I have popup windows on my site that display large product
photos that have been indexed by search engines. The thing
is, when a customer is refered by a search engine by one of
these indexed popup windows pages, the page does not 'render'
like a pop up window if the customer was already
Dave, the JS function to launch the new window is below. Would might code
look like on the popup (child) page to do this? I'm not a JS pro by any
means. Thanks, Che.
script language=JavaScript
function NewWindow(mypage, myname, w, h, scroll) {
var winl = (screen.width - w) / 2;
var wint =
Dave, the JS function to launch the new window is below.
Would might code look like on the popup (child) page to do
this? I'm not a JS pro by any means. Thanks, Che.
The code would depend on what exactly you want as a result, of course, but
if you just wanted to conditionally hide the close
12:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines the indexing of javascript popup windows
Dave, the JS function to launch the new window is below.
Would might code look like on the popup (child) page to do
this? I'm not a JS pro by any means. Thanks, Che.
The code would depend on what exactly
Hmmm, I should have been more specific. How about...
if window opener is defined
show page as a normal popup
if not
redirect to a a specific page. say www.domain.com
You could simply replace the contents of the conditional block with whatever
you want to do:
if (!window.opener)
Dave, using your code, what I have below works in Firefox, but not IE. Any
ideas? Thanks a bunch, Che.
script language=JavaScript!--
if (!window.opener) {
document.write('a href=\http://www.mydomain.com\;span
style=\font-family: Verdana; font-weight: Bold;\Purchase This Product at
Dave, using your code, what I have below works in Firefox,
but not IE. Any ideas? Thanks a bunch, Che.
script language=JavaScript!--
if (!window.opener) {
document.write('a href=\http://www.mydomain.com\;span
style=\font-family: Verdana; font-weight: Bold;\Purchase
This Product at
://www.shaftek.org/blog/archives/000300.html
~Che
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 3:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines the indexing of javascript popup windows
Dave, using your code, what I have below works in Firefox
The problem is that in IE, I still get the Close Window
button on the indexed popup page that comes from Google
instead of getting the hyperlink to purchase it from
'MyDomain.com'. I'll try removing the escape slashes.
An explicit comparison would probably work in both, then:
if
Nope. Oh well, it seems to work in all browsers except IE. That's better
than where I was before.
Thanks for your help.
~Che
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 4:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines the indexing
Nope. Oh well, it seems to work in all browsers except IE.
This will work in both IE7 and Firefox:
if (window.opener == null || window.opener == undefined) ...
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 5:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines the indexing of javascript popup windows
Nope. Oh well, it seems to work in all browsers except IE.
This will work in both IE7 and Firefox:
if (window.opener == null || window.opener == undefined) ...
Dave
best practices for search engine optimization when using coldfusion
I would say that SEO best practices are development language independent.
What we are currently doing is setting up a site map of sorts
Heres a tip:
If you can make the order of the links on the site map change dependent on,
say,
Hey Kerry, so what you are saying is that changing the order of the links on
the site map will signal to google that the page has changed?
Heres a tip:
If you can make the order of the links on the site map change dependent on,
say, the number of jobs for that type, or the most recently posted
yep.
-Original Message-
From: Protoculture [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 June 2005 16:07
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search engines and CF
Hey Kerry, so what you are saying is that changing the order of the links on
the site map will signal to google that the page has changed
]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: search engines
Someone brought up serving up different content to a bot then to the viewers
as being a viable solution but wordpress just found out the hard way thats
not the way to go.
Google officials declined to comment
, April 04, 2005 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: search engines
Someone brought up serving up different content to a bot then to the viewers
as being a viable solution but wordpress just found out the hard way thats
not the way to go.
Google officials declined to comment on why
that question...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Marty Johll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 9:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: search engines
For more information, here's a slashdot article:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/31/196220tid=217
On Apr 4, 2005 4
, April 05, 2005 9:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: search engines
Oh, and one other where Google punished an internal (Adwords) unit
for doing serving up different content to the bot vs user:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1774677,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K594
Marty
On Apr 5, 2005 8:39 AM
Someone brought up serving up different content to a bot then to the viewers as
being a viable solution but wordpress just found out the hard way thats not the
way to go.
Google officials declined to comment on why WordPress.org pages had dropped
from the company's index, but its Webmaster
Good to knowthanks for the heads up, Dave!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: search engines
Someone brought up serving up different content to a bot then to the viewers
as being a viable
On Friday 19 Mar 2004 13:22 pm, Brad Roberts wrote:
append cfid/cftoken to every url.However, I don't want search engines to
index my sites with a cfid/cftoken.Any way around this?
Check the browser string and do something different if it's a spider.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion
comprise a list of the top
crawlers, and if so, any suggestions on a list of (popular) words to test
against?
-Brad
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Search Engines CFID/CFTOKEN
On Friday 19 Mar
We've started to do some work with Lucene by using the lindex tags
included in the latest DRK.
The search itself works pretty well, although we've had to jump through
some hoops to get content out of a database, into files, and then into
the index.
Seems as fast or faster than Verity and doesn't
Ryan
What db are you using? If you're using SQL server - full text search may
be an option?
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2003 14:35
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Search Engines
We currently use the canned verity search features that come with
Message -
From: Kola Oyedeji [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: Search Engines
Ryan
What db are you using? If you're using SQL server - full text search may
be an option?
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto
Hi Ryan,
We used to use verity but when we started indexing over 3million files
it got very slow indeed. We now use lucene to index flat files and
database content. If you are a java coder you can write your own cfx
interface to lucene and then anything you can access with java you can
index with
16, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: RE: Search Engines
Hi Ryan,
We used to use verity but when we started indexing over 3million files
it got very slow indeed. We now use lucene to index flat files and
database content. If you are a java coder you can write your own cfx
interface to lucene
Hi Ryan,
We are accessing the database via jdbc, quering for the columns we need
and then indexing the returned data.
