Sam wrote:
Speeaking of the Wall Street Journal :)
The most liberally biased news product is the Wall Street Journal:
Well then I guess the best daily newspaper on the planet is
liberally biased. I don't have the time to read the reasoning
behind this, but that's the first time I've heard
look who's keeping score. Or at least reporting it.
Dana
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 15:48:23 -0500, Jerry Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the Drudge report and Jim Lehrer would be considered liberal leaning? Holy
cow.
Jerry
Jerry Johnson
Web Developer
Dolan Media Company
[EMAIL
Speeaking of the Wall Street Journal :)
The most liberally biased news product is the Wall Street Journal:
http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/997meijg.asp
The scores: 100 is Liberal 0 is Conservative
Wall Street Journal 85.1
New York Times 73.7
CBS Evening News 73.7
So the Drudge report and Jim Lehrer would be considered liberal leaning? Holy
cow.
Jerry
Jerry Johnson
Web Developer
Dolan Media Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/16/04 03:26PM
The scores: 100 is Liberal 0 is Conservative
DrudgeReport 60.4
News Hour with Jim Lehrer 55.8
Gruss Gott wrote:
His listeners desire this groupthink because they don't read much and
are confused about the world but nevertheless concerned. They turn to
Mr. Limbaugh who makes them feel comfortable with their ignorance and
then fills their head with talking points. In this way the bulk
http://www.nypost.com/news/worldnews/36359.htm
qoute
We think he was a major player in this — a central figure, a senior
law-enforcement official told The Post.
...
Since most of the recipients did not have refineries or cargo ships,
they needed to sell the oil to someone else who could ship the
true but there is a difference between what he can do and how
seriously he should be taken
Dana
Since when do you decide what Mr. Limbaugh can talk about on his own show?
This isn't CNN, it's his talk show and he can discuss whatever he
feels like. No equal time rule apply.
On Mon, 13 Dec
I did a google news search for
food-for-oil Exxon
food-for-oil Chevron
Came up with nothing
Then searched for
Exxon Iraq
And came up with the NY Post Article the Rush Limbaugh linked to.
The very last line of that article was:
Several major American oil companies, including Chevron Texaco and
Sam :)
Maybe there is a reason why none of us knows what you are talking
about -- we don't toe the neo-con line :) Your previous post inspired
me to do a news search on food for oi, all alone, without specifying
Marc Rich or any corporations and I came up with the following amusing
little piece:
Sanctions against Iraq should have been lifted in 1991?
NY Times supports Bush?
Clinton is a Neo-Con?
Wow, too much to debunk here and no time.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2063934/
If you believe this then of course you won't understand what I'm
talking about :)
And you make fun of Rush :P
I love
wayward :) hehe I love that. The guy used to be a supply-sider, then
he became wayward :) Seriously, I don't have time for this right now
either. Your article is a bit old and seems to assume that Saddam
Hussein is an imminent threat to, well, somebody :)
My point is that reasonable people may
Sam, you may listen to other sources and occasionally you have come up
with some good links to prove your point*, but you seem to be far more
likely to quote Rush than anyone else.
BTW, it was Bill Maher that said that about Clinton and a stake. It
was a joke. A true joke :) but a joke.
I've
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:16:04 -0700, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam, you may listen to other sources and occasionally you have come up
with some good links to prove your point*, but you seem to be far more
likely to quote Rush than anyone else.
I usually only quote Rush when someone starts
Sam wrote:
So if it wasn't for Rush we'de never know about Exxon or Texaco involvment.
LOL - or the Wall Street Journal. From Dec 2nd:
The roles of several American oil companies, including ChevronTexaco
(CVX) and ExxonMobil (XOM), are also under investigation.
ChevronTexaco received
Sam wrote:
In my mind groupthink is when some unwitting fool listens to Terry
McAuliffe, Al Franken and Bill Maher
Yeah, they're guilty of partisan chicanery too - especially Mr.
McAuliffe. I don't know that I'd include Mr. Maher in that group
though; he's especially critical of most of the
Ann Coulter is an acerbic idtiot.
--- On Monday, December 13, 2004 9:37 AM, Marlon Moyer scribed: ---
Canada should consider themselves lucky that we allow them to
exist, Ann Coulter
http://www.hugi.is/hahradi/bigboxes.php?box_id=51208f_id=1211
Yep, quicktime.
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 10:20 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The ignorance of the conservative talking heads
what sort of clip is this? I am getting a red x. Maybe because I moved
Quicktime
what sort of clip is this? I am getting a red x. Maybe because I moved
Quicktime to another drive last night?
Dana
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 08:37:39 -0600, Marlon Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Canada should consider themselves lucky that we allow them to exist, Ann
Coulter
He got in some trouble if i recall toowhich is great.
To paraphrase George Carlin, its good to piss off any group that takes
itself too seriously.
Brian wrote:
Triumph consistently cracks me up. Did you ever see that gig with the
people
waiting in line to see the Star Wars movie? I
Brian wrote:
He got in some trouble if i recall toowhich is great.
yeah, I think Conan is banned from Quebec for life. Too funny.
