Yes... as are server vars.
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Sebastian Powell [mailto:bas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 6:10 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Coldfusion Standard and Load balancing env
Thanks great
ox and setup a
> load balancing environment for the site. Here are my questions:
>
> * Is Coldfusion Standard sufficient for this environment or will i
> require enterprise?
> * If so would anyone know of any good information sources in relation
> to configuring coldfusion
As Dave notes, hardware load balancing works just fine in front of CF
Std servers. The sticky session thing really is key, though, if you
have any sort of session management in your applications. Another
option to sticky sessions on the LB is to convert session structs to
client structs
> We currently run coldfusion 9 Standard on a single server, our site has grown
> and we are looking at adding an additional box and setup a load
> balancing environment for the site. Here are my questions:
>
> * Is Coldfusion Standard sufficient for this environment or
Hi,
We currently run coldfusion 9 Standard on a single server, our site has grown
and we are looking at adding an additional box and setup a load balancing
environment for the site. Here are my questions:
* Is Coldfusion Standard sufficient for this environment or will i require
enterprise
Have had good luck with hardware load balancing from Coyote Point. We used
client vars so that sessions weren't lost even when users were moved across
4-5 servers, but cookies should provide you the same behavior. Works
especially well if you've got your uploaded files in a sin
Thank you!
This is very helpful!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: WebSite CFTalk [mailto:cft...@website.no]
Sent: December-10-09 11:53 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: Load-balancing servers
Maybe something like:
- Hardware load balancer in front of web/app servers, or NLB load balancing
ticky sessions there :(
~Brad
Original Message ----
Subject: Load-balancing servers
From: "Rick Sanders"
Date: Thu, December 10, 2009 8:59 am
To: cf-talk
I have 2 Cold Fusion Enterprise servers. What I would like to do is
balance
the load between 2 machines, and maybe more in t
so I don't forsee an issue
with speed or bandwidth. The only thing the cf server does is serve the
website. Database, email, and load-balancing servers are all separate
machines.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Mark Kruger [mailto:mkru...@cfwebtools.com]
Sent: December-10-09 12:05 PM
To:
Thanks Shannon but I'm running on Windows Server.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Shannon Peevey [mailto:spee...@stolaf.edu]
Sent: December-10-09 12:26 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: Load-balancing servers
Here is a couple of Clustering FAQs that I wrote back in 2007, which may
have
, WebSite CFTalk wrote:
>
> Maybe something like:
>
> - Hardware load balancer in front of web/app servers, or NLB load balancing
> between web/app servers (Windows)
> - Instead of UNC path to shared folders synchronize web folders/content
> folders using DFS Replication (Wind
M, WebSite CFTalk wrote:
>
> Maybe something like:
>
> - Hardware load balancer in front of web/app servers, or NLB load balancing
> between web/app servers (Windows)
> - Instead of UNC path to shared folders synchronize web folders/content
> folders using DFS Replication
Rick,
The questions to ask are - what are you doing with session variabls and
client variables, and .. What are the capabilities of your chosen load
balancing method. Remember that the potential here is for a user to bounce
back and forth between your servers while surfing your site - so you
Maybe something like:
- Hardware load balancer in front of web/app servers, or NLB load balancing
between web/app servers (Windows)
- Instead of UNC path to shared folders synchronize web folders/content folders
using DFS Replication (Windows 2003 R2 - Windows 2008)
- If windows 2008, IIS 7.5
I have 2 Cold Fusion Enterprise servers. What I would like to do is balance
the load between 2 machines, and maybe more in the future. I have a very
large and demanding portal app that is going live soon. I've looked over the
documentation and it doesn't seem to cover much about it. Can anyone off
Sounds like your load balancing isn't set up to allow multipart posts, or
maybe there's a size limit - try uploading something like a 3-byte text
file, just for kicks, and submit a multipart form with no attachment to see
which it is.