Adam.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2003 15:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Search Engines
Hey, Adam,
Thanks for the response
Try http://www.searchengineworld.com a good amount of information.
Good Luck
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:05 AM
Subject: OT: Search Engines
Does anyone know of a
This site is pretty nice http://www.searchengineworld.com/ the thing is
though, the biggest place for you to get higher ranking is from reciprical
links. So you would need to do a type of link exchange program between like
sites or customers.
Robert Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer
Also http://searchenginewatch.com/
Shawn McKee
-Original Message-
From: Paul Giesenhagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Search Engines
Try http://www.searchengineworld.com a good amount of information.
Good Luck
Paul
WordTracker.com is an essential tool.
cf_plug
There are also firms (like ours) that can do this for you. It's not that
expensive...
/cf_plug
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 9:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Search Engines
www.searchenginewatch.com
He has a newsletter too. Pretty interesting each month.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Douglas Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:05 PM
Subject: OT: Search Engines
Does anyone know of a list that has to do
check out http://www.rolist.com
rotating search engine.
Anthony Petruzzi
Webmaster
954-321-4703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sheriff.org
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Search Engines
Does
Uh - it's a domain name for sale . . . .
Daved
- Original Message -
From: Ian Lurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: Search Engines
WordTracker.com is an essential tool.
cf_plug
There are also firms (like ours) that can
Are you sure - I just cut and paste this:
http://www.wordtracker.com/
We use it every day, honest
-Original Message-
From: Dave Hannum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Search Engines
Uh - it's a domain name for sale
Well the thing with these search engine placement companies is they
were worth something about 2 years ago. Right before google came around and
the other search engines started making you pay for placement. Google goes
by link popularity, the more people that link back to you the more
You know, that might of worked back in the day, but the new search
engine's do not go by the number of words on a page. From what I've
read, they go by links to your page (i.e. references from other pages to
yours).
What's that mean? Just make sure you put your copyright info with a link
on
Does anyone have current stats SE rankings? Last I heard Yahoo, at 38%,
was still the top first-use search facility, although it was sinking.
MSN was a distant #2 (about 16%) with Google and AOL making up the #3
and #4 spots (11 and 7 1/2%). That was May 2001 on Statmarket.com.
That noscript
Applications Developer
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 23 September 2001 17:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines
You don't have to pay. Do it yourself. I do. Just go to each of the
search engines, and register a site with them. .. Capture the form
ColdFusion Developer Resources
http://www.cfdev.com/
-Original Message-
From: Declan Maher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines
Hi,
The whole issue of whether you have to pay for search engines or not is
very complex
You don't have to pay. Do it yourself. I do. Just go to each of the
search engines, and register a site with them. .. Capture the form you
submit, and put that code into a CF template yourself.
I have made one where I put in the keywords, description, basic information
enough to fill in all
whatever you do,
don't go on register.com SUBMIT SERVICE
no good.
Thanks,
Michael Lugassy
Interactive Music Ltd.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives:
www.jimtools.com
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 12:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:Search Engines
Out of curiosity, what program is most popular when
submitting website information to search engines?
I have come
One site I have found is www.addme.com they have a lot of free info about
how to get better standings and they submit to lots of engines.
From what I understand, some search engines may demerit you if you use a
program or site. Don't know of any proof of this Anyone?
Mark W. Breneman
-Cold
Check out selfpromotion.com. It's a good starting point and free to use at
first. If you like it, I think they ask for $10 to continue using the
service.
Russell Conway
HallofSports.com, Inc.
351 West 22nd Street
New York, NY 10011
P (646) 638-2500
F (561) 423-2674
http://www.hallofsports.com
..
What I have done in the past is generate static html templates from the
database that the search engines can pick up and then put a redirect on
those pages to the CF templates so when the user follows a link they get the
CF page and not the page the search engine has indexed.
Kevin
-
The new thing is that Search Engines are apparently no including the full
URL, including that after ? and
There's a message in the archive documenting one search engine that does
not do this.
best, paul
At 09:57 AM 1/8/01 -0500, you wrote:
I'm building a site that will be entirely based on
Web Position Gold does this and a lot more.
http://searchengineboost.com/webpositiongold/index.htm
Chris Giminez
Ok.. remedial question, but one that I can seem to find a good answer to.
We do a lot of web hosting and we provide a service to our customers where
we register domain names
We use Add Web which we find quite good.
http://www.cyberspacehq.com/
+
Kevin Parker
Service and Communication
WorkCover Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.workcover.com
ph: +61 8 82332548
fax: +61 8 82332000
mob: 0418 800 287
++
-Original Message-
From: Computer
easy, make a hundred static pages all with meta tags. the only code on the
static page besides the meta tag would be an include to your index.cfm
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Kear" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 1:32 AM
Subject:
You may want to look here:
www.marketposition.com
and here:
www.webposition.com
They have some intersting ideas - and a product. Ive used.. not much...
Steve
I taught a client how to use meta tags and comments inside the header of
his static pages to give the search engines something
pretty easy, make a static page out of the dynamic one...
There are several different tags and other methods...to automatically copy
the dynamic version into the .html version that is in the navigation menu...
the easiest is the CF_STaticPage
but they all use the same command...
cfhttp
At 07:32 PM 3/31/00 +1000, you wrote:
I taught a client how to use meta tags and comments inside the header of
his static pages to give the search engines something to index.
He's done this to great effect, and he has hundreds of static pages - one
for every product - most of which are indexed
55 matches
Mail list logo
