The issue mainly is that it's not always happening all the time. So it's
not
repeatable as far as I can tell.
If you have verified the code then check to see if the user in question is
running an internet security program of some kind. Many of the firewalls
they install prevent form
AAAa... There we go. That's the most logical answer (since I blocked
the error emails from that one user and when that specific error shows up
and it's been quiet).
I'll pass the word along and let him know. Thank you. :)
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 12:19 PM, UXB Internet
But the correct answer is to correct the enctype so this won't be an issue.
On 9/22/14, 12:21 PM, Phillip Vector wrote:
AAAa... There we go. That's the most logical answer (since I blocked
the error emails from that one user and when that specific error shows up
and it's been quiet).
Already corrected it and it's still doing it.
I'm willing to try anything at this point.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:16 PM, .jonah jonah@creori.com wrote:
But the correct answer is to correct the enctype so this won't be an issue.
On 9/22/14, 12:21 PM, Phillip Vector wrote:
AAAa...
Gotit. Apologies for not tracking the thread closely.
It might be interesting to log ALL the variables in the various scopes
when that happens and see what's coming through.
Good luck!
On 9/22/14, 1:25 PM, Phillip Vector wrote:
Already corrected it and it's still doing it.
I'm willing to
Are you posting the data via AJAX? There's a known issue w/IE9 and earlier
w/AJAX POST operations, where if the server's keep alive timeout is lower
than 60 seconds, it can cause IE problems and what you get is a request
that doesn't post the data back to the server.
-Dan
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014
No. Just a straight form. No AJAX.
I THINK I traced it down to a bug in Railo in that it needs write access to
the Web-Inf directory. But we will see if the issue is solved or not later.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Dan G. Switzer, II dswit...@pengoworks.com
wrote:
Are you posting the
I don't know if this is a CFML issue or what... But perhaps someone has run
across this and can offer a hand...
form action=#myself#Login.CheckLogin method=post
enctype=multipart/form-data
input type=text name=username
input type=Password
It was just a copy over from an old form. The old login page was a combo
login/create account that had a picture upload as part of the creation
process.
I removed the enctype and I'm still getting the error.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
I don't know
ISTR fusebox apps by default always used FormURL2Attributes tag o convert
all the form and url scope to attributes scope.
obviously it has been many many years since I looked at fusebox, although
the thought of it still makes me ill :-) but perhaps this tag kills off the
original scope in certain
The issue mainly is that it's not always happening all the time. So it's
not repeatable as far as I can tell.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
ISTR fusebox apps by default always used FormURL2Attributes tag o convert
all the form and url scope to
ok a few couple of reasons I can think of.
you have an un-closed tag somewhere in the form, but it doesn't always get
rendered, maybe some conditional logic causes it to only display for some
people.
Some other conditional logic that causes the page to get redirected or
reloaded, thus without
Thanks for the tips. I'll see what I can find.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
ok a few couple of reasons I can think of.
you have an un-closed tag somewhere in the form, but it doesn't always get
rendered, maybe some conditional logic causes it
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Steve LaBadie wrote:
I am being asked to insert some type of header record to indicate the
message is coming from a local form that guarantees a person completed the
fields.
cfmailparam is your friend:
they shouldn't even need to do that.
they simply need to whitelist the web server which sends the form so it is
no spam filtered, and add it to your SPF record also.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Steve LaBadie slaba...@po-box.esu.eduwrote:
I have numerous forms on the website that are
The first thing that jumps out at me would be to have hidden form fields
in the form that contain the original values. Then, when you're
processing the form any value that doesn't match its corresponding
hidden value has been changed.
thanks,
eric cobb
ecar technologies, llc
Some of the answer depends on your overall architecture. The first step
would be to retrieve the relevant database record using the ID passed from
your form. That would give you, in some manner (a query record, a bean,
whatever) a representation of the existing data.
Then you could write a
After reading my answer, I realize the way I worded it may be
confusing. Here's an example.
On your form:
input type=hidden name=Val1_orig value=#val1#
input type=text name=Val1 value=#val1#
On your processing page.
cfif form.Val1 neq form.Val1_orig
!--- this element has been changed.
Yeah, your right, I see what Pete is after now. The easiest way is to use
cfform otherwise you need to use the ColdFusion JavaScript functions.
I misread and thought you wanted a form on the main page to submit to a
cfwindow.
On Jan 8, 2008 8:01 PM, Azadi Saryev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
iirc,
OK, followup to my own question.