Either way, your load balancing setup sounds
We always used a shared network directory when saving uploads when using
load balancing, not sure if that would make any difference or not,
though. It was always the rule of thumb
Thanks!
Robert Bailey
210.748.2363
Richard Steele wrote:
> We are getting an HTTP 503 Upload Error when us
We are getting an HTTP 503 Upload Error when using cffile and uploading
multiple files from one computer and load balancing. Without load balancing
it's not a problem. What might be going on here?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusi
We are looking to move a CF5 10 server farm running on NT 4.0 to W2K3 and CF8.
We currently have CF5 ent and use Bright Tiger exclusively. It works fine but
there is no upgrade path obviously.
I would like to use Foundry LB switches but was hoping that CF8 standard would
suffice because of th
AJ Mercer wrote:
> When it comes to connecting to the JRun (CF) cluster, does IIS work
> differently than Apache?
Not significantly. They both depend on a library that gets plugged in to
the server, they both bootstrap etc.
> For what we have been experiencing (IIS [separate server] | CF702/JRu
Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:28 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: load balancing / failover
>
> Just to clarify Russ,
>
> You still have a (JRun) cluster,
> even though you are connecting directly to a CF instance?
>
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Russ <[EMAIL P
dify the Apache connector a bit to make this work. I basically
> added a new config command which restricts which instances it's allowed to
> connect to.
>
> Russ
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: AJ Mercer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wed
ED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:58 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: load balancing / failover
>
> So if money was not object, what would be the perfect set up for a
> ColdFusion Environment?
>
>
> Do other vendor's provide a better J2EE server that has
p
> > that warrants having multiple physical servers and a hardware load
> > balancer". Even LVS would not only require him to use Linux, but have
> > an additional physical server to control the load balancing.
> >
> Sorry I wasn't following the thread closely. Ha
ire him to use Linux, but have
> an additional physical server to control the load balancing.
>
Sorry I wasn't following the thread closely. Having two instances on the
same server won't provide a huge amount of redundancy, but if he wants to
run everything on the same server, there&
cal servers and a hardware load
balancer". Even LVS would not only require him to use Linux, but have
an additional physical server to control the load balancing.
~Brad
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most
Russ wrote:
>>> Basically I'd like to have two IIS servers each using a separate CF
>>> instance, and have a software load balancer distribute the requests to each
>>> (maintaining sticky sessions), and if one instance stops responding (due to
>>> failure or high load), force requests onto the avai
>
> > Basically I'd like to have two IIS servers each using a separate CF
> > instance, and have a software load balancer distribute the requests to
> each
> > (maintaining sticky sessions), and if one instance stops responding (due
> to
> > failure or high load), force requests onto the available
Rick Root wrote:
> I've determined that Coldfusion clusters suck.
ColdFusion clusters don't exists. You mean a JRun cluster?
> If one instance in a cluster freezes, other people still get referenced to
> that instance and get no response. CF clustering provides no real
> "failover" from one ins
~Brad
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: load balancing / failover
I've determined that Coldfusion clusters suck. They're just DUMB.
If one instance in a cluster freezes, other people still ge
an
the web connector and hooked IIS to the myCluster object instead of
instance1.
I have had the failover work great for me in a CF cluster.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:22 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: load balancing / failo
Actually, I think what your seeing here is not that the clustering is
breaking, but rather that the JRun/IIS connector piece is dying. I'm
running clusters in all of my shared environments and experience this
very infrequently. All of them are Win2k3 RC2 (though they were
previously Win2k).
this?
I don't have a setup that warrants having multiple physical servers and a
hardware load balancer so I'm wondering if there are any decent software
load balancing solutions that will provide more reliability than CF
clustering does.
Basically I'd like to have two IIS server
George Lu wrote:
> Thank you Jochem! It's a good template.
>
> I'm not quite sure about the sticky sessions and replicate sessions. Do I
> really need to these?
