RE: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

You mean like how John Boehner and Eric Cantor put up bills to repeal Obamacare for the 40th time? -Original Message- From: Bruce Sorge [mailto:sor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 4:03 PM To: cf-community Subject: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying a

Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

ons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 9:07 PM > > To: cf-community > > Subject: Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying > > ab

Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

ce Sorge wrote: > > That's a good start. > > -Original Message- > From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 9:07 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying > about rea

Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

took Information Assurance. It was interesting. My next class is MIS. >>>> Seems like we are on a similar degree path. And yes, including books is >> a >>>> nice thing. I only wish they were the actual books instead of PDF's. I >>>> still >>>>

Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

y were the actual books instead of PDF's. I > >> still > >> end up buying some of them because I just like having an actual book in > my > >> hands. > >> > >> > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com]

Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

still >> end up buying some of them because I just like having an actual book in my >> hands. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:17 PM >> To: cf-community >> Su

Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

stead of PDF's. I > still > end up buying some of them because I just like having an actual book in my > hands. > > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:17 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: R

RE: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

in my hands. -Original Message- From: Scott Stroz [mailto:boyz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 11:17 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things... Technically, I am at APU (American P

Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

Technically, I am at APU (American Public University), but both APU and AMU are part of the American Public University System (APUS). Some of the classes I have had to take were a bit lacking, but I think that may be because I was 'learning' stuff I have been doing for 10+ years. I am really enj

RE: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

That's a good start. -Original Message- From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 9:07 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things... You mean like the most r

Re: Wow, glad to see that Durbin is spending his time worrying about really important things...

You mean like the most recent attempt to repeal the ACA by the House of Reps? On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Bruce Sorge wrote: > > Like the name of a for-profit university. > > > > http://www.armytimes.com/article/20130801/EDU03/308010033 > > > > Seriously? I mean, we have a huge economic cr

RE: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

I missed this but if I just have 1 or 2 people can google still host their domain email s for free? -Original Message- From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com] Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:52 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains

Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

Nah I read the whole thing. I was thinking about future customers. But I found a work-around I havent had time yet to try. :) On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > > > Well just feck. > > > > Now to find a new solutio

Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > Well just feck. > > Now to find a new solution. > Casey didn't actually post the entire copy from the blop posting. The very next sentence after what he posted is: "Please note this change has no impact on our existing customers, includin

Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

Well just feck. SmarterMail is fine, but not as good virus and spam capabilities as Google. I've been migrating customers for the past couple of years, and still had a few dozen to go. Oh well. Now to find a new solution. On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions <

Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:52 AM, Justin Scott wrote: > Even if I have to pay eventually, what they > give me would be worth the $50/yr for my individual account. > Yeah, I agree with my account as I like the storage, guess we could always setup mail using the normal hosting providers and if they

Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

I was bummed when I saw the announcement as I have my personal domain and e-mail and such on Google Apps (free edition). I've been enjoying their service for a couple of years and hope to continue enjoying it for some time to come. Even if I have to pay eventually, what they give me would be wor

Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

They told me that my grandfathered domain is good to go. How many years? Who knows. Judah On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote: > > do those grandfathered ones last? I cannot quite tell from the article > linked above. > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Ray Champagne

Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

Well, shit, they do own it!! On Dec 7, 2012 11:16 PM, "Jerry Milo Johnson" wrote: > > do those grandfathered ones last? I cannot quite tell from the article > linked above. > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Ray Champagne > wrote: > > > > > I am bummed for this too. Promised an ex-coworker

Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

do those grandfathered ones last? I cannot quite tell from the article linked above. On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Ray Champagne wrote: > > I am bummed for this too. Promised an ex-coworker I'd set him up with his > own domain this week. Bad timing on my part. At least I got a half dozen

Re: Wow, no more free google apps for domains???

