be the equivalent of rifles or handguns.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> And this...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 4:08 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: W
statements about how guns may
or may not handle 'backblast'.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> Here you go...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 9:19 AM
> To: cf-communi
And this...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 4:08 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
OK...you keep believing in magic guns and bullets, I stay firmly
rooted in the real
Here you go...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 9:19 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Had to look it up, could not think of the reference at the time that
proves this is
id
hehehe...yay PDANet!!!), so the bandwidth kinda sucks, so I can't review
video very well.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
ROFL...
The heel was a play on the shoe theme...maybe he was just stringing us
along...
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 8:37 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
I don't
Didn't you mean fast typing? hehehe
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:04 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Stupid fat fingers...
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:31 PM,
;
>> > You stated that it was a violation of the laws of physics.
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:57 AM
>> > To: cf-community
>> > Subject: Re: Daily
were/are wrong?
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
>>
>> You stated that it was a violation of the laws of physics.
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 20
m> wrote:
>
> I wasn't going to say anything even though he is such a heel :-D
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:31 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love
I wasn't going to say anything even though he is such a heel :-D
-Original Message-
From: Medic [mailto:hofme...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:31 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
You heard the man. Shoe him.
backwards
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:26 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
I never said that 'weapons don't absorb energy to reduce recoil'
Please shoe
re wrong?
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
> >
> > You stated that it was a violation of the laws of physics.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:5
z [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:57 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> Please show me where I said that.
>
> Attributing things to someone that they never said is dishonest.
>
> On
You stated that it was a violation of the laws of physics.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:57 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Please show me where I said that
---
> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 7:22 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> A .45 is slow moving compared to other penetrating bullets. It is
> still a penetrating
onday, July 12, 2010 7:53 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> Truly sad that you cannot admit when you are wrong.
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah...knockback as in being
y 12, 2010 6:29 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> Yes, a 45 is a penetrating bullet, it is not like a rubber bullet or
> bean bag projectile. Please just go back and read the damn thing
f the blow.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 7:53 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Truly sad that you cannot admit when you are wrong.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Er
>
> > admit you were talking out your ass.
/me raises hand sheepishly
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
h
0 6:24 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> Debating with you is like playing Calvin-ball. When you are confronted
> with facts, you change the argument.
>
> So, now you are talking about 'knockback
it's energy than say the faster moving 9mm which is why the .45 is
> more effecting at knocking back your opponent.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 6:29 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: D
rom: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 6:29 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> Yes, a 45 is a penetrating bullet, it is not like a rubber bullet or
> bean bag projectile. Please just go b
e
> against body armor as far as penetration goes.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 4:57 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
>
absorb
the energy by moving in the same direction.
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 6:29 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Yes, a 45 is a penetrating bullet, it is
ssage-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 6:29 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Yes, a 45 is a penetrating bullet, it is not like a rubber bullet or
bean bag projectile. Please just go back and
Yeah...knockback as in being knocked back...pretty simple...
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 6:24 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Debating with you is like playing
e-
> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:20 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Eric Roberts
> wrote:
>>
>> The .
but I think that would
> qualify as a slug...it's a pretty huge round.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:20 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Secon
ervation of momentum, the
> gun's recoil is always larger than the bullet's knockback, as some momentum
> of the bullet is lost during flight, and if the bullet penetrates through
> the target it will not have imparted all its momentum into the target.
>
> -Original Messa
s packing a heavy
> punch.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 4:35 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> Still waiting for any kind of p
Not sure if you have ever seen a .45 acp round, but I think that would
qualify as a slug...it's a pretty huge round.
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:20 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> The .45 acp is a "slow" moving round...slow enough that it is ineffective
> against body armor as far as penetration goes.
Yes, I know, but most people out there aren't wearing body armor and a
45 round will be a penetrating round at reaso
Again...go fire one and you will understand.
> Something that can penetrate 27 inches of ballistic gel is packing a heavy
> punch.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 4:35 PM
> To: cf-community
> S
On 7/12/2010 2:41 PM, Eric Roberts wrote:
> Just because there are no videos (or none that I can find) on the net
> doesn't mean it is not true. Again...go fire one and you will understand.
> Something that can penetrate 27 inches of ballistic gel is packing a heavy
> punch.
But that is a mean
o:ks...@gckschools.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 9:55 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> There are ways around Newton's third law in guns. The person firing the
gun
> doesn't necessarily have to abso
understand.
> Something that can penetrate 27 inches of ballistic gel is packing a heavy
> punch.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 4:35 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals shou
:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 4:35 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Still waiting for any kind of proof I am wrong. You continue to tell
me I am wrong, yet offer no proof. I have not found anything that
supports your statement that
0 9:55 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: RE: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> There are ways around Newton's third law in guns. The person firing the gun
> doesn't necessarily have to absorb all the force of the gun firing. You
> can't les
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.45_Colt
>> >
>> > and this is what eventually replaced the m1911:
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9x19mm_Parabellum
>> >
>> >
>> > Eric
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > F
On 7/12/2010 10:12 AM, Sisk, Kris wrote:
> I've got a high listen score so I'll just take a 10 on that check. :-]
This thread has not devolved into a much more interesting and
entertaining direction of late!
