worthless since we keep printing them. That
> > raises fuel cost, driving, heating, shipping etc.
> > This is a new thing.
> >
>
> Please do explain that mechanism: how does the Fed's purchase o
Sam wrote:
>
> Because the dollar is now worthless since we keep printing them. That
> raises fuel cost, driving, heating, shipping etc.
> This is a new thing.
>
Please do explain that mechanism: how does the Fed's purchase of
treasury bonds raise "fuel, driving, heating, shipping, etc"?
~
Because the dollar is now worthless since we keep printing them. That
raises fuel cost, driving, heating, shipping etc.
This is a new thing.
.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
>
>
> (1.) A shrinking economy doesn't mean nobody can sell anything, it
> means no growth or shri
Robert Munn wrote:
>
> it mirrors the hollowing out of the middle class that is underway.
> middle-skill office work is vanishing in the united states. sooner or
> later the effect is going to cause the us economy to completely
> crater. and apple will still sell millions of ipads a year because
You mean republican ideals...you left out hypocrisy BTW...
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 11:10 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not So Much: Taxes Discourage Millionaires
Apple is selling millions of iPads because they can
Apple is selling millions of iPads because they can be used to that
exact middle-skill office work. We are replacing the desktop machines
at all our dealerships with iPads for the sales staff to work deals.
I am also doing a similar project for buildlng contractors to do
quotes in the field. iP
it mirrors the hollowing out of the middle class that is underway.
middle-skill office work is vanishing in the united states. sooner or
later the effect is going to cause the us economy to completely
crater. and apple will still sell millions of ipads a year because
demand elsewhere in the world
That is because it is a fact...
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 01:02 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not So Much: Taxes Discourage Millionaires
I would say that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard but I've a
[mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 01:00 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not So Much: Taxes Discourage Millionaires
Well if you say everyone is broke, Why is Apple doing so well, and no small
businesses have money based on you're own experience not getting work the
I would say that's the stupidest thing I've ever heard but I've
already heard it here before.
.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> You are right on the last part. The health care bill was little more than
> Republicans Bob Dole and Chuck Grassley's answer to Hillary Clin
Well if you say everyone is broke, Why is Apple doing so well, and no
small businesses have money based on you're own experience not getting
work then who am I to dispute it.
.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The only problem is that he is trying to take why small bu
lican originated
ideas...it's why many progressives were against it.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 11:22 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not So Much: Taxes Discourage Millionaires
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Eric Robe
they
don't have the funds, I would have enough money to comfortably retire.
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 11:17 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not So Much: Taxes Discourage Millionaires
Makes sense to me.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Most places do not stock inventory as that is considered a loss. They
> usually do things in real time.
That was GG claiming they were using old inventory not me.
> Plus...if they don't have inventory, in
> order to create more inventor
Makes sense to me.
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/08/small-businesses-are-not-hiring-why.html
.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> The portion quoted below is what I'm talking about.
>
> You have nothing to back this up.It doesn't even make much sense.
>
> On
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 09:12 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Not So Much: Taxes Discourage Millionaires
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
> And, btw, there's nothing to invest in. US corps are sitting on
>
The portion quoted below is what I'm talking about.
You have nothing to back this up.It doesn't even make much sense.
On 25 April 2011 11:24, Sam wrote:
> Companies, other than
>>> Apple, don't want to try to draw out that money because of fear of
>>> getting punished. If they take their pile
Which part?
GG hates links :P
.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Vivec wrote:
>
> This is a completely unfounded and unsupported statement. You make
> such huge assumptions here as to completely invalidate your argument.
>
> Do you have anything at all to back up this statement? A news articl
This is a completely unfounded and unsupported statement. You make
such huge assumptions here as to completely invalidate your argument.
Do you have anything at all to back up this statement? A news article
where a few Fortune 500 CEOs stated this opinion perhaps?
On 25 April 2011 10:12, Sam wr
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
> And, btw, there's nothing to invest in. US corps are sitting on
> trillions, and have spent the last 3 years getting rid of excess
> inventory.
If they got rid of old inventory then they would need more.
> The only thing lef
this is the core of the problem to me. our labor market is local but
capital is global, and there are far too many cheap investment
opportunities abroad for rich people to invest at home. that's why tax
cuts as incentives are not going to work. people will just take the
extra money they make here
Sam wrote:
>
> Who said people would move? We say they won't invest if their
> investment will be over taxed.
> Corporations on the other hand will move offices and factories overseas.
>
Really? Would you give up your largest market? Cause the that's how
I'd write the new law.
And, btw, there
Who said people would move? We say they won't invest if their
investment will be over taxed.
Corporations on the other hand will move offices and factories overseas.
.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> "The study found that the overall population of millionaires increased
"The study found that the overall population of millionaires increased
during the tax period. Some millionaires moved out, of course. But
they were more than offset by the creation of new millionaires...
[Furthermore,] they found that the rate of out-migration among
millionaires was in line with a
44 matches
Mail list logo
