:) oh you're right. "Those people" are just not like "us."
you're the one who can't seem to let it go at the moment ;)
Dana
On 10/30/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you just can't let it go, can you?
>
>
>
> --
> ---
> Robert Munn
> www.emergentpath.com
>
>
~~~
you just can't let it go, can you?
--
---
Robert Munn
www.emergentpath.com
~|
ColdFusion 8 - Build next generation apps
today, with easy PDF and Ajax features - download now
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/
I am just appreciating the irony of your position :) Still think New
Orleans should not be rebuilt?
On 10/30/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some people would not evacuate and the firefighters did the right thing and
> saved those people before saving property. I never said otherwise
Some people would not evacuate and the firefighters did the right thing and
saved those people before saving property. I never said otherwise. The vast
majority of people left when asked.
Half a million people evacuated, there was very little criminal activity in
the wake of the fires, and in gen
I'm not sour. You are saying untrue things is all.
On Oct 29, 2007 11:29 AM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what are you so sour about?
>
> On 10/25/07, Dana wrote:
> >
> > actually -- a lot of them did not. Some of the early news stories were
> > talking about the fire-fighting beng ham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Personal responsibility is paramount in this world. If the people
> want to 'stay and see', or 'stay and fight', they should have that
> right. And the rest of us should have the right to have the
> firefighters who should be fighting the fire, not the homeowner, to
s signed.
> actually -- a lot of them did not. Some of the early news stories
were
> talking about the fire-fighting beng hampered by having to forcibly
> evacuate
> people.
-Original Message
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Date: Oct 29, 2007 9:29
-To: "CF-Community"
-S
what are you so sour about?
On 10/25/07, Dana wrote:
>
> actually -- a lot of them did not. Some of the early news stories were
> talking about the fire-fighting beng hampered by having to forcibly
> evacuate
> people.
>
~|
Cold
They still evacuated.
On 10/25/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> actually -- a lot of them did not. Some of the early news stories were
> talking about the fire-fighting beng hampered by having to forcibly evacuate
> people.
>
~~
actually -- a lot of them did not. Some of the early news stories were
talking about the fire-fighting beng hampered by having to forcibly evacuate
people.
On 10/25/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> my point.
>
> On 10/25/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They evacuated when asked?
> >
> RoMunn wrote:
> Several reasons. Our government was prepared, they got word out early, and
> people cooperated- not only with the government, but with each other.
>
It seems like California, and maybe San Diego specifically, should
become a model for disaster management. Y'all should really do
I wonder what would happen if the entire city of San Diego were told to
evacuate and that only the people who didn't have transport went to the
Stadium. Alot of the people least likely to have transport in San Diego
are actually hispanic, not black. It's kinda apples and oranges, but I
do won
Several reasons. Our government was prepared, they got word out early, and
people cooperated- not only with the government, but with each other.
I don't include the Feds in this little love-fest. They are involved, but
all of the early work, the important work, was done by first responders from
ci
Do I really need to mention the school buses again?
On 10/25/07, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I recall, the problem in New Orleans was that many residents
> could not afford to evacuate. Even those that did ended up in the most
> horrid conditions.
>
> The US Gov't has stated that
and i guess at this point george bush likes black people?
tw
On 10/25/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my point.
>
> On 10/25/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They evacuated when asked?
> >
> > On 10/25/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > EVERYONE is not getting that treatment.
>
As far as I recall, the problem in New Orleans was that many residents
could not afford to evacuate. Even those that did ended up in the most
horrid conditions.
The US Gov't has stated that things are better in San Diego because of
the lessons it learnt form New Orleans, and claims that its respon
my point.
On 10/25/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They evacuated when asked?
>
> On 10/25/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > EVERYONE is not getting that treatment.
> > the masses arent.
> >
> > spotty, varied people are... but not the masses.
> >
> > why are the masses there so much be
3) the shelters where they are staying are actually out of the disaster
area, vs. the superdome which was smack dab in the middle of the disaster
itself.
To say this another way no where near 100% of San Diego has gone up in flames.
New Orleans was a little more completely involved.
~~
They evacuated when asked?
On 10/25/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> EVERYONE is not getting that treatment.
> the masses arent.
>
> spotty, varied people are... but not the masses.
>
> why are the masses there so much better behaved?
>
> no rapings?
> no deaths?
> no violence of any sort?
>
Well, I'm not there, but my understanding is that the fires aren't
displacing major urban areas. Aren't they primarily displacing suburb
type places? Places where people have transportation and some
disposable income? That can go a long way.
On 10/25/07, Tony wrote:
> EVERYONE is not getting that
Not to mention lights and working bathrooms??
-Original Message-
From: Deanna Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:48 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: the dichotomy of disasters
Perhaps because they're being fed gourmet meals and provided with
EVERYONE is not getting that treatment.
the masses arent.
spotty, varied people are... but not the masses.
why are the masses there so much better behaved?
no rapings?
no deaths?
no violence of any sort?
no philanderers?
no breaking into stores?
hmmm...
On 10/25/07, Deanna Schneider <[EMAIL PR
Perhaps because they're being fed gourmet meals and provided with free
massages while they're in the football stadium?
On 10/25/07, Tony wrote:
> so.
>
> why is it that the displaced san diegans are so much better behaved
> than the displaced new orleaners?
>
> hmmm
>
>
~
Because San Diego has a better football team???
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 8:14 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: the dichotomy of disasters
so.
why is it that the displaced san diegans are so much better behaved
than the
Just hypothesizing here but...
1) they were MUCH more prepared, because of recent fires and improvements
SINCE Katrina
2) they are much more affluent, and have much better means to see to their
comfort and safety
3) the shelters where they are staying are actually out of the disaster
area, vs. the
so.
why is it that the displaced san diegans are so much better behaved
than the displaced new orleaners?
hmmm
--
'Never have anything in your life that you can't walk out on in thirty
seconds flat, if you spot the heat coming around the corner'
robert deniro - heat (1995)
~~~
26 matches
Mail list logo