The form that I am displaying with cfwindow has date fields. I always like
to give my users a date picker, and I generally use Mishoo's excellent DHTML
calendar -- http://www.dynarch.com/projects/calendar/ However, I was unable
to get this to work properly when
I'd like to add some quick comments.
a) my approach is done when this particular form action usually also have some
impact on the Main/Parent window hence justification of reloading this window,
otherwise, the cost of reloading the Main window does not seem to be necessary
unless not much
I'm not sure if I can understand your question. Is it something like this
cfif isdefined(FORM.Send2Pop)
-- pop up a small window...
cfwindow...
source=popMeUp.cfm/
/cfif
-- main window
cfwindow...
...
cfform action=#CGI.script_name# method=post
e1
e2...
input type=submit
Pete,
You mean something like this:
html
head
body
script type=text/javascript
function submitPoll() {
ColdFusion.navigate(pollEcho.cfm,pollResults,,,POST,pollForm);
ColdFusion.Window.show(pollResults);
}
/script
form name=pollForm id=pollForm
input type=text name=echoMe
input
iirc, where your form in a cfwindow submits to (that cfwindow or the
master page) depends on if you use form ... or cfform ...
hth
---
Azadi Saryev
Sabai-dee.com
http://www.sabai-dee.com
Pete Ruckelshaus wrote:
I would like to have a small form (normal HTML form) that is contained
within an
On 25/09/2007, Michael David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I admit it; I hate developing forms!
There's not one part of the process that I find even remotely
interesting, enlightening, or fulfilling.
Forms suck.
Now that I got that off of my chest, does anyone know of some
nifty-cool
: Monday, October 22, 2007 4:26 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: #$^% Forms!
On 25/09/2007, Michael David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I admit it; I hate developing forms!
There's not one part of the process that I find even remotely
interesting, enlightening, or fulfilling.
Forms suck.
Now that I
Chris I took a look at that - I think it would be relatively
straightforward to automate the generation of those snippets from a
database table introspection or in a CMS too.
Interesting stuff. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
Adobe Certified
Love to join your alpha but ironically I can't get my (uk) phone number past
your form validation :)
Well I can if I miss off a digit...
On 24/09/2007, jonese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
shamless plug
The CMS our company uses and is currently getting ready to release
open
source makes
Message-
From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 12:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: #$^% Forms!
Love to join your alpha but ironically I can't get my (uk) phone number past
your form validation :)
Well I can if I miss off a digit...
On 24/09/2007, jonese
Miss a digit, we don't care about the phone number. Originally we were going
to restrict it but decided not to later on and have been to busy (or lazy)
to fix the form.
erj
On 9/25/07, Wayne Putterill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Love to join your alpha but ironically I can't get my (uk) phone
have you checked out Flex?
On 9/24/07, Michael David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I admit it; I hate developing forms!
There's not one part of the process that I find even remotely
interesting, enlightening, or fulfilling.
Forms suck.
Now that I got that off of my chest, does anyone know
What aspect of developing the forms are you having an issue with?
William
-Original Message
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Date: Sep 24, 2007 12:46
-To: CF-Talkcf-talk@houseoffusion.com
-Subj: #$^%amp; Forms!
-
-Ok, I admit it; I hate developing forms!
-
-There's not one part of the process
I'm assuming he means just the overall monotony of developing forms, and I
must say, I totally agree.
On 9/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What aspect of developing the forms are you having an issue with?
William
-Original Message
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Date:
I'm assuming he means just the overall monotony of developing forms, and I
must say, I totally agree.
I think we can all agree to that, but if you're doing building CMS systems
there's no way out of it.
Don't think of it like forms. Think of it as User Interface Data Entry
Portal Programming
Transfer (http://www.transfer-orm.com/)?
Reactor (http://trac.reactorframework.com/reactor)?
objectBreeze (http://www.objectbreeze.com/)? :)
On 9/24/07, Michael David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I admit it; I hate developing forms!
There's not one part of the process that I find even
http://www.jotform.com
You end up with some extra crap (form names not what you want, extra
style info) but they're basically clean, and it's a lot easier to clean
out what little isn't right than to build from scratch.
I've given this to a couple of other developers, and gotten nothing but
Now that I got that off of my chest, does anyone know of
some nifty-cool program/guy in a dark room halfway around
the world/magic spell that would help with most of the
more mundane aspects of the process.
Our company specializes in web sites with CMS for the clients to manage
all their own
I personally LOVE working with forms. I understand the OP's frustrations
because I used to feel like that back when I tried to buid forms using PHP.