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - CFDynamics
That's the scary thing. They are obviously taking the piss to some
extent, but the attitude is at the core of conservative thinking here.
-Kevin
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:49:21 -, James Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If those two are kidding then that is a funny couple of articles, if they
First of all, Coulter and Limbaugh are not in the same league so I
don't no why anyone would heap them together.
She's like Howard Stern and goes for the shock value to get noticed.
If she didn't, nobody would know her. Rush on the other hand is well
established so doesn't need to use shock to get
Marlon wrote:
Canada should consider themselves lucky that we allow them to exist, Ann
Coulter
Ann Coulter ... yeah, I banged her. They arrested ME for beastiality.
- Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, covering the 2004 Republican National convention
Marlon wrote:
Canada should consider themselves lucky that we allow them to exist, Ann
Coulter
Ms. Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Baghdad Bob, and like have figured out
they can make a living from appealing to the worst of human nature:
we're good, they're evil.
They're professionals at it because
only in the thread subject and the body of your post :)
No mention of stupidity or ignorance.
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby
http://www.ruwebby.com
Message:
Sam wrote:
Secondly, I would question the IQ of someone with the arrogance to
pass judgment on the intelligence of people he doesn't agree with.
It's about agreeing with someone, it has to do with the method and
accuracy with which the content is delivered.
For example, we could disagree
I don't see it in the body of my post.
How are you feeling today?
-sm
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:16:20 -0700, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
only in the thread subject and the body of your post :)
No mention of stupidity or ignorance.
Gruss, you know it's not quite THAT simple.
Rush will also have his studies that support his ideas. Its the conclusions
he draws from them that are outrageous, in my opinion. Extremism almost
always grows from a much more logical source, then takes that next step,
often in spite of logic.
, quicktime.
-Original Message-
From: Dana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 10:20 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: The ignorance of the conservative talking heads
what sort of clip is this? I am getting a red x. Maybe because I moved
Quicktime
Do you really think that? I would not like him either if that were true.
I think you're confusing him with Michael Savage. Disclaimer: I only
listen occasionally for the comedy. He is truly an extremist nut job.
He complains all the time about Bush not being a Conservative and that
Liberalism is a
testy :) how else would I feel when talking to you? :)
But I'll grant you that the body of your post doesn't say stupidity
it says intelligence. I reversed the term to preserve the meaning
without going to some complex construction like you still seem to
think it isn't possible to call someone
Sam wrote:
He complains all the time about Bush not being a Conservative
He's certainly not fiscally conservative and he's responsible for the
largest expansion of the federal government in history - those are all
liberl claims to fame not conservative. Mr. Bush's only conservative
positions
And he does a hilarious Clinton imitation
Gee, 4 years out of office, and Rush still manages to get mileage out
of Clinton?
boy, now that's a talent! Harkens back to the days of Take my wife,
please! and Where's the beef?
must have had a field day with the Clinton library opening up...
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:11:04 -0600, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam wrote:
He complains all the time about Bush not being a Conservative
He's certainly not fiscally conservative and he's responsible for the
largest expansion of the federal government in history - those are all
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:11:04 -0600, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's certainly not fiscally conservative and he's responsible for the
largest expansion of the federal government in history - those are all
liberl claims to fame not conservative.
Those are only mistaken liberal
I dunno. Why do you bother to what? What are you thinking when you say
such things? And why would I be anything but fine?
Dana
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:25:01 -0800, Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Always with the attitude.
Why do I bother?
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:58:35 -0700, Dana
Brian wrote:
Rush will also have his studies that support his ideas. Its the conclusions
he draws from them that are outrageous, in my opinion. Extremism almost
always grows from a much more logical source, then takes that next step,
often in spite of logic.
Well said
He's not the #1
Because your so testy!
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:40:31 -0700, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I dunno. Why do you bother to what? What are you thinking when you say
such things? And why would I be anything but fine?
~|
Special
Re: The ignorance of the conservative talking heads
The Talking Heads were an amazing band - I don't know how conservative they
were though, or ignorant for that matter. :/
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver
Hey Bill Maher still gets mileage out of Clinton :) My favorite line
was that they'll have to put a stake through the guy's heart to get
him out of politics.
Dana
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:17:32 -0800, William Bowen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And he does a hilarious Clinton imitation
Gee, 4
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:49:30 -0600, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I pointed out that this is what makes it ridiculous - he offers
opinions on policy based on nothing but the theory that team A is
better than team B.
He doesn't do that so I again ask please give at least ONE example.
Jason wrote:
The Talking Heads were an amazing band - I don't know how conservative
they were though, or ignorant for that matter. :/
I think David Byrne has been an outspoken proponent of liberal causes.
~|
Special
So what is his point with this tid-bit? Why discuss it? What is it's
relevance?
You keep saying:
I pointed out that this is what makes it ridiculous - he offers
opinions on policy based on nothing but the theory that team A is
better than team B.
