Lol, that's awesome
On Dec 21, 2011, at 1:52 PM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
> Given that the only thing Romney has done in terms of businesses is
> buy other companies, gut them, lay off all the workers and then sell
> the remnants. Just lots of business experience. Imagine what would
> happe
Given that the only thing Romney has done in terms of businesses is
buy other companies, gut them, lay off all the workers and then sell
the remnants. Just lots of business experience. Imagine what would
happen if he ran the country like that. I can see from Omaha to Laredo
being sold to China.
O
That's exactly the problem.
.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> In short he's everything Obama is plus more.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/
Romneys a strong candidate and he has the advantage when it comes to business
and leadership. Obama has known to be weak at those and Romney has proven
himself there both as a businessman and as a governor.
Further Romney is smart, level headed, and trustworthy. In short he's
everything Obam
As I quoted in another email
---
If the election were held today, Obama would have a 52%-45% advantage over
former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Texas Rep. Ron Paul. The
incumbent would have a double-digit lead over former House Speaker Newt
Gingrich, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachma
That's what the DNC wants people to think.
.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
>
> Nobody has a chance against Obama but romney.
>
>
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-C
Nobody has a chance against Obama but romney.
On Dec 20, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> If Romney gets the vote Obama wins anyway, with out without Ron Paul's votes
>
> .
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Cameron Childre
If Romney gets the vote Obama wins anyway, with out without Ron Paul's votes
.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>>
>> > Which is why I say Romney needs
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> So start printing Obama 2012 Inauguration posters.
>
Could very well be...
-Cameron
...
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusi
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> > Which is why I say Romney needs to bring Paul's supporters into the fold.
> > They have energy that is lacking in the rest of the field.
>
>
> I think this is largely impossibl
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
> Which is why I say Romney needs to bring Paul's supporters into the fold.
> They have energy that is lacking in the rest of the field.
I think this is largely impossible.
-Cameron
...
Which is why I say Romney needs to bring Paul's supporters into the fold.
They have energy that is lacking in the rest of the field.
On Dec 20, 2011 3:01 AM, "Larry C. Lyons" wrote:
>
> Santorum? You are talking about the man whose name has become to mean
> a frothy mix of various .,. stuff. I'l
snicker... me either.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> Paul is a lunatic in the debates, like a deer in the headlights. Poor
>> fool was schooled by Michelle Bachman during the last go round. He's
>> shaky and scared bec
Santorum? You are talking about the man whose name has become to mean
a frothy mix of various .,. stuff. I'll let you google the rest.George
Rockwell Lincoln dead and buried has a much better chance of becoming
president. If there is any candidate that could fire up the Democratic
Party base more
in terms of connection to reality, I suspect that Sam is as
disconnected as Bachmann.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Wow..you think that is Bachmann 'schooling' Ron Paul? Maybe you and I
> have a different meaning of the word 'schooling'. If any 'schooling'
> went on in
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> So is Paul an irrelevant fringe candidate or Ross Perot II? He can't be
> both.
Some in the middle consider Paul a series candidate as they did Perot.
Those are the folks that aren't paying attention yet. When it comes
down to it he will li
So is Paul an irrelevant fringe candidate or Ross Perot II? He can't be
both.
Look at the facts, Sam. All else being equal, Romney does not beat Obama
head to head. Gingrich could, I think, if he recovers from his precipitous
drop in the polls, but what are the odds he can keep it together for
an
Yea...you and I definitely have drastically different definitions of 'schooling'
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> He started rambling shit about how we killed a million Iraq's and we
> don't have enemies around the world and if we do a phone call would
> solve it. That all points
>
> If there's one thing they lean to one side on, it's balance.
>
That right there deserves a placard.
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffus
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Gruss Gott wrote:
> Dude. Catch up. It's those people that are radical about moderation.
>
> If there's one thing they lean to one side on, it's balance.
Same reason Fox News hates that American Islam show - it's not radical
enough for them.
-Cameron
...
Dude. Catch up. It's those people that are radical about moderation.
If there's one thing they lean to one side on, it's balance.
On Dec 19, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> That's awesome - "Hardcore middle". I am also worried about the jumbo
> shrimp.
>
> Now we have to
That's awesome - "Hardcore middle". I am also worried about the jumbo
shrimp.
Now we have to look out for morons and oxymorons too!
-Cameron
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Sam wrote:
> You so confused.
