> I need to provide a big client with the practical limits of
> ColdFusion 5 running on a Windows 2000 server. The clients
> wants to know that the server and the associated MS SQL
> Server can handle 2000 simultaneous transactions. Are there
> any published stats that would help? Would I ne
esday, November 19, 2002 3:48 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: ColdFusion practical limits
>> I have a small content management system built with CF5 on a single Win
>> 2K server. I load tested it with over 200,000 hits per hour. Normal
>> load for the app isn't
> S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
>> Yea, that's a rediculous scenario...
>>
>> "I have a toothpick and some chewing gum. I'd like you to build the
>> Hoover
>> dam. Can you guarantee that it will support the weight of 15
>> million gallons
>> of water? ... No we don't have a budget for high-school physics
t: RE: ColdFusion practical limits
> I have a small content management system built with CF5 on a single Win
> 2K server. I load tested it with over 200,000 hits per hour. Normal
> load for the app isn't more than a few hundred hits on the busiest of
> days.
> This is not comparab
> I have a small content management system built with CF5 on a single Win
> 2K server. I load tested it with over 200,000 hits per hour. Normal
> load for the app isn't more than a few hundred hits on the busiest of
> days.
> This is not comparable to most sites--it uses a lot of caching which
>
> > Drop the typical page time to 50ms (easier said than
> > done), and you've got a lot more "simultaneous" connections.
>
> I've always used the term simultaneous in this context to
> mean executing at the same time, not executing within the
> same second or, as Dave suggested, pooled but n
> Drop the typical page time to 50ms (easier said than done),
> and you've got a lot more "simultaneous" connections.
I've always used the term simultaneous in this context to mean executing
at the same time, not executing within the same second or, as Dave
suggested, pooled but not currently ex
S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
> Yea, that's a rediculous scenario...
>
> "I have a toothpick and some chewing gum. I'd like you to build the Hoover
> dam. Can you guarantee that it will support the weight of 15
> million gallons
> of water? ... No we don't have a budget for high-school physics
> text-book
webappermb
Web Application Specialists
-Original Message-
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion practical limits
I tried to tell them that 2000 simultaneous queries was a ridiculous number
to consider
> > 2000 simultaneous transactions
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but it used to be that
> Allaire recommended (as a general rule) limiting the
> simultaneous transactions to 4 x the number of CPUs.
> Of course, that goes back to ColdFusion 4 and early
> Pentium IIs, and there were lots of ot
nal Message-
> From: Benjamin S. Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 2:17 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: ColdFusion practical limits
>
>
> > 2000 simultaneous transactions
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but it use
tested against during
system testing.
Good luck.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ColdFusion practical limits
I need to provide a big client with the practical limits of ColdFusion 5
runni
I would hope its death would be quick and painless -- the likely alternative
would have been a long and torturous death.
> I had a client that wanted to support 1 million+ existing subscribers
> using a single CF server, attached to an Access db and a Btrieve Db,
> served through a 56K line.
> No
isn't possible in more dynamic apps--but I still like these results.
BTW, it uses an MS Access back end. :)
Sam
> -Original Message-
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:12 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: ColdFusion practical
Message-
From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ColdFusion practical limits
I need to provide a big client with the practical limits of ColdFusion 5
running on a Windows 2000 server. The clients
wants to know that the se
://www.pubcrawler.com
412-292-3135
[finding the future in the past, passing the future in the present]
[connecting people, places and things]
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Houwing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 20:00:06 +0100
Subject: Re: ColdFusion practical limits
> > If by &
;>for failover etc.
>>
>>that's really a shitload of *simultaneous* hits.
>>
>>..tony
>>
>>Tony Weeg
>>Senior Web Developer
>>Information System Design
>>Navtrak, Inc.
>>Fleet Management Solutions
>>www.navtrak.n
ltaneous* hits.
>
>..tony
>
>Tony Weeg
>Senior Web Developer
>Information System Design
>Navtrak, Inc.
>Fleet Management Solutions
>www.navtrak.net
>410.548.2337
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday,
ber 19, 2002 1:42 PM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion practical limits
> another thing to think about is 2000 simultaneous users, is about the
> same
> traffic that yahoo gets. wouldn't you say? simultaneous means, exact
> click at the
> exact same moment, to the exact same res
Answers embedded below...
- Original Message -
From: "Gaulin, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:38 PM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion practical limits
> Hi Howie
> If by "simultaneous transac
> If by "simultaneous transactions" you truly mean concurrent hits, then 2000
> is a pretty big number. If you mean "concurrent users" then things relax
> quite a bit, since a user is making requests (page hits) at a pretty slow
> rate.
Just as an example, we had a NT4 IIS static site running with
multaneous* hits.
>
>..tony
>
>Tony Weeg
>Senior Web Developer
>Information System Design
>Navtrak, Inc.
>Fleet Management Solutions
>www.navtrak.net
>410.548.2337
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, Novemb
0.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion practical limits
Definitely Load Test and / or Stress Test.
Load Testing simulates real world use. Stress Testing bangs the
server
a
e Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: ColdFusion practical limits
I need to provide a big client with the practical limits of ColdFusion 5
running on a Windows 2000 server. The clients
wants to know that the server and the associated MS S
Thanks - sage advice...
Regards,
Howie
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffry Houser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: ColdFusion practical limits
> Definitely Load Test and
The whitepaper also includes CF5 statistics so this should be a very good start.
Thanks for the info!
Regards,
Howie
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:24 PM
Subject: RE: ColdF
Definitely Load Test and / or Stress Test.
Load Testing simulates real world use. Stress Testing bangs the server
all at once.
You can load test with the free Microsoft Tool. I believe it is called
Web Application Stress Tool.
I like to use Web Performance Trainer ( www.webperformancei
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 1:12 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: ColdFusion practical limits
>
>
> I need to provide a big client with the practical limits of
> ColdFusion 5 running on a Windows 2000 server. The clients
> wants to know that the server and the as
I need to provide a big client with the practical limits of ColdFusion 5 running on a
Windows 2000 server. The clients
wants to know that the server and the associated MS SQL Server can handle 2000
simultaneous transactions. Are there any
published stats that would help? Would I need to lod ba
29 matches
Mail list logo