I am bummed for this too. Promised an ex-coworker I'd set him up with his own domain this week. Bad timing on my part. At least I got a half dozen grandfathered in. On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Casey Dougall - Uber Website Solutions < ca...@uberwebsitesolutions.com> wrote: > > Next I bet

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

int-presentation-0022899-1> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:02 PM >> To: cf-community >> Subject: Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama... >> >&

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

current-affairs/irish-priest-says-he-has-no- > idea-how-gay-porn-appeared-during-his-powerpoint-presentation-0022899-1 > > -Original Message- > From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:02 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: W

RE: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

w-gay-porn-appeared-during-his-powerpoint-presentation-0022899-1 -Original Message- From: Cameron Childress [mailto:camer...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 12:02 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama... On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Er

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

listen, I'm the biggest whistleblower on racist shit and I do not get any sense of mal intent in the stunted version of a grunt he made. On Friday, March 30, 2012, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Eric Roberts < > ow...@threeravensconsulting.com > wrote: > > > But t

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Eric Roberts < ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > But those do not have the same sound as the one Satorum used... I was > referring to the sound, not just the letters You are hearing something you want to hear. -Cameron ... ~

RE: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

But those do not have the same sound as the one Satorum used... I was referring to the sound, not just the letters -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:tonyw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 11:24 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

Nothing there man On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Scott Stroz wrote: > > I am all for anything that will make Santorum even more un-electable, > but I listened to this a few times and I still have no idea what it is > I am supposed to hear. > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Eric Roberts

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

I am all for anything that will make Santorum even more un-electable, but I listened to this a few times and I still have no idea what it is I am supposed to hear. On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage >

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Eric Roberts < ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > So what other words start with nig? Sounded kinda like he was about to say Government NATO. Either way, he's not going to be the candidate, it's Romney. -Cameron

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

night nickel nigh whatever you want. but it wasn't even the beginning of a thought in which it would fit in the flow. On Friday, March 30, 2012, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > " I hate Santorum as much as the freedom-loving next guy, but I think that > is a stretch. " > > Santorum seems to be a do

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

" I hate Santorum as much as the freedom-loving next guy, but I think that is a stretch. " Santorum seems to be a dope. I think that he actually believes he has a chance to win this the primary when the winner was known before the primaries even started. J - Ninety percent of politicians giv

RE: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

So what other words start with nig? -Original Message- From: Ray Champagne [mailto:r...@raychampagne.com] Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 10:42 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama... I hate Santorum as much as the freedom-loving next guy

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

yeah, next. On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Ray Champagne wrote: > > I hate Santorum as much as the freedom-loving next guy, but I think that is > a stretch.  This is what I hate about politics these days, making things > out of nothing, > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Eric Roberts wrot

Re: Wow...Santorum almost dropping the n-bomb on Obama...

I hate Santorum as much as the freedom-loving next guy, but I think that is a stretch. This is what I hate about politics these days, making things out of nothing, On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Eric Roberts wrote: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage > < > http://www.

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > I tried thumping a bible once. Turns out that I still prefer women. I would think the paper cuts would be a deterrent. -Cameron ... ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anth

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

I tried thumping a bible once. Turns out that I still prefer women. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Scott Stewart wrote: > > How exactly does one drink a closet? > On Nov 10, 2011 4:35 PM, "Cameron Childress" wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: >> >> > LOL! No

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

How exactly does one drink a closet? On Nov 10, 2011 4:35 PM, "Cameron Childress" wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > > > LOL! No :P All the closet drinking bible thumpers. > > > > Yeah, well those bible thumpers need to come of the closet! > > -Cameron > > >

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > LOL! No :P All the closet drinking bible thumpers. > Yeah, well those bible thumpers need to come of the closet! -Cameron ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

LOL! No :P All the closet drinking bible thumpers. On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > > > Ah, LOL! > > > > Actually, the rattling of empty bottles and glasses in the closets are > > louder than the thumping ;

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > Ah, LOL! > > Actually, the rattling of empty bottles and glasses in the closets are > louder than the thumping ;) > Who's rattling them? Do you have ghosts? -Cameron ...

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

Ah, LOL! Actually, the rattling of empty bottles and glasses in the closets are louder than the thumping ;) On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > You know - the bibles. > > Thump. > Thump. > Thump. > > -Cameron > > ~

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

You know - the bibles. Thump. Thump. Thump. -Cameron On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > OK that went over my head ... LOL! translate? > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Cameron Childress >wrote: > > Does the sound of the thumping bother you when you are trying to sle

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

OK that went over my head ... LOL! translate? On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > Does the sound of the thumping bother you when you are trying to sleep at > hight? > > -Cameron > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > > > Yeah. Let's not get carried

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

Does the sound of the thumping bother you when you are trying to sleep at hight? -Cameron On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:25 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > Yeah. Let's not get carried away. We still can't buy a drink in a > restaurant on a Sunday here in Union County ... > > We MIGHT get it on the ballot

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

Yeah. Let's not get carried away. We still can't buy a drink in a restaurant on a Sunday here in Union County ... We MIGHT get it on the ballot next year, but we only *JUST* got alcohol full stop this past November. And - as an aside... I now have my alcohol license and am legal to bartend! Yay!