-Original Message-
From: Crow T. Robot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 3:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re
I was going to say something similar to Justin. I got to the point
where i was hating the drudgery of writing the forms. So i wrote a
little app that interrogates a database table and writes a form that
has an input field for every column in the table, making the
appropriate input type for teh
shamless plug
The CMS our company uses and is currently getting ready to release open
source makes building forms a bit more fun. It doesn't read the DB yet
(future will) but it does create the tables, columns and has built in
validation etc. You can even export a form and import it into
I wrote a form generator and submitted data handler into my ContentMonger
CMS years ago. Supports every form type, secure forms, handles data
encryption where desired etc. etc. Let the editors build and manage their
own forms, I say :-).
A year or so ago I put in hooks that let developers tie
LOL. I think the general strategy (which several other replies have alluded
to) is:
1. Hire a munchkin to code your boring forms
2. Spend all your new free time becoming the nifty-cool guy in the dark room
After an interval that's both long (what a huge undertaking!) and short (but
what a
paul gordon wrote:
paul gordon wrote:
I haven't done that, just tried the Flash form.
Hooray! I've actually got the field to display the number of the
person selected.
Is there a way of preserving the number and adding further numbers to
the same field?
Hi
paul gordon wrote:
I'm trying to implement your way of doing things, but can only get so far.
What would the _root.phonelist refer to in my code?
It is still only adding one mobile number, and I think this would be the
reason - sorry if I sound dumb!
Don't worry about it... I spent 3
Stephen, thanks for your time and patience with me, this now works!
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
client
This is fairly easy using Flash forms in CFMX 7, is this what you are using
or is it normal HTML forms?
Regards
Mark Drew
On 14/09/05, MrG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit of a CF newbie, and need a bit of help on something I'm sure is
easy to do.
I have created a form
This is fairly easy using Flash forms in CFMX 7, is this what you are using
or is it normal HTML forms?
Regards
Mark Drew
On 14/09/05, MrG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing it in a standard HTML form. Would using Flash Forms be better?
Using flash forms is pretty easy, will come back with a sample for you in a
few minutes :)
MD
On 14/09/05, paul gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is fairly easy using Flash forms in CFMX 7, is this what you are
using
or is it normal HTML forms?
Regards
Mark Drew
On 14/09/05,
Here is what I come up with.
cfquery name=getArtists datasource=cfartgallery
SELECT *
FROM ARTISTS
/cfquery
cfform method=get preloader=no format=flash skin=haloblue
cfselect name=fartists query=getArtists display=FIRSTNAME
value=PHONE
/cfselect
cfinput type=text name=fNumber readonly=true
I have to say that doing things with Flash forms being easy is a
relative term.
The functionality that is required in this instance is _not_ a simple
field bind.
To do this with Javascript would probably be just as easy, if not easier.
script language=javascript
function addnumber(thisOption) {
Thanks Mark, it works a treat!
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
client with Logware today. Try it for free
Here is what I come up with.
cfquery name=getArtists datasource=cfartgallery
SELECT *
FROM ARTISTS
/cfquery
cfform method=get preloader=no format=flash skin=haloblue
cfselect name=fartists query=getArtists display=FIRSTNAME
value=PHONE
/cfselect
cfinput type=text name=fNumber readonly=true
I've actually started having difficulties with the Flash form now - when the
page loads in the browser, it doesn't actually get anywhere, it just loads
constantly, or until the page times out.
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new
paul gordon wrote:
I've actually started having difficulties with the Flash form now - when the
page loads in the browser, it doesn't actually get anywhere, it just loads
constantly, or until the page times out.
If you put my javascript on the flash form that won't work. The
javascript is
paul gordon wrote:
I've actually started having difficulties with the Flash form now -
when the page loads in the browser, it doesn't actually get anywhere,
it just loads constantly, or until the page times out.
If you put my javascript on the flash form that won't work. The
paul gordon wrote:
I haven't done that, just tried the Flash form.
Hooray! I've actually got the field to display the number of the person
selected.
Is there a way of preserving the number and adding further numbers to the same
field?
paul gordon wrote:
paul gordon wrote:
I haven't done that, just tried the Flash form.
Hooray! I've actually got the field to display the number of the person
selected.
Is there a way of preserving the number and adding further numbers to the same
field?
cfsavecontent
Make sure that the /cfide directory is properly mapped in Apache or IIS
(or whatever webserver you are using).
If not it can't find the JS files that CFFORM uses and throws a JS error.
J.J.
Claremont, Timothy wrote:
Using CF7, I have a data entry form (regular form, not flash).
I have a
Couple other ideas:
1) make your page one large form, with field names like
caption#imageId#, and then process them all when you submit. Going
this route, I'd still probably page the gallery into batches of ten or
so, just to make it more managable.