And I keep asking for examples. To help you
hrm? You mean that Bill Maher quote that amused me? If you're agreeing
with Bill Maher, I'm writing the date down g although, kudos for the
open mind :)
Dana
And... since there was mention of Rush still talking about Clinton all
these years later it kind of fits in with Dana's way of thinking
And he does a hilarious Clinton imitation
Brian wrote:
Rush will also have his studies that support his ideas. Its the
conclusions
he draws from them that are outrageous, in my opinion. Extremism almost
always grows from a much more logical source, then takes that next step,
often
Don't you think that's news?
Clinton pardoned rich for illegal deals with Iraq and is now at the
center of the Oil-for-food scandal. He has donated to both Clintons
election campaign and to the Clinton Library.
But, even if you take the Clintons out of this it's still big news and
could force
sure, why not. Maybe :) depends on what you think my way of thinking is :)
Dana
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:25:41 -0800, Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I don't find the stake in the heart quote funny. I'm not saying
it's bad, just a really weak joke. Actually I don't think anything he
Sam wrote:
He doesn't do that so I again ask please give at least ONE example.
I'll give you another starting point:
Marc Rich at Center of Oil-For-Food Scandal
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121304/content/it_stinks_out_there_2.guest.html
So what is his point with this
you're still confusing ignorant with stupid. Already been a few rounds
of that with you.
Dana
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:32:09 -0800, Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, Coulter and Limbaugh are not in the same league so I
don't no why anyone would heap them together.
She's like
Sorry, I don't find the stake in the heart quote funny. I'm not saying
it's bad, just a really weak joke. Actually I don't think anything he
says is funny.
Jon Stewart on the other hand is hilarious. Can I get a kudos for the
open mind there?
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 16:38:15 -0700, Dana [EMAIL
Sam wrote:
I told you he doesn't only talk about policy.
Clearly Mr. Limbaugh is demagogue - he makes his living off of
people's prejudices; convincing them that they're part of some greater
whole with which they can attach their allegiance too.
His listeners desire this groupthink because
It's funny because it's true., Homer Simpson
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 9:38 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: The ignorance of the conservative talking heads
Canada should consider themselves lucky that we allow them to
Heh.
-Kevin
Ann Coulter is an acerbic idtiot.
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139569
Archives:
If those two are kidding then that is a funny couple of articles, if they
are serious then god help us all!
--
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 December 2004 14:38
To: CF-Community
Subject: The ignorance of the conservative talking heads
Triumph consistently cracks me up. Did you ever see that gig with the people
waiting in line to see the Star Wars movie? I laughed so hard I think I gave
myself another hernia
Marlon wrote:
Canada should consider themselves lucky that we allow them to exist,
Ann
Coulter
Ann Coulter
Brian wrote:
Triumph consistently cracks me up. Did you ever see that gig with the people
waiting in line to see the Star Wars movie? I laughed so hard I think I gave
myself another hernia
That was great! My favorite was when Conan was hosting from Canada
and Triumph went on tour of
Always with the attitude.
Why do I bother?
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 13:58:35 -0700, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
testy :) how else would I feel when talking to you? :)
But I'll grant you that the body of your post doesn't say stupidity
it says intelligence. I reversed the term to preserve the
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:05:35 -0600, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Limbaugh listener may not be a simpleton, but if they choose to
believe in Mr. Limbaugh's arguments then they are choosing to be
ignorant (the none so blind as those who refuse to see thing).
Can you please give a few
hmm so the Republicans tax and spend then get to benefit from calling
people tax and spend liberals? Nice work if you can get it :
Dana
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:30:04 -0600, Kevin Graeme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:11:04 -0600, Gruss Gott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's
Sam wrote:
This whole thread has gone buggy.
Limbaugh doesn't craft policy, he's a talk show host on the radio.
Yes, one who offers opinions on policy - that's the whole point of his
show: liberals have stupid policy ideas and conservatives have smart
ones.
I pointed out that this is what
Kevin wrote:
Those are only mistaken liberal stereotypes.
I've always thought that American liberalism has 2 historical components:
1.) Basic needs provided for and protected by the federal government:
health care, retirement, jobs, food, etc. Historically this has meant
high taxes to pay
What are you talking about? How did ignorance or stupid get into this thread?
We're talking about the mentally weak, low IQ's and arrogance. No
mention of stupidity or ignorance.
Now 'bout them dogs?
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:59:09 -0700, Dana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you're still confusing
So you're saying she's got balls? :-D
-Kevin
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 14:12:02 -0800, Sam Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because your so testy!
~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
Sam wrote:
And I keep asking for examples.
I'll show you if you answer the question - why should Mr. Limbaugh be
discussing this in the first place. How is it relevant? What does
Marc Rich have to do with anything?
~|
Sam wrote:
Don't you think that's news?
Clinton pardoned rich for illegal deals with Iraq and is now at the
center of the Oil-for-food scandal.
To answer your question, Mr. Rich isn't at the center of the scandal
he's one participant; which is mild news. There are many other
participants
65 matches
Mail list logo