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

That MS personhood shit was typical religious douchebaggery...trying to get their bullshit through when voter turnout is going to be low because they KNOW that what they want is nowhere near what the majority of people want. Glad it didn't work. On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

AWESOME!! :) We can all have hope heh heh. On 9 November 2011 10:28, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote: > > MS defeats "personhood" amendment > OH defaults anti-collective bargaining law > Pearce in AZ gets defeated by a newbie with no money > GA repeals blue law. > > MS voting suppression law was disa

Re: Wow. Elections and voters surprise me with common sense

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Jerry Milo Johnson wrote: > GA repeals blue law. > Actually, only certain localities repealed it, luckily including the one I live in. Certain other counties and cities within GA did not repeal it, I think (mainly) votes in those areas have been delayed and the

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

1 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade. > > > It's a bit unseasonable here. It hit 97 on our thermometer in the > mountains... but you will NEVER hear me complain about heat. I LOVE it. Let > it get hot! I'd rather shed clothes than try and put

RE: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Now there's a picture to keep in the wallet. -Original Message- From: Erika L. Rich [mailto:elr...@ruwebby.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 5:31 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade. It's a bit unseasonable here. It hit 97 on our thermometer in the

RE: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Yeah I was gonna go watch but saw that some things were cancelled because of heat. Some actors had to slim down on what they were wearing/carrying. -Original Message- From: Larry Lyons [mailto:larrycly...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 7:43 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: wow

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

foggy and cool earlier, now sunny. should be 80 today, cooler right at the ocean. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Dana wrote: > > in San Jose it's been 89 or so and people are complaining ;) Cold at night, > at a guess low 50s. Sweater weather in Santa Cruz yesterday, I am told. > ~~

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

They can still make the same jokes about Nunavit. >Yesterday it was 37 C, 45 C with the humidex. >That's 99F, 113F with humidex. > >If these temperatures keep up American's are going to be forced to stop >making igloo jokes about Canada. > > > > > >>

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Darn, I wish I knew. I was passing through Everett 3weeks ago on my way up to Vancouver, BC. Would have stopped by and brought some beer. > A local meteorologist did some research and calculated zero *minutes* > above 75 degrees in Everett, where I live (20 miles north of Seattle), > > to date

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

That's the what I really miss sine I moved to this part of the country, real snow and cold weather. >Tony and I will take the snow over this heat. We've been over 90 for weeks >now and the humidity so high.. gonna go put out the steak and the sun should >have it baked in about 30 minutes.. just

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

in San Jose it's been 89 or so and people are complaining ;) Cold at night, at a guess low 50s. Sweater weather in Santa Cruz yesterday, I am told. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Larry Lyons wrote: > > Driving home after work the external temperature sensor on the Mini read > 110 in Reston, V

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Driving home after work the external temperature sensor on the Mini read 110 in Reston, VA and in Centreville. That's going to put a real damper on the reenactment of the 150th anniversary celebration of the 1st Battle of Manassas this weekend. There are almost 10,000 Civil War reenactors in th

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

That's awesome, thanks. . On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Erika L. Rich wrote: > it get hot! I'd rather shed clothes ... ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/143027

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

It's a bit unseasonable here. It hit 97 on our thermometer in the mountains... but you will NEVER hear me complain about heat. I LOVE it. Let it get hot! I'd rather shed clothes than try and put 90 layers on just to stay warm. Give me 100 and a pool, with a drink, and I'm good. :) On Fri, Jul 22

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

the sun should > have it baked in about 30 minutes.. just gotta remember to flip it over. > > -Original Message- > From: Ray Champagne [mailto:r...@raychampagne.com] > Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:15 PM > To: cf-community > Subject: Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade. >

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Scott Raley wrote: > > Tony and I will take the snow over this heat. We've been over 90 for weeks > now and the humidity so high.. gonna go put out the steak and the sun > should > have it baked in about 30 minutes.. just gotta remember to flip it over. > > Don't

RE: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Plus at the sand and wind... Bruce gets a double whammy. -Original Message- From: Maureen [mailto:mamamaur...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:31 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade. That's hot. But just imagine what Bruce is enduring. On Fri