> The Hardcore middle does not represent the Majority.
> The are a fringe like all other
You so confused.
The Hardcore middle does not represent the Majority.
The are a fringe like all other fringe groups.
They can swing both ways or in neither direction. Do not confuse the
with the mainstream.
.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:59 PM, GMoney wrote:
>
> Are you asking what hardcore indepe
He started rambling shit about how we killed a million Iraq's and we
don't have enemies around the world and if we do a phone call would
solve it. That all points back to we caused 9/11.
So by throwing cold water on his nonsense she had him rambling crazy shit.
.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:56 P
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> No real loss if he defects just a bunch of
> hardcore independents. What are they called extreme middle wing? But
> they are extremists.
>
Are you asking what hardcore independents are called?
How about "The Majority of Americans"?
I still fail to see how she 'schooled' him? care to enlighten me?
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Really? We killed a million Iraq's when a phone call could have solved
> everything? Like the Kennedy call actually worked?
>
> Yes we see things very differently.
>
> .
>
> On Mon,
Really? We killed a million Iraq's when a phone call could have solved
everything? Like the Kennedy call actually worked?
Yes we see things very differently.
.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> Wow..you think that is Bachmann 'schooling' Ron Paul? Maybe you and I
> have a
Name calling is what's getting Paul movement in the polls. Foolishly
Gingrich said he would not go negative so he's open to heavy attack.
I think most of his supporters wouldn't vote R unless it was next to
his Paul's name anyway. No real loss if he defects just a bunch of
hardcore independents.
Wow..you think that is Bachmann 'schooling' Ron Paul? Maybe you and I
have a different meaning of the word 'schooling'. If any 'schooling'
went on in that clip, it was Paul schooling Bachmann.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDBxfBt96JU&feature=rela
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDBxfBt96JU&feature=related
The last one.
.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Sam wrote:
>
>>
>> Paul is a lunatic in the debates, like a deer in the headlights. Poor
>> fool was schooled by Michelle Bachman
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> The latest poll is by a dem pollster. They want more than anything for
> Ross Perot two to get Obama elected.
>
Which is why it is incumbent upon Republicans to find a way to keep Paul in
the fold and not have him run as a third party spoiler.
P
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Scott Stroz wrote:
> Which debate was that? I cannot fathom anyone being 'schooled' by
> Bachmann about anything.
>
The times I've seen Paul in debates he pretty much shrugs off any attack
and rarely respond to it directly, instead simply stating his position.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Sam wrote:
>
> Paul is a lunatic in the debates, like a deer in the headlights. Poor
> fool was schooled by Michelle Bachman during the last go round. He's
> shaky and scared because I think he knows deep down he's a loon.
Which debate was that? I cannot fathom
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> There is no denying the reality of his growing popularity, though a Paul
> nomination is still very much a longshot. Even if he won the Presidency,
> many of his views would simply not translate into policy without a Congress
> willing to en
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Robert Munn wrote:
> There is no denying the reality of his growing popularity, though a Paul
> nomination is still very much a longshot. Even if he won the Presidency,
> many of his views would simply not translate into policy without a Congress
> willing to ena
*reads from card
Mr [Paul]: your campaign seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight
train, why are you so popular?
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Robert Munn wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Cameron Childress >wrote:
>
> >
> > Even when Paul was number two in a three ma
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> Even when Paul was number two in a three man race they would talk about
> number one and three without even acknowledging his existence.
>
> I think it's less about Gingrich and more about "Wow, Paul's still in the
> race? Guess we s
Even when Paul was number two in a three man race they would talk about
number one and three without even acknowledging his existence.
I think it's less about Gingrich and more about "Wow, Paul's still in the
race? Guess we should finally start talking about him"
-Cameron
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011
Its still pretty soft, and I think its in response to Gingrich's
latest implosion. I suspect that even Frufree the wonder dog would
become the front runner at some point for this nomination cycle.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Cameron Childress wrote:
>
> They have even been talking about hi
They have even been talking about him on CNN lately after months of totally
ignoring him.
-Cameron
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>
> http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2011/12/ppp-iowa-is-paul-country-107984.html
>
>
http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2011/12/ppp-iowa-is-paul-country-107984.html
--
Larry C. Lyons
web: http://www.lyonsmorris.com/lyons
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/larryclyons
There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always
has been. The strain of anti-int
41 matches
Mail list logo