2) keep the per-image forms, but use JS
SiteObjects actually... soXML and soEditor were a couple of their
products... Not to be nit-picky, just that SmartObjects actually
happens to be the name of another CF something that's completely
unrelated...
http://www.siteobjects.com
http://cfdj.sys-con.com/read/41953.htm
Isaac,
Actually I have a buddy who works everyday on a large extranet that was
built using SmartObjects. So I am familiar with it.
I thought it had disappeared completely, but he tells me that it's now a
project on Sourceforge. But I just checked and it's now in the process of
moving to
Connie,
Slight correction, the SO_XML tag was by SiteObjects not SmartObjects.
Same company as the SO_Editor. The tag was written by Brett Suwyn who was
both a presenter and a member of our user group at the time..
Rick Mason
Mid-Michigan CFUG
www.ColdFusion.org http://www.ColdFusion.org
see if you can make the action= point to the full url
like http://www.yourdomain.com/formpost.cfm
instead of
formpost.cfm
see if that works.
tw
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:15:05 -0500, Matthew Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
What's the deal with an HTML email
Hi guys,
What's the deal with an HTML email containing
a form? The form,
which works great in a web page, does not work when sent
in an HTML email
and is being viewed in an email client. I'm using Outlook
2003. Is this a
security measure of Outlook or is this a
What's the deal with an HTML email containing a
form? The form, which works great in a web page, does not
work when sent in an HTML email and is being viewed in an
email client. I'm using Outlook 2003. Is this a security
measure of Outlook or is this a standard across the
Subject: RE: Forms in Email
What's the deal with an HTML email containing a
form? The form, which works great in a web page, does not
work when sent in an HTML email and is being viewed in an
email client. I'm using Outlook 2003. Is this a security
measure of Outlook
, 2005 12:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Forms in Email
see if you can make the action= point to the full url
like http://www.yourdomain.com/formpost.cfm
instead of
formpost.cfm
see if that works.
tw
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:15:05 -0500, Matthew Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys
Actually, you usually DO pass in server, application, session, and
client variables into a CFC. Part of encapsulation is isolation from
the environment. What if I switch from client to session variables?
Do I really want to have to go change every CFC?
Same with your form CFCs. Chances are
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:07:50 -0500, Michael Dinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is where I disagree with the whole OO approach and what people consider
no nos. I know that the form processor CFC always processes a form. I know
that a form will only be posted as a form, never as an URL. I
I echo what Barney saidbut i also see a valid point in what
Micheal is saying i thinkif I have a CFC called form_validator.cfc
I should be able to use it on a form...but I think that kinda defeats
some of the concepts that CFC are supposed to be used for...its like
making a CSS class
I guess I have to see more CFCs. The ones I've seen 'assume' that server,
application, session, and client exist and do not have to be passed in. I
usually even see request.DSN 'assumed' into the form. In your example (I see
what your saying about the form processing CFC) this would fail as no
, January 17, 2005 3:30 PM
...To: CF-Talk
...Subject: RE: Forms to CFCs RE: Extra query info
...
...I guess I have to see more CFCs. The ones I've seen 'assume' that server,
...application, session, and client exist and do not have to be passed in. I
...usually even see request.DSN 'assumed' into the form
It all boils down to how much you value encapsulation. I think it's
worth it, but that's just me. I hate testing code, so the more
isolated each bit of code is the better. I also work on
constant-development apps, so it's not a build it and let it run
type thing, I'm constantly making changes.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:30:25 -0500, Michael Dinowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I have to see more CFCs. The ones I've seen 'assume' that server,
application, session, and client exist and do not have to be passed in.
I would classify those as not good practice.
I usually even see
The more I think about it, the more passing the form scope into the form
processing CFC makes sense, as long as there is no overhead for this operation.
On the other hand, I can't see a reason to pass the CGI scope into a CFC that's
designed to do site logging. It's designed to operate with the
nothing wrong with it, but does it gain you anything?
What if you want to add a length or onclick attributes to some but not
all fields?
If you want to shorten the code you could do your form the standard
way but drop it in a separate file and cfinclude it.
this sounds like a good excuse to build a persistant cfc component.
-- Original Message --
From: Arden Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:Sat, 07 Aug 2004 22:43:43 -0400
In many cases I have a master form/page with a dozen or so
For a display widget? ... Sounds like the wrong thing to use
persistence for to me... CFC is a matter of preference.
this sounds like a good excuse to build a persistant cfc
component.