That follows from your code and business requirements. If you use
session variables, you need something to make sure that those variabl
erver configuration and created a cluster
> and
> > added two instances on the same physical box. Then I've used
> wsconfig.exe to
> > connect the cluster to IIS and remove 'cfusion' from IIS (with help from
> > MrBuzzy).
> >
> > Now I can consider the
;
> Now I can consider the cluster is successfully installed. However, how can I
> test the load balancing and failover?
I typically start with the following template:
#createObject("java", "jrunx.kernel.JRun").getServerName()#
#createObject("java", "
TECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > > > I've installed CF8 using multiserver configuration and created a
> > cluster
> > > > and
> > > > > added two instances on the same physical box. Then I've used
> > > > wsconfig.exe to
> wsconfig.exe to
> > > connect the cluster to IIS and remove 'cfusion' from IIS (with help
> > from
> > > MrBuzzy).
> > >
> > > Now I can consider the cluster is successfully installed. However, how
> > can I
> > > te
t; from
> > MrBuzzy).
> >
> > Now I can consider the cluster is successfully installed. However, how
> can I
> > test the load balancing and failover? If I run CF Admin on one of the
> > instances, how can I add server
ded two instances on the same physical box. Then I've used wsconfig.exe to
> connect the cluster to IIS and remove 'cfusion' from IIS (with help from
> MrBuzzy).
>
> Now I can consider the cluster is successfully installed. However, how can I
> test the load balancin
ccessfully installed. However, how can I
test the load balancing and failover? If I run CF Admin on one of the
instances, how can I add servers (server name? port?) in Multiserver
Monitor?
Can someone please help?
George
~|
:
>
>How are you referencing the images in the HTML behind the PDF? For
>speed reasons you should be pulling them from the disk like src="file:///C:\tmp\whatever.jpg">. In that case there shouldn't be
>an
ou referencing the images in the HTML behind the PDF? For
speed reasons you should be pulling them from the disk like . In that case there shouldn't be
any issues with load balancing.
-Ryan
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 sof
We recently updated our infrastructure to include HW loadbalacing and a linux
based firewall. With this new change, came a basket full of issues. One issue
that is most pressing, is when attempting to create a pdf via cfdocument that
has images with in the pdf, cfdocument times out every time. I
> Sticky sessions?
Yes. J2EE sessions are enabled. It's been working well for the past year or
so.
> How about CSS and Javascript? Anyplace where we can see the HTML?
There's one block of inline CSS, and no javascript. It seems to mostly be the
images tanking this. I'm looking to get perm
Matthew Williams wrote:
> The situation stands as such. I have an application hosted in my environment
> that uses the cfdocument tag. Our servers are clustered at the JRun level.
Sticky sessions?
> We also have a hardware load balancer in front of the servers. When calling
> the page conta
The situation stands as such. I have an application hosted in my environment
that uses the cfdocument tag. Our servers are clustered at the JRun level. We
also have a hardware load balancer in front of the servers. When calling the
page containing the cfdocument through the load balanced URL
On 10/24/07, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > a previous job, we used a product called "Coherence" from tangosol
> > (now owned by Oracle) (see
> > http://www.tangosol.com/coherence-overview.jsp). the coherence box
> > acts as a dedica
On Tuesday 23 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> a previous job, we used a product called "Coherence" from tangosol
> (now owned by Oracle) (see
> http://www.tangosol.com/coherence-overview.jsp). the coherence box
> acts as a dedicated session variable repository in the cluster...
Err, but the
Charlie,
We use JRun clustering at my day job. We currently have several
clusters in place. One handles public access requests. It consists of
4 machines, about 60 applications, and handles between 80-100k
ColdFusion template hits daily. This has been in place for about a year
now and has
;
> > Hey all...
> >
> > up front, i'm not a server guy. just a code monkey :)
> >
> > with that disclaimer out of the way... got a question about load
> > balancing and failover of cf servers.
