Ok, here are my final words to the original poster.
>From a web application server perspective, performance is irrelevant. Do
not look at performance as a major (or even minor) determining factor in
what to pick.
Instead, look at scalability. Find out how scalable each of the
technologies are.
> I'm new to this list but have always been a fan of CF's
> elegance and power for years. I am a manager in dev shop
> and the classic argument arises when CF comes up: can CF
> perform on par with jsp? Php? Asp? .net?
Yes, yes, yes, it can perform "on par" with all of the above. Whatever that
> > Wherever there were perfomance issues they always related
> > back to bad coding or dodgy infrastructure.
>
> Not always true. CFHTTP, the dodgy locking in 4.0, CFFILE
> all were tags that, even if you coded properly, liked to die.
> Did I mention CFHTTP?
You neglected CFOBJECT/COM, which
> He was asking for performance. And those technologies are
> mostly slow. Write an ecommerce site in assembly. It'll
> probably scream. But it'll take forever to write, and
> writing scalability features into it will be a major
> undertaking.
Unless you're also going to write all your other co
ED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:37 AM
Subject: RE: Good Ol' Cold Fusion Performance Question
> > He was asking for performance. And those technologies are mostly slow.
> > Write an ecommerce site in assembly.
>
> He was a
t your viewpoint.
-Cameron
-
Cameron Childress
Sumo Consulting Inc.
---
cell: 678-637-5072
aim: cameroncf
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Kwang Suh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:07 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subje
> Um, wow -- fast and slow at what? Development? Compilation? Execution?
> Performance under load? Math calculations? etc etc?
>
> CFMX, JSP compile to java byte code and get executed by a JVM.
> PHP, ASP compiles to pseudocode and is run by a C++ interpreter.
> ASP.NET is compiled to .NET byte
- Original Message -
From: "Kwang Suh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: Good Ol' Cold Fusion Performance Question
> JSP: Slow
> CFMX: Slow
> PHP: Fast
> ASP: Very S
ouch!
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 11:25 PM
Subject: RE: Good Ol' Cold Fusion Performance Question
> Thanks for the insight. This is really helpful
Message-
From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Good Ol' Cold Fusion Performance Question
Rich this is a question that has been aired in various forms many times.
I can give you my experience having used CF seriously since
> Wherever there were perfomance issues they always related back to bad
coding or dodgy infrastructure.
Not always true. CFHTTP, the dodgy locking in 4.0, CFFILE all were tags
that, even if you coded properly, liked to die. Did I mention CFHTTP?
~~~
users, it still takes 100ms. Other technologies (cough
classic ASP, PHP cough) fall flat and die at such high volumes.
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 6:14 PM
Subject:
Rich this is a question that has been aired in various forms many times. I can give
you my experience having used CF seriously since version 1.54 and having worked for
Allaire and MM as a field based Consultant (read Troubleshooter). My view is very
much from a CF angle.
>From a coding standp
Hello all:
I'm new to this list but have always been a fan of CF's elegance and
power for years. I am a manager in dev shop and the classic argument
arises when CF comes up: can CF perform on par with jsp? Php? Asp? .net?
Is there anything out there in terms of a comparative study of some sort
14 matches
Mail list logo