-- Original Message
--
From: Arden Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
validation process and for multiform processing as well.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 5:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: forms and sub-forms best practices feedback desired
this sounds like a good excuse to build a persistant
I guess that's up to you. I just did a form with MANY steps, after I validated each step and made sure all values entered were ok, I dumped the entire form results into a session structure (Thanks to a tip from a fellow cftalker it was extremely simple)
!--- these couple of lines will dump every
Very nice -- Thanks
Hope to get some more inputs -- this ole brain needs all the help it can get and then some :-))
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
: Saturday, August 07, 2004 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: forms and sub-forms best practices feedback desired
Very nice -- Thanks
Hope to get some more inputs -- this ole brain needs all the help it can get and then some :-))
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User
Don't rely on the browser to hold form values. Rather, redisplay the form with the
value attribute populated.
- Original Message -
From: E. Keith Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, November 18, 2002 10:44 am
Subject: Forms *sometimes* not holding info in MX
(my first posting ever on
Something like this:
Entry Form - Action page that validates - validate fails - include entry form so
you can repopulate the form.
And like I said before, don't depend on the browser to retain form values. Gawd knows
what kind of headers CFMX is sending. And so, for people who set their
Les Mizzell wrote:
I've got a 10 page multipart form constructed like
FORM PAGE 1 submits to:
Process page 1 - which writes page 1 to the database and redirects
(cflocation) to:
FORM PAGE 2 submits to:
Process page 2 - which writes page 2 to the database and redirects
Here's a method I use: instead of writing to the database on every new
page, just drop the entire form structure into every page as hidden
fields. That way, if somebody wants to use the back button, only form
fields are affected, and those can change from page to page without any
effect on the
: Here's a method I use: instead of writing to the database on every new
: page, just drop the entire form structure into every page as hidden
: fields.
I thought about it, but this particular application has close to 650 fields,
and I was a little worried about carrying that many from one page
Off the top of my head:
Create a session variable containing the steps. (An array perhaps?) As each
step is complete, remove the value from the session variable.
On each page, check to see if the step is still available. If not, say I'm
sorry, but you've already completed this step and give
Is Flash MX an option? You could store all of the answers locally in the flash movie,
and then have CF populate the database when the user is done with the form.
- No bandwidth or url size issues
- No database issues.
-Original Message-
From: Les Mizzell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I handle this by checking wether the Insert is going to overwrite and throw an
error... if the userID is the same however I branch to an update statement instead of
an insert statement.
At 06:42 AM 8/14/02, you wrote:
: Here's a method I use: instead of writing to the database on every new
:
oi Les!!
try this:
on all of your pages starting with the first one place this in the head
script
history.forward()
/script
--
Critz
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
CFX_BotMaster Network=Efnet Channel=ColdFusion
Tuesday, August
You're using cfform, right? Form.submit() does not drive the form
submission event. What you can do is look at your form page's html
source and find the javascript in the form tag that is called when the
form is submitted. Call the same functions in your button tag and it
should work.
- Matt
onClick=somefunction()
function somefunction() {
validation_goes_here
submit();
}
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Tim wrote:
I have a form that I wanted to restrict so that the user has to hit the Submit
button to enter the form, and not the Enter key. I included the following:
input
Compliance Engineer for Macromedia
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo IM : morpheus
My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Larkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Forms and CF
:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Forms and CF Code
Why would anyone need to clean cfcode? Unless you save user input to a
file and cfinclude it, it will not get executed.
FYI, to clean HTML and stuff, look for StripHTML on cflib.org
Raymond Camden wrote:
Why would anyone need to clean cfcode? Unless you save user input to a
file and cfinclude it, it will not get executed.
That is a dangerous oversimplification.
Many people generate dynamic forms and loop over either form.fieldnames
or the form collection to evaluate
Why would anyone need to clean cfcode? Unless you save user
input to a
file and cfinclude it, it will not get executed.
Many people generate dynamic forms and loop over either
form.fieldnames
or the form collection to evaluate the forms that are posted
back. This
frequently
Raymond Camden wrote:
Many people generate dynamic forms and loop over either
form.fieldnames
or the form collection to evaluate the forms that are posted
back. This
frequently involves the Evaluate() function. Something like:
cfloop list=#form.fieldnames# index=i
cfset temp =
loop through the
Query parameters, and the form elements - guess I should include cookies in
there too.)
My two cents worth.
Shawn Grover
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 December 2001 15:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Forms and CF Code
Shawn Grover wrote:
I place my stripping functions in the application.cfm - so that every page I
code is automagically protected from the script kiddies, without me having
to worry about it on every page I write. (My functions loop through the
Query parameters, and the form elements -
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