> >
> > as i understand it...
> >
> > ther
er <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey all...
>
> up front, i'm not a server guy. just a code monkey :)
>
> with that disclaimer out of the way... got a question about load
> balancing and failover of cf servers.
>
> as i understand it...
>
> there is the
> we haven't moved to CF8 yet (still on CF7), but I had heard that
> CF8 would actually have this functionality built in (the
> ability to use sessions in a clustered environment). quick
> googling tho seemed to indicate that this was an "expensive"
> process and not necessarily recommended (?
Hey all...
up front, i'm not a server guy. just a code monkey :)
with that disclaimer out of the way... got a question about load
balancing and failover of cf servers.
as i understand it...
there is the concept of "sticky sessions", where all requests by a
particular us
--Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: load balancing/failover and CF
Hey all...
up front, i'm not a server guy. just a code monkey :)
with that disclaimer out of the way... got a question about loa
-Talk
Subject: installing CF Enterprise, Load Balancing Etc...
Well, my work is taking a big leap with our servers. We are going to
transition from Linux back to Windows. Linux was working well for us,
but unfortunately most of us at this shop are much more comfortable with
Windows administration
r this to get into a future
build of CF).
Matthew Williams
Geodesic GraFX
www.geodesicgrafx.com/blog
Quoting Brad Wood :
> Thank you VERY much for the information. This is exactly the kind
of
> wisdom I was hoping to extract.
>
> Matthew, tell me-- what type of load balancing do you us
Thank you VERY much for the information. This is exactly the kind of
wisdom I was hoping to extract.
Matthew, tell me-- what type of load balancing do you use for your
clusters?
~Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07
rials, step by step installs instructions, how to's) on
> the subject of installing enterprise and configuring session sharing
> across clusters etc. which was my original request... Does this stuff
> not exist?
>
> *sigh*
>
> ~Brad
>
> -Original Message
ch was my original request... Does this stuff
not exist?
*sigh*
~Brad
-Original Message-
From: Eric Haskins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 10:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: installing CF Enterprise, Load Balancing Etc...
Brad,
Most Hardware balancers h
On Wednesday 07 Mar 2007, Brad Wood wrote:
> > All well and good, but he's then set it up like it was a hobby, not a
> The names of our Linux servers are things like "Sabaoth" and "Cyberdemon",
> none of which match our naming standards. And they actually sport such
> user accounts such as "goatsu
Brad,
Most Hardware balancers have options to allow the server to drain users
on it by not allowing new sessions. Yes it will kick users on the server you
are taking out of service if you do not allow it to drain. I can see how
many sessions are active on each server in the farms.
When we wer
> All well and good, but he's then set it up like it was a hobby, not a
> proper prodcution system.
LOL. That is so true.
The names of our Linux servers are things like "Sabaoth" and "Cyberdemon", none
of which match our naming standards. And they actually sport such user
accounts such as
their
session/client information follow them or were they required to log in again
and start over?
~Brad
-Original Message-
From: Eric Haskins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 8:30 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: installing CF Enterprise, Load Balancing Etc...
We had
some more in-depth explanations.
Thanks!
~Brad
Clustering requires software. Load balancing is better done with hardware than
software, and you should be able to pull a server from active duty by
preventing new connections at the hardware device.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://ww
On Wednesday 07 Mar 2007, Brad Wood wrote:
> good answers to them. My point is, due the collective lack of Linux at MY
> particular business we have actually created MORE maintenance headaches and
> cost ourselves MORE money then if we had stuck with Windows in the first
Sounds like the classic p
WSD's and love them we can set Client table timeouts down
to the second and it routes basd on anything you need it too
JSESSIONID,CFID/CFTOKEN
Load balancing has come along way.
As for the Linux debate we currently use it mostly on our frontend
servers(web) but we are swapping out JRun boxe
during the day seamlessly. The last two least
> are not possible with hardware only from my understanding.
