Al Qaeda members hide in Brazil, raise money - report
BRASILIA (Reuters) - Al Qaeda operatives are in Brazil planning attacks,
raising money and recruiting followers, a leading news magazine reported
Saturday, renewing concerns about the nation serving as a hide-out for
Islamic militants.
Veja
I call BS on this story.
It's a report on a report in another magazine, with nothing verified
(and no doubt, nothing verifiable)
Al Qaeda seem to be doing just fine operating out of Pakistan.
What's next?
Bin Laden in Brazil?
Bin Laden in Libya?
On 4 April 2011 16:59, Michael Dinowitz
Bin Laden in Brazil?
If so I'll join the hunt.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion
Archive:
Vivec gel21...@gmail.com wrote:
I call BS on this story.
It's a report on a report in another magazine, with nothing verified
(and no doubt, nothing verifiable)
Al Qaeda seem to be doing just fine operating out of Pakistan.
I'm too lazy to do any real research, but AQ in Brazil has been
I find a whole lot more middle-aged white men suffer from the
inability to think for themselves than people of color. Hence the
popularity of the booble-heads like Windbag.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
You do always imply people with skin darker than yours
No, my point is health problems kill more people than terrorism so if
the goal were simply to reduce deaths, then prevention of health
problems would have priority.
It is not now, nor has it ever been, about the numbers. Which is a
direct response to your question What's the number?.
On Fri,
Yeah, and we won't have any more tsunamis cause they are closing down
the weather reporting stations.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson jmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't worry. the proposed budget calls for canceling the poison
control centers, so that number should drop to zero,
or are they and the palestinians no longer media darlings?
either way, I was just wondering the same the other day
Sent from my iPhone... Don't hate.
On Apr 1, 2011, at 1:53 PM, G Money gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone concerned by the relative silence of AL Qaeda amidst the revolutions
in
G Money gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Al Qaeda seems to be their most vocal when things are NOT going well for
thembut when they are quiet, that's usually a bad sign.
Very good question ... this is parallel to my supposition that Obama's
greatest strength (to this issue) is his skin color and
Maybe they are in planning...
-Original Message-
From: G Money [mailto:gm0n3...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:54 AM
To: cf-community
Subject: Where's Al-Qaeda?
Anyone concerned by the relative silence of AL Qaeda amidst the revolutions
in several Arab countries?
Al Qaeda
I think it is simpler than all that.
I don't think they ever were that big a threat or deal.
They made a great straw man, but not a lot of substance behind the
smoke they are blowing through the genital hair of their
camels/goats/cave buddies.
I think we are just bored of them, so have put
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson jmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is simpler than all that.
I don't think they ever were that big a threat or deal.
On September 10th, 2001Al Qaeda posed no threat to the United
States??
They don't need to create releases for Al Qaeda right now with so much
stuff going around.
Everyone's too busy jockeying for the forthcoming reconstruction contracts ;-)
When this all dies down we will start seeing Al Qaeda releases and
threats again.
On 1 April 2011 13:53, G Money
3,000, even 10,000 people killed are a danger, but not an existential
danger to the United States of America.
There was no threat that the country as a whole was in danger.
We have done more damage to the American Way of Life than they did.
And we took pretty good vengeance for their moves.
I think when money started coming into the picture of the whole 'War
on Terror' all objectivity was lost.
Now the machinery is moving too fast and too far to turn it back now.
From now until just about always there will be an Al Qaeda threat.
On 1 April 2011 15:00, Jerry Milo Johnson
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson jmi...@gmail.com wrote:
3,000, even 10,000 people killed are a danger, but not an existential
danger to the United States of America.
There was no threat that the country as a whole was in danger.
We have done more damage to the American
I posted a link where rebel leaders in Libya admitted that there were Al
Qaeda elements in their 'army'. There was also a report of a raid on a
Libyan missile warehouse by Al Qaeda recently. They're still around but as
Tony said, they're not the media darlings anymore. The Muslim Brotherhood
is.
The Palestinians are still the media's darlings that can do no wrong. The
only news you really hear about them is their refusal to negotiate with
Israel and their push to have a country without a peace plan or clear
borders. Every few days there's an article about this Central American
country
I honestly don't think the masses are as stupid as you constantly claim.
.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
G Money gm0n3...@gmail.com wrote:
Al Qaeda seems to be their most vocal when things are NOT going well for
thembut when they are quiet, that's
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson jmi...@gmail.com wrote:
3,000, even 10,000 people killed are a danger, but not an existential
danger to the United States of America.
There was no threat that the country as a whole was in danger.
So shutting down air travel for three days
If you are going to base the wars on using the number, then where is
the war on heart disease, or the war on cancer, or the war on traffic
accidents, or the war on medical incompetance all of which kill
substantially more people in the US per year than the attack on the
World Trade Center.
On
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are going to base the wars on using the number, then where is
the war on heart disease, or the war on cancer, or the war on traffic
accidents, or the war on medical incompetance all of which kill
substantially more
Now your point is more people die from health reasons than from
terrorism so why fight terrorism?
Help me out with what your point is.
.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Maureen mamamaur...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are going to base the wars on using the number, then where is
the war on
Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
I honestly don't think the masses are as stupid as you constantly claim.
Hey, I NEVER called you the masses.
Now if you're referring to birthers then, yes, I will officially call
THEM stupid. Maybe more slightly more retarded in some way ...
although it's
You do always imply people with skin darker than yours are only able
to think what they're told. Currently your applying that brush to
anyone in the Mid-East or North Africa.
.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Gruss Gott grussg...@gmail.com wrote:
Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
I honestly
Sam sammyc...@gmail.com wrote:
You do always imply people with skin darker than yours are only able
to think what they're told. Currently your applying that brush to
anyone in the Mid-East or North Africa.
Not darker *skin* darker GLASSES. You know, those goofs who put up
their facebook
Don't worry. the proposed budget calls for canceling the poison
control centers, so that number should drop to zero,
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Casey Dougall
ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com wrote:
*Each year, over-the-counter pain relievers containing acetaminophen are to
blame for more
27 matches
Mail list logo