~|
Order the Ad
If we are going to take out intruders with the item closest at hand, I
would probably end up hitting them with the blunt end of an electric
bass. There is family precedent for that. My dad once knocked out an
armed attacker with his fiddle case.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Sisk, Kris wrot
I've got a high listen score so I'll just take a 10 on that check. :-]
-Original Message-
From: Eric Roberts [mailto:ow...@threeravensconsulting.com]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 11:10 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendm
rd though. It's a little hard to swing a
> bastard sword indoors.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 9:57 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second
Not according to Scott the physics expert...
-Original Message-
From: Sisk, Kris [mailto:ks...@gckschools.com]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 9:55 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: RE: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
There are ways around Newton's third law in
word though. It's a little hard to swing
a
> bastard sword indoors.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 9:57 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second
ard to swing a
> bastard sword indoors.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 9:57 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> We don&
necessity with high caliber guns. A
50 cal would be impossible to fire otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 9:19 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Had to look it up
July 11, 2010 7:21 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Any weapon that will knock the bad guy back a few feet will also knock
you back a few feet. I know this because I saw it in
AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
We don't have any firearms in the house. But a four an a half foot
bastard sword does a pretty good job of intimidation.
~|
Order the A
gt; and this is what eventually replaced the m1911:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9x19mm_Parabellum
> >
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 10:34 PM
> &
gt;> Go read up on the m1911
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 8:09 PM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>>
>>
>
LOL. I'm a firm believer in Heinlein's axiom: Keep your shoes and
weapons where you can find them in the dark.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Maureen wrote:
>>
>> I had to sent it to snake heaven. I used a 22 pistol
>> cause I don'
: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I think something is going to happen as a result of the nonsensical
complete
> resistance to every bit of gun control...there is absolutely no
compromise.
> Like wi
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
>
> I think something is going to happen as a result of the nonsensical complete
> resistance to every bit of gun control...there is absolutely no compromise.
> Like with the assault gun ban...the NRA advertised it as the government
> taking aw
s is what eventually replaced the m1911:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9x19mm_Parabellum
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 10:34 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Show me vi
sure that criminals and mentally challenged folk aren't getting
weapons.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 10:06 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 a
hink you need to study how guns work.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 4:08 PM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>>
>&
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Eric Roberts
wrote:
You can thank the NRA for the bulk of that as they have opposed
> every bit of sensible legislation that was designed to right that in. Their
> idiotic opposition to any gun control laws will eventually lead to guns
> being banned.
So there i
Go read up on the m1911
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 8:09 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
I think you need to understand physics.
There is no gun that can be held
t: Sunday, July 11, 2010 4:08 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> OK...you keep believing in magic guns and bullets, I stay firmly
> rooted in the real world. Sound fair?
>
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Eric
I think you need to study how guns work.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 4:08 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
OK...you keep believing in magic guns and bullets, I stay
oming back at
> you is absorbed by springs or vented and thus deflected in a different
> direction thus lessening it's effect on you.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 12:52 PM
> To: cf-community
>
11, 2010 12:52 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
IIRC, the biggest gun they tested was a .50 caliber rifle.
I do not have to fire a gun to know that any bullets it shoots cannot
defy the laws of physics.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:05 A
handgun was used up until the late 80's/early 90's when it was
>>> replaced by the much less powerful (and more accurate at greater
> distances)
>>> 9mm.
>>>
>>> Eric
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Sco
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Had to look it up, could not think of the reference at the time that
> proves this is physically imposible, its Newton's Third Law of Motion
I don't know anything about either the Mythbusters episode nor the
m1911, however, Newton's 3rd Law
s powerful (and more accurate at greater
distances)
>> 9mm.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 7:21 AM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why li
.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 7:21 AM
>> To: cf-community
>> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>>
>>
gt; From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 7:33 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> Here you go
> http://www.thecmp.org/m1garand.htm
>
> different type of M-1 I know, bu
greater distances)
> 9mm.
>
> Eric
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 7:21 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> Any weapon
I was referring to the Abrams ;-) It was the main battle tank when I was
in.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 7:33 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Here
Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 7:21 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
Any weapon that will knock the bad guy back a few feet will also knock
you back a few feet. I know this because I saw it in Mythbusters.
ail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:03 PM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
>
>
> I feel the same way. I am not against all gun control, but I think
> there is a happy medium somewhere between 'no one can own a
ly don't want to be put in
> that situation. I'll give my opponent a fighting chance and stick to blades
> ;-)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 1:49 AM
> To: cf-community
> Subject: Re: Dai
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
I could go for either of those, or maybe the M4 shotgun.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> I've got the Remington 870 Express.