Clustering requires software. Load balancing is better done with hardware
than software, and you should be able to pull a server from active duty by
preventing new connections at the hardware d
last two least are
not possible with hardware only from my understanding.
~Brad
>Yeah I'll have to agree with Eric,
>
>I've not worked with the load balancing before, but after many a discussion
>with some higher level devs and plenty of ISP's I think the general opi
I appreciate the advice Jordan, but at this point it would be even more counter
productive to hire additional people. This business has traditionally been a
windows shop. We run several CF sites, all of them are on Windows with the
exceptions of this one which we moved to Linux a couple years
>OUCH kinda sounds like a step backwards on a couple levels. Of course I am
>partial to linux on a performance level but the step back from Hardware to
>software loadbalancing I just do not understand.
>
>~Eric
Well, there are a couple reasons why we want to try to use a software
Brad Wood wrote:
> Well, my work is taking a big leap with our servers. We are going to
> transition from Linux back to Windows. Linux was working well for us,
> but unfortunately most of us at this shop are much more comfortable with
> Windows administration and the maintenance was getting compl
dev, test, and production environments.
I guess if you have to install a new version of CF, it's not as big a deal
to switch OSs, but it's one more thing that you'll have to test.
> Not only that, we hope to drop our hardware load balancing
> solution in favor of a software load ba
Yeah I'll have to agree with Eric,
I've not worked with the load balancing before, but after many a discussion
with some higher level devs and plenty of ISP's I think the general opinion
is that software load balancing isn't really very good, I know when talking
about up scal
OUCH kinda sounds like a step backwards on a couple levels. Of course I am
partial to linux on a performance level but the step back from Hardware to
software loadbalancing I just do not understand.
~Eric
~|
ColdFusion MX7 by Ad
, we are ALSO upgrading to CF Enterprise on all our dev,
test, and production environments.
Not only that, we hope to drop our hardware load balancing solution in
favor of a software load balanced cluster with our 5 production servers
including session sharing and all that good stuff. Oh, and we
Dave Watts wrote:
>
> If both cluster instances are on the same physical machine, and both
> instances will be connected with a single virtual web server, you don't need
> to copy your CFM files. You don't even need to go through creating and
> deploying an EAR file at all; it's just a simple way
> Well, the JRun web server is running, but there doesn't seem
> to be any way to change its web root. (I'm looking at it
> from the JRun Administrator).
http://www.adobe.com/support/coldfusion/adv_development/config_builtin_webse
rver/
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com
Dave Watts wrote:
>
> Honestly, I don't know. Are the files in that directory compiled classes? Is
> the JRun web server enabled for the second instance? If it is, and you
> change the web root directory for that web server to e:\inetpub\ads\, that
> might fix your problem even though you're not u
> I ended up going the route of the EAR file anyway, and
> although the requests are coming in through IIS, coldfusion
> seems to be grabbing the files out of the
> C:\jrun4\servers\ads1_1\ads1.ear\ads1.war directory
>
> The OTHER instance properly looks at the files in E:\Inetpub\ads\
>
> Can
Dave Watts wrote:
>
> If both cluster instances are on the same physical machine, and both
> instances will be connected with a single virtual web server, you don't need
> to copy your CFM files. You don't even need to go through creating and
> deploying an EAR file at all; it's just a simple way
> I'm looking at the clustering instructions on this page in livedocs:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/ymfybu
>
> We're looking at doing this for failover/redundancy of the
> coldfusion instances.. they'll reside on the same physical server.
>
> Step 5 says that I'm supposed to include my applications C
I'm looking at the clustering instructions on this page in livedocs:
http://tinyurl.com/ymfybu
We're looking at doing this for failover/redundancy of the coldfusion
instances.. they'll reside on the same physical server.