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

That's hot. But just imagine what Bruce is enduring. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Tony wrote: > > holy baking earth. > > 95 with a feels like of 115. > > beat that. ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.a

RE: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

lto:r...@raychampagne.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:15 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade. We hit 100 multiple days here in Minneapolis this week, we just sent that crap out to you. Enjoy it. Oh, BTW, we had ONE day yesterday where the high did not reach 90. First time in l

RE: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Partly cloudy and about 70 outside the office.. :) -Original Message- From: Tony [mailto:tonyw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 9:12 AM To: cf-community Subject: wow. 115 degrees in the shade. holy baking earth. 95 with a feels like of 115. beat that. Tony Weeg Sr. Web App

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

A local meteorologist did some research and calculated zero *minutes* above 75 degrees in Everett, where I live (20 miles north of Seattle), to date this year. http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/dannywestneat/2015663852_danny20.html?prmid=obinsite On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:02 AM, GMoney wr

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

> Hot coffee instead of iced :P Ssssip. ah. :-P -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amaz

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Geez. I'm in the tropics and it's about 33C outside. And that's pretty damn hot. On 22 July 2011 13:26, Medic wrote: > > Yesterday it was 37 C, 45 C with the humidex. > That's 99F, 113F with humidex. > > If these temperatures keep up American's are going to be forced to stop > making igloo joke

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Yesterday it was 37 C, 45 C with the humidex. That's 99F, 113F with humidex. If these temperatures keep up American's are going to be forced to stop making igloo jokes about Canada. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Tony wrote: > > holy baking earth. > > 95 with a feels like of 115. > > beat

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:51 AM, William Bowen wrote: > >> 95 with a feels like of 115. >> >> beat that. > > 60 degrees and sunny here in Seattle. > > What do I win? > > :-P > Hot coffee instead of iced :P Judah ~| Order the A

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

8 straight days are projected high in KC has been 99. Two of those days are actual high was 100. Heat indexes anywhere from 100-115. Tomorrows projected high is 101. We have had ZERO days in the 80's the last 10 days. We get a break Monday when our high is supposed to be 91. Then on Tuesday and W

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Yeah it was 109 in DuPont circle at 530 yesterday On Jul 22, 2011 12:12 PM, "Tony" wrote: > > holy baking earth. > > 95 with a feels like of 115. > > beat that. > > Tony Weeg > Sr. Web Applications Architect & Developer > Navtrak, Inc. > Smart Companies Drive Navtrak > www.navtrakgps.com > 800.78

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

> 95 with a feels like of 115. > > beat that. 60 degrees and sunny here in Seattle. What do I win? :-P -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~| Order

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

Pretty normal 90 degrees-ish here in Atlanta, humidity is even pretty low today - 50%. Enjoy the heat. :) -Cameron ... ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/14302721

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

After the 2nd wettest spring in 115 years, we still haven't hit 90 yet this year and have only hit 80 degrees 7 times. Today is supposed to be a bit sunnier though and hit 77 which should be nice for playing volleyball at the company picnic. Judah On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Ray Champagne

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Tony wrote: > > holy baking earth. > > 95 with a feels like of 115. > > beat that. > > NO NO NO, or they will cancel opening day races here in Saratoga today! ~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Ant

Re: wow. 115 degrees in the shade.

We hit 100 multiple days here in Minneapolis this week, we just sent that crap out to you. Enjoy it. Oh, BTW, we had ONE day yesterday where the high did not reach 90. First time in like a week, and it looks like the hot stuff is back again today and tomorrow. I will not complain though. When

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "You can't raise taxes on top 2% because those are the job creators and this > same top 2% relies on the markets and companies where we're fucked again > because profit is the bottom line." > > Fifty percent of the citizens do not pay federal income taxes. > > In 2008, the

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

"I've been trying to hire a dependable graphic artist to do redesigns on my websites for months, and can't get anyone who actually wants to work. Lots of people who say they want a paycheck..none who will show up and do the job." You want someone to work instead of facebooking and twittering? Wh

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

Yes, I know. But the rhetoric is that raising taxes would kill job creation. So it's simple. Create jobs, pay a lower tax rate. I think the whole "there are no jobs" stuff is just BS. I've been trying to hire a dependable graphic artist to do redesigns on my websites for months, and can't get

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

For years, profits have been going to pay shareholders and not to invest in jobs or infrastructure. On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Maureen wrote: > > So just raise the taxes on those who don't create jobs. An exemption > for actual job creation should be simple to include in any tax > legislat