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:16 P
But it would be cool to have your own M1 :-D
-Original Message-
From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:03 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
I feel the same way. I am not against all gun
That is very true. One would have thought we would have learned from
prohibition, but apparently we dont learn from our mistakes.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Munn [mailto:cfmuns...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:49 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals
That's not semanticsonly Sam antics ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Sam [mailto:sammyc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 3:15 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
We already have gun control, by extending it you banish
nal Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 2:46 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
So is your position that gun control only keeps guns from law abiding
citizens? How does that work, since there
Every day is a hyperbole day for Sam...
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 2:47 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
When did we "ban all guns", or even suggest tha
BINGO!
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:h...@ilsweb.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 2:25 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
On 7/9/2010 12:14 PM, Sam wrote:
> Good point. While we're banning all guns beca
rs own a gun. I just
think the arguments against gun control make a whole lot more sense than
the ones against it.
-Original Message-
From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:29 PM
To: cf-community
Subject: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amend
...it's a medieval historical society
On Jul 10, 2010 6:42 PM, "Medic" wrote:
>
> I am a former SCAer myself...
Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Cold
LOL...no...Society for Creative Anachronisms
On Jul 10, 2010 6:42 PM, "Medic" wrote:
>
> I am a former SCAer myself...
Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Ado
>
> I am a former SCAer myself...
Sexual Compulsives Anonymous?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
http://
I am a former SCAer myself...so yeah...same here hehe.
On Jul 10, 2010 1:55 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
No the thing is a holdover from my SCA days. Sort of like the Black
Knight from The Holy Grail.
Besides seeing me in a loincloth would be scary enough. They'd
probably die laughing.
On Sat
t: Re: Daily Kos: Why liberals should love the Second Amendment
No the thing is a holdover from my SCA days. Sort of like the Black Knight
from The Holy Grail.
Besides seeing me in a loincloth would be scary enough. They'd probably di
No the thing is a holdover from my SCA days. Sort of like the Black
Knight from The Holy Grail.
Besides seeing me in a loincloth would be scary enough. They'd
probably die laughing.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> only if you put a loincloth on, wrap a leather cor
Kinda sounds like my house...though mine us a longsword with a 2ft parrying
dagger;)
On Jul 10, 2010 9:56 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
We don't have any firearms in the house. But a four an a half foot
bastard sword does a pretty good job of intimidation.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Scot
only if you put a loincloth on, wrap a leather cord around your head and
shout in you're best Arnold voice "You moust leeve theese house now!". One
of those blow up muscle suits wouldn't hurt either.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> We don't have any firearms in the h
We don't have any firearms in the house. But a four an a half foot
bastard sword does a pretty good job of intimidation.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
>>
>> I've used several different kinds of weapons, including Glo
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Maureen wrote:
>
> I had to sent it to snake heaven. I used a 22 pistol
> cause I don't know where the men folk hid the shotgun,
I understand this is going to sound sexist, but that is one of the
coolest things I have ever heard a woman say.
--
Scott Str
The biggest villains you are likely to encounter in your new place are
snakes. The neighbor's cat dragged one onto the grass by the steps
last week, and I had to sent it to snake heaven. I used a 22 pistol
cause I don't know where the men folk hid the shotgun, and I wasn't
going to get close e
I could go for either of those, or maybe the M4 shotgun.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox
wrote:
>
> I've got the Remington 870 Express.
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>>
>> We have a Benelli SuperNova tactical shotgun.
~~~
I support open carry also...not that it would make a lot of difference as
everywhere you go, private business here say that weapons are not allowed
inside.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I like guns. I also support reasonable restrictions on the ability of
> people to
I feel the same way. I am not against all gun control, but I think
there is a happy medium somewhere between 'no one can own any guns'
and 'any one should be able to buy a tank'
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Judah McAuley wrote:
>
> I like guns. I also support reasonable restrictions on the a
I like guns. I also support reasonable restrictions on the ability of
people to have them. The problem is coming up with a definition of
"reasonable". The NRA makes me want to kick them in the nuts. They are
anything but reasonable. On the other hand, I support things like open
carry, which a lot
I've got the Remington 870 Express. It's nice and loud when you're cocking
it. Still thinking of getting a pistol for my wife though. She's afraid of
the shotgun and doesn't even want to attempt shooting it. Can't say that I
blame her since it does have quite the kick. It's not near as smooth
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> I've used several different kinds of weapons, including Glock, Sig
> Sauer, snub-nosed .357, M1 carbine, black powder musket, .22 target
> pistol, and shotgun. No assault rifles that I recall. If I were going
> the rifle route, I would get e
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Ian Skinner wrote:
> Whether or not that is worth pursuing as a policy and if it is
> constitutional in the USA is a completely different argument. But one
> is not supporting ones side well if one argues from the assumption that
> removing guns overall will have
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