Step 5 says that I'm supposed to include my applications CFM files in
the
Dave,
Do you mean when using NLBS (the windows clustering solution)? I was under
the impression that it could not do this.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Dave Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 6:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cflogin and load balancing
Win2k3 will do sticky sessions when clustered using NLB
-Dave
>A hardware load balancer that provides for sticky sessions will work,
>if you can afford it.
>
>On 3/23/06, wolf2k5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>--
>CFAJAX docs and other useful articles:
>http://jr-holmes.coldfusionjournal.com/
~~~
Just to complete this thread, since it's been linked to by several folks:
One customer in particular had issues ad we walked them through their code
issues. In particular, the following problems were found that prevented
CFLOGIN working in a clustered environment:
- There are nested cflogin ta
nope and nope.
I've setup JAAS in JRun, seems to work fine. In fact I setup a
serverwide SSO solution using JAAS where CF can interface with it
simply.
DK
On 3/28/06, Andy Allan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't cflogin already based on JAAS? The CF (or indeed JRun)
> implementation just happe
Isn't cflogin already based on JAAS? The CF (or indeed JRun)
implementation just happens to be botched?
Andy
On 28/03/06, Douglas Knudsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been wondering why the CF team has not switched over to using
> J2EE security. A rewrite of cflogin code that can use JAAS w
I've been wondering why the CF team has not switched over to using
J2EE security. A rewrite of cflogin code that can use JAAS would be
just swell and allow integration with non CF J2EE products without
messing with web.xml files and such, eh?
DK
On 3/27/06, wolf2k5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On 3/26/06, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't work that way. Since your CFLOGINUSER call is inside a CFLOGIN
> call, that CFLOGIN call *won't* run when the second server sees your
> authentication cookie because CFLOGIN only runs when you are *not*
> authenticated.
Actually,
On 3/26/06, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And one more thing... SSL really doesn't matter because you're not going to
> use it everywhere on your site, only in some places, so everywhere else that
> doesn't use SSL is still exposed.
The whole application will use HTTPS.
Regards.
~~
usion Developers at
ProductivityEnhancement.com
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: cflogin and load balancing
Adam Churvis wrote:
> It doesn't work that way. Since your CFLOGINUSER call is inside a CFLOG
Adam Churvis wrote:
> It doesn't work that way. Since your CFLOGINUSER call is inside a CFLOGIN
> call, that CFLOGIN call *won't* run when the second server sees your
> authentication cookie because CFLOGIN only runs when you are *not*
> authenticated.
So what you do is assign one standard rol
ement.com
- Original Message -
From: Adam Churvis
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: cflogin and load balancing
And one more thing... SSL really doesn't matter because you're not going to
use it everywhere on your site, only in some pla
r
BlueDragon Alliance Founding Committee
Get advanced intensive Master-level training in
C# & ASP.NET 2.0 for ColdFusion Developers at
ProductivityEnhancement.com
- Original Message -
From: wolf2k5
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 5:02 AM
Subject: Re: cflogin and l
Subject: Re: cflogin and load balancing
On 3/24/06, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, *authorization* (not authentication) can't work across
multiple CF servers -- clustered or not -- because there's no mechanism for
specifying *roles* on an
On 3/24/06, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, *authorization* (not authentication) can't work across
> multiple CF servers -- clustered or not -- because there's no mechanism for
> specifying *roles* on any computer other than the one on which CFLOGINUSER
> was execu
training in
C# & ASP.NET for ColdFusion Developers at
ProductivityEnhancement.com
- Original Message -
From: wolf2k5
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: cflogin and load balancing
On 3/23/06, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/23/06, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ColdFusion Server is broken with respect to the CFLOGIN security framework
> working on a clustered system with failover. The reason is that the
> authentication cookie contains the authentication information but not any
> authorization (roles)
On 3/23/06, wolf2k5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I still wonder why the cflogin cookie includes the full login info
> (username/password base64 encoded), what does it need to then?
I stand corrected again!
I did further testing and the cflogin/cfloginuser code will
automatically login the use
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