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

So just raise the taxes on those who don't create jobs. An exemption for actual job creation should be simple to include in any tax legislation. Propose that, and if the politicians balk, you know that "job creators" is just a buzz word, and not an actual class of people or businesses that exist

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

"You can't raise taxes on top 2% because those are the job creators and this same top 2% relies on the markets and companies where we're fucked again because profit is the bottom line." Fifty percent of the citizens do not pay federal income taxes. In 2008, the top 1% paid 38% of all income taxe

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

Free markets have collapsed, the rats are fleeing the sinking ship of the US economy and they are trying to steal the furniture on their way out. On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand" > > Excerpt: > > Layoff

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

Did you mean Lose, Lose, Lose? On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Casey Dougall wrote: > Loose loose loose, from every side. > > You can't raise taxes on top 2% because those are the job creators and this > same top 2% relies on the markets and companies where we're fucked again > because profit

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Cameron Childress wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:20 PM, G Money wrote: > > > Would this be a case of "wall street" layoffsand not necessarily > "main > > street" layoffs? > > > > Sir - Here are the main street layoffs you requested. > > http://signaln

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:20 PM, G Money wrote: > Would this be a case of "wall street" layoffsand not necessarily "main > street" layoffs? > Sir - Here are the main street layoffs you requested. http://signalnews.com/cisco-layoff-1-employee-497 Thank you -Cameron -- Cameron Child

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

"Again, i never really understood the difference between wall street and main street, since what happens there affects what happens here, and visa versabut whatever." Because the media loves to report on Wall Street but does not think Main Street is as news worthy. J - Ninety percent of po

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

In 30+ years of dealing with brokerage firms, I'm never encountered a more incompetent bunch that the ones we are currently dealing with at Morgan Stanley. They bought the brokerage where my partner has his investments, and every single month they screw up something. I think after reading this,

Re: WOW: Morgan Stanley "Running Layoff Scenarios Into Several Thousand"

Would this be a case of "wall street" layoffsand not necessarily "main street" layoffs? Again, i never really understood the difference between wall street and main street, since what happens there affects what happens here, and visa versabut whatever. On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Je

Re: Wow. This is worth a read

"I can and often do, though you obviously don't seem to notice." I'll tell you as I tell my children, once you resort to bullying or name calling, you have lost. You have shown no faith in your position so you have moved to the irrational. It doesn't matter if you do it occasionally or all of t

Re: Wow. This is worth a read

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Eric Roberts < ow...@threeravensconsulting.com> wrote: > > Well Jerry isn't allowed to think that unless Rush or Glenn tell him that > it > is ok. They told him that he must think that it is because it was the only > time she was proud of her country... > Jerry

RE: Wow. This is worth a read

PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Wow. This is worth a read "Of course Michelle is proud of her country, which is why she and Barack talk constantly about how their story wouldn't be possible in any other nation on Earth. What she meant is that she's really proud at this moment b

RE: Wow. This is worth a read

I say go back to the 1952 borders ;-) -Original Message- From: Gruss Gott [mailto:grussg...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 03:07 PM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Wow. This is worth a read Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "You think that Michelle Obama isn't prou

Re: Wow. This is worth a read

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > "I rarely call people names without also meting out pointed criticism of > their stances as well." > > But you can't do it without resorting to insults.  Such restraint and > control. I can and often do, though you obviously don't seem to

RE: Wow. This is worth a read

You are surprised why? -Original Message- From: Judah McAuley [mailto:ju...@wiredotter.com] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 12:13 AM To: cf-community Subject: Re: Wow. This is worth a read On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Jerry Barnes wrote: > > Yesterday, with with no fear

Re: Wow. This is worth a read

I loved the she clarifies by saying she only likes the country now because it has changed . On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Vivec wrote: > > “Of course Michelle is proud of her country, which is why she and Barack > talk constantly about how their story wouldn’t be possible in any other > nati

Re: Wow. This is worth a read

“Of course Michelle is proud of her country, which is why she and Barack talk constantly about how their story wouldn’t be possible in any other nation on Earth. What she meant is that she’s really proud at this moment because for the first time in a long time, thousands of Americans who’ve never

Re: Wow. This is worth a read

"I rarely call people names without also meting out pointed criticism of their stances as well." But you can't do it without resorting to insults. Such restraint and control. I understand though. I used to call people names too. Then I moved up from middle school to high school. J - Money

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >